Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://blindgossip.com/the-calculated-baby/#more-102003

Not surprising. But really makes me sick.

Blind gossip just repackages the obvious as if it’s juicy deets. Like omg a 38 year old used ivf???? The horror!!!

They also lie. I still remember the piece they did in October about about a powerful man who raped women and the military covered it up. They wrote it shadily so it looks like Prince Harry but it was obviously Hunter Biden.

Guess why it hasn't been revealed? That's right - Hunter's father is the President of the United States and secret service would be up their ass.

https://blindgossip.com/famous-son-got-very-rough/

Yeah, like the Trump campaign wouldn’t have been all over this if it were true.

You didn't see the Hunter laptop files did you?

And are you waiting for March 4th too? You seem gullible.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:In order to keep Archwell, they’ll need a name with well in it.

Boswell?

Howell?

Lowell?

Welliam

[Anonymous]

They will add a name. Archwell James or Archwell Harrison

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://blindgossip.com/the-calculated-baby/#more-102003

Not surprising. But really makes me sick.

Blind gossip just repackages the obvious as if it’s juicy deets. Like omg a 38 year old used ivf???? The horror!!!

+1 there was nothing in there that was the least bit revealing or juicy.

[Anonymous]

Team Queen. Megan seems to have that @look at me@ syndrome that worsens with age / public lack of interest. Woe to Harry.

[Anonymous]

Didn't get a change to respond to the other thread.

Team Meghan.

I have disdain for old archaic institutions that do absolutely nothing but provide weird antiquated symbolism. F the whole "royal" grifter charade.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Didn't get a change to respond to the other thread.

Team Meghan.

I have disdain for old archaic institutions that do absolutely nothing but provide weird antiquated symbolism. F the whole "royal" grifter charade.

So funny because “grifting” is exactly what H&M are doing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Didn't get a change to respond to the other thread.

Team Meghan.

I have disdain for old archaic institutions that do absolutely nothing but provide weird antiquated symbolism. F the whole "royal" grifter charade.

Do nothing? You obviously don't know your English history. I would be team Queen just based on her World War II heroics. And if the question was team Harry or the Queen it would always be THE QUEEN!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Didn't get a change to respond to the other thread.

Team Meghan.

I have disdain for old archaic institutions that do absolutely nothing but provide weird antiquated symbolism. F the whole "royal" grifter charade.

Do nothing? You obviously don't know your English history. I would be team Queen just based on her World War II heroics. And if the question was team Harry or the Queen it would always be THE QUEEN!

Shaking hands and kissing babies is worthless. What being royalty means right now is that they are a) wealthy, and b) inbred. And apparently also very, very corrupt. I don't believe for a second that the royal family didn't know about Prince Andrew's repulsive behavior, just like they know all about Charles cheating on Diana and William's womanizing and cheating on Kate. And Prince Phillip's racist remarks are world famous.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Didn't get a change to respond to the other thread.

Team Meghan.

I have disdain for old archaic institutions that do absolutely nothing but provide weird antiquated symbolism. F the whole "royal" grifter charade.

Do nothing? You obviously don't know your English history. I would be team Queen just based on her World War II heroics. And if the question was team Harry or the Queen it would always be THE QUEEN!

I love my grandmother and think she was a total bad a and lived a pretty amazing life. Doesn’t mean she wasn’t also judge mental and mean, particularly to family members she disapproved of for reasons both rational and irrational.

Personally to me this has shown me that for the Queen love is conditional. She’s an amazing queen but has long seemed like a sub par mother and grandmother. People can be more than one thing at the same time

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Didn't get a change to respond to the other thread.

Team Meghan.

I have disdain for old archaic institutions that do absolutely nothing but provide weird antiquated symbolism. F the whole "royal" grifter charade.

Do nothing? You obviously don't know your English history. I would be team Queen just based on her World War II heroics. And if the question was team Harry or the Queen it would always be THE QUEEN!

Shaking hands and kissing babies is worthless. What being royalty means right now is that they are a) wealthy, and b) inbred. And apparently also very, very corrupt. I don't believe for a second that the royal family didn't know about Prince Andrew's repulsive behavior, just like they know all about Charles cheating on Diana and William's womanizing and cheating on Kate. And Prince Phillip's racist remarks are world famous.

Ikr?! Makes you wonder why the virtuous Megan would even want the title of “duchess” bestowed by such a corrupt and repellent clan? Team #losethetitleMegs

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Didn't get a change to respond to the other thread.

Team Meghan.

I have disdain for old archaic institutions that do absolutely nothing but provide weird antiquated symbolism. F the whole "royal" grifter charade.

Do nothing? You obviously don't know your English history. I would be team Queen just based on her World War II heroics. And if the question was team Harry or the Queen it would always be THE QUEEN!

Harry was an actual soldier deployed to war zones. Then he founded the Invictus Games. I'd say that Harry's military bonafides are pretty solid.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Didn't get a change to respond to the other thread.

Team Meghan.

I have disdain for old archaic institutions that do absolutely nothing but provide weird antiquated symbolism. F the whole "royal" grifter charade.

Do nothing? You obviously don't know your English history. I would be team Queen just based on her World War II heroics. And if the question was team Harry or the Queen it would always be THE QUEEN!

Shaking hands and kissing babies is worthless. What being royalty means right now is that they are a) wealthy, and b) inbred. And apparently also very, very corrupt. I don't believe for a second that the royal family didn't know about Prince Andrew's repulsive behavior, just like they know all about Charles cheating on Diana and William's womanizing and cheating on Kate. And Prince Phillip's racist remarks are world famous.

Ikr?! Makes you wonder why the virtuous Megan would even want the title of “duchess” bestowed by such a corrupt and repellent clan? Team #losethetitleMegs

Exactly! Who forced Meghan to join such an abhorrent bunch? Do tell us, PP.

[Anonymous]

They will probably be removed from the line of succession. Lose their titles. It's time.

(Soup Nazi to Harry & Meghan), "no more soup for you!"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Didn't get a change to respond to the other thread.

Team Meghan.

I have disdain for old archaic institutions that do absolutely nothing but provide weird antiquated symbolism. F the whole "royal" grifter charade.

Do nothing? You obviously don't know your English history. I would be team Queen just based on her World War II heroics. And if the question was team Harry or the Queen it would always be THE QUEEN!

I love my grandmother and think she was a total bad a and lived a pretty amazing life. Doesn’t mean she wasn’t also judge mental and mean, particularly to family members she disapproved of for reasons both rational and irrational.

Personally to me this has shown me that for the Queen love is conditional. She’s an amazing queen but has long seemed like a sub par mother and grandmother. People can be more than one thing at the same time

+1

She destroys/tries to destroy everyone who disagrees with her. Her sister. Prince Charles (her fault he married Diana), and now she tried it with Harry/Meghan. Also the kid she was closest to/most involved in rearing was Andrew...and he’s the worst one of the bunch!