Official Kamala Harris VP Thread

[Anonymous]

Sugar baby Harris will need the most puritanical white man she could find as a VP and not someone who bores people to tears like Pete or Kaine

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Definitely not Josh Shapiro!! His office completely mishandled the Ellen Greenberg case when he headed the AG’s office. Crooked as they come. ( or just incompetent)


https://www.pennlive.com/crime/2023/05/parents-500k-investigation-of-ellen-greenbergs-2011-death-uncovers-clues-they-say-point-to-murder.html?outputType=amp

As anti-semitic as the party is today, she can't take on Shapiro.

[Anonymous]

I actually think she should select another woman. Make things shake up so women will feel this is truly history making to have women controlling both Pres and VP.

Whitmer is a good choice to be honest but she is too smart to get in this doomed Dem. contest

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Even her staff hate her. Why would anyone want to work with her as VP.

https://nypost.com/2022/07/15/kamala-harris-staff-exodus-continues-as-top-adviser-speechwriter-leave-posts/


Staff departures galore in 2021 article caller her unprepared and soul destroying. Yeah, she is a real gem.

Okay, now find something more recent. You can't? Because she fixed the problem with new staff who are working together better? That's good to know.

Recently? That's easy. Kamala lying for the psst three years about how sharp and energetic Joe Biden is and has been. She lied right up until the debate on how he had no cognitive problems (after working with him every day)

Is that recent enough for you?

That horse won't run. Try again.

Oh, but it just did and will in the coming weeks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Even her staff hate her. Why would anyone want to work with her as VP.

https://nypost.com/2022/07/15/kamala-harris-staff-exodus-continues-as-top-adviser-speechwriter-leave-posts/


Staff departures galore in 2021 article caller her unprepared and soul destroying. Yeah, she is a real gem.

Okay, now find something more recent. You can't? Because she fixed the problem with new staff who are working together better? That's good to know.

Recently? That's easy. Kamala lying for the psst three years about how sharp and energetic Joe Biden is and has been. She lied right up until the debate on how he had no cognitive problems (after working with him every day)

Is that recent enough for you?

That horse won't run. Try again.

Oh, but it just did and will in the coming weeks.

Ok. Waste your time with that one. The more time you waste, the better for the Dems.

[Anonymous]

Given Dems need Michigan, Whitmer would be a wise choice.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think she can pull it off if she performs well in debates.

Has a strong VP pick


Drives home the truth about Project 2025.

I feel like i'm in the minority about this. I don't want to hear about Trump and Project 2025. Everyone who cares about that is already voting for her. Let's have some positivity. Something to get excited about.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I've met Mark Kelly. Great guy, but I just feel like he's not the right person. I'm guessing Cooper or Beshear.

Why?

Just a silly instinct, but after thinking about it more, i was wrong. He probably is the right guy -great guy, great story, and well liked senator from a key battleground state.

Exactly -- he would be the one to be able to pull the most votes away from Trump IMHO. I'm a moderate and vote for whose policies I align with the most which historically lean Republican but I voted Biden last term and was not happy at all with Harris. I don't think she will serve as the best POTUS, but with Kelly as VP I'd feel much better and then in 4 years he'd become POTUS in a landslide probably.

Ok! I am down with this vision. Let's do it!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Given Dems need Michigan, Whitmer would be a wise choice.

A two woman ticket makes me very nervous (unfortunately), but I do hope Whitmer is out there as an extremely vocal surrogate trying to drive the vote for Kamala in Michigan.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Given Dems need Michigan, Whitmer would be a wise choice.

A two woman ticket makes me very nervous (unfortunately), but I do hope Whitmer is out there as an extremely vocal surrogate trying to drive the vote for Kamala in Michigan.

The Dem women are more popular than the men . At least Warren, AOC, and Whitmer are highly popular with Dems .


A two women ticket is bold and revolutionary and can excite younger voters with the history making prospect of it

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Given Dems need Michigan, Whitmer would be a wise choice.

A two woman ticket makes me very nervous (unfortunately), but I do hope Whitmer is out there as an extremely vocal surrogate trying to drive the vote for Kamala in Michigan.

The Dem women are more popular than the men . At least Warren, AOC, and Whitmer are highly popular with Dems .


A two women ticket is bold and revolutionary and can excite younger voters with the history making prospect of it

I would love any of them on the ticket and agree.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If she is the nominee it doesn’t much matter who she picks. Anyone she selects would be crazy to accept. She will drag that person down with her. She is abysmal.

And let me just say that when she loses it won’t be because of “racism” or “misogyny” or any other excuse the liberals will blame it on. It’s because she is horrendous and a failure. And because people don’t want 4 more years of the Biden/Harris policies.

Boy, you’re working hard to spread your lies.
She’s been great and so has Joe.

Well I’m a NP and agree with the person above you.
That won’t stop the Democrat voters and media from trying very hard to hammer the “it’s because the country is racist and misogynistic” mantra for the next four years. Jen Psaki has already started putting out there as the reason Kamala can’t win, and she said it last week, long before Biden even stepped aside.

But if they are pretty sure she won’t win, this gets her out of the way politically. They can all get behind her, write this one off as a loss, and still be able to move her aside after the race is over. If Biden had stayed in and lost, they would have had to deal with her expectation of being the party’s nominee in 2028. And nobody wants that—but there would be no way around it without making their own party look misogynistic and racist.

[Anonymous]

I'll say it.
Democrats don't run women, not because the other Democrats won't vote for women and they're very unpopular (HRC is the frumpiest most annoying white woman you can bring up and she got the popular vote), but because those people don't think women are worthy to be president. That's it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Given Dems need Michigan, Whitmer would be a wise choice.

A two woman ticket makes me very nervous (unfortunately), but I do hope Whitmer is out there as an extremely vocal surrogate trying to drive the vote for Kamala in Michigan.

The Dem women are more popular than the men . At least Warren, AOC, and Whitmer are highly popular with Dems .


A two women ticket is bold and revolutionary and can excite younger voters with the history making prospect of it

Please make it AOC or Warren as the VP nominee. Please please please.
I double dog dare you.
-excited Republican

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I've met Mark Kelly. Great guy, but I just feel like he's not the right person. I'm guessing Cooper or Beshear.

Why?

Just a silly instinct, but after thinking about it more, i was wrong. He probably is the right guy -great guy, great story, and well liked senator from a key battleground state.

Exactly -- he would be the one to be able to pull the most votes away from Trump IMHO. I'm a moderate and vote for whose policies I align with the most which historically lean Republican but I voted Biden last term and was not happy at all with Harris. I don't think she will serve as the best POTUS, but with Kelly as VP I'd feel much better and then in 4 years he'd become POTUS in a landslide probably.

Ok! I am down with this vision. Let's do it!

Not a chance in the world that the Dems will put Kelly on that ticket. Zero.