VA Democratic House candidate performed sex acts online for tips

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sex work is real work. Sex between consenting adults should never be shamed. It's not immoral and if someone has a problem with it that's on them, not the person or people that are involved. I don't see what the problem is, other than there are conservatives that think there's some moral failing because they're ashamed of sex.

This is not about "sex between consenting adults."
It is about soliciting money to allow others to watch you have sex online. THAT is the part that is immoral. And, then to top it off with running for public office.

Had they just kept their sex acts in their bedroom and private, nobody would take issue. Once you take your sex acts public for others to "participate in" it becomes immoral, IMO.

And, "sex work is real work" is false. In most places, it is illegal.

This. Also where were the kids when they were live streaming 15+ times? Down the hall? Think about this.

How much money does it make this kind of liability really worth it? IMO it was intoxicating to them, it wasn’t about the money.

Most people’s kids are down the hall when they are having sex.

While you live stream for money? I guess it doesn’t matter where the kids were or if they could have walked in because she told people on the chat where she lived anyway and plus those kids are going to end up seeing those videos unfortunately at some point on the web. So who cares….da fuq?!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sex work is real work. Sex between consenting adults should never be shamed. It's not immoral and if someone has a problem with it that's on them, not the person or people that are involved. I don't see what the problem is, other than there are conservatives that think there's some moral failing because they're ashamed of sex.

This is not about "sex between consenting adults."
It is about soliciting money to allow others to watch you have sex online. THAT is the part that is immoral. And, then to top it off with running for public office.

Had they just kept their sex acts in their bedroom and private, nobody would take issue. Once you take your sex acts public for others to "participate in" it becomes immoral, IMO.

And, "sex work is real work" is false. In most places, it is illegal.

I'm the pp you replied to. I do not find it immoral. If she is a consenting adult and someone wants to pay to watch her have sex or even pay to have sex with her, then that is not immoral. They are adults and she is of her own free will.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sex work is real work. Sex between consenting adults should never be shamed. It's not immoral and if someone has a problem with it that's on them, not the person or people that are involved. I don't see what the problem is, other than there are conservatives that think there's some moral failing because they're ashamed of sex.

This is not about "sex between consenting adults."
It is about soliciting money to allow others to watch you have sex online. THAT is the part that is immoral. And, then to top it off with running for public office.

Had they just kept their sex acts in their bedroom and private, nobody would take issue. Once you take your sex acts public for others to "participate in" it becomes immoral, IMO.

And, "sex work is real work" is false. In most places, it is illegal.

I'm the pp you replied to. I do not find it immoral. If she is a consenting adult and someone wants to pay to watch her have sex or even pay to have sex with her, then that is not immoral. They are adults and she is of her own free will.

Good point. Do you have the token to USD exchange rate so I can contribute to her campaign?
LMAO.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who cares? All she did was violate the terms and conditions of some web site -- seems like a total non-issue.

Is this the kind of person you want as an elected official?

Don’t go there

Better her than the pu$$y grabber rapist tRUMP. Also, she did it with her DH and to pay her college loans. Mad respect to this White Christian lady!!

[Anonymous]

Out of curiosity I looked up her republican opponent and IMO she’s going to lose (even before this scandal). I’m from western Henrico county and my extended family all still lives there. Her district includes Goochland and Louisa, which are both rural to very rural and moderate to conservative. Not Trumpy, but probably voted for Youngkin.

According to his website Owen was born and raised in that area with parents who also are from there, with GRANDPARENTS who were from there, went to Tucker then UVA. In that area, this matters. He was a small business owner for 20 years and seems very well connected and into the community. I mean he could be related to or a former boss of many of the voters (j/k, but not really kidding).

Gibson had an uphill battle before this story broke. This guy seems like a lock but when she loses they’ll blame this scandal for it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Who are the people who actually pay for this stuff? If you sat down today and started watching porn for the rest of your life you'd never run out of free videos. I mean, maybe that's the problem, but who are these people?

And also, why the hell would you pay to watch this 40 year old madam? She's out of my league but I wouldn't give her a second glance if I saw her on the street. God there are so many losers out there.

Watch the videos. She is hot

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m not sure how to feel about this. Can someone link to the pics, that would help me make up my mind as a voter.

Search up "hotwifeexperience" with the quotation marks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Out of curiosity I looked up her republican opponent and IMO she’s going to lose (even before this scandal). I’m from western Henrico county and my extended family all still lives there. Her district includes Goochland and Louisa, which are both rural to very rural and moderate to conservative. Not Trumpy, but probably voted for Youngkin.

According to his website Owen was born and raised in that area with parents who also are from there, with GRANDPARENTS who were from there, went to Tucker then UVA. In that area, this matters. He was a small business owner for 20 years and seems very well connected and into the community. I mean he could be related to or a former boss of many of the voters (j/k, but not really kidding).

Gibson had an uphill battle before this story broke. This guy seems like a lock but when she loses they’ll blame this scandal for it.

I don't think so. A lot of the people in that area are transplant democrats and the old timers are furious on the RE developers because they sold their land and brought the said democrats. RVA has seen a huge increase in population and the original townies are sick and tired of the increasing RE taxes and congestion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Out of curiosity I looked up her republican opponent and IMO she’s going to lose (even before this scandal). I’m from western Henrico county and my extended family all still lives there. Her district includes Goochland and Louisa, which are both rural to very rural and moderate to conservative. Not Trumpy, but probably voted for Youngkin.

According to his website Owen was born and raised in that area with parents who also are from there, with GRANDPARENTS who were from there, went to Tucker then UVA. In that area, this matters. He was a small business owner for 20 years and seems very well connected and into the community. I mean he could be related to or a former boss of many of the voters (j/k, but not really kidding).

Gibson had an uphill battle before this story broke. This guy seems like a lock but when she loses they’ll blame this scandal for it.

I don't think so. A lot of the people in that area are transplant democrats and the old timers are furious on the RE developers because they sold their land and brought the said democrats. RVA has seen a huge increase in population and the original townies are sick and tired of the increasing RE taxes and congestion.

The residents hate the new Democrats so they'd... elect a Democrat?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sex work is real work. Sex between consenting adults should never be shamed. It's not immoral and if someone has a problem with it that's on them, not the person or people that are involved. I don't see what the problem is, other than there are conservatives that think there's some moral failing because they're ashamed of sex.

This is not about "sex between consenting adults."
It is about soliciting money to allow others to watch you have sex online. THAT is the part that is immoral. And, then to top it off with running for public office.

Had they just kept their sex acts in their bedroom and private, nobody would take issue. Once you take your sex acts public for others to "participate in" it becomes immoral, IMO.

And, "sex work is real work" is false. In most places, it is illegal.

I'm the pp you replied to. I do not find it immoral. If she is a consenting adult and someone wants to pay to watch her have sex or even pay to have sex with her, then that is not immoral. They are adults and she is of her own free will.

Good point. Do you have the token to USD exchange rate so I can contribute to her campaign?
LMAO.

I know people that have done sex work. If they're consenting adults and they are not coerced then I see nothing wrong with it. For some people, it's the only way they can make any kind of meaningful income. Shaming people for this is wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sex work is real work. Sex between consenting adults should never be shamed. It's not immoral and if someone has a problem with it that's on them, not the person or people that are involved. I don't see what the problem is, other than there are conservatives that think there's some moral failing because they're ashamed of sex.

This is not about "sex between consenting adults."
It is about soliciting money to allow others to watch you have sex online. THAT is the part that is immoral. And, then to top it off with running for public office.

Had they just kept their sex acts in their bedroom and private, nobody would take issue. Once you take your sex acts public for others to "participate in" it becomes immoral, IMO.

And, "sex work is real work" is false. In most places, it is illegal.

I'm the pp you replied to. I do not find it immoral. If she is a consenting adult and someone wants to pay to watch her have sex or even pay to have sex with her, then that is not immoral. They are adults and she is of her own free will.

Good point. Do you have the token to USD exchange rate so I can contribute to her campaign?
LMAO.

I know people that have done sex work. If they're consenting adults and they are not coerced then I see nothing wrong with it. For some people, it's the only way they can make any kind of meaningful income. Shaming people for this is wrong.

It's immoral because (cannot elaborate further)...

Then when cannot elaborate further, make middle school level joke about watching the video.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sex work is real work. Sex between consenting adults should never be shamed. It's not immoral and if someone has a problem with it that's on them, not the person or people that are involved. I don't see what the problem is, other than there are conservatives that think there's some moral failing because they're ashamed of sex.

This is not about "sex between consenting adults."
It is about soliciting money to allow others to watch you have sex online. THAT is the part that is immoral. And, then to top it off with running for public office.

Had they just kept their sex acts in their bedroom and private, nobody would take issue. Once you take your sex acts public for others to "participate in" it becomes immoral, IMO.

And, "sex work is real work" is false. In most places, it is illegal.

I'm the pp you replied to. I do not find it immoral. If she is a consenting adult and someone wants to pay to watch her have sex or even pay to have sex with her, then that is not immoral. They are adults and she is of her own free will.

Good point. Do you have the token to USD exchange rate so I can contribute to her campaign?
LMAO.

I know people that have done sex work. If they're consenting adults and they are not coerced then I see nothing wrong with it. For some people, it's the only way they can make any kind of meaningful income. Shaming people for this is wrong.

She’s ashamed herself! She tried to take down everything. Unfortunately for her the internet never forgets. LOL.
The only victims here are her children.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sex work is real work. Sex between consenting adults should never be shamed. It's not immoral and if someone has a problem with it that's on them, not the person or people that are involved. I don't see what the problem is, other than there are conservatives that think there's some moral failing because they're ashamed of sex.

This is not about "sex between consenting adults."
It is about soliciting money to allow others to watch you have sex online. THAT is the part that is immoral. And, then to top it off with running for public office.

Had they just kept their sex acts in their bedroom and private, nobody would take issue. Once you take your sex acts public for others to "participate in" it becomes immoral, IMO.

And, "sex work is real work" is false. In most places, it is illegal.

I'm the pp you replied to. I do not find it immoral. If she is a consenting adult and someone wants to pay to watch her have sex or even pay to have sex with her, then that is not immoral. They are adults and she is of her own free will.

Good point. Do you have the token to USD exchange rate so I can contribute to her campaign?
LMAO.

I know people that have done sex work. If they're consenting adults and they are not coerced then I see nothing wrong with it. For some people, it's the only way they can make any kind of meaningful income. Shaming people for this is wrong.

Struggling lawyer and nurse practitioner in a low cost area need to do porn and prostitution?

[Anonymous]

She shouldn’t be ashamed.
It’s just sex.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who are the people who actually pay for this stuff? If you sat down today and started watching porn for the rest of your life you'd never run out of free videos. I mean, maybe that's the problem, but who are these people?

And also, why the hell would you pay to watch this 40 year old madam? She's out of my league but I wouldn't give her a second glance if I saw her on the street. God there are so many losers out there.

Watch the videos. She is hot

Oh man. So that’s what a happy marriage looks like. Lucky guy. Oy vey. I guess I should wish in one hand and sht in the other and see which one fills up first.