UHC CEO Gunned Down in Midtown Manhattan

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This trial is going to be a circus.

He’s going to take a plea.

Yeah no way this goes to trial unless he pleads insanity and even then very good chance of a plea.

Crime is on video, footage of him at Starbucks, and they found the gun and the fake idea he used to check into the NYC hostel PLUS a 3-page "manifesto" that will show motive, on him in Altoona.

He's cooked.

Probably, but that also means they don't need to offer him anything. Posters here may have fanciful ideas about jury nullification, but there's no way a jury doesn't convict on first degree murder here.

Yeah?

If I’m on that jury, I’ll hold out until it hangs. I don’t care what they say, I just won’t convict. Period.

Now, there’s plenty of people out there like me.

Are you willing to commit perjury to get on the jury in the first place? Because it will require that.

Sure. Prove I perjured myself. You cannot.

Unless you have extremely sophisticated IT privacy, yes, they can. However, I’m sure there are plenty of sympathetic prospective jurors who have not posted, and all it takes is one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:he looks like he had an AMAZING life.
What went wrong???????

Got radicalized by anti-establishment radicals including climate activists. They’re looking to see if he had ties to antifa.

DP. I don’t think so. I think he lost his job and health insurance. The back X-rays on his FB with pins will be preexisting if there is a gap in coverage.

Special enrollment, ACA, if no money and you're in a medicaid expansion state you get coverage. If you have more income than the expansion allows you still get tax credit. He'd be smart enough to know this stuff.

Plus, people who end up with big problems with their back usually shoot the doctor.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This trial is going to be a circus.

He’s going to take a plea.

Yeah no way this goes to trial unless he pleads insanity and even then very good chance of a plea.

Crime is on video, footage of him at Starbucks, and they found the gun and the fake idea he used to check into the NYC hostel PLUS a 3-page "manifesto" that will show motive, on him in Altoona.

He's cooked.

Probably, but that also means they don't need to offer him anything. Posters here may have fanciful ideas about jury nullification, but there's no way a jury doesn't convict on first degree murder here.

Yeah?

If I’m on that jury, I’ll hold out until it hangs. I don’t care what they say, I just won’t convict. Period.

Now, there’s plenty of people out there like me.

There were 2 jurors on a trial I served on who said nothing would change their minds to convict, unless they’d been standing there. A lot of people who say what pp above you did haven’t ever served on a jury, or it was a cut and dry case.

This will be the Gen Z OJ Simpson case. He has a massive amount of fangirls right now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This trial is going to be a circus.

He’s going to take a plea.

Yeah no way this goes to trial unless he pleads insanity and even then very good chance of a plea.

Crime is on video, footage of him at Starbucks, and they found the gun and the fake idea he used to check into the NYC hostel PLUS a 3-page "manifesto" that will show motive, on him in Altoona.

He's cooked.

Probably, but that also means they don't need to offer him anything. Posters here may have fanciful ideas about jury nullification, but there's no way a jury doesn't convict on first degree murder here.

Yeah?

If I’m on that jury, I’ll hold out until it hangs. I don’t care what they say, I just won’t convict. Period.

Now, there’s plenty of people out there like me.

There really isn't. Jury nullification is rare. It's not going in a murder case.

A mistrial wouldn't really benefit him. There
seems to be solid evidence which doesn't rely on eyewitnesses. He'd continue to be remanded for a second trial and would almost certainly get convicted then.

No, once the jury is deliberating double Jeopardy has already attached and there is no re-trial.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This trial is going to be a circus.

He’s going to take a plea.

Yeah no way this goes to trial unless he pleads insanity and even then very good chance of a plea.

Crime is on video, footage of him at Starbucks, and they found the gun and the fake idea he used to check into the NYC hostel PLUS a 3-page "manifesto" that will show motive, on him in Altoona.

He's cooked.

Probably, but that also means they don't need to offer him anything. Posters here may have fanciful ideas about jury nullification, but there's no way a jury doesn't convict on first degree murder here.

Yeah?

If I’m on that jury, I’ll hold out until it hangs. I don’t care what they say, I just won’t convict. Period.

Now, there’s plenty of people out there like me.

There really isn't. Jury nullification is rare. It's not going in a murder case.

A mistrial wouldn't really benefit him. There
seems to be solid evidence which doesn't rely on eyewitnesses. He'd continue to be remanded for a second trial and would almost certainly get convicted then.

No, once the jury is deliberating double Jeopardy has already attached and there is no re-trial.

Oh wait, you said mistrial. So what I said was incorrect there would be a retrial.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Good looking solo young men stick out like a sore thumb in the Rust Belt, especially a McDonald’s, which is full of obese poor locals and crippled elderly people.

Oh my, oh lord!

[Anonymous]

Is there a link that suggests his family is loaded or owns assisted living facilities? A quick Google showed just a John Mangione as the administrator of a nursing home but that’s not typically the owner. Where are people getting this?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is there a link that suggests his family is loaded or owns assisted living facilities? A quick Google showed just a John Mangione as the administrator of a nursing home but that’s not typically the owner. Where are people getting this?

https://www.wbaltv.com/article/unitedhealthcare-ceo-shooting-man-questioned-maryland-ties/63137390

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This trial is going to be a circus.

He’s going to take a plea.

Yeah no way this goes to trial unless he pleads insanity and even then very good chance of a plea.

Crime is on video, footage of him at Starbucks, and they found the gun and the fake idea he used to check into the NYC hostel PLUS a 3-page "manifesto" that will show motive, on him in Altoona.

He's cooked.

Probably, but that also means they don't need to offer him anything. Posters here may have fanciful ideas about jury nullification, but there's no way a jury doesn't convict on first degree murder here.

Yeah?

If I’m on that jury, I’ll hold out until it hangs. I don’t care what they say, I just won’t convict. Period.

Now, there’s plenty of people out there like me.

There were 2 jurors on a trial I served on who said nothing would change their minds to convict, unless they’d been standing there. A lot of people who say what pp above you did haven’t ever served on a jury, or it was a cut and dry case.

This will be the Gen Z OJ Simpson case. He has a massive amount of fangirls right now.

Nope people were sad for the victims

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This trial is going to be a circus.

He’s going to take a plea.

Yeah no way this goes to trial unless he pleads insanity and even then very good chance of a plea.

Crime is on video, footage of him at Starbucks, and they found the gun and the fake idea he used to check into the NYC hostel PLUS a 3-page "manifesto" that will show motive, on him in Altoona.

He's cooked.

Probably, but that also means they don't need to offer him anything. Posters here may have fanciful ideas about jury nullification, but there's no way a jury doesn't convict on first degree murder here.

Yeah?

If I’m on that jury, I’ll hold out until it hangs. I don’t care what they say, I just won’t convict. Period.

Now, there’s plenty of people out there like me.

There really isn't. Jury nullification is rare. It's not going in a murder case.

A mistrial wouldn't really benefit him. There
seems to be solid evidence which doesn't rely on eyewitnesses. He'd continue to be remanded for a second trial and would almost certainly get convicted then.

No, once the jury is deliberating double Jeopardy has already attached and there is no re-trial.

Tell that to Karen Read.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Sounds like surgery screwed him up:

https://x.com/jackmaccfb/status/1866208569512907216?s=46

Doctors should get guards too…

Still a murderer and unacceptable

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This trial is going to be a circus.

He’s going to take a plea.

Yeah no way this goes to trial unless he pleads insanity and even then very good chance of a plea.

Crime is on video, footage of him at Starbucks, and they found the gun and the fake idea he used to check into the NYC hostel PLUS a 3-page "manifesto" that will show motive, on him in Altoona.

He's cooked.

Probably, but that also means they don't need to offer him anything. Posters here may have fanciful ideas about jury nullification, but there's no way a jury doesn't convict on first degree murder here.

Yeah?

If I’m on that jury, I’ll hold out until it hangs. I don’t care what they say, I just won’t convict. Period.

Now, there’s plenty of people out there like me.

Are you willing to commit perjury to get on the jury in the first place? Because it will require that.

Sure. Prove I perjured myself. You cannot.

Unless you have extremely sophisticated IT privacy, yes, they can. However, I’m sure there are plenty of sympathetic prospective jurors who have not posted, and all it takes is one.

NP. Oh honey lol

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can’t believe this came down to a McDonald’s sighting.

This is America.

You’re right. I should not be surprised.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This trial is going to be a circus.

He’s going to take a plea.

Yeah no way this goes to trial unless he pleads insanity and even then very good chance of a plea.

Crime is on video, footage of him at Starbucks, and they found the gun and the fake idea he used to check into the NYC hostel PLUS a 3-page "manifesto" that will show motive, on him in Altoona.

He's cooked.

Probably, but that also means they don't need to offer him anything. Posters here may have fanciful ideas about jury nullification, but there's no way a jury doesn't convict on first degree murder here.

Yeah?

If I’m on that jury, I’ll hold out until it hangs. I don’t care what they say, I just won’t convict. Period.

Now, there’s plenty of people out there like me.

Are you willing to commit perjury to get on the jury in the first place? Because it will require that.

Sure. Prove I perjured myself. You cannot.

You’re right. But having picked about 15 criminal juries, I’ve looked a lot of potential jurors in the eye. People have a much harder time lying when they’re standing alone in front of a judge, a prosecutor, and a defense attorney than you might think.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This trial is going to be a circus.

He’s going to take a plea.

Yeah no way this goes to trial unless he pleads insanity and even then very good chance of a plea.

Crime is on video, footage of him at Starbucks, and they found the gun and the fake idea he used to check into the NYC hostel PLUS a 3-page "manifesto" that will show motive, on him in Altoona.

He's cooked.

Probably, but that also means they don't need to offer him anything. Posters here may have fanciful ideas about jury nullification, but there's no way a jury doesn't convict on first degree murder here.

Yeah?

If I’m on that jury, I’ll hold out until it hangs. I don’t care what they say, I just won’t convict. Period.

Now, there’s plenty of people out there like me.

There really isn't. Jury nullification is rare. It's not going in a murder case.

A mistrial wouldn't really benefit him. There
seems to be solid evidence which doesn't rely on eyewitnesses. He'd continue to be remanded for a second trial and would almost certainly get convicted then.

No, once the jury is deliberating double Jeopardy has already attached and there is no re-trial.

Oh wait, you said mistrial. So what I said was incorrect there would be a retrial.

Yeah, my point is that there's no way he's getting an acquittal. Even if one or two people manage to lie their way onto the jury, it would end in a mistrial and he'd be retried. They're not going to let him walk, so they'd retry it as many times as it would take.