+1 |
+1 Each kid has their unique gifts and challenges. Many skills a developmental and come at different ages for different people. Some kids need parental help with executive functions into early adulthood. Others are handling everything in Middle School. IMO parents need to give each kid what they need. We have one kid who needed "helicopter parenting" through the end of HS and one who was able to handle everything themselves starting with freshman year. |
Thread title and OP set the tone usually. Currently on the first page are several threads where the tone is perfectly nice, lots of helpful replies, and there is actual conversation. If someone seems to have good intentions but started off poorly, encourage the OP to start a new thread with a better title and clearer OP. Then OP posts link to new thread in old thread and "reports" the post with the lower right button asking Jeff to lock the old thread. He can see it is same OP and will do so. |
Do you report them? Jeff is amazingly good about responding to inappropriate posts quickly, and he shows doing judgement in doing so. Thank you Jeff! |
Yup. I do that too. Glad I'm not alone! Would love to reclaim this from trolls and jerks. |
+2 Reporting the trolls is key. I can't stand it when people respond and get into a back-and-forth with some dope who's clearly trying to get a rise out of regular posters. Do not respond - report. |
NP. I have been reading here for ten years and never seen anything like the bolded. I think you are making it up so you can continue to be mean. |
This, exactly. NP |
|
I think people here have a hard time discerning who is trying to get them fired up. There are a lot of teenagers messing around on this board. I’ve heard them talk about it.
Ignore the inflammatory stuff and this board is great. Let a kid’s messing around turn into a 5+ page thread and you’re contributing to the toxicity. |
|
On this website and in the "College and University Discussion" area, all of the behaviors whose banning would lead to a better conversation -- threadjacking, flaming, sock puppets, political advocacy, link sharing, doxxing, and business promotion, for starters -- are tolerated. That makes for a wild ride that, honestly, keeps people engaged and coming back.
About the only thing you can't do here is type the name of a former president's youngest son. |
|
A modest way to make these threads more useful would be for users of DCUM to start making and labeling as such three types of posts that are popular on Reddit's college threads and College Confidential: (1) the "Chanceme" post with anonymous but full admissions qualifications (not just "stats," which are meaningless) by way of asking what an applicant's chances are at being accepted to a particular school; (2) the "College Search and Selection" post that asks for suggestions about which schools to apply to based on what an applicant is looking for in a school; and (3) the "College Results" post that presents a truthful admissions profile followed by a list of the applicant's actual acceptances and rejections.
Btw, the fictitious posts where people pose as parents are the ones that gain traction the fastest, and in my opinion are the most fun. I hope those continue to pop up regularly. |
+1 This is so well said PP. No two people are alike so parents can not parent each child in the same way. What may seem like "helicoptering" parenting to some may not to others and that should be respected. |
So, do your “due diligence” elsewhere first or it’s ok to “attack”? What’s wrong with you? |
| Don’t focus on “tone” of the message. Focus on the message itself. So many women can’t get over the tone and never get the message. |
Women?? |