Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 5

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:When you get to the point where you have to write an op ed in a major newspaper defending yourself, you are a joke. Stop the farce and step down. Have a little bit of self respect. You are embarrassing yourself and your family.

There was no need for him to defend himself, he had a chance to do that at the hearing. He prepared for that hearing, including a written statement, and had plenty of advanced knowledge of what he was being accused of. So he is either unable to keep his cool after being thoroughly prepared or his tactic was deliberate to win the President over. In any case, his article in the WSJ is his tactic to solidify support from the Republican base, he clearly wants this job more than anything.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:1) BK *lied* under oath about his drinking. Doesn't matter why, or what pressures were on him, or that the drinking took place when he was younger. A SCOTUS should *never* lie under oath. The truly sad part about this is that if he had not lied about his drinking (which we all would have chalked up to as typical highschool/college behavior), we would be more likely to believe him about the Ford assault claims.

2) BK was clearly partisan when it mattered. Before the SJC, televised before the nation, he made clearly biased claims about the Democratic Party and the Clintons.

1. No he didn’t.
2. No he wasn’t.

I think it is crazy that these insane allegations were thrown at him and you expect him to respond in a calm manner.
I also think it is telling that your arguments for not confirming him have moved throughout this confirmation. A sign that you are prepared to throw anything at him to derail the nomination.

Gee, who has had endless crap thrown at her and taken it FOR HOURS at a time without cracking?

Hillary can take it. He is getting a taste of his own bitter medicine. It was so laughable he blamed the Clintons. Kavanaugh can dish it out but he can't take it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If we truly believe the Supreme Court should be above politics and not subject to public whims, campaigning for the position should be disqualifying.

Up until now, it was

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Brett Kavanaugh WSJ Op-ed Oct 4, 2018:
Trust me, how I behaved during that testimony is not who I am, and I would not be that way on the Supreme Court.

President Donald J. Trump, Sept 27, 2018:
"Judge Kavanaugh showed America exactly why I nominated him."


Kavanaugh supporters care to discuss?


He’s a person who fights for what he knows is right. Why is that so hard to understand?

1) Kavanaugh: the person at the hearing is not who I am.

2) Trump: the person at the hearing is exactly who he is and that’s why I nominated him.

3) Discuss

He stated it pretty clearly in his piece.
As a judge, he is even-tempered and unbiased.
As a father and husband who is wrongly accused of heinous acts, he will aggressively defend HIMSELF against such attacks.

Not sure why this is so hard for you to understand.

His job that day was to show up as a judge. That he was incapable of doing so is disqualifying.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

He was offensive at the hearing, and I don't believe for a minute that wasn't his true self.

This is corroborated by his op-ed that continues with the entitlement and whine.

No professional I know would have behaved like that on the stand. My husband has had to engage in a similar manner in a highly stressful situation with repeated attacks on his personal integrity and morals, and kept his cool admirably.

Did those accusations include such heinous acts as attempted rape, rape, gang rape and attempted murder?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

He was offensive at the hearing, and I don't believe for a minute that wasn't his true self.

This is corroborated by his op-ed that continues with the entitlement and whine.

No professional I know would have behaved like that on the stand. My husband has had to engage in a similar manner in a highly stressful situation with repeated attacks on his personal integrity and morals, and kept his cool admirably.

Did those accusations include such heinous acts as attempted rape, rape, gang rape and attempted murder?

Character is how you act when you're under pressure.

He showed his.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Brett Kavanaugh WSJ Op-ed Oct 4, 2018:
Trust me, how I behaved during that testimony is not who I am, and I would not be that way on the Supreme Court.

President Donald J. Trump, Sept 27, 2018:
"Judge Kavanaugh showed America exactly why I nominated him."


Kavanaugh supporters care to discuss?


He’s a person who fights for what he knows is right. Why is that so hard to understand?

1) Kavanaugh: the person at the hearing is not who I am.

2) Trump: the person at the hearing is exactly who he is and that’s why I nominated him.

3) Discuss

He stated it pretty clearly in his piece.
As a judge, he is even-tempered and unbiased.
As a father and husband who is wrongly accused of heinous acts, he will aggressively defend HIMSELF against such attacks.

Not sure why this is so hard for you to understand.

Slow learning curve and .... your brain on pot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

He was offensive at the hearing, and I don't believe for a minute that wasn't his true self.

This is corroborated by his op-ed that continues with the entitlement and whine.

No professional I know would have behaved like that on the stand. My husband has had to engage in a similar manner in a highly stressful situation with repeated attacks on his personal integrity and morals, and kept his cool admirably.

Did those accusations include such heinous acts as attempted rape, rape, gang rape and attempted murder?

Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi, waaaah, sob, Blessed Sacrament.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:BK is obviously not suitable for the supreme court

The question is only.. how low will the senators go? Will they preserve the legitimacy of the supreme court or will they turn it into another partisan and untrustworthy branch of government?

Low. Very low. He will likely be confirmed. And we can all mourn the day he ruined the Supreme Court. Way to go Brett!

Here's the thing - if he were truly an upstanding, for the good-of-the-country, non-partisan guy, he would recognize that his appointment to the S.Ct. is going to undermine the institution, perhaps very significantly and for very long time, he will always have an asterisk next to his name just like Thomas (though I suppose, like Thomas, he figures he can just hang with his boot-licking Federalist society guys to make himself feel good), and his nomination is tearing this country apart. If he weren't out for anyone but himself, he would withdraw for those reasons. But, Exhibit A - Brett himself - establishes that he is only out for himself and to hell with the country.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

He was offensive at the hearing, and I don't believe for a minute that wasn't his true self.

This is corroborated by his op-ed that continues with the entitlement and whine.

No professional I know would have behaved like that on the stand. My husband has had to engage in a similar manner in a highly stressful situation with repeated attacks on his personal integrity and morals, and kept his cool admirably.

Did those accusations include such heinous acts as attempted rape, rape, gang rape and attempted murder?

I suspect not. +1000

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:BK is obviously not suitable for the supreme court

The question is only.. how low will the senators go? Will they preserve the legitimacy of the supreme court or will they turn it into another partisan and untrustworthy branch of government?

Low. Very low. He will likely be confirmed. And we can all mourn the day he ruined the Supreme Court. Way to go Brett!

Here's the thing - if he were truly an upstanding, for the good-of-the-country, non-partisan guy, he would recognize that his appointment to the S.Ct. is going to undermine the institution, perhaps very significantly and for very long time, he will always have an asterisk next to his name just like Thomas (though I suppose, like Thomas, he figures he can just hang with his boot-licking Federalist society guys to make himself feel good), and his nomination is tearing this country apart. If he weren't out for anyone but himself, he would withdraw for those reasons. But, Exhibit A - Brett himself - establishes that he is only out for himself and to hell with the country.

Here's the thing - NO ONE appointed by the President will be acceptable to you. Period. The only people that will see him that way on the wackos on the left, and yes, sadly, there are plenty of you. Look in the mirror and get some help.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:BK is obviously not suitable for the supreme court

The question is only.. how low will the senators go? Will they preserve the legitimacy of the supreme court or will they turn it into another partisan and untrustworthy branch of government?

Low. Very low. He will likely be confirmed. And we can all mourn the day he ruined the Supreme Court. Way to go Brett!

Here's the thing - if he were truly an upstanding, for the good-of-the-country, non-partisan guy, he would recognize that his appointment to the S.Ct. is going to undermine the institution, perhaps very significantly and for very long time, he will always have an asterisk next to his name just like Thomas (though I suppose, like Thomas, he figures he can just hang with his boot-licking Federalist society guys to make himself feel good), and his nomination is tearing this country apart. If he weren't out for anyone but himself, he would withdraw for those reasons. But, Exhibit A - Brett himself - establishes that he is only out for himself and to hell with the country.

Imagine the cringing all the current justices are doing at having this crybaby join their ranks.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

He was offensive at the hearing, and I don't believe for a minute that wasn't his true self.

This is corroborated by his op-ed that continues with the entitlement and whine.

No professional I know would have behaved like that on the stand. My husband has had to engage in a similar manner in a highly stressful situation with repeated attacks on his personal integrity and morals, and kept his cool admirably.

Did those accusations include such heinous acts as attempted rape, rape, gang rape and attempted murder?

Kavanaugh himself investigated whether Hillary Clinton murdered Vince Foster.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

He was offensive at the hearing, and I don't believe for a minute that wasn't his true self.

This is corroborated by his op-ed that continues with the entitlement and whine.

No professional I know would have behaved like that on the stand. My husband has had to engage in a similar manner in a highly stressful situation with repeated attacks on his personal integrity and morals, and kept his cool admirably.

Did those accusations include such heinous acts as attempted rape, rape, gang rape and attempted murder?

Character is how you act when you're under pressure.

He showed his.

She’s been accused of murdering Vince Foster. She was accused of what in Benghazi? Not caring if her friends and employees died? Not doing her job in a way to protect life because she didn’t care enough? Selling out American foreign policy for personal profit?

Kavanaugh is a joke. Whatever else you think about Hillary, she is strong and knows how to keep her cool and be professional

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:BK is obviously not suitable for the supreme court

The question is only.. how low will the senators go? Will they preserve the legitimacy of the supreme court or will they turn it into another partisan and untrustworthy branch of government?

Low. Very low. He will likely be confirmed. And we can all mourn the day he ruined the Supreme Court. Way to go Brett!

Here's the thing - if he were truly an upstanding, for the good-of-the-country, non-partisan guy, he would recognize that his appointment to the S.Ct. is going to undermine the institution, perhaps very significantly and for very long time, he will always have an asterisk next to his name just like Thomas (though I suppose, like Thomas, he figures he can just hang with his boot-licking Federalist society guys to make himself feel good), and his nomination is tearing this country apart. If he weren't out for anyone but himself, he would withdraw for those reasons. But, Exhibit A - Brett himself - establishes that he is only out for himself and to hell with the country.

Here's the thing - NO ONE appointed by the President will be acceptable to you. Period. The only people that will see him that way on the wackos on the left, and yes, sadly, there are plenty of you. Look in the mirror and get some help.

Gorsuch doesn't exist, in your world.