Criminal record = dealbreaker?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DH has a couple of charges for impersonating a postal carrier and, unrelated to those incidents (misunderstandings), unauthorized use of beekeeping equipment, honey and honey by-products. Still, even months after these events, people judge him as less than. It is not fair and indicative of a larger problem in "your" society.

I’m intrigued.

Who wouldn’t be? I need to hear about the postal carrier one

[Anonymous]

No stable job or actual skills, No thanks.

Side hustles like what?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DH has a couple of charges for impersonating a postal carrier and, unrelated to those incidents (misunderstandings), unauthorized use of beekeeping equipment, honey and honey by-products. Still, even months after these events, people judge him as less than. It is not fair and indicative of a larger problem in "your" society.

I’m intrigued.

Who wouldn’t be? I need to hear about the postal carrier one

And I want to hear about the guy making a buck by selling watered down honey as honey!

Mail fraud is another story…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DH has a couple of charges for impersonating a postal carrier and, unrelated to those incidents (misunderstandings), unauthorized use of beekeeping equipment, honey and honey by-products. Still, even months after these events, people judge him as less than. It is not fair and indicative of a larger problem in "your" society.

I’m intrigued.

Who wouldn’t be? I need to hear about the postal carrier one

And I want to hear about the guy making a buck by selling watered down honey as honey!

Mail fraud is another story…

Your attention please: impersonating a postal carrier is not "mail fraud." And ask yourself this, how could anyone have mistaken him for a bonafide postal carrier when he was clearly wearing a poly cotton beekeeper's veil-and-round-hat combo? Makes no sense, but that's "justice."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DH has a couple of charges for impersonating a postal carrier and, unrelated to those incidents (misunderstandings), unauthorized use of beekeeping equipment, honey and honey by-products. Still, even months after these events, people judge him as less than. It is not fair and indicative of a larger problem in "your" society.

I’m intrigued.

Who wouldn’t be? I need to hear about the postal carrier one

And I want to hear about the guy making a buck by selling watered down honey as honey!

Mail fraud is another story…

Your attention please: impersonating a postal carrier is not "mail fraud." And ask yourself this, how could anyone have mistaken him for a bonafide postal carrier when he was clearly wearing a poly cotton beekeeper's veil-and-round-hat combo? Makes no sense, but that's "justice."

More please, honey thief’s wife!

[Anonymous]

To be honest OP, it’s your statement that you’d be the breadwinner “for now” that gives me pause. Not about money even, but it sounds like you are being hustled. I definitely avoid guys who talk and live in a space of “I am about to make it big.”

[Anonymous]

This guy is the wrong type of criminal.

Don’t get it twisted, women love real gangster dudes.

[Anonymous]

Hard pass. NO

[Anonymous]

This would not be okay with me. You don’t mr room then these things happened - that’s a crucial piece of information.
“Side hustles”…all sounds sketchy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This would not be okay with me. You don’t mr room then these things happened - that’s a crucial piece of information.
“Side hustles”…all sounds sketchy.

Definitely. He does not sound stable, OP. No thanks.

[Anonymous]

The drug offenses would be the dealbreaker for me.

[Anonymous]

Pass… Plenty of fish in the sea.

[Anonymous]

DUIs can be forgiven if they’ve demonstrated they aren’t alcoholics and responsibly drink now. Drug offenses need more context. And I’d be worried about “side hustles” - has he had a full-time job? And if so, for how long?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He’s a loser. Is that the kind of parent you’d want for your kids? Sounds like you are making excuses for him.

The convictions themselves are not the issue. The issue is: he thinks laws do not apply to him.

The fact that he got caught not once, but 3 times, should tell you: he chose to commit way more than 3 offenses.

THIS.

Cut him loose, OP. You deserve better.

[Anonymous]

If he’s 34, are you near his age? Absolutely don’t settle for this.