Boundary Review Meetings

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thanks super specific SPA person! Looks like FCPS has posted the map of SPAs, but there isn’t any student count associated.

https://www.fcps.edu/system/files/forms/2025-10/2025-26_student_planning_areas_map.pdf

Oof.

The resolution is terrible. It is nearly impossible to read anything.

If you zoom in/give it time to resolve on a fast computer, it's very legible.

What good is it? Mine is clear but I don't see any numbers for students. I see the SPA but without population numbers.

SPA boundaries matter when they're reallocating students. The SPAs are the finest granularity they're playing around with. So, not just population, but precisely where the population is coming from. Matters for transportation/community boundaries/...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Scenario 3 was better for that area of wolftrap. No more attendance island

It's not a Wolftrap ES island. It's a Westbriar ES island.

Moving that island to Wolftrap would have been the obvious solution and avoided the new problems they've created (they've turned the island into an ES/MS/HS island rather than just an ES island, and they're crowding Thoreau).

But it will be hard to put the genie back in the bottle once they've offered the Wolftrap families now at Marshall a one-way ticket out of IB to a wealthier school.

For those of us currently zoned Wolftrap/Kilmer/Marshall and the perfect student body mix at Marshall with strong academic performance here's hoping this boundary review process crashes and burns and no change is made.

Marshall Pride is nice but judging from the revisions to Scenario 3 and the comments at public meetings most of those zoned for Wolftrap/Kilmer/Marshall clearly welcome the Scenario 4 proposal to move to Thoreau/Madison. They haven't just quietly acquiesced in the change; they've come out in droves to say they support it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Attending tonight’s meeting, the Superintendent opened by addressing Hagel Circle and it looks like they’ll be making corrections to the maps to send the kids to their community school of Lorton Station vs Halley (current school) or Gunston (proposed school)

Keep in mind, Lorton Station already has over 700 students. An additional 146 students would lead to overcrowding. Lorton Station is not their community school. Gunston was built at the time Hagel Circle was. That was the original elementary school for Hagel.

Better solution is keeping Gunston or having them go to Halley which both schools could easily handle that amount of students. Keep in mind, there is a reason why Hagel Circle was zoned for Halley, it was a capacity issue.

Gunston is one of the oldest elementary schools in the county. It was built in the 1950s. It was one of the only schools in Lorton! That’s not relevant to today, especially when Lorton has undergone substantial development since the. Gunston doesn’t have the capacity because they’re on a septic system that already has issues. Lorton Station has capacity for 890 students, with approximately 700 current students there is plenty of room for Hagel Circle students to attend the elementary school within walking distance of their home. Lorton Station is also an AAP center - get rid of centers and there is even more space.

Okay, let’s say as you propose Lorton Station Elementary becomes Hagel Circles assigned school. That would mean Gunston Elementary would be well under its capacity. What neighborhood should be added?

Gunston wouldn’t be under capacity. If you looked at the proposal you would see that multiple neighborhoods are being forced out of Gunston under the options to move Hagel Circle from Halley. That was part of the parents concern at the meeting on the 22nd, why was their school targeted to have neighborhoods moved out when Halley Elementary is the school that will end up at 68% enrollment? Even with the neighborhoods being moved out, there is only room for the Hagel Circle kids if Gunston starts using the two dilapidated module units.

Then it came up that if Halley has all of this extra capacity, it can be used for a Korean Immersion program that someone on the school board wants to create.

Also, Hagel Circle can access the Pohick Village townhouse community via walking path which is directly across from Lorton Station elementary. Mateo Dunne even confirmed this during the meeting on the 22nd.

What you are saying about the capacity makes no sense.

Look at the PowerPoint slides provided before the meeting and still available. They did a study and found that there definitely is capacity to handle the Hagel circle community since they assigned Inlet Cove to Island Creek Elementary. They shuffled around some neighborhoods to accommodate so what you’re saying is not believable or able to be backed up with evidence.

Second, let’s say Lorton Station is walkable, why should that be a huge reason why Lorton Station should take it? Lorton station already serves two large apartment complexes which make up the majority of students there. Overcrowding will become an issue and need to be accommodated with six extra trailers. I spoke with Mr. Dunne and he confirmed this.

You know the real reason why most parents objected to it and it was displayed subtlety and blatantly that evening….. it’s because the reputation Hagel Circle has and it’s really unfair to that community to be pushed away.

Honestly, PP you sound like a Lorton Station parent trying to avoid Hagel Circle being rezoned to its community school. So I guess it’s the pot calling the kettle black. Multiple posts have laid out why Gunston isn’t a good option for Hagel Circle, and why the ability to walk to a school is important for the lower income students. If Lorton Station is overcrowded it’s because it’s an AAP center for South County and Hayfield schools. Maybe FCPS can create a center at Halley with all of the excess capacity to alleviate the pressure on Lorton Station so that students who actually live in the community can attend.

I don’t have any issue with Hagel Circle coming to Lorton Station. There already is over 50% of low income and high minority. It wouldn’t change much. It’s the overcrowding that is the issue.

An option would be to have Woods of Fairfax sent to Gunston elementary. That would be a better solution than adding 146 students.

But the real reason why Gunston parents objected was seen that night by all. I hope I can find a taped recording so everyone see the things said about Hagel Circle. It was extremely offensive and has no place at FCPS

There’s a bit more nuance here. Lorton Station is already a Title I school (or at least, it was listed as one in the most recent CIP.) Gunston is not. When capacity numbers are thrown around, Thru is using Program Capacity. Program Capacity chances under Title I status. Gunston would likely become a Title I school under the current proposal, which might have cascading effects.

Unfortunately, nobody seems to be paying attention to these aspects. Graham Road is a prime example. It will loose Title I status under Scenarios 3 and 4, and the poverty will be concentrated at Timber Lane. Shrevewood will also pick up FARM students, but not quite enough for Title I status. They’re shifting around disadvantaged students while losing the resources meant to help them.

What are you saying, what’s your point?

You heard what the administrators said, even becoming a Title 1 school does not adversely affect the level of education. Title 1 status provides additional resources to help students achieve success.

Hagel circle were being taught at Halley Elementary and they were not a Title 1 school.

You make no sense

Program capacity changes when Title I is implemented. They’re proposing scenarios that could change Title I status without tracking how that impacts capacity utilization. I’m not saying one way or the other where students should be moved, but when they shuffle planning areas to utilize Gunston ES to 98%, that capacity could instantly disappear if they need to make program changes to accommodate an influx of Title I students. I don’t think these factors are being considered when they make their recommendations.

Halley, even with Hagel Circle does not qualify for Title I, so the same concerns do not apply.

+1. This was also brought up at the meeting last week. The PP who keeps posting about the bigoted and evil Gunston parents is clearly a Lorton Station parent continuing to try to keep Hagel Circle from attending their neighborhood school.

Also, Gunston is located on Mason Neck and the Mason Neck Citizens Association has a lot of sway at the local political level. I believe when South County opened, it was Dan Storke who stepped in and ensured Mason Neck was zoned for South County. In return, Hunt Valley was moved from Lee to West Springfield.

The land swap that even allowed South County to be built involved land owned by a Mason Neck resident.

I don’t mind Hagel Circle part of Lorton station. Lorton station wouldn’t change much as it is already a title 1 school. It is Gunston parents pushing Hagel circle students out.

If Hagel does become part of Lorton Station, then Gunston should take students from woods of Fairfax or one of the other neighborhoods. Why should Lorton Station take all those 146 students the whole inlet Cove neighborhood was re-zoned to Island Creek Elementary.

Inlet Cove and Lyndham Hill won’t need to be rezoned to Island Creek - they can stay at Gunston. That’s what all of the parents at the meeting wanted! To stay at the elementary school they have been zoned for since their neighborhoods were built. They don’t want to drive with rush hour traffic further away from their homes to go to Island Creek. There is no excess capacity issue at Gunston, the only school with an excess capacity issue is Halley.

The Fairfax Woods neighborhood also won’t be rezoned to Gunston. It’s technically walkable to Lorton Station and as has been mentioned throughout this thread, these lower income neighborhoods don’t necessarily have parents with cars who can get kids to school if they miss the bus. Lorton Station has always had these lower income apartment complexes, FCPS needs to get away from bussing kids out of their communities.

You’re proving my point that this resistance to having Hagel Circle stems from Classism and discrimination based on Socio-economic status.

The parents that night preferred Inlet Cove and Lyndham Hill part of Gunston which are much further away from Gunston than Hagel Circle. That’s precisely because they are more of an affluent community and “won’t degrade the quality of education” as mentioned throughout the meeting. Walkability is being used as an excuse to move Hagel Circle out of Gunston and having it pushed onto Lorton Station which definitely not have the capacity. Lorton station would need additional trailers which they have already tried having removed.

I’ve visited Hagel Circle and it is entirely fenced in. There is no authorized safe way to get to Lorton Station without having to walk from Richmond Hwy and towards Lorton Station which is easily a 30-40 minute walk.

I know exactly what you are trying to do and I will expose it to all the committee members.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thanks super specific SPA person! Looks like FCPS has posted the map of SPAs, but there isn’t any student count associated.

https://www.fcps.edu/system/files/forms/2025-10/2025-26_student_planning_areas_map.pdf

Oof.

The resolution is terrible. It is nearly impossible to read anything.

If you zoom in/give it time to resolve on a fast computer, it's very legible.

Ah, OK. Thank you. Waiting helps.

[Anonymous]

Anyone doing the Chantilly meeting?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Scenario 3 was better for that area of wolftrap. No more attendance island

It's not a Wolftrap ES island. It's a Westbriar ES island.

Moving that island to Wolftrap would have been the obvious solution and avoided the new problems they've created (they've turned the island into an ES/MS/HS island rather than just an ES island, and they're crowding Thoreau).

But it will be hard to put the genie back in the bottle once they've offered the Wolftrap families now at Marshall a one-way ticket out of IB to a wealthier school.

For those of us currently zoned Wolftrap/Kilmer/Marshall and the perfect student body mix at Marshall with strong academic performance here's hoping this boundary review process crashes and burns and no change is made.

Marshall Pride is nice but judging from the revisions to Scenario 3 and the comments at public meetings most of those zoned for Wolftrap/Kilmer/Marshall clearly welcome the Scenario 4 proposal to move to Thoreau/Madison. They haven't just quietly acquiesced in the change; they've come out in droves to say they support it.

I'm lost - is this a popularity contest? How are we measuring things? What was the "voter turnout"? Is it the wishes of parents of students now versus those that have come before or will come in the future? Is it focused on parents of students currently at a particular stage of schooling versus those at another (i.e., elementary versus high school)? Is it which moves makes neighborhoods more valuable? Is it to reduce the economic and/or ethnic diversity at certain schools while concentrating needs at certain schools? I hope this work is being done to ensure schools can handle capacity over the next 10 - 20 years, improve transportation, try to balance needs across schools, and provide the best education possible for all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Did no one last night mention the absurdity of turning the Westbriar ES island into a ES/MS/HS island when BRAC clearly provided instructions to THRU on how to solve the Westbriar/Wolftrap neighborhoods?

Curious what were those instructions?

To either send the island to Colvin Run/Cooper/Langley or keep it at Westbriar. It would put Langley at or over 105% so it wasn’t modeled.

They did exactly that. They left it at westbriar as requested. The problem is they got rid of wolftrap’s split feeder which had a bridge to the high school. It’s confusing, is Wolftrap a school that had a <25% split ? They worked really hard to remove that split. Also why didn’t they fix that split feeder by sending those wolftrap students that attend Kilmer and Marshall to westbriar. Just do an elementary school swap.

The 10 students added to Colvin Run are an example of the long term oddities for Westbriar. That spa :
current Westbriar-Cooper-Langley
scenario 3 Wolftrap - Cooper-Langley
scenario 4 Colvin Run-Cooper-Langley

[Anonymous]

Thank goodness we got a new school because we don’t have enough space. We need another middle school too

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Scenario 3 was better for that area of wolftrap. No more attendance island

It's not a Wolftrap ES island. It's a Westbriar ES island.

Moving that island to Wolftrap would have been the obvious solution and avoided the new problems they've created (they've turned the island into an ES/MS/HS island rather than just an ES island, and they're crowding Thoreau).

But it will be hard to put the genie back in the bottle once they've offered the Wolftrap families now at Marshall a one-way ticket out of IB to a wealthier school.

For those of us currently zoned Wolftrap/Kilmer/Marshall and the perfect student body mix at Marshall with strong academic performance here's hoping this boundary review process crashes and burns and no change is made.

Marshall Pride is nice but judging from the revisions to Scenario 3 and the comments at public meetings most of those zoned for Wolftrap/Kilmer/Marshall clearly welcome the Scenario 4 proposal to move to Thoreau/Madison. They haven't just quietly acquiesced in the change; they've come out in droves to say they support it.

I'm lost - is this a popularity contest? How are we measuring things? What was the "voter turnout"? Is it the wishes of parents of students now versus those that have come before or will come in the future? Is it focused on parents of students currently at a particular stage of schooling versus those at another (i.e., elementary versus high school)? Is it which moves makes neighborhoods more valuable? Is it to reduce the economic and/or ethnic diversity at certain schools while concentrating needs at certain schools? I hope this work is being done to ensure schools can handle capacity over the next 10 - 20 years, improve transportation, try to balance needs across schools, and provide the best education possible for all.

Let's recap, shall we?

Kilmer is overcrowded, Madison was recently expanded, and the latest proposal eliminates the split feeder at Wolftrap by assigning all of it, including the Marshall neighborhoods, to Thoreau/Madison. So it's kind of a three-for-one (helps with overcrowding at Kilmer, takes advantage of additional capacity at Madison, and eliminates a split feeder).

They had a community meeting this week, and those from the affected Wolftrap neighborhoods were close to unanimous in their support for the move. Reid then told them that, even if other changes were made affecting Madison/Marshall boundaries, she wouldn't anticipate the proposal affecting Wolftrap getting reversed.

Anything is possible with FCPS, but they'd have an awful lot of egg on their face at this point if they said "never mind" and reverted to the current Wolftrap boundary.

[Anonymous]

These Walney Oaks folks are annoying AF and misrepresenting their situation. They are not a mile from Chantilly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:These Walney Oaks folks are annoying AF and misrepresenting their situation. They are not a mile from Chantilly.

I was curious when I read that. I google mapped it. Just as close to Westfield as Chantilly--maybe closer. And definitely more in the Westfield area community wise: shopping, activities, etc.
I will say, they should not be assigned to Franklin Middle. I don't understand that.

[Anonymous]

Have Oakton people tried to take over the Chantilly meeting?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Have Oakton people tried to take over the Chantilly meeting?

Yes, there was someone from Crossfield advocating to keep with Oakton.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These Walney Oaks folks are annoying AF and misrepresenting their situation. They are not a mile from Chantilly.

I was curious when I read that. I google mapped it. Just as close to Westfield as Chantilly--maybe closer. And definitely more in the Westfield area community wise: shopping, activities, etc.
I will say, they should not be assigned to Franklin Middle. I don't understand that.

Franklin is just a straight shot up Walney Road. It's only slightly further than Rocky Run, about about identical drive time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These Walney Oaks folks are annoying AF and misrepresenting their situation. They are not a mile from Chantilly.

I was curious when I read that. I google mapped it. Just as close to Westfield as Chantilly--maybe closer. And definitely more in the Westfield area community wise: shopping, activities, etc.
I will say, they should not be assigned to Franklin Middle. I don't understand that.

Franklin is just a straight shot up Walney Road. It's only slightly further than Rocky Run, about about identical drive time.

Yes, but most of the kids there live north of 50. It's a pretty major dividing point visually and mentally.

Shouldn't they go to Stone Middle School if they go to Westfield? It's closer than Franklin