Official Kamala Harris VP Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Given Dems need Michigan, Whitmer would be a wise choice.

A two woman ticket makes me very nervous (unfortunately), but I do hope Whitmer is out there as an extremely vocal surrogate trying to drive the vote for Kamala in Michigan.

The Dem women are more popular than the men . At least Warren, AOC, and Whitmer are highly popular with Dems .


A two women ticket is bold and revolutionary and can excite younger voters with the history making prospect of it

Please make it AOC or Warren as the VP nominee. Please please please.
I double dog dare you.
-excited Republican

Hahaha, no. They're not stupid. It'll be Kelly, Bashear, Buttigieg or Cooper or maybe Polis.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Given Dems need Michigan, Whitmer would be a wise choice.

A two woman ticket makes me very nervous (unfortunately), but I do hope Whitmer is out there as an extremely vocal surrogate trying to drive the vote for Kamala in Michigan.

The Dem women are more popular than the men . At least Warren, AOC, and Whitmer are highly popular with Dems .


A two women ticket is bold and revolutionary and can excite younger voters with the history making prospect of it

Please make it AOC or Warren as the VP nominee. Please please please.
I double dog dare you.
-excited Republican

AOC and Warren are super super popular with progressives and millennials and two women can drive turn out with the younger vote which means trump is screwed. America loves the shiny and new and Trump is yesterdays news (three time candidate , 78 years old) if a bold and exciting Pres/VP ticket is made for the Dems

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think she can pull it off if she performs well in debates.

Has a strong VP pick


Drives home the truth about Project 2025.

I feel like i'm in the minority about this. I don't want to hear about Trump and Project 2025. Everyone who cares about that is already voting for her. Let's have some positivity. Something to get excited about.

Agree but she has no choice but to focus her campaign on “anything but trump” because the Biden/Harris policies are not gonna do it.

And the thing is—Trump has been President before and the world didn’t burn (apart from Covid pandemic completely shifting the booming economy and momentum he had leading into the 2020 election cycle), so I’m
not sure you can scare up the “it’ll be the end of democracy” boogeyman fearmongering argument twice.

[Anonymous]

Oh, he's coming back with stronger, stricter plans in place, with a vengeful heart for those who wronged him, which are many.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Given Dems need Michigan, Whitmer would be a wise choice.

A two woman ticket makes me very nervous (unfortunately), but I do hope Whitmer is out there as an extremely vocal surrogate trying to drive the vote for Kamala in Michigan.

The Dem women are more popular than the men . At least Warren, AOC, and Whitmer are highly popular with Dems .


A two women ticket is bold and revolutionary and can excite younger voters with the history making prospect of it

Please make it AOC or Warren as the VP nominee. Please please please.
I double dog dare you.
-excited Republican

AOC and Warren are super super popular with progressives and millennials and two women can drive turn out with the younger vote which means trump is screwed. America loves the shiny and new and Trump is yesterdays news (three time candidate , 78 years old) if a bold and exciting Pres/VP ticket is made for the Dems

Do it then.
Pleeeeeeeaaaase do it.
I’m on record as not saying a peep to stand in the way,

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Oh, he's coming back with stronger, stricter plans in place, with a vengeful heart for those who wronged him, which are many.

Thank God

[Anonymous]

Aoc and Warren are the children of Bernie Sanders. Putting them on a powerless position like VP can finally help fix the fissures in the Dem Party between centrists and progressives and help scare D. Trump and Vance because a blue wave of younger millenial turnout like 2018 could happen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think she can pull it off if she performs well in debates.

Has a strong VP pick


Drives home the truth about Project 2025.

I feel like i'm in the minority about this. I don't want to hear about Trump and Project 2025. Everyone who cares about that is already voting for her. Let's have some positivity. Something to get excited about.

Agree but she has no choice but to focus her campaign on “anything but trump” because the Biden/Harris policies are not gonna do it.

And the thing is—Trump has been President before and the world didn’t burn (apart from Covid pandemic completely shifting the booming economy and momentum he had leading into the 2020 election cycle), so I’m
not sure you can scare up the “it’ll be the end of democracy” boogeyman fearmongering argument twice.

There were A LOT of problems before 2020. You've just forgotten them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'll say it.
Democrats don't run women, not because the other Democrats won't vote for women and they're very unpopular (HRC is the frumpiest most annoying white woman you can bring up and she got the popular vote), but because those people don't think women are worthy to be president. That's it.

HRC and Kamala aren’t the best candidates . They laugh foolishly when discussing serious issues like war and mayhem. America likes women that aren’t weird cacklers and say stupid things like “Why am I not 50 points ahead ????”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It seems like it's between Cooper and Bershear.

She needs to pick someone from the “blue wall” if she wants to win. Biden won those narrowly and he was way more moderate than Harris.

I don’t think picking KY governor despite how moderate he is, would be smart.

Maybe I’m underestimating Cooper’s appeal but there’s a lot of ways she loses without Pennsylvania—even if she wins North Carolina.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Given Dems need Michigan, Whitmer would be a wise choice.

A two woman ticket makes me very nervous (unfortunately), but I do hope Whitmer is out there as an extremely vocal surrogate trying to drive the vote for Kamala in Michigan.

Whitmer is campaigning hard for Harris. She’s said she doesn’t want to leave MI.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Given Dems need Michigan, Whitmer would be a wise choice.

A two woman ticket makes me very nervous (unfortunately), but I do hope Whitmer is out there as an extremely vocal surrogate trying to drive the vote for Kamala in Michigan.

The Dem women are more popular than the men . At least Warren, AOC, and Whitmer are highly popular with Dems .


A two women ticket is bold and revolutionary and can excite younger voters with the history making prospect of it

Please make it AOC or Warren as the VP nominee. Please please please.
I double dog dare you.
-excited Republican

AOC and Warren are super super popular with progressives and millennials and two women can drive turn out with the younger vote which means trump is screwed. America loves the shiny and new and Trump is yesterdays news (three time candidate , 78 years old) if a bold and exciting Pres/VP ticket is made for the Dems

Do it then.
Pleeeeeeeaaaase do it.
I’m on record as not saying a peep to stand in the way,

Your own base is poor and likes progressive policies . Cue Kentucky citizens screaming at McConnell attempting to repeal Obamacare leaving them to die.

As soon as the Democrats don’t get afraid of progressives and stop running Wall Street and Silicon Valley/donor approved empty suits like B. Clinton, BO , Biden, and Harris , the Repubs will be in real danger.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It seems like it's between Cooper and Bershear.

She needs to pick someone from the “blue wall” if she wants to win. Biden won those narrowly and he was way more moderate than Harris.

I don’t think picking KY governor despite how moderate he is, would be smart.

Maybe I’m underestimating Cooper’s appeal but there’s a lot of ways she loses without Pennsylvania—even if she wins North Carolina.

Biden's still going to campaign for her. You know this, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'll say it.
Democrats don't run women, not because the other Democrats won't vote for women and they're very unpopular (HRC is the frumpiest most annoying white woman you can bring up and she got the popular vote), but because those people don't think women are worthy to be president. That's it.

HRC and Kamala aren’t the best candidates . They laugh foolishly when discussing serious issues like war and mayhem. America likes women that aren’t weird cacklers and say stupid things like “Why am I not 50 points ahead ????”

I've never thought the Democratic party has run very intelligent people. Obama was a smooth talker, but we can see how they turned out. Bill Clinton is an idiot. Biden is an idiot and for a while was just making the same bland "unity" statements while appeasing really no one at all-he reminds me of Jeb Bush. I don't think you need to be the best candidate at all to win the race. I do think people should be more honest and just say the thing: "I don't think women should be president"

[Anonymous]

I know Warren will sadly always be shafted because she had the nerve to speak up and criticize King Obama about the TPP.

Only who he approves will be the Vp so it willl probably be a dud like Pete or insane liberal like Newsom