VA Democratic House candidate performed sex acts online for tips

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sex work is real work. Sex between consenting adults should never be shamed. It's not immoral and if someone has a problem with it that's on them, not the person or people that are involved. I don't see what the problem is, other than there are conservatives that think there's some moral failing because they're ashamed of sex.

This is not about "sex between consenting adults."
It is about soliciting money to allow others to watch you have sex online. THAT is the part that is immoral. And, then to top it off with running for public office.

Had they just kept their sex acts in their bedroom and private, nobody would take issue. Once you take your sex acts public for others to "participate in" it becomes immoral, IMO.

And, "sex work is real work" is false. In most places, it is illegal.

I'm the pp you replied to. I do not find it immoral. If she is a consenting adult and someone wants to pay to watch her have sex or even pay to have sex with her, then that is not immoral. They are adults and she is of her own free will.

Good point. Do you have the token to USD exchange rate so I can contribute to her campaign?
LMAO.

I know people that have done sex work. If they're consenting adults and they are not coerced then I see nothing wrong with it. For some people, it's the only way they can make any kind of meaningful income. Shaming people for this is wrong.

It's immoral because (cannot elaborate further)...

Then when cannot elaborate further, make middle school level joke about watching the video.

DP. A moral argument: She and/or her husband appear to either enjoy humiliation or at least the appearance of humiliation. That would be mocking the institution of marriage. Assuming it's an act, that's a deontological violation. Man is a noble animal, not some coarse beast.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sex work is real work. Sex between consenting adults should never be shamed. It's not immoral and if someone has a problem with it that's on them, not the person or people that are involved. I don't see what the problem is, other than there are conservatives that think there's some moral failing because they're ashamed of sex.

This is not about "sex between consenting adults."
It is about soliciting money to allow others to watch you have sex online. THAT is the part that is immoral. And, then to top it off with running for public office.

Had they just kept their sex acts in their bedroom and private, nobody would take issue. Once you take your sex acts public for others to "participate in" it becomes immoral, IMO.

And, "sex work is real work" is false. In most places, it is illegal.

I'm the pp you replied to. I do not find it immoral. If she is a consenting adult and someone wants to pay to watch her have sex or even pay to have sex with her, then that is not immoral. They are adults and she is of her own free will.

Good point. Do you have the token to USD exchange rate so I can contribute to her campaign?
LMAO.

I know people that have done sex work. If they're consenting adults and they are not coerced then I see nothing wrong with it. For some people, it's the only way they can make any kind of meaningful income. Shaming people for this is wrong.

It's immoral because (cannot elaborate further)...

Then when cannot elaborate further, make middle school level joke about watching the video.

DP. A moral argument: She and/or her husband appear to either enjoy humiliation or at least the appearance of humiliation. That would be mocking the institution of marriage. Assuming it's an act, that's a deontological violation. Man is a noble animal, not some coarse beast.

Lol wut.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sex work is real work. Sex between consenting adults should never be shamed. It's not immoral and if someone has a problem with it that's on them, not the person or people that are involved. I don't see what the problem is, other than there are conservatives that think there's some moral failing because they're ashamed of sex.

This is not about "sex between consenting adults."
It is about soliciting money to allow others to watch you have sex online. THAT is the part that is immoral. And, then to top it off with running for public office.

Had they just kept their sex acts in their bedroom and private, nobody would take issue. Once you take your sex acts public for others to "participate in" it becomes immoral, IMO.

And, "sex work is real work" is false. In most places, it is illegal.

I'm the pp you replied to. I do not find it immoral. If she is a consenting adult and someone wants to pay to watch her have sex or even pay to have sex with her, then that is not immoral. They are adults and she is of her own free will.

Good point. Do you have the token to USD exchange rate so I can contribute to her campaign?
LMAO.

I know people that have done sex work. If they're consenting adults and they are not coerced then I see nothing wrong with it. For some people, it's the only way they can make any kind of meaningful income. Shaming people for this is wrong.

It's immoral because (cannot elaborate further)...

Then when cannot elaborate further, make middle school level joke about watching the video.

DP. A moral argument: She and/or her husband appear to either enjoy humiliation or at least the appearance of humiliation. That would be mocking the institution of marriage. Assuming it's an act, that's a deontological violation. Man is a noble animal, not some coarse beast.

Pretty much all of history has proven this to not be true. But nice aspirations, I suppose.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Out of curiosity I looked up her republican opponent and IMO she’s going to lose (even before this scandal). I’m from western Henrico county and my extended family all still lives there. Her district includes Goochland and Louisa, which are both rural to very rural and moderate to conservative. Not Trumpy, but probably voted for Youngkin.

According to his website Owen was born and raised in that area with parents who also are from there, with GRANDPARENTS who were from there, went to Tucker then UVA. In that area, this matters. He was a small business owner for 20 years and seems very well connected and into the community. I mean he could be related to or a former boss of many of the voters (j/k, but not really kidding).

Gibson had an uphill battle before this story broke. This guy seems like a lock but when she loses they’ll blame this scandal for it.

No it doesn't. This district was redistricted. It is divided between western Henrico and parts of Goochland, but there are a lot more votes in Henrico.

Henrico County (partial) 54,460 86.97%
Goochland County (partial) 8,157 13.03%

I've lived in this area most of my life, and it has changed dramatically since I was younger. Most of the people who live around here now didn't necessarily grow up in Richmond. Hell, a lot of them moved here from NOVA because of the good schools and cheaper big housing. I have never heard of this guy, and like I said, I have lived here most of my life.

I have no idea what will happen now, but before this I would have said she stood an excellent chance to win probably because many of the families in this area knew her or knew people who knew her. This is Abigail Spanberger territory, and she fit the mold. Now I have no idea what will happen.

[Anonymous]

Spanberger and Gibson could probably team up and break the internet. Tokens for both!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sex work is real work. Sex between consenting adults should never be shamed. It's not immoral and if someone has a problem with it that's on them, not the person or people that are involved. I don't see what the problem is, other than there are conservatives that think there's some moral failing because they're ashamed of sex.

This is not about "sex between consenting adults."
It is about soliciting money to allow others to watch you have sex online. THAT is the part that is immoral. And, then to top it off with running for public office.

Had they just kept their sex acts in their bedroom and private, nobody would take issue. Once you take your sex acts public for others to "participate in" it becomes immoral, IMO.

And, "sex work is real work" is false. In most places, it is illegal.

I'm the pp you replied to. I do not find it immoral. If she is a consenting adult and someone wants to pay to watch her have sex or even pay to have sex with her, then that is not immoral. They are adults and she is of her own free will.

Good point. Do you have the token to USD exchange rate so I can contribute to her campaign?
LMAO.

I know people that have done sex work. If they're consenting adults and they are not coerced then I see nothing wrong with it. For some people, it's the only way they can make any kind of meaningful income. Shaming people for this is wrong.

It's immoral because (cannot elaborate further)...

Then when cannot elaborate further, make middle school level joke about watching the video.

DP. A moral argument: She and/or her husband appear to either enjoy humiliation or at least the appearance of humiliation. That would be mocking the institution of marriage. Assuming it's an act, that's a deontological violation. Man is a noble animal, not some coarse beast.

Pretty much all of history has proven this to not be true. But nice aspirations, I suppose.

It shouldn't be a race to the bottom. But, you do you .

[Anonymous]

Issue is that’s it’s not a personal sex tape that was stolen and posted on the internet.

It was a video made for a pornographic website where they performed for an audience and recorded it. Then they solicited MONEY for people to view them having sex. Sorry, you can’t not claim it was a violation of your privacy if you knew and got paid to perform sex acts online.

Not someone that shows good judgement.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sex work is real work. Sex between consenting adults should never be shamed. It's not immoral and if someone has a problem with it that's on them, not the person or people that are involved. I don't see what the problem is, other than there are conservatives that think there's some moral failing because they're ashamed of sex.

This is not about "sex between consenting adults."
It is about soliciting money to allow others to watch you have sex online. THAT is the part that is immoral. And, then to top it off with running for public office.

Had they just kept their sex acts in their bedroom and private, nobody would take issue. Once you take your sex acts public for others to "participate in" it becomes immoral, IMO.

And, "sex work is real work" is false. In most places, it is illegal.

I'm the pp you replied to. I do not find it immoral. If she is a consenting adult and someone wants to pay to watch her have sex or even pay to have sex with her, then that is not immoral. They are adults and she is of her own free will.

Good point. Do you have the token to USD exchange rate so I can contribute to her campaign?
LMAO.

I know people that have done sex work. If they're consenting adults and they are not coerced then I see nothing wrong with it. For some people, it's the only way they can make any kind of meaningful income. Shaming people for this is wrong.

It's immoral because (cannot elaborate further)...

Then when cannot elaborate further, make middle school level joke about watching the video.

DP. A moral argument: She and/or her husband appear to either enjoy humiliation or at least the appearance of humiliation. That would be mocking the institution of marriage. Assuming it's an act, that's a deontological violation. Man is a noble animal, not some coarse beast.

I doubt their young children share their humiliation fetish. It's all so tawdry.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Issue is that’s it’s not a personal sex tape that was stolen and posted on the internet.

It was a video made for a pornographic website where they performed for an audience and recorded it. Then they solicited MONEY for people to view them having sex. Sorry, you can’t not claim it was a violation of your privacy if you knew and got paid to perform sex acts online.

Not someone that shows good judgement.

Exactly.

Not someone I'd want as my NP, attorney or representative. Or as a parent in my kids' orbit in some way. Would they supervise a sleep over or be busy streaming and counting their tokens?

They are gross. How will they be able to push the limits farther after this? Sex acts on a stage with an audience?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who are the people who actually pay for this stuff? If you sat down today and started watching porn for the rest of your life you'd never run out of free videos. I mean, maybe that's the problem, but who are these people?

And also, why the hell would you pay to watch this 40 year old madam? She's out of my league but I wouldn't give her a second glance if I saw her on the street. God there are so many losers out there.

Watch the videos. She is hot

Oh man. So that’s what a happy marriage looks like. Lucky guy. Oy vey. I guess I should wish in one hand and sht in the other and see which one fills up first.

I think a lot of men there will secretly vote for her just so that they could see her IRL more often.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who are the people who actually pay for this stuff? If you sat down today and started watching porn for the rest of your life you'd never run out of free videos. I mean, maybe that's the problem, but who are these people?

And also, why the hell would you pay to watch this 40 year old madam? She's out of my league but I wouldn't give her a second glance if I saw her on the street. God there are so many losers out there.

Watch the videos. She is hot

Oh man. So that’s what a happy marriage looks like. Lucky guy. Oy vey. I guess I should wish in one hand and sht in the other and see which one fills up first.

I think a lot of men there will secretly vote for her just so that they could see her IRL more often.

No way. She’s thin but that’s it. Looks terrible.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She’s kinda attractive in some way. But not completely. Not sure how to explain

Very manly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s kinda attractive in some way. But not completely. Not sure how to explain

her face has a lot of extreme nasolabial folds which ages her

I think enough people have looked at her labial folds...

OMG... dying!
DP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She’s a great example for women and should be celebrated.

So long as she is pro choice and anti gun I’ll support her!

A perfect LWNJ example. Thanks for illustrating.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sex work is real work. Sex between consenting adults should never be shamed. It's not immoral and if someone has a problem with it that's on them, not the person or people that are involved. I don't see what the problem is, other than there are conservatives that think there's some moral failing because they're ashamed of sex.

https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1064489.page

THANK YOU. I can't stand LB, but the utter hypocrisy on the part of our resident liberals is so disgusting. Here they are cheering for this woman because she's a Democrat, yet calling LB "slut and whore" - over RUMORS.