LOL -- didn't mean to insult SFL, but in the absence of ODSL, SFL is the fill-in. SFL will be the option for at least one club that has any NEW parent/volunteer-led teams forming out of the rec pools who want some kind of travel option and ability to have their own team/players but don't want to join the academy. |
I've also heard that this is happening from a few different people connected to different clubs. |
So tell me buddy what's going to happen to CCL2 |
Things will be structured along the lines of how Ranting Soccer Dad blogged about in the past. |
At this point I'm wondering why NCSL was not good enough for these clubs. Maybe not elite enough, or some parent of child wanted to flex their managment skills. Promotion/relegation is still the best way to find out which team is good enough. It takes time to reach the top, and I guess impatience can also be a factor for creating "elite" leagues. |
Because pro/rel doesn’t put $ in their pocket. Playing in an “elite” league is the sales pitch. The coaching can be awful, the administration can be awful, and people continue to show up and pay. |
It’s an inevitable evolution in a market system. Leagues try to get bigger, become watered down and less exclusive, opening new opportunities for another league to be the more exclusive one.
ECNL expansion is a bad thing. ECNL’s draw is that it gives college exposure to all teams. If it expands too much, not all the teams can get the same exposure because events attended by college coaches are a limited resource. Some teams will grow unhappy and look for something else. |
ECNL-R is not ECNL. The general premise of your post is true but ECNL-R can expand all it wants, and should, if overall ECNL wants Pro/Rel |
Lol pro/rel will never happen with the ECNL. None of the existing clubs will agree to pro/rel. ECNL is about making money, protecting clubs and keeping the u little ranks filled. It is not about competition, winning programs or development. It is not a professional league. Winning does not matter to the ECNL. There will always be first and last place teams. The colleges will take ECNL players off the first through last place teams or any other league players because they need players. It is the equivalent of Pop Warner football or little baseball. ECNL- r sucks because it is an after thought for the ECNL clubs. ECNL club do not care about ECNL-r. It’s the second team. |
ECNL or ECNL-R are not professional leagues these are youth leagues. It is about the player not about the club. If you have your son playing HS football would you be demanding pro/rel? |
It's probably a good deal about club v club play -- on any given weekend in ECNL-R and CCL all of your club's teams are playing all of another clubs teams in the same general vicinity, making coordination of multiple kids easier for families and deconflicting games easier for clubs with coaches who coach multiple teams. |
Yes and it also means that one person can coach four teams and do a really watered down job |
I think a lot of clubs really like the idea of having your club play one other club on the same day. |
See bolded. I have no idea what ECNL wants to do BUT if Pro/Rel is on the table at all then it requires more club participation overall. The Pro/Rel could be limited to ECNL-R and not extend into ECNL at all. BUT if ECNL wants to expand ECNL-R via moves like CCL mergers then it needs to offer Regional league clubs the carrot of earning their way into ECNL otherwise there just isn't a whole lot of reason to be nothing more than the B league. |
1 B League is probably better than 2 B Leagues (ECNL R and CCL) |