Forum Index
»
Jobs and Careers
Not one person has been RIFed at my large Agency. Most agency haven't had any one RIFed. Mine hasn't even fired people who were on PIPs. |
Because all of the people at your large agency align with the admin's priorities. That PP is correct, the people who "don't align" have mostly all been DRP'ed, RIF'ed, or at least been made aware. Read literally, this threat applies to no one (no one left). |
PP here. Disagree. We have large sectors of our agency that the admin hates (environmental work type things). |
Same. To another PP’s point, only parts of my agency “align” with the current administration. Some parts certainly do not. But, I’m not going to worry about this. My magic eight ball says future unclear. It is, in fact, all unclear. |
| Is there a universe where a fed who retired in 2018 doesn’t get their pension check? This is a parent and they can’t survive without it. Please serious answers only! |
pension is not appropriated funds. it shouldn't be affected, just like social security shouldn't be affected |
| Pensions are fine. |
Exactly. So Im apparently supposed to listen to all the talk about how stupid the administration is, but then not consider what it means about the intelligence of the current democratic leadership if, given half a year to plan, it cant outsmart the administration to form a winning position/message? If what you’re doing doesn’t work, it’s insanity to keep trying the same thing hoping for a different outcome. |
That is the funniest thing I have read in ages. |
I think DOI is doing RIFs in October so theyre not done yet. I think they re going to do whatever RIFs they plan on doing regardless of the budget situation. |
THIS! Clinton made a tragic miscalculation in allowing SS checks to go out the first time Republicans pulled this stunt. Gingrich lost the battle but might be on the verge of winning the war. |
In that case, the OMB memo was a huge mistake. They don't want agencies to declare people essential and really mean it, as that hurts their ability to come along with further cuts. But they also aren't going to get agencies to actually do large-scale RIFs. Besides not being able to do it in a way that wouldn't get reversed by the courts, most agency heads don't actually want to destroy their own agency. They might want to change it, but not destroy it. And they already had a chance to get rid of the parts they didn't like. |
They can’t agree on a message, plus there is no one remotely compelling in the Senate minority caucus. And health care has never been a winning message even if it is critical and a bunch of people are about to lose it. |
That's lose-lose, since there would be pressure to just pass a funding bill for SSA. |
| We haven’t had any rifs in my medium sized agency. |