Married NY Times sports reporter viral after being busted allegedly having an affair with married NFL coach

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the gossip vultures are after another woman.

Gross.

Another woman? Please. It’s pretty rare that women are taken down over things like this. How many can you actually name?

The Coldplay lady seemed to take a lot more heat than the man.

Amanda Batula is getting more heat than West Wilson.

Those are both current.

A few rare women. This is not a trend and by far more men’s careers are ruined. It’s only fair that women get to play by the same rules.

I have no problem with people playing by the same rules, which doesn't seem to be happening here or in the other cases above. Those women were demonized more than the men.

If you take a famous man and a no-name woman, then sure, the public fallout is going to be greater for the famous man because no one cares about the no-name woman.

In the examples above, both couples had the same level of fame (or lack thereof) and the woman got way more slaughtered.

Society absolutely holds woman to a higher standard than men. It's wild that you can't acknowledge that.

it's wild you're using this case to make your point. She quit because she knows she was in the wrong. Take it up with her.

You seem to have a pretty hard time grasping the point here. I'm not saying she isn't in the wrong. I'm not even saying she shouldn't be more "in trouble" than Vrabel in this case, given the difference in their careers. But I think she's in far more "trouble" than he is, and part of that is due to the fact that women are blamed more than men in these situations.

If Kamala Harris had had three husbands, she wouldn't have even been the presidential candidate. Meanwhile, look who's in the Oval Office.

Kamala's not the best example given her dating history.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the gossip vultures are after another woman.

Gross.

Stop trying to make the woman the helpless victim. She put herself in the situation where her professionalism and reporting is now questionable. She's a journalist covering him not the other way around.

+1. It's gross paternalism to think that she can't be held accountable for her actions.

That's not remotely the point.

What is your point? That poor little women can't be held responsible for their actions.

I'll try to use small words so you can understand. She can, and should, be held responsible for her actions. The point is that she is dealing with more because she's a woman. If it were a male reporter and a female coach, everyone would make a bigger deal about what the coach did and let the male reporter get away with less.

No, she is being held to a different standard because she's the reporter covering the coach.

I get that's not the narrative you want, but it's the case here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the gossip vultures are after another woman.

Gross.

Another woman? Please. It’s pretty rare that women are taken down over things like this. How many can you actually name?

The Coldplay lady seemed to take a lot more heat than the man.

Amanda Batula is getting more heat than West Wilson.

Those are both current.

A few rare women. This is not a trend and by far more men’s careers are ruined. It’s only fair that women get to play by the same rules.

I have no problem with people playing by the same rules, which doesn't seem to be happening here or in the other cases above. Those women were demonized more than the men.

If you take a famous man and a no-name woman, then sure, the public fallout is going to be greater for the famous man because no one cares about the no-name woman.

In the examples above, both couples had the same level of fame (or lack thereof) and the woman got way more slaughtered.

Society absolutely holds woman to a higher standard than men. It's wild that you can't acknowledge that.

it's wild you're using this case to make your point. She quit because she knows she was in the wrong. Take it up with her.

You seem to have a pretty hard time grasping the point here. I'm not saying she isn't in the wrong. I'm not even saying she shouldn't be more "in trouble" than Vrabel in this case, given the difference in their careers. But I think she's in far more "trouble" than he is, and part of that is due to the fact that women are blamed more than men in these situations.

If Kamala Harris had had three husbands, she wouldn't have even been the presidential candidate. Meanwhile, look who's in the Oval Office.

Kamala's not the best example given her dating history.

She actually is a good example. The Right tried to railroad her the way gossipheads successfully railroaded Dianna.

In both cases, women held to standards that would never be applied to men.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the gossip vultures are after another woman.

Gross.

Another woman? Please. It’s pretty rare that women are taken down over things like this. How many can you actually name?

The Coldplay lady seemed to take a lot more heat than the man.

Amanda Batula is getting more heat than West Wilson.

Those are both current.

A few rare women. This is not a trend and by far more men’s careers are ruined. It’s only fair that women get to play by the same rules.

I have no problem with people playing by the same rules, which doesn't seem to be happening here or in the other cases above. Those women were demonized more than the men.

If you take a famous man and a no-name woman, then sure, the public fallout is going to be greater for the famous man because no one cares about the no-name woman.

In the examples above, both couples had the same level of fame (or lack thereof) and the woman got way more slaughtered.

Society absolutely holds woman to a higher standard than men. It's wild that you can't acknowledge that.

it's wild you're using this case to make your point. She quit because she knows she was in the wrong. Take it up with her.

You seem to have a pretty hard time grasping the point here. I'm not saying she isn't in the wrong. I'm not even saying she shouldn't be more "in trouble" than Vrabel in this case, given the difference in their careers. But I think she's in far more "trouble" than he is, and part of that is due to the fact that women are blamed more than men in these situations.

If Kamala Harris had had three husbands, she wouldn't have even been the presidential candidate. Meanwhile, look who's in the Oval Office.

Kamala's not the best example given her dating history.

She actually is a good example. The Right tried to railroad her the way gossipheads successfully railroaded Dianna.

In both cases, women held to standards that would never be applied to men.

Never? Like never ever?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the gossip vultures are after another woman.

Gross.

Another woman? Please. It’s pretty rare that women are taken down over things like this. How many can you actually name?

The Coldplay lady seemed to take a lot more heat than the man.

Amanda Batula is getting more heat than West Wilson.

Those are both current.

A few rare women. This is not a trend and by far more men’s careers are ruined. It’s only fair that women get to play by the same rules.

I have no problem with people playing by the same rules, which doesn't seem to be happening here or in the other cases above. Those women were demonized more than the men.

If you take a famous man and a no-name woman, then sure, the public fallout is going to be greater for the famous man because no one cares about the no-name woman.

In the examples above, both couples had the same level of fame (or lack thereof) and the woman got way more slaughtered.

Society absolutely holds woman to a higher standard than men. It's wild that you can't acknowledge that.

it's wild you're using this case to make your point. She quit because she knows she was in the wrong. Take it up with her.

You seem to have a pretty hard time grasping the point here. I'm not saying she isn't in the wrong. I'm not even saying she shouldn't be more "in trouble" than Vrabel in this case, given the difference in their careers. But I think she's in far more "trouble" than he is, and part of that is due to the fact that women are blamed more than men in these situations.

If Kamala Harris had had three husbands, she wouldn't have even been the presidential candidate. Meanwhile, look who's in the Oval Office.

Kamala's not the best example given her dating history.

Congrats. You are proving the PP’s point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the gossip vultures are after another woman.

Gross.

Another woman? Please. It’s pretty rare that women are taken down over things like this. How many can you actually name?

The Coldplay lady seemed to take a lot more heat than the man.

Amanda Batula is getting more heat than West Wilson.

Those are both current.

A few rare women. This is not a trend and by far more men’s careers are ruined. It’s only fair that women get to play by the same rules.

I have no problem with people playing by the same rules, which doesn't seem to be happening here or in the other cases above. Those women were demonized more than the men.

If you take a famous man and a no-name woman, then sure, the public fallout is going to be greater for the famous man because no one cares about the no-name woman.

In the examples above, both couples had the same level of fame (or lack thereof) and the woman got way more slaughtered.

Society absolutely holds woman to a higher standard than men. It's wild that you can't acknowledge that.

it's wild you're using this case to make your point. She quit because she knows she was in the wrong. Take it up with her.

You seem to have a pretty hard time grasping the point here. I'm not saying she isn't in the wrong. I'm not even saying she shouldn't be more "in trouble" than Vrabel in this case, given the difference in their careers. But I think she's in far more "trouble" than he is, and part of that is due to the fact that women are blamed more than men in these situations.

If Kamala Harris had had three husbands, she wouldn't have even been the presidential candidate. Meanwhile, look who's in the Oval Office.

Kamala's not the best example given her dating history.

Congrats. You are proving the PP’s point.

You are welcome to put the reporter on a pedestal. Nobody else has to and nobody is celebrating Vrabel either.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the gossip vultures are after another woman.

Gross.

Another woman? Please. It’s pretty rare that women are taken down over things like this. How many can you actually name?

The Coldplay lady seemed to take a lot more heat than the man.

Amanda Batula is getting more heat than West Wilson.

Those are both current.

A few rare women. This is not a trend and by far more men’s careers are ruined. It’s only fair that women get to play by the same rules.

I have no problem with people playing by the same rules, which doesn't seem to be happening here or in the other cases above. Those women were demonized more than the men.

If you take a famous man and a no-name woman, then sure, the public fallout is going to be greater for the famous man because no one cares about the no-name woman.

In the examples above, both couples had the same level of fame (or lack thereof) and the woman got way more slaughtered.

Society absolutely holds woman to a higher standard than men. It's wild that you can't acknowledge that.

it's wild you're using this case to make your point. She quit because she knows she was in the wrong. Take it up with her.

You seem to have a pretty hard time grasping the point here. I'm not saying she isn't in the wrong. I'm not even saying she shouldn't be more "in trouble" than Vrabel in this case, given the difference in their careers. But I think she's in far more "trouble" than he is, and part of that is due to the fact that women are blamed more than men in these situations.

If Kamala Harris had had three husbands, she wouldn't have even been the presidential candidate. Meanwhile, look who's in the Oval Office.

Kamala's not the best example given her dating history.

Congrats. You are proving the PP’s point.

You are welcome to put the reporter on a pedestal. Nobody else has to and nobody is celebrating Vrabel either.

Nobody is doing that sooooo…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the gossip vultures are after another woman.

Gross.

Another woman? Please. It’s pretty rare that women are taken down over things like this. How many can you actually name?

The Coldplay lady seemed to take a lot more heat than the man.

Amanda Batula is getting more heat than West Wilson.

Those are both current.

A few rare women. This is not a trend and by far more men’s careers are ruined. It’s only fair that women get to play by the same rules.

I have no problem with people playing by the same rules, which doesn't seem to be happening here or in the other cases above. Those women were demonized more than the men.

If you take a famous man and a no-name woman, then sure, the public fallout is going to be greater for the famous man because no one cares about the no-name woman.

In the examples above, both couples had the same level of fame (or lack thereof) and the woman got way more slaughtered.

Society absolutely holds woman to a higher standard than men. It's wild that you can't acknowledge that.

it's wild you're using this case to make your point. She quit because she knows she was in the wrong. Take it up with her.

You seem to have a pretty hard time grasping the point here. I'm not saying she isn't in the wrong. I'm not even saying she shouldn't be more "in trouble" than Vrabel in this case, given the difference in their careers. But I think she's in far more "trouble" than he is, and part of that is due to the fact that women are blamed more than men in these situations.

If Kamala Harris had had three husbands, she wouldn't have even been the presidential candidate. Meanwhile, look who's in the Oval Office.

Kamala's not the best example given her dating history.

Congrats. You are proving the PP’s point.

You are welcome to put the reporter on a pedestal. Nobody else has to and nobody is celebrating Vrabel either.

Nobody is doing that sooooo…

Soooo what's your problem? You probably weren't one of her readers before but now she's suddenly very interesting?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the gossip vultures are after another woman.

Gross.

Another woman? Please. It’s pretty rare that women are taken down over things like this. How many can you actually name?

The Coldplay lady seemed to take a lot more heat than the man.

Amanda Batula is getting more heat than West Wilson.

Those are both current.

A few rare women. This is not a trend and by far more men’s careers are ruined. It’s only fair that women get to play by the same rules.

I have no problem with people playing by the same rules, which doesn't seem to be happening here or in the other cases above. Those women were demonized more than the men.

If you take a famous man and a no-name woman, then sure, the public fallout is going to be greater for the famous man because no one cares about the no-name woman.

In the examples above, both couples had the same level of fame (or lack thereof) and the woman got way more slaughtered.

Society absolutely holds woman to a higher standard than men. It's wild that you can't acknowledge that.

it's wild you're using this case to make your point. She quit because she knows she was in the wrong. Take it up with her.

You seem to have a pretty hard time grasping the point here. I'm not saying she isn't in the wrong. I'm not even saying she shouldn't be more "in trouble" than Vrabel in this case, given the difference in their careers. But I think she's in far more "trouble" than he is, and part of that is due to the fact that women are blamed more than men in these situations.

If Kamala Harris had had three husbands, she wouldn't have even been the presidential candidate. Meanwhile, look who's in the Oval Office.

Kamala's not the best example given her dating history.

Congrats. You are proving the PP’s point.

You are welcome to put the reporter on a pedestal. Nobody else has to and nobody is celebrating Vrabel either.

Nobody is doing that sooooo…

Soooo what's your problem? You probably weren't one of her readers before but now she's suddenly very interesting?

I DGAF about her.

This thread however is disgusting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the gossip vultures are after another woman.

Gross.

Another woman? Please. It’s pretty rare that women are taken down over things like this. How many can you actually name?

The Coldplay lady seemed to take a lot more heat than the man.

Amanda Batula is getting more heat than West Wilson.

Those are both current.

A few rare women. This is not a trend and by far more men’s careers are ruined. It’s only fair that women get to play by the same rules.

I have no problem with people playing by the same rules, which doesn't seem to be happening here or in the other cases above. Those women were demonized more than the men.

If you take a famous man and a no-name woman, then sure, the public fallout is going to be greater for the famous man because no one cares about the no-name woman.

In the examples above, both couples had the same level of fame (or lack thereof) and the woman got way more slaughtered.

Society absolutely holds woman to a higher standard than men. It's wild that you can't acknowledge that.

it's wild you're using this case to make your point. She quit because she knows she was in the wrong. Take it up with her.

You seem to have a pretty hard time grasping the point here. I'm not saying she isn't in the wrong. I'm not even saying she shouldn't be more "in trouble" than Vrabel in this case, given the difference in their careers. But I think she's in far more "trouble" than he is, and part of that is due to the fact that women are blamed more than men in these situations.

If Kamala Harris had had three husbands, she wouldn't have even been the presidential candidate. Meanwhile, look who's in the Oval Office.

Kamala's not the best example given her dating history.

Congrats. You are proving the PP’s point.

You are welcome to put the reporter on a pedestal. Nobody else has to and nobody is celebrating Vrabel either.

Nobody is doing that sooooo…

Soooo what's your problem? You probably weren't one of her readers before but now she's suddenly very interesting?

I DGAF about her.

This thread however is disgusting.

You can see yourself out. Getting upset about some philanderers is a pretty poor choice on your part.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the gossip vultures are after another woman.

Gross.

Another woman? Please. It’s pretty rare that women are taken down over things like this. How many can you actually name?

The Coldplay lady seemed to take a lot more heat than the man.

Amanda Batula is getting more heat than West Wilson.

Those are both current.

A few rare women. This is not a trend and by far more men’s careers are ruined. It’s only fair that women get to play by the same rules.

I have no problem with people playing by the same rules, which doesn't seem to be happening here or in the other cases above. Those women were demonized more than the men.

If you take a famous man and a no-name woman, then sure, the public fallout is going to be greater for the famous man because no one cares about the no-name woman.

In the examples above, both couples had the same level of fame (or lack thereof) and the woman got way more slaughtered.

Society absolutely holds woman to a higher standard than men. It's wild that you can't acknowledge that.

it's wild you're using this case to make your point. She quit because she knows she was in the wrong. Take it up with her.

You seem to have a pretty hard time grasping the point here. I'm not saying she isn't in the wrong. I'm not even saying she shouldn't be more "in trouble" than Vrabel in this case, given the difference in their careers. But I think she's in far more "trouble" than he is, and part of that is due to the fact that women are blamed more than men in these situations.

If Kamala Harris had had three husbands, she wouldn't have even been the presidential candidate. Meanwhile, look who's in the Oval Office.

Kamala's not the best example given her dating history.

Congrats. You are proving the PP’s point.

You are welcome to put the reporter on a pedestal. Nobody else has to and nobody is celebrating Vrabel either.

Nobody is doing that sooooo…

Soooo what's your problem? You probably weren't one of her readers before but now she's suddenly very interesting?

I DGAF about her.

This thread however is disgusting.

You can see yourself out. Getting upset about some philanderers is a pretty poor choice on your part.

I'm not upset by the reporter or the coach. I don't know them or work with them so not my circus.

They are consenting adults and will likely face marital/professional consequences from their actions.

The woman does not need a public lynching over this though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the gossip vultures are after another woman.

Gross.

Another woman? Please. It’s pretty rare that women are taken down over things like this. How many can you actually name?

The Coldplay lady seemed to take a lot more heat than the man.

Amanda Batula is getting more heat than West Wilson.

Those are both current.

A few rare women. This is not a trend and by far more men’s careers are ruined. It’s only fair that women get to play by the same rules.

I have no problem with people playing by the same rules, which doesn't seem to be happening here or in the other cases above. Those women were demonized more than the men.

If you take a famous man and a no-name woman, then sure, the public fallout is going to be greater for the famous man because no one cares about the no-name woman.

In the examples above, both couples had the same level of fame (or lack thereof) and the woman got way more slaughtered.

Society absolutely holds woman to a higher standard than men. It's wild that you can't acknowledge that.

it's wild you're using this case to make your point. She quit because she knows she was in the wrong. Take it up with her.

You seem to have a pretty hard time grasping the point here. I'm not saying she isn't in the wrong. I'm not even saying she shouldn't be more "in trouble" than Vrabel in this case, given the difference in their careers. But I think she's in far more "trouble" than he is, and part of that is due to the fact that women are blamed more than men in these situations.

If Kamala Harris had had three husbands, she wouldn't have even been the presidential candidate. Meanwhile, look who's in the Oval Office.

Kamala's not the best example given her dating history.

Congrats. You are proving the PP’s point.

You are welcome to put the reporter on a pedestal. Nobody else has to and nobody is celebrating Vrabel either.

Nobody is doing that sooooo…

Soooo what's your problem? You probably weren't one of her readers before but now she's suddenly very interesting?

I DGAF about her.

This thread however is disgusting.

You can see yourself out. Getting upset about some philanderers is a pretty poor choice on your part.

I'm not upset by the reporter or the coach. I don't know them or work with them so not my circus.

They are consenting adults and will likely face marital/professional consequences from their actions.

The woman does not need a public lynching over this though.

Where are you seeing "lynching" but as a public figure you realize that people are more likely to talk than if she was just some mom from the car pool pickup line, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the gossip vultures are after another woman.

Gross.

Another woman? Please. It’s pretty rare that women are taken down over things like this. How many can you actually name?

The Coldplay lady seemed to take a lot more heat than the man.

Amanda Batula is getting more heat than West Wilson.

Those are both current.

A few rare women. This is not a trend and by far more men’s careers are ruined. It’s only fair that women get to play by the same rules.

I have no problem with people playing by the same rules, which doesn't seem to be happening here or in the other cases above. Those women were demonized more than the men.

If you take a famous man and a no-name woman, then sure, the public fallout is going to be greater for the famous man because no one cares about the no-name woman.

In the examples above, both couples had the same level of fame (or lack thereof) and the woman got way more slaughtered.

Society absolutely holds woman to a higher standard than men. It's wild that you can't acknowledge that.

it's wild you're using this case to make your point. She quit because she knows she was in the wrong. Take it up with her.

You seem to have a pretty hard time grasping the point here. I'm not saying she isn't in the wrong. I'm not even saying she shouldn't be more "in trouble" than Vrabel in this case, given the difference in their careers. But I think she's in far more "trouble" than he is, and part of that is due to the fact that women are blamed more than men in these situations.

If Kamala Harris had had three husbands, she wouldn't have even been the presidential candidate. Meanwhile, look who's in the Oval Office.

Kamala's not the best example given her dating history.

Congrats. You are proving the PP’s point.

The point of dating someone to get ahead professionally and then run for president. No, that wasn't the pp's point. The pp was pretending a woman who did that would be damaged forever not run for president.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the gossip vultures are after another woman.

Gross.

Another woman? Please. It’s pretty rare that women are taken down over things like this. How many can you actually name?

The Coldplay lady seemed to take a lot more heat than the man.

Amanda Batula is getting more heat than West Wilson.

Those are both current.

A few rare women. This is not a trend and by far more men’s careers are ruined. It’s only fair that women get to play by the same rules.

I have no problem with people playing by the same rules, which doesn't seem to be happening here or in the other cases above. Those women were demonized more than the men.

If you take a famous man and a no-name woman, then sure, the public fallout is going to be greater for the famous man because no one cares about the no-name woman.

In the examples above, both couples had the same level of fame (or lack thereof) and the woman got way more slaughtered.

Society absolutely holds woman to a higher standard than men. It's wild that you can't acknowledge that.

it's wild you're using this case to make your point. She quit because she knows she was in the wrong. Take it up with her.

You seem to have a pretty hard time grasping the point here. I'm not saying she isn't in the wrong. I'm not even saying she shouldn't be more "in trouble" than Vrabel in this case, given the difference in their careers. But I think she's in far more "trouble" than he is, and part of that is due to the fact that women are blamed more than men in these situations.

If Kamala Harris had had three husbands, she wouldn't have even been the presidential candidate. Meanwhile, look who's in the Oval Office.

Kamala's not the best example given her dating history.

She actually is a good example. The Right tried to railroad her the way gossipheads successfully railroaded Dianna.

In both cases, women held to standards that would never be applied to men.

Never? Like never ever?

It's sad how little respect people on her have for holding a woman accountable for her behavior.

[Anonymous]

Oh no the poor woman reporter was tricked by the big bad man. It's not her fault.