Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't get it. Harry and Meghan seem lovely and they're helping other people. They want out of the British Royal Family obligations, which I get. What's the issue?

None of us know what they are really like.

The issue, in a nutshell, is that they wanted to leave the Royal Family but keep the money-making parts of it. Because without their Royal Family affiliation, they would be of interest to no one.

They didn’t need the titles to make money. Harry wanted to keep a connection to his birthright, the one he’s been raised to revere. Hardly shocking.

Were you born yesterday? As if Netflix would be handing out 9-figure deals to Mr. and Mrs. Harry Nobody Smith.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
That’s actually one thing they have in common

Jackie did it for money.

The Queen did it because she thought it was best for her duty.

Jackie came from money herself. Both she and the Queen were in eras and social circles where married men’s indiscretions were to be tolerated.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't get it. Harry and Meghan seem lovely and they're helping other people. They want out of the British Royal Family obligations, which I get. What's the issue?

None of us know what they are really like.

The issue, in a nutshell, is that they wanted to leave the Royal Family but keep the money-making parts of it. Because without their Royal Family affiliation, they would be of interest to no one.

They didn’t need the titles to make money. Harry wanted to keep a connection to his birthright, the one he’s been raised to revere.

Hardly shocking.

Were you born yesterday? As if Netflix would be handing out 9-figure deals to Mr. and Mrs. Harry Nobody Smith.

So you think that Harry should renounce his birthright?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't get it. Harry and Meghan seem lovely and they're helping other people. They want out of the British Royal Family obligations, which I get. What's the issue?

None of us know what they are really like.

The issue, in a nutshell, is that they wanted to leave the Royal Family but keep the money-making parts of it. Because without their Royal Family affiliation, they would be of interest to no one.

They didn’t need the titles to make money. Harry wanted to keep a connection to his birthright, the one he’s been raised to revere. Hardly shocking.

Were you born yesterday? As if Netflix would be handing out 9-figure deals to Mr. and Mrs. Harry Nobody Smith.

Pp you crazy. He’s been one of the most famous people in the world since he was born! The titles are a formality, it doesn’t matter what the Queen says or does Harry will always be prince Harry, especially in the us.

Like this new angle you have it just completely illustrative of your lose grip on reality.

The reason accusations of Harry being a fame whore seem crazy is that he is one of the few people in the entire world who would have a hard time becoming more famous than he already is!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't get it. Harry and Meghan seem lovely and they're helping other people. They want out of the British Royal Family obligations, which I get. What's the issue?

None of us know what they are really like.

The issue, in a nutshell, is that they wanted to leave the Royal Family but keep the money-making parts of it. Because without their Royal Family affiliation, they would be of interest to no one.

They didn’t need the titles to make money. Harry wanted to keep a connection to his birthright, the one he’s been raised to revere.

Hardly shocking.

Were you born yesterday? As if Netflix would be handing out 9-figure deals to Mr. and Mrs. Harry Nobody Smith.

So you think that Harry should renounce his birthright?

Yes. That's what he should do. Since he hasn't, that's why he's getting so much criticism.

[Anonymous]

Lol ok maria shriver

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't get it. Harry and Meghan seem lovely and they're helping other people. They want out of the British Royal Family obligations, which I get. What's the issue?

None of us know what they are really like.

The issue, in a nutshell, is that they wanted to leave the Royal Family but keep the money-making parts of it. Because without their Royal Family affiliation, they would be of interest to no one.

They didn’t need the titles to make money. Harry wanted to keep a connection to his birthright, the one he’s been raised to revere. Hardly shocking.

Er...do you think Harry would be interesting to anyone at all if he wasn't related to the royals? Would Meghan?

Nope.

Do you think Harry would have been interesting to Meghan if he weren't royal? And we know Meghan was a second-rate actress before she became affiliated with the royals (I had never heard of her...).

[Anonymous]

I love how HM still call themselves the Duke and Duchess...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't get it. Harry and Meghan seem lovely and they're helping other people. They want out of the British Royal Family obligations, which I get. What's the issue?

None of us know what they are really like.

The issue, in a nutshell, is that they wanted to leave the Royal Family but keep the money-making parts of it. Because without their Royal Family affiliation, they would be of interest to no one.

They didn’t need the titles to make money. Harry wanted to keep a connection to his birthright, the one he’s been raised to revere.

Hardly shocking.

Were you born yesterday? As if Netflix would be handing out 9-figure deals to Mr. and Mrs. Harry Nobody Smith.

So you think that Harry should renounce his birthright?

Yes. That's what he should do. Since he hasn't, that's why he's getting so much
criticism.

So you want Harry to say I renounce being the son of Prince Charles, future king of England?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://britishheritage.com/jfk-and-jackie-insulted-queen-elizabeth-at-royal-dinner.amp

Bingo!

Jackie did not mince words either.

the First Lady told dinner guests that the queen was “a middle-aged woman so incurious, unintelligent and unremarkable that Britain’s new reduced place in the world was not a surprise but an inevitability

And yet...the Queen is beloved and still ruling the roost while the curious, intelligent and remarkable Jackie is pushing up daisies while the distant fragments of her family are fading into obscurity.

Wow. Jackie’s cancer was a character flaw, huh? Wow.

Neither was the Queen's age.

I can't think of anything more unremarkable than turning a blind eye to your husband's many infidelities for the perks of money and power. I mean really, Jackie to lecture on being remarkable?

Are you taking about the double-digit known mistresses of Philipp's that Elizabeth knew about.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8726759/Prince-Philip-linked-12-women-rumours-wont-away-says-biographer.html#:~:text=Sarah%20Bradford%2C%20the%20highly%20respected,Abercorn%20certainly%20had%20an%20affair.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't get it. Harry and Meghan seem lovely and they're helping other people. They want out of the British Royal Family obligations, which I get. What's the issue?

None of us know what they are really like.

The issue, in a nutshell, is that they wanted to leave the Royal Family but keep the money-making parts of it. Because without their Royal Family affiliation, they would be of interest to no one.

They didn’t need the titles to make money. Harry wanted to keep a connection to his birthright, the one he’s been raised to revere.

Hardly shocking.

Were you born yesterday? As if Netflix would be handing out 9-figure deals to Mr. and Mrs. Harry Nobody Smith.

So you think that Harry should renounce his birthright?

Yes. That's what he should do. Since he hasn't, that's why he's getting so much
criticism.

So you want Harry to say I renounce being the son of Prince Charles, future king of England?

LOL these people won't satisfied with anything less. Then it'll be 'he should renounce being a citizen of Britain'.

They're nuts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't get it. Harry and Meghan seem lovely and they're helping other people. They want out of the British Royal Family obligations, which I get. What's the issue?

None of us know what they are really like.

The issue, in a nutshell, is that they wanted to leave the Royal Family but keep the money-making parts of it. Because without their Royal Family affiliation, they would be of interest to no one.

They didn’t need the titles to make money. Harry wanted to keep a connection to his birthright, the one he’s been raised to revere.

Hardly shocking.

Were you born yesterday? As if Netflix would be handing out 9-figure deals to Mr. and Mrs. Harry Nobody Smith.

So you think that Harry should renounce his birthright?

Yes. That's what he should do. Since he hasn't, that's why he's getting so much
criticism.

So you want Harry to say I renounce being the son of Prince Charles, future king of England?

LOL these people won't satisfied with anything less. Then it'll be 'he should renounce being a citizen of Britain'.

They're nuts.

Yes, that is totally bonkers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't get it. Harry and Meghan seem lovely and they're helping other people. They want out of the British Royal Family obligations, which I get. What's the issue?

None of us know what they are really like.

The issue, in a nutshell, is that they wanted to leave the Royal Family but keep the money-making parts of it. Because without their Royal Family affiliation, they would be of interest to no one.

They didn’t need the titles to make money. Harry wanted to keep a connection to his birthright, the one he’s been raised to revere.

Hardly shocking.

Were you born yesterday? As if Netflix would be handing out 9-figure deals to Mr. and Mrs. Harry Nobody Smith.

So you think that Harry should renounce his birthright?

Yes. That's what he should do. Since he hasn't, that's why he's getting so much
criticism.

So you want Harry to say I renounce being the son of Prince Charles, future king of England?

Harry formerly known as Prince doesn’t have quite the same cachet, does it? lol

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't get it. Harry and Meghan seem lovely and they're helping other people. They want out of the British Royal Family obligations, which I get. What's the issue?

None of us know what they are really like.

The issue, in a nutshell, is that they wanted to leave the Royal Family but keep the money-making parts of it. Because without their Royal Family affiliation, they would be of interest to no one.

They didn’t need the titles to make money. Harry wanted to keep a connection to his birthright, the one he’s been raised to revere.

Hardly shocking.

Were you born yesterday? As if Netflix would be handing out 9-figure deals to Mr. and Mrs. Harry Nobody Smith.

So you think that Harry should renounce his birthright?

Yes. That's what he should do. Since he hasn't, that's why he's getting so much
criticism.

So you want Harry to say I renounce being the son of Prince Charles, future king of England?

Harry formerly known as Prince doesn’t have quite the same cachet, does it? lol

He can never be formerly known as since he is a prince by birth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't get it. Harry and Meghan seem lovely and they're helping other people. They want out of the British Royal Family obligations, which I get. What's the issue?

None of us know what they are really like.

The issue, in a nutshell, is that they wanted to leave the Royal Family but keep the money-making parts of it. Because without their Royal Family affiliation, they would be of interest to no one.

They didn’t need the titles to make money. Harry wanted to keep a connection to his birthright, the one he’s been raised to revere.

Hardly shocking.

Were you born yesterday? As if Netflix would be handing out 9-figure deals to Mr. and Mrs. Harry Nobody Smith.

So you think that Harry should renounce his birthright?

Yes. That's what he should do. Since he hasn't, that's why he's getting so much
criticism.

So you want Harry to say I renounce being the son of Prince Charles, future king of England?

Harry formerly known as Prince doesn’t have quite the same cachet, does it? lol

He can never be formerly known as since he is a prince by birth.

There's a great (mini) read on why Brits and the haters are pissed off for that reason. Harry is a blood Prince. Those titles and HRHs can never been stripped away.

Unlike what they did with Diana and Fergie et al.