Propose parents sue the Coalition for TJ--you're holding up our kids' decisions

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is getting ridiculous. How does this outfit argue that they care about students when they are screwing with the class of 2026 decisions?

Shut up and get out of the way.

Umm. . . you do realize they won the case, right? The school appealed and also appealed the Judge denying the stay pending appeal. So, maybe you should be angry with FCPS for not respecting the decision and denial of the stay.

No, I'm more upset with Asra whats-her-face trying to represent my interests when she really isn't. Her group wants to screw over my kid's application class for her gain.

Stop being a racist to a minority woman.

In the context of TJ, she is the exact opposite of a minority.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So... is anyone suing C4TJ?

My kid is applying and we'd join a class suit. If someone wants to kick one off.

OP and PP

If you are serious, I would reach out to the TJ Alumni Action Group. I know that they would be interested in talking to you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is getting ridiculous. How does this outfit argue that they care about students when they are screwing with the class of 2026 decisions?

Shut up and get out of the way.

Your desire for clarity doesn't override the Constitution, and FCPS is ignoring the district court decision now anyway.

You might have considered whether, with over 200 schools, FCPS is really up to the task of trying to administer the equivalent of the admissions process at a selective SLAC at a single high school.

The new class would be seated if coalition for TJ didn't appeal the circuit courts ruling

The new class would be seated if FCPS followed the court order and used the original admission process or a plan b that the court asked them to do in last September.

You should sue FCPS too for holding up the decisions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is getting ridiculous. How does this outfit argue that they care about students when they are screwing with the class of 2026 decisions?

Shut up and get out of the way.

Your desire for clarity doesn't override the Constitution, and FCPS is ignoring the district court decision now anyway.

You might have considered whether, with over 200 schools, FCPS is really up to the task of trying to administer the equivalent of the admissions process at a selective SLAC at a single high school.

The new class would be seated if coalition for TJ didn't appeal the circuit courts ruling

The new class would be seated if FCPS followed the court order and used the original admission process or a plan b that the court asked them to do in last September.

You should sue FCPS too for holding up the decisions.

The old admissions process is impossible, the tests are not available. A "plan b" would also be litigated. Have you met the C4TJ people?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is getting ridiculous. How does this outfit argue that they care about students when they are screwing with the class of 2026 decisions?

Shut up and get out of the way.

Your desire for clarity doesn't override the Constitution, and FCPS is ignoring the district court decision now anyway.

You might have considered whether, with over 200 schools, FCPS is really up to the task of trying to administer the equivalent of the admissions process at a selective SLAC at a single high school.

The new class would be seated if coalition for TJ didn't appeal the circuit courts ruling

The new class would be seated if FCPS followed the court order and used the original admission process or a plan b that the court asked them to do in last September.

You should sue FCPS too for holding up the decisions.

The court order said absolutely nothing about following the original admissions process (which, as others pointed out, would be impossible) nor did it indicate which aspects of the new process were enjoined from further use.

Essentially all Judge Hilton said (read the order) is "The motivation behind changing admissions processes was impermissibly racist and you can't use the new process to select the next class." He said nothing else.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So... is anyone suing C4TJ?

Is anyone suing TJAAG for starting all this mess in the first place?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is getting ridiculous. How does this outfit argue that they care about students when they are screwing with the class of 2026 decisions?

Shut up and get out of the way.

Umm. . . you do realize they won the case, right? The school appealed and also appealed the Judge denying the stay pending appeal. So, maybe you should be angry with FCPS for not respecting the decision and denial of the stay.

No, I'm more upset with Asra whats-her-face trying to represent my interests when she really isn't. Her group wants to screw over my kid's application class for her gain.

Stop being a racist to a minority woman.

Funny how Asra is quick to pull out the racist card anytime anyone calls out her bullsh1t.

You are spreading disinformation Putin puppet.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So... is anyone suing C4TJ?

Is anyone suing TJAAG for starting all this mess in the first place?

They didn't start anything. They didn't design or implement the admissions process and they haven't filed nuisance suits seeking to enjoin the implementation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is getting ridiculous. How does this outfit argue that they care about students when they are screwing with the class of 2026 decisions?

Shut up and get out of the way.

Umm. . . you do realize they won the case, right? The school appealed and also appealed the Judge denying the stay pending appeal. So, maybe you should be angry with FCPS for not respecting the decision and denial of the stay.

No, I'm more upset with Asra whats-her-face trying to represent my interests when she really isn't. Her group wants to screw over my kid's application class for her gain.

Stop being a racist to a minority woman.

Funny how Asra is quick to pull out the racist card anytime anyone calls out her bullsh1t.

You are spreading disinformation Putin puppet.

Are you referring to Asra's buddy, Tucker Carlson?

Those Trumphumpers have to stick together.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is getting ridiculous. How does this outfit argue that they care about students when they are screwing with the class of 2026 decisions?

Shut up and get out of the way.

Umm. . . you do realize they won the case, right? The school appealed and also appealed the Judge denying the stay pending appeal. So, maybe you should be angry with FCPS for not respecting the decision and denial of the stay.

No, I'm more upset with Asra whats-her-face trying to represent my interests when she really isn't. Her group wants to screw over my kid's application class for her gain.

Stop being a racist to a minority woman.

Funny how Asra is quick to pull out the racist card anytime anyone calls out her bullsh1t.

She is in the sunken place.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is getting ridiculous. How does this outfit argue that they care about students when they are screwing with the class of 2026 decisions?

Shut up and get out of the way.

Your desire for clarity doesn't override the Constitution, and FCPS is ignoring the district court decision now anyway.

You might have considered whether, with over 200 schools, FCPS is really up to the task of trying to administer the equivalent of the admissions process at a selective SLAC at a single high school.

The new class would be seated if coalition for TJ didn't appeal the circuit courts ruling

The new class would be seated if FCPS followed the court order and used the original admission process or a plan b that the court asked them to do in last September.

You should sue FCPS too for holding up the decisions.

The court order said absolutely nothing about following the original admissions process (which, as others pointed out, would be impossible) nor did it indicate which aspects of the new process were enjoined from further use.

Essentially all Judge Hilton said (read the order) is "The motivation behind changing admissions processes was impermissibly racist and you can't use the new process to select the next class." He said nothing else.

The judge doesn't make laws or policies. It's not his role to spec out the needed changes.

The original policy is constitutional. It had been used for years. It's certainly possible to use it again. Or just get rid of the new changes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So... is anyone suing C4TJ?

My kid is applying and we'd join a class suit. If someone wants to kick one off.

This is one of the most idiotic things I’ve read in a long time. Suing C4TJ because they are defending constitutional rights? The incompetent racist school board who just can’t stop wasting millions of dollars in litigation is the one to blame. FCPS SB is the reason the class of 2025 received admissions decisions at the end of June as they engineered a new policy to get an outcome more to their liking. Regarding class of 2026 admissions, They should’ve prepared for an adverse ruling as they were warned and acknowledged, but unsurprisingly didn’t so they could cry inconvenience as an excuse to continue their racist admissions policy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So... is anyone suing C4TJ?

My kid is applying and we'd join a class suit. If someone wants to kick one off.

This is one of the most idiotic things I’ve read in a long time. Suing C4TJ because they are defending constitutional rights? The incompetent racist school board who just can’t stop wasting millions of dollars in litigation is the one to blame. FCPS SB is the reason the class of 2025 received admissions decisions at the end of June as they engineered a new policy to get an outcome more to their liking. Regarding class of 2026 admissions, They should’ve prepared for an adverse ruling as they were warned and acknowledged, but unsurprisingly didn’t so they could cry inconvenience as an excuse to continue their racist admissions policy.

While it may change tomorrow, as of right now, the new admissions policy is legal, likely to be found constitutional, and is proceeding.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So... is anyone suing C4TJ?

My kid is applying and we'd join a class suit. If someone wants to kick one off.

This is one of the most idiotic things I’ve read in a long time. Suing C4TJ because they are defending constitutional rights? The incompetent racist school board who just can’t stop wasting millions of dollars in litigation is the one to blame. FCPS SB is the reason the class of 2025 received admissions decisions at the end of June as they engineered a new policy to get an outcome more to their liking. Regarding class of 2026 admissions, They should’ve prepared for an adverse ruling as they were warned and acknowledged, but unsurprisingly didn’t so they could cry inconvenience as an excuse to continue their racist admissions policy.

While it may change tomorrow, as of right now, the new admissions policy is legal, likely to be found constitutional, and is proceeding.

It has not been determined to be legal. It was found to be unconstitutional. For the moment the SB got a stay on the order forbidding them to use the new admissions policy but the stay does not rule on the merits of the case

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So... is anyone suing C4TJ?

My kid is applying and we'd join a class suit. If someone wants to kick one off.

This is one of the most idiotic things I’ve read in a long time. Suing C4TJ because they are defending constitutional rights? The incompetent racist school board who just can’t stop wasting millions of dollars in litigation is the one to blame. FCPS SB is the reason the class of 2025 received admissions decisions at the end of June as they engineered a new policy to get an outcome more to their liking. Regarding class of 2026 admissions, They should’ve prepared for an adverse ruling as they were warned and acknowledged, but unsurprisingly didn’t so they could cry inconvenience as an excuse to continue their racist admissions policy.

While it may change tomorrow, as of right now, the new admissions policy is legal, likely to be found constitutional, and is proceeding.

It has not been determined to be legal. It was found to be unconstitutional. For the moment the SB got a stay on the order forbidding them to use the new admissions policy but the stay does not rule on the merits of the case

Yes, that's what the stay means. It means likely to win on the merits.