Wanted to add that my kid does a lot of activities and is good at almost everything. He isn’t necessarily outstanding at anything though. |
But to be realistic, getting into UVA has become a lotto, especially for unhooked Nova kids. Last years incoming class has a 4,53 and an astounding 34 at the 75th percentile. Mcps full pay might have an edge. |
You made "poor English = Asian" in that post. That's racism. And you expect OP to appreciate you?! |
You have nothing to be anxious about. |
|
Don't let the board get you down, I have multiple kids at Ivies and we are not minorities, athletes, or legacy.
Work hard and apply wisely with your ED. Do some unique ECs. |
There are just many on DCUM obsessed with getting their child into an Ivy without any thought whatsoever as to the best fit for their child. They would probably sell their mother to get their child into any Ivy if they could. Its kind of pathetic given that there are so many great colleges that are better than the Ivies depending on the child and what he or she wants to study. |
Really? I don't see that here. If anything, I see way too much praise for mediocre LACs that have "a way better undergrad experience than a place like Harvard!" |
| NP. I have Ivy professors in my family. They tell me they don’t want their kids going to an Ivy for undergrad and are pushing the SLACs. They also told me that for graduate admissions, they really like kids from SLACs because they know they were well-educated. Just a data point but I think it is interesting. |
Uh, it's pretty hard to miss |
See the comment above you: "They also told me that for graduate admissions, they really like kids from SLACs because they know they were well-educated." Hahaha. As if a Grinnell degree opens the same doors as one from HYPS. |
I can totally see this. I'm an Ivy grad and I'm encouraging my DC to look at SLACs. She has found several SLACs that she loves and I'm so impressed with what I see. I think she'll get a better education at a SLAC than an Ivy. |
OP, you lost me at "we have aspirations for her to attend an Ivy." I don't even know where to start. |
For graduate school admissions at the Ivies? Grinnell definitely opens the same doors. Possibly more. |
If you do well at HYPS undergrad, you don't even have to go to grad school. The kids I know at the top of their class from HYPS are not even going to grad school for the most part. They're walking straight into six figure jobs in consulting, investment banking, private equity, and product management. I don't see that happening at Grinnell (although it's possible a school like Williams or Amherst might be more conducive to that). Plus, I'll have to admit that it's a little odd when SLAC boosters promote their high admissions rates into PhD programs. PhDs almost always have a negative ROI (even the ones in STEM), and many PhD students are extremely depressed as they realize that all their hard work was mainly for no financial reward. |
I agree, but I still think that an Ivy is better for most students than a SLACs (save for maybe Williams, Amherst, and Wellesley). College is not so much for the education that you get as much as it is for the connections you make and the internships/job opportunities you get after -- and that's much better at, say, Princeton than at Grinnell or Vassar. |