Forum Index
»
Jobs and Careers
Part of the problem is that neither side wants to address that. Immigrants, including illegal immigrants, are too important to the economy-- particularly to the businesses that exploit cheap labor. The Republicans don't want to stop illegal immigration. If they did, they'd go after employers. Instead they just want to force them into second-tier status, living without legal protections so that employers can treat them horribly. Going after the individuals is part of how you keep them subjugated and plays well to their base who don't understand what is really going on. |
First, please do not mix legal immigrants with illegal immigrants. It is unfair to law-abiding legal immigrants who enter the country legally. Second, I agree with you that the government should go after employers who knowingly hired illegal immigrants. But those employers are being charged if there are evidence. |
You're kidding. Enforcement is minimal, even with this administration, and even when they're caught, they're usually let off entirely or receive a fine that is less than the money they saved through exploitation. Things like the wall are ridiculous and expensive distractions. Holding employers accountable for verifying status would go much farther if curbing illegal immigration was the goal. You could get some small improvements beyond that by adding more checks on sending money out of the country, including on cryptocurrency exchanges. But of course they're not going to do anything to make things more difficult for the cryptocurrency grifters. |
PP you replied to. I hear you, and I agree with you but only up to a point. America's borders are much more easily controlled than Europe's, for instance. I am a French citizen. There are small boats every day that cross the Mediterranean and the Channel, and they are VERY hard to detect. The borders between EU nations are porous by design, to allow EU citizens some mobility to live and work. It's an immigration nightmare. The US has the money to build actual walls on its southern border (I know it costs billions and some areas are are environmental protection or are underwater) and police them. They can do this, if they really want to. |
Me again. I think my overall point is that treating humans with respect and basic decency is expensive, but worth it in the end. Most of the time, it costs less to turn a blind eye to one' own immigration laws, than it is to enforce them in a humane way. Wealthy nations benefit economically from immigration. They don't benefit from spending massive sums to throw them all out. It's only when recession threatens, and horrible people whip up racism and xenophobia with lies that immigrants are a burden on the nation, that citizens' tolerance to cruelty increase to monstrous levels, and we get the mass murders of previous or current wars, and the heartbreaking mistreatment of the world's most vulnerable populations, migrants and immigrants. |
| OP here - can I request this thread be locked? It'd devolved into political discussion, which was the initial purpose of the thread (i.e. sharing shutdown gossip). |