Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t expect sobfest, woe-is-me, or royal dirty laundry airing at the Oprah interview. I expect the whole thing to be the equivalent of some Glennon Doyle plus Instagram influencer nonsense — a mishmash of Black Lives Matter, My Life as a Working Mom, Charting My Own Path, Living Our Truth, etc etc plus news of new products or faux charity initiatives. It will be boring.

I do.

I do, too. I think Meghan and Harry have a very codependent relationship. They both had traumatic relationships with a parent in childhood, and it stunted their emotional growth. This is how it's manifesting itself in adulthood. They need therapy. (I don't say that to be glib.)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In order to keep Archwell, they’ll need a name with well in it.

Boswell?

Howell?

Lowell?

???

Do you think they’ll keep Archwell as the foundation named after just Archie?

I think baby 2 must have “well” in its name or else they’ll rebrand.

[Anonymous]

Can Meghan remain as a Patron to the National Theatre? I don’t think you need to be royal to be one but I’m not British. If they still want her and she wants them, can’t they work out something similar to what celebrities and charities do all the time?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In order to keep Archwell, they’ll need a name with well in it.

Boswell?

Howell?

Lowell?

???

Do you think they’ll keep Archwell as the foundation named after just Archie?

I think baby 2 must have “well” in its name or else they’ll rebrand.

Arche: (n.)
Greek word meaning “source of action”

Well: (n.)
a plentiful source or supply; a place we go to dig deep

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Palace looks weak.

How?

Had they let them remain half in and half out (and let’s face it, mostly out since they live in CA and are aggressively pursuing profitable ventures), that would have looked weaker. Actually, it would have looked borderline criminal.

No. The palace looks weak because this brings a lot of attention to H&M as something the palace is deeply concerned about. If the palace had treated H like the sulking child he is acting like, they would have ignored H&M, let them have their California fun, and waited for H to come crawling back. He would have. He's not bright enough to make it on his own, and he will eventually divorce.

Instead, they overreacted. Worse, they don't act at all when faced with an actual child molester in their ranks but they hurt charities when Harry doesn't fall in line? It's a glaring contrast and it shows just how far the palace has fallen and how out of touch and irrelevant they are. They look petty, weak, whiny, and useless.

+1

The smarter move would have been to add a second local working royal to their patronages (but not will and Kate). Someone like Anne. It forces them to share the spotlight whereas revoking the patronages gives them more attention. If people are unimportant you treat them like they are. Not release statements about them etc

[Anonymous]

https://blindgossip.com/the-calculated-baby/#more-102003

Not surprising. But really makes me sick.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://blindgossip.com/the-calculated-baby/#more-102003

Not surprising. But really makes me sick.

Whatever. She's 39 and wants as many children as fast as possible - shocking. I'd say she's lucky to be so fertile. Three pregnancies in three years is pretty great.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In order to keep Archwell, they’ll need a name with well in it.

Boswell?

Howell?

Lowell?

???

Do you think they’ll keep Archwell as the foundation named after just Archie?

I think baby 2 must have “well” in its name or else they’ll rebrand.

Arche: (n.)
Greek word meaning “source of action”

Well: (n.)
a plentiful source or supply; a place we go to dig deep

Wellington if it's a boy. Wellma if it's a girl, LOL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://blindgossip.com/the-calculated-baby/#more-102003

Not surprising. But really makes me sick.

People doing IVF makes you sick? You must be a very delicate flower.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://blindgossip.com/the-calculated-baby/#more-102003

Not surprising. But really makes me sick.

Wake up and smell the coffee, gramps. This is no different from what many hundreds of thousands of couples all over the world are doing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://blindgossip.com/the-calculated-baby/#more-102003

Not surprising. But really makes me sick.

Blind gossip just repackages the obvious as if it’s juicy deets. Like omg a 38 year old used ivf???? The horror!!!

[Anonymous]

I wouldn’t be surprised if a woman as smart as Meghan had the foresight to have frozen her eggs when she was younger. And then it would hardly be a surprise that they easily had their children. It was amusing to watch all those harpies shriek about how Meghan would be barren due to her age.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://blindgossip.com/the-calculated-baby/#more-102003

Not surprising. But really makes me sick.

Blind gossip just repackages the obvious as if it’s juicy deets. Like omg a 38 year old used ivf???? The horror!!!

They also lie. I still remember the piece they did in October about about a powerful man who raped women and the military covered it up. They wrote it shadily so it looks like Prince Harry but it was obviously Hunter Biden.

Guess why it hasn't been revealed? That's right - Hunter's father is the President of the United States and secret service would be up their ass.

https://blindgossip.com/famous-son-got-very-rough/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://blindgossip.com/the-calculated-baby/#more-102003

Not surprising. But really makes me sick.

Blind gossip just repackages the obvious as if it’s juicy deets. Like omg a 38 year old used ivf???? The horror!!!

They also lie. I still remember the piece they did in October about about a powerful man who raped women and the military covered it up. They wrote it shadily so it looks like Prince Harry but it was obviously Hunter Biden.

Guess why it hasn't been revealed? That's right - Hunter's father is the President of the United States and secret service would be up their ass.

https://blindgossip.com/famous-son-got-very-rough/

Yeah, like the Trump campaign wouldn’t have been all over this if it were true.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://blindgossip.com/the-calculated-baby/#more-102003

Not surprising. But really makes me sick.

Blind gossip just repackages the obvious as if it’s juicy deets. Like omg a 38 year old used ivf???? The horror!!!

They also lie. I still remember the piece they did in October about about a powerful man who raped women and the military covered it up. They wrote it shadily so it looks like Prince Harry but it was obviously Hunter Biden.

Guess why it hasn't been revealed? That's right - Hunter's father is the President of the United States and secret service would be up their ass.

https://blindgossip.com/famous-son-got-very-rough/

Yeah, like the Trump campaign wouldn’t have been all over this if it were true.

You didn't see the Hunter laptop files did you?