Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do any of you actually believe this “rape train” gang rape allegation?

Of course not.

Not in a million years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is Julie Swetnick actually alleging?

Her affidavit is only 3 pages long. Haven't you read it?

Yes. And, I am asking specifically what she is alleging. What exactly is she accusing Judge Kavanaugh of?

So, you’re illiterate?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Do any of you actually believe this “rape train” gang rape allegation?

Do any of you actually think it COULDN'T have happened? Why? Because this kids are basically YOUR kids?

You might want to turn off the TV and have a nice long chat with your kids. Like, now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:LOL:

A new report just came out that provides information on Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s third accuser. The report suggests that Julie Swetnick’s ex-boyfriend filed a restraining order against her for some disturbing violence-related issues. This was back in 2001.

Oh, but we can’t point these things out because that would be victim shaming. You are about to be flamed, pp.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:LOL:

A new report just came out that provides information on Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s third accuser. The report suggests that Julie Swetnick’s ex-boyfriend filed a restraining order against her for some disturbing violence-related issues. This was back in 2001.

Oh my. Now we have it. Another raging Liberal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:LOL:

A new report just came out that provides information on Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s third accuser. The report suggests that Julie Swetnick’s ex-boyfriend filed a restraining order against her for some disturbing violence-related issues. This was back in 2001.

A) What does this have to do with her accusations?

B) For anyone who asks why women don't come forward with accusations, here's your reason: the accuser's life becomes subject to scrutiny.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:LOL:

A new report just came out that provides information on Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s third accuser. The report suggests that Julie Swetnick’s ex-boyfriend filed a restraining order against her for some disturbing violence-related issues. This was back in 2001.

Yes. Then charges dropped. She had poor judgement in boyfriends.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do any of you actually believe this “rape train” gang rape allegation?

Of course not.

I do but fully believe that the guys might not.have thought they were raping anyone. I dont believe the implied intent behind that phrasing but absolutely believe that they had parties where girls were gotten drunk and tossed around.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

As a woman who has two sons, I'm enraged. I told them and my husband the only thing that separates them from Kavanaugh's fate is decent moral women. Any woman now can accuse her husband of rape and all it would take is her allegation and a few tears to destroy him.

You are the horrible Republican type woman I speak of. Bet you joined in the slutshaming at school. God you are brainwashed. Bet you're blonde and drive a huge black SUV.

Like Renate Schroeder, signing a letter of support only to learn later how they spoke about her and wrote about her in the yearbook.

Lesson for women: currying favor with misogynistic men doesn’t make you special. You’re no different than any other woman in their eyes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What was this college student doing partying with high schoolers with whom she hadn't even gone to high school with? In what bizarro world does that happen?

You must be like 22 years old right? You have no idea of the party culture in 1982, 83, 84 or 85, lots of grain, houses we didn't know who owned, kegs, kids of all ages from HS to college, lots of drinking, pot, and kids didn't report, heck - sexual assault wasn't taken seriously if you did report. You couldn't say "no" to a frat boy if you were alone, that's why you never left your group, and if you were left behind you had to be very careful. Frat boys and prep boys were the worst sexual predators of them all, and they were mean and treated women like objects especially when they got drunk. I know a lot of boys from upper class neighborhoods who attended private schools who acted like choir boys when sober, but once they started drinking with their buddies you learned to watch out.

This sounds a lot like Kavanagh and that Mark Judge guy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL:

A new report just came out that provides information on Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s third accuser. The report suggests that Julie Swetnick’s ex-boyfriend filed a restraining order against her for some disturbing violence-related issues. This was back in 2001.

A) What does this have to do with her accusations?

B) For anyone who asks why women don't come forward with accusations, here's your reason: the accuser's life becomes subject to scrutiny.

As well it should. She apparently was nuts enough for an ex to file a restraining order against her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do any of you actually believe this “rape train” gang rape allegation?

Do any of you actually think it COULDN'T have happened? Why? Because this kids are basically YOUR kids?

You might want to turn off the TV and have a nice long chat with your kids. Like, now.

Anything COULD have happened. You COULD be a rapist yourself. That isnt a relevant question though.

[Anonymous]

From politico: https://www.politico.com/story/2018/09/26/ex-boyfriend-filed-restraining-order-against-kavanaugh-accuser-845348

Julie Swetnick, the woman who accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh and a friend of attending house parties where women — including herself — were sexually assaulted, had a restraining order filed against her years later in Miami by her former boyfriend...

According to Vinneccy, Swetnick threatened him after they broke up and even after he got married to his current wife and had a child.

“Right after I broke up with her, she was threatening my family, threatening my wife and threatening to do harm to my baby at that time,” Vinneccy said in a telephone interview with POLITICO. "I know a lot about her.”

"She’s not credible at all,” he said. “Not at all.”...

Vinneccy, 63, is a registered Democrat, according to Miami-Dade County voting records...

Vinneccy made clear that he did not believe her story.

“I have a lot of facts, evidence, that what she’s saying is not true at all,” he said. “I would rather speak to my attorney first before saying more."

[Anonymous]

this thread is moving at lightening speed.I am embarrassed to admit how many times I have checked it even while working.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Richard Goldstein, former Hillary advisor on TV with Tucker: "You don't have to prove this beyond a reasonable doubt because it's not a criminal proceeding"

Wow, that's pretty damn telling. That's a flat-out admission that the intention is to simply bring Kavanaugh down with unfounded accusations.

Not it isn't. It is admitting that this is not a criminal proceeding and "beyond reasonable doubt" doesn't apply.

How about just meeting minimal standards like corroborating evidence that's not hearsay?

Yes. Our country is in real trouble if a man’s life can be destroyed based on mere allegations. A truly sad day.

As a woman who has two sons, I'm enraged. I told them and my husband the only thing that separates them from Kavanaugh's fate is decent moral women. Any woman now can accuse her husband of rape and all it would take is her allegation and a few tears to destroy him.

I’m sure you’re some thinks-he’s-smart young white male shill.