Meghan and Prince Harry are moving to the U.S./Canada - OFFICIAL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If Harry had a hard-on for phony actresses, he should have married Emma Watson or Lily Collins or Emilia Clarke. Not this z list nobody laughing stock.

Why would any of them want to marry Harry? Nothing in it for them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If Harry had a hard-on for phony actresses, he should have married Emma Watson or Lily Collins or Emilia Clarke. Not this z list nobody laughing stock.

Or Australian Margot Robbie! She's so perfect. Looks like a princess.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Harry had a hard-on for phony actresses, he should have married Emma Watson or Lily Collins or Emilia Clarke. Not this z list nobody laughing stock.

Why would any of them want to marry Harry? Nothing in it for them.

Harry was the most eligible bachelor in the world before pairing up with this nutcake.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Harry had a hard-on for phony actresses, he should have married Emma Watson or Lily Collins or Emilia Clarke. Not this z list nobody laughing stock.

Why would any of them want to marry Harry? Nothing in it for them.

Harry was the most eligible bachelor in the world before pairing up with this nutcake.

Everyone knows royal life is hard. Everyone but Megan apparently.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the Queen has handled this admirably. The Royal Family will survive with the junior royals happily living their best life in Canada.

Yep. Contrary to what some what to think, it's been handled very quickly, minimal fuss, Harry and Meghan were already halfway out the door, it resolves the issue of Harry's future for the time being (not a working royal and makes it easier to focus on Will & Kate's family as the future). Within a few days the press furor will die down and Harry and Meghan will move on to their new life quickly enough.

My only thoughts are two fold: what the actual future is like for Harry and Meghan is utterly unpredictable and I am not gambling on a happy outcome. I don't think they are greedy or manipulative, but what they seem to want won't jar well with reality, methinks. They will too easily fall into the celebrity rut of too much easy money, slavish adoration and no challenges. And my second thought is that the Royal family will never forget nor forgive Meghan Markle and are probably glad to see her gone. Not because of racism but because they probably do see her as unsuitable for Harry, took him away from them, emotionally unstable, and most of all, who rejected the entire concept of royal duty and obligation, and probably do expect her to divorce Harry someday.

+1

What does the future hold for Meghan? 40 years of her life shows us drama, social climbing and bridge burning are never far. What goes up must come down. She will become a laughing stock and Harry will be known as a putz.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Harry had a hard-on for phony actresses, he should have married Emma Watson or Lily Collins or Emilia Clarke. Not this z list nobody laughing stock.

Why would any of them want to marry Harry? Nothing in it for them.

But those and Margo Robbie are not phony at all and some enormously successful and talented. You make no sense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Harry had a hard-on for phony actresses, he should have married Emma Watson or Lily Collins or Emilia Clarke. Not this z list nobody laughing stock.

Or Australian Margot Robbie! She's so perfect. Looks like a princess.

Imagine being able to marry a charming A list beauty from Australia. And you settle for a money grubbing Z list narc with no family and no real friends.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Harry had a hard-on for phony actresses, he should have married Emma Watson or Lily Collins or Emilia Clarke. Not this z list nobody laughing stock.

Or Australian Margot Robbie! She's so perfect. Looks like a princess.

Yes, Oscar nominated and financially successful actress Margot Robie wants to give that all up to cut ribbons and live with her in laws

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Harry had a hard-on for phony actresses, he should have married Emma Watson or Lily Collins or Emilia Clarke. Not this z list nobody laughing stock.

Why would any of them want to marry Harry? Nothing in it for them.

But those and Margo Robbie are not phony at all and some enormously successful and talented. You make no sense.

I’m not insulting them, I like them. But they have fame and money and freedom. Harry brings nothing to the table. The same reason this rich British girls didn’t want to marry him, Cressa and the other one? They can marry other rich guys without the royal nonsense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Harry had a hard-on for phony actresses, he should have married Emma Watson or Lily Collins or Emilia Clarke. Not this z list nobody laughing stock.

Why would any of them want to marry Harry? Nothing in it for them.

But those and Margo Robbie are not phony at all and some enormously successful and talented. You make no sense.

DP. It does make sense. The more successful you are the more you would have to give up to join the royal family. Or do you think grannie is going to let Harry’s wife appear topless/scantily clad in things like “Wolf of Wall Street” and Game of thrones?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:William looks ticked off. That's what you get for running a smear campaign against your brother!

He will be king, maybe. His brother at best his personal assistant. So, he's pissed he may have to step up his duties and not dump them off on his brother?

Nah, they will just do fewer engagements total.

William always looks grumpy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Harry had a hard-on for phony actresses, he should have married Emma Watson or Lily Collins or Emilia Clarke. Not this z list nobody laughing stock.

Or Australian Margot Robbie! She's so perfect. Looks like a princess.

Yes, Oscar nominated and financially successful actress Margot Robie wants to give that all up to cut ribbons and live with her in laws

I don't know Margot's dating life. But are you seriously suggesting she'd turn down '2016 Harry' for a date?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Harry had a hard-on for phony actresses, he should have married Emma Watson or Lily Collins or Emilia Clarke. Not this z list nobody laughing stock.

Why would any of them want to marry Harry? Nothing in it for them.

But those and Margo Robbie are not phony at all and some enormously successful and talented. You make no sense.

And they are all definitely whiter. So, I guess we see why some women are better choices....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Harry had a hard-on for phony actresses, he should have married Emma Watson or Lily Collins or Emilia Clarke. Not this z list nobody laughing stock.

Or Australian Margot Robbie! She's so perfect. Looks like a princess.

Yes, Oscar nominated and financially successful actress Margot Robie wants to give that all up to cut ribbons and live with her in laws

I don't know Margot's dating life. But are you seriously suggesting she'd turn down '2016 Harry' for a date?

DP. Quite easily and without regret.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Harry had a hard-on for phony actresses, he should have married Emma Watson or Lily Collins or Emilia Clarke. Not this z list nobody laughing stock.

Why would any of them want to marry Harry? Nothing in it for them.

But those and Margo Robbie are not phony at all and some enormously successful and talented. You make no sense.

And they are all definitely whiter. So, I guess we see why some women are better choices....

don’t you get tired of this. We do.