VA Democratic House candidate performed sex acts online for tips

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Sex work is real work. Sex between consenting adults should never be shamed. It's not immoral and if someone has a problem with it that's on them, not the person or people that are involved. I don't see what the problem is, other than there are conservatives that think there's some moral failing because they're ashamed of sex.


This is not about "sex between consenting adults."
It is about soliciting money to allow others to watch you have sex online. THAT is the part that is immoral. And, then to top it off with running for public office.

Had they just kept their sex acts in their bedroom and private, nobody would take issue. Once you take your sex acts public for others to "participate in" it becomes immoral, IMO.

And, "sex work is real work" is false. In most places, it is illegal.


This. Also where were the kids when they were live streaming 15+ times? Down the hall? Think about this.

How much money does it make this kind of liability really worth it? IMO it was intoxicating to them, it wasn’t about the money.


Most people’s kids are down the hall when they are having sex.


Are most people's kids down the hall when their parents are filming themselves having sex and then soliciting payment for sex acts? Discuss.
DP
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Issue is that’s it’s not a personal sex tape that was stolen and posted on the internet.

It was a video made for a pornographic website where they performed for an audience and recorded it. Then they solicited MONEY for people to view them having sex. Sorry, you can’t not claim it was a violation of your privacy if you knew and got paid to perform sex acts online.

Not someone that shows good judgement.


Exactly. I have to laugh at the people insisting she's some kind of victim here - as she herself claims! What a joke.
Anonymous
Between this and the Rhode Island state senator filming herself as she was twerking in a bikini, upside down... Democrats proving as always how klassy they are.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Between this and the Rhode Island state senator filming herself as she was twerking in a bikini, upside down... Democrats proving as always how klassy they are.


I’ll take klassy over criminal.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Between this and the Rhode Island state senator filming herself as she was twerking in a bikini, upside down... Democrats proving as always how klassy they are.

Democrats have zero ethics.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Sex work is real work. Sex between consenting adults should never be shamed. It's not immoral and if someone has a problem with it that's on them, not the person or people that are involved. I don't see what the problem is, other than there are conservatives that think there's some moral failing because they're ashamed of sex.


This is not about "sex between consenting adults."
It is about soliciting money to allow others to watch you have sex online. THAT is the part that is immoral. And, then to top it off with running for public office.

Had they just kept their sex acts in their bedroom and private, nobody would take issue. Once you take your sex acts public for others to "participate in" it becomes immoral, IMO.

And, "sex work is real work" is false. In most places, it is illegal.


I'm the pp you replied to. I do not find it immoral. If she is a consenting adult and someone wants to pay to watch her have sex or even pay to have sex with her, then that is not immoral. They are adults and she is of her own free will.

Good point. Do you have the token to USD exchange rate so I can contribute to her campaign?
LMAO.


I know people that have done sex work. If they're consenting adults and they are not coerced then I see nothing wrong with it. For some people, it's the only way they can make any kind of meaningful income. Shaming people for this is wrong.


Struggling lawyer and nurse practitioner in a low cost area need to do porn and prostitution?

This is as trashy as it gets.
Anonymous
Sounds like Lauren Boebert
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Between this and the Rhode Island state senator filming herself as she was twerking in a bikini, upside down... Democrats proving as always how klassy they are.

Democrats have zero ethics.


More than Republicans.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Sounds like Lauren Boebert


Where are the Lauren bobert videos, asking for research purposes
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Between this and the Rhode Island state senator filming herself as she was twerking in a bikini, upside down... Democrats proving as always how klassy they are.

Democrats have zero ethics.


More than Republicans.


No, hon. Just... no.
DP
Anonymous
A politician prostitute, but I repeat myself.

I guess we know we can all get behind her.
Anonymous
Someone is putting a lot of effort removing her videos.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Someone is putting a lot of effort removing her videos.


Imagine being her parents (or his). And their poor kids, who will absolutely be seeing these videos for the rest of their lives. What stupid, stupid people.
Anonymous
Immoral or not. It shows a lack of common sense. The inability to think things through. Unfortunately, she doesn’t appear to be leadership material
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Sex work is real work. Sex between consenting adults should never be shamed. It's not immoral and if someone has a problem with it that's on them, not the person or people that are involved. I don't see what the problem is, other than there are conservatives that think there's some moral failing because they're ashamed of sex.


This is not about "sex between consenting adults."
It is about soliciting money to allow others to watch you have sex online. THAT is the part that is immoral. And, then to top it off with running for public office.

Had they just kept their sex acts in their bedroom and private, nobody would take issue. Once you take your sex acts public for others to "participate in" it becomes immoral, IMO.

And, "sex work is real work" is false. In most places, it is illegal.


I'm the pp you replied to. I do not find it immoral. If she is a consenting adult and someone wants to pay to watch her have sex or even pay to have sex with her, then that is not immoral. They are adults and she is of her own free will.

Good point. Do you have the token to USD exchange rate so I can contribute to her campaign?
LMAO.


I know people that have done sex work. If they're consenting adults and they are not coerced then I see nothing wrong with it. For some people, it's the only way they can make any kind of meaningful income. Shaming people for this is wrong.


Struggling lawyer and nurse practitioner in a low cost area need to do porn and prostitution?

This is as trashy as it gets.


I disagree. Marjorie Taylor Greene's tantric sex guru lover is the ultimate, especially in those gold leggings. She was sleeping with this one, the gym owner, and (I'm assuming, occasionally) her husband at the same time. That's pretty scandalous imo.
Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Go to: