Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 5

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OMG. I just watched this. She claims Kavanaugh was wearing "his Georgetown Prep uniform" when she met him. Um, there IS NO GP UNIFORM. A jacket and tie, but no uniform. She said she thinks he was "proud" of his uniform. Wow, that's not a lie at all. She's *completely* believable.

You literally just described a school uniform.

A bunch of boys prep schools have the uniform of a jacket and tie. How would it identify Georgetown Prep vs an entirely different boys school?

She said he was wearing a basketball team uniform from his school.

Do you have a source? I haven't read that one.

All dozen of these parties happened during basketball season? And after games, for him to be wearing his uniform? And he'd go to these parties sweaty and gross?

I am a few years younger than Kavanaugh and did not hang out with private school kids, but that still doesn't seem particularly plausible.

Combine the oddness with the lack of the other gang-raped women speaking out, or other people talking about drunken orgy parties (if she got the rape aspect wrong, as she seemed to walk back in the NBC interview), and none of it passes the smell test.

She had other people who were willing to speak with the FBI only. After seeing the trash treatment and picking apart of meaningless details, I can understand why a victim or a witness would ONLY want to talk to the FBI.

Which is *exactly* the treatment afforded to Kavanaugh.

LOL!!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone please clearly show what he actually, provably LIED about under oath?
Honest question.

Here you go! so you can ignore it for the seventh time. https://mobile.twitter.com/senatorleahy/status/1037753403856887808?lang=en

If it's provable perjury, why isn't Leahy doing something about it? It's been over a month since he tweeted those tweets...

What would you like someone in the minority party to do when this was made readily available and the majority party is acting like a band of fascists? What would you like him to do? Do you see all your fellow conservatives on here bleating on about Swetnick, when there’s proven perjury, right here? Why do you think the GOP might be looking away? Why does the GOP insist 9n pretending that any part of Brett’s nomination is normal or non-criminal? His “confirm Brett” web address was bought back in February 2017. Kennedy had hired his clerks, met with Trump, and then BOOF! he retires. There’s clear evidence of perjury (not to mention Republican crimes going back almost two decades), and no one sees anything. Brett had a PR campaign paid for by no one knows whom. He lost his ever-sniffing mind at the hearing.

The GOP is a band of criminals. And I hope someone gets a sense of duty to their country and does something to fix it.

I would assume that if someone thought Kavanaugh had committed provable perjury, they would follow up on it.

He's a slimy, raping, drunken jerk, right? Don't they want him off the court, or better yet to have never been confirmed?

But I guess it doesn't matter if you're in the minority party and you might have to exert yourself a little bit. I didn't know Leahy was so overwhelmed. That's a shame.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

And yet unfortunately the liberals decided not to focus on these things but instead of an allegation of sexual assault that had zero evidence to back it up.

Zero evidence? Julie Swetnick is a woman with an impeccable reputation. She was at 10 parties where Kavanaugh was spiking the punch bowl and gang raping women. She had 4 witnesses that could back up her story but Trump made sure the FBI would not investigate her claim.

Is this supposed to be a joke. This allegation blew the whole case for the Democrats. Not believable at all.

I know that when I head out to a gang rape, I always pack a punch bowl. It adds a touch of class.

Anybody who thinks that a 20 year old woman who went to Gaithersburg High is going to be hanging out with a bunch of 16-17 year old Georgetown Prep students on 10 different occasions clearly never went to private school in this area.

And punch bowls? What high school party have you ever seen a punch bowl at?

I went to public school in MoCo. While in high school I hung out with many prep school kids - including kids from Georgetown Prep. No crazy animal house parties for us (we were NOT the Brett Kavanaugh type of high schoolers). But we certainly socialized together and we were all kids were from affluent families. I'm not sure why posters are suggesting that it impossible that public school and private school kids didn't mix. Depending on the neighborhood, we certainly did.

Swetnick was 20 years old hanging out with 16-17 year old kids not once but 10 times. There was a spiked punch bowl and a line of guys waiting to rape drunk girls. Where are all the other rape victims? Who continues going to these parties afterwards?

Brock Turner's victim was also in her 20s, a college graduate. Do you think she was lying about being at the frat party?

There were two witnesses who pulled her away so there was proof and it also was reported immediately. Attending a frat party in your early 20's is not the same thing as attending a high school party.

she said they were mixed aged parties and had kids from high school and college.

Yes she did say that and what a credible witness she is. There is not one witness to back her story up. If these boys were doing this to multiple girls there would be more victims. Correct? She also never stated that kavanaugh participated in the rape. He stood by the punch bowl.

She had other witnesses who agreed to talk to the FBI.

NONE of the four "witnesses" she names have corroborated her story. See other post.

YOU are talking the people who knew she had been raped. And two of them are dead. So saying they didn't corroborate her story is a brett kavanaugh lying his ass off move. Just like he lied about what both Judge and Leland had said.

I am talking about the other witnesses from the parties who were willing to speak to the FBI.

No, you dolt. I'm talking about the video interview, in which Kate Snow says that Swetnick provided the names of four "witnesses" to them (NBC), who supposedly could vouch for these parties. To repeat: one said he had no idea who she was. One is dead (kind of weird to provide the name of a dead person as your witness). And two never got back to them. THOSE are the witnesses I'm referring to. Get your facts straight.

So now you consider a NBC interview to be as thorough and resourceful as a FBI investigation? Please.

[Anonymous]

All republicans are not sexual predators, but the GOP has gone whole hog on two and put them in the two of the highest positions.

GOP is now the party of sexual assault.
Congrats!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And then she totally retracts her sworn statement where she said Kavanaugh and Judge spiked the punch bowl. Now she says merely, they were "near" the punch bowl. Sorry, this woman is lying. Anyone who insists otherwise just looks idiotic.

No she did not.

No she did not what? Did you watch the video? She completely backpeddles when asked about the punch bowl. She knows she can't claim they spiked the punch, but by golly, they were standing nearby! And later, the four names she provides as having gone with her to these parties: one says they have no recollection of any of this, one is dead, and two aren't responding. Oh, Julie. What a farce.

Did you actually read her sworn statement? She didn't retract anything. She stuck with her sworn statement.
She knew him to be lecherous and grope women - she saw that. She said how she saw him behaving at these parties and what was going on around him. Her sworn statement is important in light of the other two accusations. Also a lot depends on what the other witnesses she has tell the FBI. Hopefully the FBI will do a real investigation in the future.

I'm wondering whether YOU actually read her sworn statement. Here is the part specifically about the punch bowl:

"During the years 1981-82, I became aware of efforts by Mark Judge, Brett Kavanaugh and others to "spike" the "punch" at house parties I attended with drugs and/or grain alcohol so as to cause girls to lose their inhibitions and their ability to say "No."

But in her interview, when specifically questioned about these allegations, she walks it back to say, well, they were standing *near* the punch bowl. What a bunch of BS.

Became aware does not say saw. Became aware means that she saw things that made her put 2 and 2 together and realize what was going on. This is why the FBI should investigate and not yahoos with a computer who like to parse words. This is what that means in court testimony. She did not see it, but she saw other things that made her realize what was happening.

You know, if I happened to REPEATEDLY attend house parties where people were being raped - which I can't imagine doing, btw - I would never in a million years decide to report some of the guys who happened to be there and insinuate heavily that they *probably* participated in gang rapes, but I just couldn't be sure. What a terrible, terrible thing to do to anyone. Unless you're certain someone did something, you do not drag their name through the mud like that. She repeatedly says that she's not quite sure, but they were in the house, so...

I was glad to see Kate Snow seemed to have her B.S. detector firmly in place.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

LOL,when questioned what she was doing at HS parties at the age of 20/21 she said that the people at these parties were "mixed age" with people anywhere between "15/16 to 25...maybe more". 15 year old Catholic prep-school kids hanging out with 25+ year old adults from Gaithersburg on 10 different instances? Right....

I time stamped the point in the interview if anybody wants a good laugh.

https://youtu.be/hq_aFCg6bKY?t=150

This is what certain people think should end a man's career? Sad that some people take her seriously. In the end though she probably helped secure Kavanaugh's confirmation. Susan Collins specifically cited Swetnick when she stated that the presumption of innocence needs to be maintained and announced she would vote yes on the confirmation.

I agree. And I applaud Collins for having the sense to know when a smear campaign is afoot, as opposed to credible allegations.

Collins just accepted a six figure ad buy on her behalf from Judicial Action Network as a reward for her yes vote. You really want to talk about Susan “Gimme my Money” Collins?

Good for her! So she's supposed to just do nothing to help her own campaign, even as liberals raised money for her opponent if she voted no on the confirmation? Which she did - glad she didn't let the blackmailing liberals take control of her vote.

What do you have to say about her opponent who accepted all those donations against Collins' no vote? Nothing? Surprise, surprise.

Collins is scum.

She's a hero and an independent thinker. Wish I lived in Maine so I could vote for her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

And yet unfortunately the liberals decided not to focus on these things but instead of an allegation of sexual assault that had zero evidence to back it up.

Zero evidence? Julie Swetnick is a woman with an impeccable reputation. She was at 10 parties where Kavanaugh was spiking the punch bowl and gang raping women. She had 4 witnesses that could back up her story but Trump made sure the FBI would not investigate her claim.

Is this supposed to be a joke. This allegation blew the whole case for the Democrats. Not believable at all.

I know that when I head out to a gang rape, I always pack a punch bowl. It adds a touch of class.

Anybody who thinks that a 20 year old woman who went to Gaithersburg High is going to be hanging out with a bunch of 16-17 year old Georgetown Prep students on 10 different occasions clearly never went to private school in this area.

And punch bowls? What high school party have you ever seen a punch bowl at?

I went to public school in MoCo. While in high school I hung out with many prep school kids - including kids from Georgetown Prep. No crazy animal house parties for us (we were NOT the Brett Kavanaugh type of high schoolers). But we certainly socialized together and we were all kids were from affluent families. I'm not sure why posters are suggesting that it impossible that public school and private school kids didn't mix. Depending on the neighborhood, we certainly did.

Swetnick was 20 years old hanging out with 16-17 year old kids not once but 10 times. There was a spiked punch bowl and a line of guys waiting to rape drunk girls. Where are all the other rape victims? Who continues going to these parties afterwards?

Brock Turner's victim was also in her 20s, a college graduate. Do you think she was lying about being at the frat party?

There were two witnesses who pulled her away so there was proof and it also was reported immediately. Attending a frat party in your early 20's is not the same thing as attending a high school party.

she said they were mixed aged parties and had kids from high school and college.

Yes she did say that and what a credible witness she is. There is not one witness to back her story up. If these boys were doing this to multiple girls there would be more victims. Correct? She also never stated that kavanaugh participated in the rape. He stood by the punch bowl.

She had other witnesses who agreed to talk to the FBI.

Why don't they go report it to the police?

She reported her rape to the police at the time. We don't know what other witnesses reported to the police at the time. An FBI investigation would keep the other witnesses identities safe, and that is important to those witnesses. Understandably! They also kept Mike Judge's interview secret too. The police are not the right people to handle this. There may not be crimes that are still under the SOL and this information is more in line with providing background information about his activities that could support Dr. Ford's and Ms. Ramirez's accusations.

There was a claim that she'd made a report, but I hadn't seen anything corroborating that. Can you link me? That would be a big help.

The police are actually the right people to handle this. They handle reports of sexual assaults all the time, including those in the distant past. And the Montgomery County Police have specifically stated they are open to these reports.

So you can either hope for the FBI to maybe, some day, decide that this is somehow within their jurisdiction, or start wondering why, if these are serious allegations, people aren't following up with the police who have an actual stated interest.

The police have said it will take them one month to find the report. The officer who took the report has since passed away. Why would shy file another report? She is not claiming specifically that he was one of the people who gang raped her, she does not remember who raped her because she was drugged that night.

The FBI will not "decide that it is in their jurisdiction" - it would be up to Democrats to push for that and call an investigation. I am not sure they would do that on the sexual assault allegations though. I think, if it happens, it will be over the perjury of the stolen emails and documents.

Why wouldn't she file another report?

If she did, perhaps the police could investigate and she could find out who raped her.

And while she did retract her initial claims that he was a raping, drugging svengali, and it turned into him being just a guy at the party, that she brought it up now, and her initial claims, makes it seem like something someone would want to follow up on.

If her allegations are true, even just her toned down ones, do you want Kavanaugh on the court? Why not file a police report in an attempt to make sure he faces justice instead of being one?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

And yet unfortunately the liberals decided not to focus on these things but instead of an allegation of sexual assault that had zero evidence to back it up.

Zero evidence? Julie Swetnick is a woman with an impeccable reputation. She was at 10 parties where Kavanaugh was spiking the punch bowl and gang raping women. She had 4 witnesses that could back up her story but Trump made sure the FBI would not investigate her claim.

Is this supposed to be a joke. This allegation blew the whole case for the Democrats. Not believable at all.

I know that when I head out to a gang rape, I always pack a punch bowl. It adds a touch of class.

Anybody who thinks that a 20 year old woman who went to Gaithersburg High is going to be hanging out with a bunch of 16-17 year old Georgetown Prep students on 10 different occasions clearly never went to private school in this area.

And punch bowls? What high school party have you ever seen a punch bowl at?

I went to public school in MoCo. While in high school I hung out with many prep school kids - including kids from Georgetown Prep. No crazy animal house parties for us (we were NOT the Brett Kavanaugh type of high schoolers). But we certainly socialized together and we were all kids were from affluent families. I'm not sure why posters are suggesting that it impossible that public school and private school kids didn't mix. Depending on the neighborhood, we certainly did.

Swetnick was 20 years old hanging out with 16-17 year old kids not once but 10 times. There was a spiked punch bowl and a line of guys waiting to rape drunk girls. Where are all the other rape victims? Who continues going to these parties afterwards?

Brock Turner's victim was also in her 20s, a college graduate. Do you think she was lying about being at the frat party?

There were two witnesses who pulled her away so there was proof and it also was reported immediately. Attending a frat party in your early 20's is not the same thing as attending a high school party.

she said they were mixed aged parties and had kids from high school and college.

Yes she did say that and what a credible witness she is. There is not one witness to back her story up. If these boys were doing this to multiple girls there would be more victims. Correct? She also never stated that kavanaugh participated in the rape. He stood by the punch bowl.

She had witnesses who were willing to speak with the FBI.

Funny how none of them corroborated her story.

HAve the FBI interviewed her????? NO

Has she gone to the police to follow up on this terrible crime?
No.

The vast majority of sexual assaults go unreported. It doesn't make the crimes less terrible. It means people don't want to be victimized again (which is exactly what has happened to Dr. Ford, Ramirez and Swetnick). We had many, many posters on these kavanaugh threads who shared their stories of sexual assault and most of them had not reported them to the police.

But it hasn't gone unreported. She chose to enter the public arena with it.

Why enter the public arena, but not file a police report?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

LOL,when questioned what she was doing at HS parties at the age of 20/21 she said that the people at these parties were "mixed age" with people anywhere between "15/16 to 25...maybe more". 15 year old Catholic prep-school kids hanging out with 25+ year old adults from Gaithersburg on 10 different instances? Right....

I time stamped the point in the interview if anybody wants a good laugh.

https://youtu.be/hq_aFCg6bKY?t=150

This is what certain people think should end a man's career? Sad that some people take her seriously. In the end though she probably helped secure Kavanaugh's confirmation. Susan Collins specifically cited Swetnick when she stated that the presumption of innocence needs to be maintained and announced she would vote yes on the confirmation.

I agree. And I applaud Collins for having the sense to know when a smear campaign is afoot, as opposed to credible allegations.

Collins just accepted a six figure ad buy on her behalf from Judicial Action Network as a reward for her yes vote. You really want to talk about Susan “Gimme my Money” Collins?

Good for her! So she's supposed to just do nothing to help her own campaign, even as liberals raised money for her opponent if she voted no on the confirmation? Which she did - glad she didn't let the blackmailing liberals take control of her vote.

What do you have to say about her opponent who accepted all those donations against Collins' no vote? Nothing? Surprise, surprise.

Collins is scum.

She's a hero and an independent thinker. Wish I lived in Maine so I could vote for her.

She wishes you did too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And then she totally retracts her sworn statement where she said Kavanaugh and Judge spiked the punch bowl. Now she says merely, they were "near" the punch bowl. Sorry, this woman is lying. Anyone who insists otherwise just looks idiotic.

No she did not.

No she did not what? Did you watch the video? She completely backpeddles when asked about the punch bowl. She knows she can't claim they spiked the punch, but by golly, they were standing nearby! And later, the four names she provides as having gone with her to these parties: one says they have no recollection of any of this, one is dead, and two aren't responding. Oh, Julie. What a farce.

Did you actually read her sworn statement? She didn't retract anything. She stuck with her sworn statement.
She knew him to be lecherous and grope women - she saw that. She said how she saw him behaving at these parties and what was going on around him. Her sworn statement is important in light of the other two accusations. Also a lot depends on what the other witnesses she has tell the FBI. Hopefully the FBI will do a real investigation in the future.

I'm wondering whether YOU actually read her sworn statement. Here is the part specifically about the punch bowl:

"During the years 1981-82, I became aware of efforts by Mark Judge, Brett Kavanaugh and others to "spike" the "punch" at house parties I attended with drugs and/or grain alcohol so as to cause girls to lose their inhibitions and their ability to say "No."

But in her interview, when specifically questioned about these allegations, she walks it back to say, well, they were standing *near* the punch bowl. What a bunch of BS.

Became aware does not say saw. Became aware means that she saw things that made her put 2 and 2 together and realize what was going on. This is why the FBI should investigate and not yahoos with a computer who like to parse words. This is what that means in court testimony. She did not see it, but she saw other things that made her realize what was happening.

This is what the police should investigate. If only she would report it. After all, she said everyone in the county was aware of it!

(Does this stuff remind anyone else of the McMartin Preschool case?)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

LOL,when questioned what she was doing at HS parties at the age of 20/21 she said that the people at these parties were "mixed age" with people anywhere between "15/16 to 25...maybe more". 15 year old Catholic prep-school kids hanging out with 25+ year old adults from Gaithersburg on 10 different instances? Right....

I time stamped the point in the interview if anybody wants a good laugh.

https://youtu.be/hq_aFCg6bKY?t=150

This is what certain people think should end a man's career? Sad that some people take her seriously. In the end though she probably helped secure Kavanaugh's confirmation. Susan Collins specifically cited Swetnick when she stated that the presumption of innocence needs to be maintained and announced she would vote yes on the confirmation.

I agree. And I applaud Collins for having the sense to know when a smear campaign is afoot, as opposed to credible allegations.

Collins just accepted a six figure ad buy on her behalf from Judicial Action Network as a reward for her yes vote. You really want to talk about Susan “Gimme my Money” Collins?

Good for her! So she's supposed to just do nothing to help her own campaign, even as liberals raised money for her opponent if she voted no on the confirmation? Which she did - glad she didn't let the blackmailing liberals take control of her vote.

What do you have to say about her opponent who accepted all those donations against Collins' no vote? Nothing? Surprise, surprise.

Collins is scum.

She's a hero and an independent thinker. Wish I lived in Maine so I could vote for her.

A bunch of people in Maine are very unhappy with her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

And yet unfortunately the liberals decided not to focus on these things but instead of an allegation of sexual assault that had zero evidence to back it up.

Zero evidence? Julie Swetnick is a woman with an impeccable reputation. She was at 10 parties where Kavanaugh was spiking the punch bowl and gang raping women. She had 4 witnesses that could back up her story but Trump made sure the FBI would not investigate her claim.

Is this supposed to be a joke. This allegation blew the whole case for the Democrats. Not believable at all.

I know that when I head out to a gang rape, I always pack a punch bowl. It adds a touch of class.

Anybody who thinks that a 20 year old woman who went to Gaithersburg High is going to be hanging out with a bunch of 16-17 year old Georgetown Prep students on 10 different occasions clearly never went to private school in this area.

And punch bowls? What high school party have you ever seen a punch bowl at?

I went to public school in MoCo. While in high school I hung out with many prep school kids - including kids from Georgetown Prep. No crazy animal house parties for us (we were NOT the Brett Kavanaugh type of high schoolers). But we certainly socialized together and we were all kids were from affluent families. I'm not sure why posters are suggesting that it impossible that public school and private school kids didn't mix. Depending on the neighborhood, we certainly did.

Swetnick was 20 years old hanging out with 16-17 year old kids not once but 10 times. There was a spiked punch bowl and a line of guys waiting to rape drunk girls. Where are all the other rape victims? Who continues going to these parties afterwards?

Brock Turner's victim was also in her 20s, a college graduate. Do you think she was lying about being at the frat party?

There were two witnesses who pulled her away so there was proof and it also was reported immediately. Attending a frat party in your early 20's is not the same thing as attending a high school party.

she said they were mixed aged parties and had kids from high school and college.

Yes she did say that and what a credible witness she is. There is not one witness to back her story up. If these boys were doing this to multiple girls there would be more victims. Correct? She also never stated that kavanaugh participated in the rape. He stood by the punch bowl.

She had witnesses who were willing to speak with the FBI.

Funny how none of them corroborated her story.

HAve the FBI interviewed her????? NO

Has she gone to the police to follow up on this terrible crime?
No.

The vast majority of sexual assaults go unreported. It doesn't make the crimes less terrible. It means people don't want to be victimized again (which is exactly what has happened to Dr. Ford, Ramirez and Swetnick). We had many, many posters on these kavanaugh threads who shared their stories of sexual assault and most of them had not reported them to the police.

But it hasn't gone unreported. She chose to enter the public arena with it.

Why enter the public arena, but not file a police report?

???? how many times do we need to cover this?
TIRESOME

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And then she totally retracts her sworn statement where she said Kavanaugh and Judge spiked the punch bowl. Now she says merely, they were "near" the punch bowl. Sorry, this woman is lying. Anyone who insists otherwise just looks idiotic.

No she did not.

No she did not what? Did you watch the video? She completely backpeddles when asked about the punch bowl. She knows she can't claim they spiked the punch, but by golly, they were standing nearby! And later, the four names she provides as having gone with her to these parties: one says they have no recollection of any of this, one is dead, and two aren't responding. Oh, Julie. What a farce.

Did you actually read her sworn statement? She didn't retract anything. She stuck with her sworn statement.
She knew him to be lecherous and grope women - she saw that. She said how she saw him behaving at these parties and what was going on around him. Her sworn statement is important in light of the other two accusations. Also a lot depends on what the other witnesses she has tell the FBI. Hopefully the FBI will do a real investigation in the future.

I'm wondering whether YOU actually read her sworn statement. Here is the part specifically about the punch bowl:

"During the years 1981-82, I became aware of efforts by Mark Judge, Brett Kavanaugh and others to "spike" the "punch" at house parties I attended with drugs and/or grain alcohol so as to cause girls to lose their inhibitions and their ability to say "No."

But in her interview, when specifically questioned about these allegations, she walks it back to say, well, they were standing *near* the punch bowl. What a bunch of BS.

Became aware does not say saw. Became aware means that she saw things that made her put 2 and 2 together and realize what was going on. This is why the FBI should investigate and not yahoos with a computer who like to parse words. This is what that means in court testimony. She did not see it, but she saw other things that made her realize what was happening.

This is what the police should investigate. If only she would report it. After all, she said everyone in the county was aware of it!

(Does this stuff remind anyone else of the McMartin Preschool case?)

No. It does remind me of OJ though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OMG. I just watched this. She claims Kavanaugh was wearing "his Georgetown Prep uniform" when she met him. Um, there IS NO GP UNIFORM. A jacket and tie, but no uniform. She said she thinks he was "proud" of his uniform. Wow, that's not a lie at all. She's *completely* believable.

You literally just described a school uniform.

A bunch of boys prep schools have the uniform of a jacket and tie. How would it identify Georgetown Prep vs an entirely different boys school?

She said he was wearing a basketball team uniform from his school.

Do you have a source? I haven't read that one.

All dozen of these parties happened during basketball season? And after games, for him to be wearing his uniform? And he'd go to these parties sweaty and gross?

I am a few years younger than Kavanaugh and did not hang out with private school kids, but that still doesn't seem particularly plausible.

Combine the oddness with the lack of the other gang-raped women speaking out, or other people talking about drunken orgy parties (if she got the rape aspect wrong, as she seemed to walk back in the NBC interview), and none of it passes the smell test.

She had other people who were willing to speak with the FBI only. After seeing the trash treatment and picking apart of meaningless details, I can understand why a victim or a witness would ONLY want to talk to the FBI.

They'd rather go to talk to the FBI, which is under the EXECUTIVE BRANCH, than the police?

Please.

They aren't filing a police report because they don't want to dig in further than they have and actually get in trouble for a false report.

You are making ZERO SENSE.

Swetnick already wrote a sworn statement. It would have to be actually investigated with a REAL INVESTIGATION by the FBI. If it is found that she lied, then she could be put in jail and lose her security clearance.
Remember, she is ONE OF THE PEOPLE who asked for a real investigation by the FBI. Who resisted a real investigation by the FBI? KAvanaugh.

A sworn affidavit does not have to be investigated by the FBI.
If this truly happened, and Kavanaugh is truly the monster her affidavit made him out to be (and not the boy at parties she later described), then surely it would be worth her going to the police to file a report and follow up. The police have explicitly said they would investigate.

But she's not interested in having the police investigate.

That doesn't speak well of her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

LOL,when questioned what she was doing at HS parties at the age of 20/21 she said that the people at these parties were "mixed age" with people anywhere between "15/16 to 25...maybe more". 15 year old Catholic prep-school kids hanging out with 25+ year old adults from Gaithersburg on 10 different instances? Right....

I time stamped the point in the interview if anybody wants a good laugh.

https://youtu.be/hq_aFCg6bKY?t=150

This is what certain people think should end a man's career? Sad that some people take her seriously. In the end though she probably helped secure Kavanaugh's confirmation. Susan Collins specifically cited Swetnick when she stated that the presumption of innocence needs to be maintained and announced she would vote yes on the confirmation.

I agree. And I applaud Collins for having the sense to know when a smear campaign is afoot, as opposed to credible allegations.

Collins just accepted a six figure ad buy on her behalf from Judicial Action Network as a reward for her yes vote. You really want to talk about Susan “Gimme my Money” Collins?

Good for her! So she's supposed to just do nothing to help her own campaign, even as liberals raised money for her opponent if she voted no on the confirmation? Which she did - glad she didn't let the blackmailing liberals take control of her vote.

What do you have to say about her opponent who accepted all those donations against Collins' no vote? Nothing? Surprise, surprise.

Collins is scum.

She's a hero and an independent thinker. Wish I lived in Maine so I could vote for her.

A bunch of people in Maine are very unhappy with her.

And a bunch of other people in Maine - and elsewhere - are thrilled with her.