Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 3

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Uh huh. Because no married Republican public figure has *ever* been a married closeted gay person. Totally insane!!!

NP. Give it a rest! I believe Dr. Ford's allegations are credible. I am glad, thanks to Senator Flake (an honest man and I admire his principles, and if he runs for Presidential nomination and becomes Republican candidate, I will weigh seriously his suitability vs. Democratic candidate to cast my vote) FBI is conducting investigation about the allegations. That doesn't mean I through wildly crazy aspersions against Judge Kavanaugh.

The FBI won't even be talking to Kavanaugh or Ford about this.

It is a sham investigation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If it were one accusation maybe, but 3 so far and possibly more so it makes it harder to deny that this guy was probably assaulted women in a bro-way that men acted in the 80s-90s, and even today (but not as much).

Three unverified, non-credible accusations.
Accusations are not evidence. There has been no evidence that any of the crap thrown at him is true.

I am 100% sure that Feinstein leaked the letter from Ford. All of her aides, and she herself, had said they didn’t, but I was there and I am 100% sure she did. I have no proof, but she did it.

You were there?

Yes. And, I am 100% sure she did it. It does not matter that the aides are not corroborating my story. She did it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Imagine your entire reputation and career on the grandest national stage coming down to your most messed up friend from high school, who probably knows things about you that you don’t even know, because you don’t remember.

Yes, Ford should be a bit concerned since her dear friend could not corroborate her story.

Her dear friend didn't want to be dragged into the public media circus. Neither would you. It takes courage to speak up.

Her statement was under oath. If she is not telling the truth, she committed a felony.

"I don't recall" is a pretty standard fuzzy response.

There are lots of GP and HA grads lying. Nobody wants to be dragged into this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He lost it when questioned by the prosecutor. If he had ended up in a criminal court he would have lost dismally.
The prosecutor wasn't even TRYING to upset him and he could not handle it.

There is no way this guy belongs on the supreme court.

Sorry but his approach of not asking for a FBI investigation to clear his name and letting it all ride in the hearing did not work.

He is pathetic.

I want to know more why Mitchell quit questioning him when it was apparent that he lied to her about the July 1st date and the underage drinking law. It is an under reported story as she stopped as he was committing perjury in front of her. GOP gagged her at that point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Uh huh. Because no married Republican public figure has *ever* been a married closeted gay person. Totally insane!!!

NP. Give it a rest! I believe Dr. Ford's allegations are credible. I am glad, thanks to Senator Flake (an honest man and I admire his principles, and if he runs for Presidential nomination and becomes Republican candidate, I will weigh seriously his suitability vs. Democratic candidate to cast my vote) FBI is conducting investigation about the allegations. That doesn't mean I through wildly crazy aspersions against Judge Kavanaugh.

The FBI won't even be talking to Kavanaugh or Ford about this.

It is a sham investigation.

It's a sham because they won't ask him about his closeted gayness?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If it were one accusation maybe, but 3 so far and possibly more so it makes it harder to deny that this guy was probably assaulted women in a bro-way that men acted in the 80s-90s, and even today (but not as much).

Three unverified, non-credible accusations.
Accusations are not evidence. There has been no evidence that any of the crap thrown at him is true.

I am 100% sure that Feinstein leaked the letter from Ford. All of her aides, and she herself, had said they didn’t, but I was there and I am 100% sure she did. I have no proof, but she did it.

You were there?

Yes. And, I am 100% sure she did it. It does not matter that the aides are not corroborating my story. She did it.

Poppycock.

Ford's friend leaked it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://turnto10.com/news/local/kavanaugh-accused-of-sexually-assaulting-woman-on-boat-in-ri-in-1985

RI man apologizes for claiming Kavanaugh sexually assaulted woman on boat in Newport

A Rhode Island man who claimed U.S. Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted a woman aboard a boat in Rhode Island more than 30 years ago apologized Wednesday, saying he “made a mistake.”


A 45-page transcript from the Senate Judiciary Committee notes that a man called Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse's office Monday and said his "close acquaintance…was sexually assaulted by two heavily inebriated men she referred to at the time as Brett and Mark” during the summer of 1985.

A Rhode Island man who claimed U.S. Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted a woman aboard a boat in Rhode Island more than 30 years ago apologized Wednesday, saying he “made a mistake.”

Indeed. People are just making shit up and liberals are screaming “it’s TRUE!”

I hope crazy man gets jail time.


A 45-page transcript from the Senate Judiciary Committee notes that a man called Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse's office Monday and said his "close acquaintance…was sexually assaulted by two heavily inebriated men she referred to at the time as Brett and Mark” during the summer of 1985.

09.25.18 BMK Interview Transcript (Redacted) by Anonymous twcKq4 on Scribd



The man said that he and another unidentified man later "physically confronted the two men, leaving them with significant injuries,” according to the transcript.

He said he decided to contact Whitehouse's office because he “realized that one of the men was Brett Kavanaugh when he saw Kavanaugh’s high school year book photo on television” during the weekend.

While the man’s name was redacted from the transcript, reporters from Heavy.com later identified him as “Jeffrey Catalan” through social media posts.

“Everyone who is going crazy about what I had said I have recanted because I have made a mistake and apologize for such mistake,” a Twitter account using the name Jeffrey Catalan noted after the claim was made public Wednesday.

And, this case has been referred to federal law enforcement for prosecution of false claims. Good.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Uh huh. Because no married Republican public figure has *ever* been a married closeted gay person. Totally insane!!!

NP. Give it a rest! I believe Dr. Ford's allegations are credible. I am glad, thanks to Senator Flake (an honest man and I admire his principles, and if he runs for Presidential nomination and becomes Republican candidate, I will weigh seriously his suitability vs. Democratic candidate to cast my vote) FBI is conducting investigation about the allegations. That doesn't mean I through wildly crazy aspersions against Judge Kavanaugh.

The FBI won't even be talking to Kavanaugh or Ford about this.

It is a sham investigation.

You have no clue who the FBI will talk to or what they will talk about. Not one clue.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Imagine your entire reputation and career on the grandest national stage coming down to your most messed up friend from high school, who probably knows things about you that you don’t even know, because you don’t remember.

Yes, Ford should be a bit concerned since her dear friend could not corroborate her story.

Her dear friend didn't want to be dragged into the public media circus. Neither would you. It takes courage to speak up.

Her statement was under oath. If she is not telling the truth, she committed a felony.

"I don't recall" is a pretty standard fuzzy response.

There are lots of GP and HA grads lying. Nobody wants to be dragged into this.

And, she stated, unequivocally that she does not know Kavanaugh. Explain that one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If it were one accusation maybe, but 3 so far and possibly more so it makes it harder to deny that this guy was probably assaulted women in a bro-way that men acted in the 80s-90s, and even today (but not as much).

Three unverified, non-credible accusations.
Accusations are not evidence. There has been no evidence that any of the crap thrown at him is true.

I am 100% sure that Feinstein leaked the letter from Ford. All of her aides, and she herself, had said they didn’t, but I was there and I am 100% sure she did. I have no proof, but she did it.

You were there?

Yes. And, I am 100% sure she did it. It does not matter that the aides are not corroborating my story. She did it.

Poppycock.

Ford's friend leaked it.

I am sure it was Feinstein. 100% sure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If it were one accusation maybe, but 3 so far and possibly more so it makes it harder to deny that this guy was probably assaulted women in a bro-way that men acted in the 80s-90s, and even today (but not as much).

Three unverified, non-credible accusations.
Accusations are not evidence. There has been no evidence that any of the crap thrown at him is true.

I am 100% sure that Feinstein leaked the letter from Ford. All of her aides, and she herself, had said they didn’t, but I was there and I am 100% sure she did. I have no proof, but she did it.

You were there?

Yes. And, I am 100% sure she did it. It does not matter that the aides are not corroborating my story. She did it.

Poppycock.

Ford's friend leaked it.

That's what Feinstein said. It seemed like she was throwing the victim under the bus--was very surprised at that misstep.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Imagine your entire reputation and career on the grandest national stage coming down to your most messed up friend from high school, who probably knows things about you that you don’t even know, because you don’t remember.

Yes, Ford should be a bit concerned since her dear friend could not corroborate her story.

Her dear friend didn't want to be dragged into the public media circus. Neither would you. It takes courage to speak up.

Her statement was under oath. If she is not telling the truth, she committed a felony.

"I don't recall" is a pretty standard fuzzy response.

There are lots of GP and HA grads lying. Nobody wants to be dragged into this.

And, she stated, unequivocally that she does not know Kavanaugh. Explain that one.

She said she doesn't know him. What's to explain?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Imagine your entire reputation and career on the grandest national stage coming down to your most messed up friend from high school, who probably knows things about you that you don’t even know, because you don’t remember.

Yes, Ford should be a bit concerned since her dear friend could not corroborate her story.

Her dear friend didn't want to be dragged into the public media circus. Neither would you. It takes courage to speak up.

Her statement was under oath. If she is not telling the truth, she committed a felony.

"I don't recall" is a pretty standard fuzzy response.

There are lots of GP and HA grads lying. Nobody wants to be dragged into this.

And, she stated, unequivocally that she does not know Kavanaugh. Explain that one.

The dots won’t connect but liberals don’t care. It’s ridiculous.

Ford stated her friend was downstairs during the assault. The friend says no party, doesn’t even know BK.

How on earth does that make sense?

[Anonymous]

Below is from must read article https://www.currentaffairs.org/2018/09/how-we-know-kavanaugh-is-lying :

DC writer on the claim that Devils Triangle is a drinking game:

“It’s one of the most blatant lies I’ve ever seen. It’s special among the lies because it’s not a simple denial. It’s a completely fake game that he invented whole cloth. Every guy who went to my D.C.-area high school knows what “devil’s triangle” means. I’m sure Brett Kavanaugh knows what it means, too. There is no reference to this “drinking game” on the entire internet or in the entire history of books written in English. There are, however, tons of references to the other act, an act that a high school jock would be into joking about. And it’s relevant to the crime because it’s literally what Ford is accusing Kavanaugh and Judge of attempting to do.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If it were one accusation maybe, but 3 so far and possibly more so it makes it harder to deny that this guy was probably assaulted women in a bro-way that men acted in the 80s-90s, and even today (but not as much).

Three unverified, non-credible accusations.
Accusations are not evidence. There has been no evidence that any of the crap thrown at him is true.

I am 100% sure that Feinstein leaked the letter from Ford. All of her aides, and she herself, had said they didn’t, but I was there and I am 100% sure she did. I have no proof, but she did it.

You were there?

Yes. And, I am 100% sure she did it. It does not matter that the aides are not corroborating my story. She did it.

Poppycock.

Ford's friend leaked it.

I am sure it was Feinstein. 100% sure.

Okay.

I get your point, but I don't know how you think that proves Kavanaugh's innocence.