Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates

[Anonymous]

Harry and Meghan need to voluntarily go by Harry and Megan Wales (or Sussex)- the titles come off sounding ridiculous in America. At least this is what they would do if they weren’t pair of narcissists.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The funny thing is - the more the island lashes out in fury, the more their own people realize what useless twats the Royal family are.

The only twats I see are Meghan and Harry. So much drama around these two all the damn time. I’m waiting for the Oprah interview where Meghan does a repeat of her Africa woe is me performance replete with lip biting and crocodile tears as she complains that no one asks her if she’s ok. Or maybe she’ll go to a tennis match again and clear all the seats around her hair only to have her guards yell at a spectator taking her picture clandestinely (actually taking a selfie unaware she is even there).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The funny thing is - the more the island lashes out in fury, the more their own people realize what useless twats the Royal family are.

The only twats I see are Meghan and Harry. So much drama around these two all the damn time. I’m waiting for the Oprah interview where Meghan does a repeat of her Africa woe is me performance replete with lip biting and crocodile tears as she complains that no one asks her if she’s ok. Or maybe she’ll go to a tennis match again and clear all the seats around her hair only to have her guards yell at a spectator taking her picture clandestinely (actually taking a selfie unaware she is even there).

+1000

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So now the MM haters are talking incredibly mean sh** about a woman long dead of cancer. But yeah you and QEII are the classy ones!

Since when does death excuses anyone from anything? I mean when Trump dies, are you going to be all reverential and say yes, don't speak ill of the dead?

You’re the one talking about the importance of class!

I’m not, actually.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't get it. Harry and Meghan seem lovely and they're helping other people. They want out of the British Royal Family obligations, which I get. What's the issue?

None of us know what they are really like.

The issue, in a nutshell, is that they wanted to leave the Royal Family but keep the money-making parts of it. Because without their Royal Family affiliation, they would be of interest to no one.

They didn’t need the titles to make money. Harry wanted to keep a connection to his birthright, the one he’s been raised to revere. Hardly shocking.

Er...do you think Harry would be interesting to anyone at all if he wasn't related to the royals? Would Meghan?

Nope.

As a woman in my 30s who reminders when Diana died and has casually thought Harry was always the hot one and who has watched third rate bachelor contestants turn their 15 minutes into robust careers yes I do think a former prince of England would have been able to support himself just fine. It’s like, literally ludicrous that you think he wouldn’t be able to.

Lol thanks for making my point with the former prince of England stuff.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The funny thing is - the more the island lashes out in fury, the more their own people realize what useless twats the Royal family are.

The only twats I see are Meghan and Harry. So much drama around these two all the damn time. I’m waiting for the Oprah interview where Meghan does a repeat of her Africa woe is me performance replete with lip biting and crocodile tears as she complains that no one asks her if she’s ok. Or maybe she’ll go to a tennis match again and clear all the seats around her hair only to have her guards yell at a spectator taking her picture clandestinely (actually taking a selfie unaware she is even there).

+1000

+2
They'll be sure to mention how hard the pandemic has been for them...as they strut carefree around their million dollar mansion equipped with all kinds of amenities and spacious yard.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The funny thing is - the more the island lashes out in fury, the more their own people realize what useless twats the Royal family are.

The only twats I see are Meghan and Harry. So much drama around these two all the damn time. I’m waiting for the Oprah interview where Meghan does a repeat of her Africa woe is me performance replete with lip biting and crocodile tears as she complains that no one asks her if she’s ok. Or maybe she’ll go to a tennis match again and clear all the seats around her hair only to have her guards yell at a spectator taking her picture clandestinely (actually taking a selfie unaware she is even there).

+1000

+2
They'll be sure to mention how hard the pandemic has been for them...as they strut carefree around their million dollar mansion equipped with all kinds of amenities and spacious yard.

Oh yeah, its almost as 'exhausting' as working from home in a 10-bedroom house that you need to relocate to a 775-room palace in order to get away from your kids.

[Anonymous]

Why should they matter?

[Anonymous]

I had some sympathy for the Queen in this until today - her outrageous statement about service, as though her family of pedophiles and wankers is more oriented to public service than non royals could ever be?! BOLLOCKS!

Honestly can’t understand how citizens over there can tolerate this long running grift. These people are no better than any family living on a council estate, it’s just an accident of birth. Time for the republicans to rise up and rid the UK of the monarchy once and for all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I had some sympathy for the Queen in this until today - her outrageous statement about service, as though her family of pedophiles and wankers is more oriented to public service than non royals could ever be?! BOLLOCKS!

Honestly can’t understand how citizens over there can tolerate this long running grift. These people are no better than any family living on a council estate, it’s just an accident of birth. Time for the republicans to rise up and rid the UK of the monarchy once and for all.

+1

Awful statement.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't get it. Harry and Meghan seem lovely and they're helping other people. They want out of the British Royal Family obligations, which I get. What's the issue?

None of us know what they are really like.

The issue, in a nutshell, is that they wanted to leave the Royal Family but keep the money-making parts of it. Because without their Royal Family affiliation, they would be of interest to no one.

But how exactly does Harry leave the fact that he is the future monarchs son? That’s where the money-making parts of it are. Also if that’s all it took then how come the york princesses or any of Harry’s aunts and uncles been able to make this type of money?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://britishheritage.com/jfk-and-jackie-insulted-queen-elizabeth-at-royal-dinner.amp

Bingo!

Jackie did not mince words either.

the First Lady told dinner guests that the queen was “a middle-aged woman so incurious, unintelligent and unremarkable that Britain’s new reduced place in the world was not a surprise but an inevitability

And yet...the Queen is beloved and still ruling the roost while the curious, intelligent and remarkable Jackie is pushing up daisies while the distant fragments of her family are fading into obscurity.

Wow. Jackie’s cancer was a character flaw, huh? Wow.

Neither was the Queen's age.

I can't think of anything more unremarkable than turning a blind eye to your husband's many infidelities for the perks of money and power. I mean really, Jackie to lecture on being remarkable?

You know Phillip has been stepping out on the Queen for decades right? He also only married her (and the British high society were merciless about this) for the 'perks of money and power'.

Monarchs with rank equal to that of the Queen are incredibly rare and probably spoken for since birth. She isn't exactly choosing from a wide pool here.

If you think turning a blind eye to infidelity is unremarkable, then by that standard Jackie is common as pig tracks.

While that’s generally true that wasn’t the case for Elizabeth. 1)
She only was really in line for the throne because her uncle abdicated...so didn’t grow up the way that say Harry and William did. 2) Elizabeth’s parents were very reluctant for her to marry him...nothing like an arranged marriage. But she’s a very unsophisticated woman who fell for an attractive slightly older womanizer.

That said...he seems like a love match for her. Which I would not say of Jackie and JFK.

[Anonymous]

The National Theatre didn't wan to lose Meghan and Brexit cut them off at the knees. But hey the Royal family says they needed to stick it to her, so off they go.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The National Theatre didn't wan to lose Meghan and Brexit cut them off at the knees. But hey the Royal family says they needed to stick it to her, so off they go.

If Meghan was that concerned she could have stayed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The National Theatre didn't wan to lose Meghan and Brexit cut them off at the knees. But hey the Royal family says they needed to stick it to her, so off they go.

If Meghan was that concerned she could have stayed.

Since when is living on an island a requirement to be a Patron? Especially in the 21st Century? Should the Queen no longer be the monarch of Canada and Australia because she isn't resident there?