Is this a joke/parody of the current housing market?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:$800K for Fairfax and 5 bedrooms?

I'm sure someone with a cousin will happily take the home off the owner's hands with a cash offer.

How much is this discounted off of a house in that neighborhood in normal condition without anyone living in the basement?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Can a house actually convey with a tenant?

Yes, happens all the time when houses with existing tenants change hands. We’ve bought more than one. But ideally the tenants will have a lease and be paying rent. 😬

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Can a house actually convey with a tenant?

Of course it can.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Maybe for those who have the willingness/means to evict a squatter, this is a bargain

Maybe a builder could dispatch their lawyer to handle it, then tear down and rebuild.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe for those who have the willingness/means to evict a squatter, this is a bargain

Maybe a builder could dispatch their lawyer to handle it, then tear down and rebuild.

Not for $800k in that area.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe for those who have the willingness/means to evict a squatter, this is a bargain

Maybe a builder could dispatch their lawyer to handle it, then tear down and rebuild.

Not for $800k in that area.

I disagree. That is teardown money now, especially for almost a half acre in a good school district. Yes there is the oil spill issue but if you're tearing down you could dig out the lot and put up a barrier plus clean dirt.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe for those who have the willingness/means to evict a squatter, this is a bargain

Maybe a builder could dispatch their lawyer to handle it, then tear down and rebuild.

Not for $800k in that area.

I disagree. That is teardown money now, especially for almost a half acre in a good school district. Yes there is the oil spill issue but if you're tearing down you could dig out the lot and put up a barrier plus clean dirt.

Wait what oil spill issue?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe for those who have the willingness/means to evict a squatter, this is a bargain

Maybe a builder could dispatch their lawyer to handle it, then tear down and rebuild.

Not for $800k in that area.

I disagree. That is teardown money now, especially for almost a half acre in a good school district. Yes there is the oil spill issue but if you're tearing down you could dig out the lot and put up a barrier plus clean dirt.

Wait what oil spill issue?

https://washingtoncitypaper.com/article/285632/crude-awakening/

Google map the site, you see the white tankers maybe 0.5 mil west of it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe for those who have the willingness/means to evict a squatter, this is a bargain

Maybe a builder could dispatch their lawyer to handle it, then tear down and rebuild.

Not for $800k in that area.

I disagree. That is teardown money now, especially for almost a half acre in a good school district. Yes there is the oil spill issue but if you're tearing down you could dig out the lot and put up a barrier plus clean dirt.

Wait what oil spill issue?

https://washingtoncitypaper.com/article/285632/crude-awakening/

Google map the site, you see the white tankers maybe 0.5 mil west of it?

this story just gets crazier with every detail.

[Anonymous]

This is like a law school property exam hypothetical. Just keeps getting better.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe for those who have the willingness/means to evict a squatter, this is a bargain

Maybe a builder could dispatch their lawyer to handle it, then tear down and rebuild.

Not for $800k in that area.

I disagree. That is teardown money now, especially for almost a half acre in a good school district. Yes there is the oil spill issue but if you're tearing down you could dig out the lot and put up a barrier plus clean dirt.

Wait what oil spill issue?

https://washingtoncitypaper.com/article/285632/crude-awakening/

Google map the site, you see the white tankers maybe 0.5 mil west of it?

Wow, I read a lot of threads here and have never seen this mentioned, as opposed to Spring Valley where it comes up in every single thread about any house there. Thanks for the info and RIP City Paper’s print edition - the last one went out this week.

[Anonymous]

AgentX wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oops, I just turned it into a hot home by posting it here. DCUM traffic is no joke! It was at 1500 RedFin views when I posted it and now 2030 RedFin views in <20 minutes.

WE HAVE NOTHING ELSE TO DO OP! And I love a good mystery!

I love that it's now a hot home. That's all kinds of awesome.

Agent X, do you think it could be an adult offspring of the owner who has issues?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe for those who have the willingness/means to evict a squatter, this is a bargain

Maybe a builder could dispatch their lawyer to handle it, then tear down and rebuild.

Not for $800k in that area.

I disagree. That is teardown money now, especially for almost a half acre in a good school district. Yes there is the oil spill issue but if you're tearing down you could dig out the lot and put up a barrier plus clean dirt.

Wait what oil spill issue?

https://washingtoncitypaper.com/article/285632/crude-awakening/

Google map the site, you see the white tankers maybe 0.5 mil west of it?

Wow, I read a lot of threads here and have never seen this mentioned, as opposed to Spring Valley where it comes up in every single thread about any house there. Thanks for the info and RIP City Paper’s print edition - the last one went out this week.

This has been mentioned before, I know I discovered it here

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

AgentX wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oops, I just turned it into a hot home by posting it here. DCUM traffic is no joke! It was at 1500 RedFin views when I posted it and now 2030 RedFin views in <20 minutes.

WE HAVE NOTHING ELSE TO DO OP! And I love a good mystery!

I love that it's now a hot home. That's all kinds of awesome.

Agent X, do you think it could be an adult offspring of the owner who has issues?

DP. No. Because then the owner/guardian could Baker's Act the child with police presence. Eviction and tenant implies this a stranger with legal issues preventing them from being thrown out.

[Anonymous]

You could always just tent the place for termites. Ooops we forgot you were in the basement.