Reid Email

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The amount of hate and bigotry on this thread is very saddening and alarming. A little empathy and compassion go a long way, especially when children are involved.

+1

Bigots are increasingly emboldened by the right.

I have empathy and compassion for the transgender kids. I also have empathy and compassion for girls in girls' sports and bathrooms.

Maybe within your own frame--probably "those poor lost souls" rather than "people with knowledge of themselves."

Please justify trans girls in girls' sports. It makes no sense. But, you call people against it "bigots."

1) I didn't call anyone a bigot--I was responding to the pp.
2) They said "I have empathy and compassion" and I was responding to that.

What literally is the percentage of trans girls in girls' sports? Out of all the girls playing, what percentage are trans girls? I would guess less than 1/10th of 1%. Is it really worth making this big of a deal about?

Yes, as they may be in the locker room with biological girls.

So you are freaking out because out of the less than 1/10 of 1% there maybe, just maybe could possibly be one that goes into a locker room at some point--likely changing in a private bathroom stall like most of the other kids do. I can pretty much assure you that even in the 1/10000th chance that happens, the kid isn't going to be getting naked in front of other kids. I don't think my kids have fully changed/showered in front of any peers/or had anyone change in front of them despite 10 years of playing three different sports including swimming-- and they are not transgender--it just isn't the norm any more.
I wonder how you will react when your kid goes to college where there are co-ed communal bathrooms.

I just think there are so many far, far more important things to be spending time/energy on.

Colleges have single sex bathrooms.. what college did you go to that didn’t?!

UVA

So you are not a parent and are just a brand new, current college student.

That explains a lot of these posts.

No, I went to UVA in the 1990s. They had co-ed bathrooms in dorms back then. I have 3 kids: MS, HS, and college-aged kids. You're just very out of touch.

I also went to UVA in the 1990s, love to know which dorms had co-ed bathrooms. Sounds like total BS.

For first year, I think it was Alderman Road--for the hall bathrooms the floors were arranged by gender, but you could use any floor bathroom you wanted. There was no designation of male or female on the bathroom, and it was commonly used by whoever needed it. It was no big deal. I remember being a little surprised when I first saw a guy in the bathroom, but got used to it very quick. Not sexualized at all.

The floors were organized by gender which means the bathroom for the women’s floor was for women. You are so full of crap.

Yep, the "Alderman Road" dorms were suites with their own bathrooms separated by gender. And nobody called them the Alderman Road dorms, they were the New Dorms.

The Old Dorms were gender separated by floor.

Nothing in this story adds up.

+1

Nope, there were suite bathrooms and there were hall bathrooms--and both were Alderman. People colloquially called them "old" and "new".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The amount of hate and bigotry on this thread is very saddening and alarming. A little empathy and compassion go a long way, especially when children are involved.

+1

Bigots are increasingly emboldened by the right.

I have empathy and compassion for the transgender kids. I also have empathy and compassion for girls in girls' sports and bathrooms.

Maybe within your own frame--probably "those poor lost souls" rather than "people with knowledge of themselves."

Please justify trans girls in girls' sports. It makes no sense. But, you call people against it "bigots."

1) I didn't call anyone a bigot--I was responding to the pp.
2) They said "I have empathy and compassion" and I was responding to that.

What literally is the percentage of trans girls in girls' sports? Out of all the girls playing, what percentage are trans girls? I would guess less than 1/10th of 1%. Is it really worth making this big of a deal about?

Yes, as they may be in the locker room with biological girls.

So you are freaking out because out of the less than 1/10 of 1% there maybe, just maybe could possibly be one that goes into a locker room at some point--likely changing in a private bathroom stall like most of the other kids do. I can pretty much assure you that even in the 1/10000th chance that happens, the kid isn't going to be getting naked in front of other kids. I don't think my kids have fully changed/showered in front of any peers/or had anyone change in front of them despite 10 years of playing three different sports including swimming-- and they are not transgender--it just isn't the norm any more.
I wonder how you will react when your kid goes to college where there are co-ed communal bathrooms.

I just think there are so many far, far more important things to be spending time/energy on.

Colleges have single sex bathrooms.. what college did you go to that didn’t?!

UVA

So you are not a parent and are just a brand new, current college student.

That explains a lot of these posts.

No, I went to UVA in the 1990s. They had co-ed bathrooms in dorms back then. I have 3 kids: MS, HS, and college-aged kids. You're just very out of touch.

I also went to UVA in the 1990s, love to know which dorms had co-ed bathrooms. Sounds like total BS.

For first year, I think it was Alderman Road--for the hall bathrooms the floors were arranged by gender, but you could use any floor bathroom you wanted. There was no designation of male or female on the bathroom, and it was commonly used by whoever needed it. It was no big deal. I remember being a little surprised when I first saw a guy in the bathroom, but got used to it very quick. Not sexualized at all.

The floors were organized by gender which means the bathroom for the women’s floor was for women. You are so full of crap.

And yet the bathrooms were regularly used by both genders. And my sister's college at the same time had full co-ed bathrooms. We talked about it at the time with each other. I swear people are just forgetting what their life was like.

+1

We had them in the late 90s in my freshman dorm. W, M, and "coed" bathrooms on each floor.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The amount of hate and bigotry on this thread is very saddening and alarming. A little empathy and compassion go a long way, especially when children are involved.

+1

Bigots are increasingly emboldened by the right.

I have empathy and compassion for the transgender kids. I also have empathy and compassion for girls in girls' sports and bathrooms.

Maybe within your own frame--probably "those poor lost souls" rather than "people with knowledge of themselves."

Please justify trans girls in girls' sports. It makes no sense. But, you call people against it "bigots."

1) I didn't call anyone a bigot--I was responding to the pp.
2) They said "I have empathy and compassion" and I was responding to that.

What literally is the percentage of trans girls in girls' sports? Out of all the girls playing, what percentage are trans girls? I would guess less than 1/10th of 1%. Is it really worth making this big of a deal about?

Yes, as they may be in the locker room with biological girls.

So you are freaking out because out of the less than 1/10 of 1% there maybe, just maybe could possibly be one that goes into a locker room at some point--likely changing in a private bathroom stall like most of the other kids do. I can pretty much assure you that even in the 1/10000th chance that happens, the kid isn't going to be getting naked in front of other kids. I don't think my kids have fully changed/showered in front of any peers/or had anyone change in front of them despite 10 years of playing three different sports including swimming-- and they are not transgender--it just isn't the norm any more.
I wonder how you will react when your kid goes to college where there are co-ed communal bathrooms.

I just think there are so many far, far more important things to be spending time/energy on.

Colleges have single sex bathrooms.. what college did you go to that didn’t?!

UVA

So you are not a parent and are just a brand new, current college student.

That explains a lot of these posts.

No, I went to UVA in the 1990s. They had co-ed bathrooms in dorms back then. I have 3 kids: MS, HS, and college-aged kids. You're just very out of touch.

I also went to UVA in the 1990s, love to know which dorms had co-ed bathrooms. Sounds like total BS.

For first year, I think it was Alderman Road--for the hall bathrooms the floors were arranged by gender, but you could use any floor bathroom you wanted. There was no designation of male or female on the bathroom, and it was commonly used by whoever needed it. It was no big deal. I remember being a little surprised when I first saw a guy in the bathroom, but got used to it very quick. Not sexualized at all.

The floors were organized by gender which means the bathroom for the women’s floor was for women. You are so full of crap.

And yet the bathrooms were regularly used by both genders. And my sister's college at the same time had full co-ed bathrooms. We talked about it at the time with each other. I swear people are just forgetting what their life was like.

That’s not a designated coed bathroom. That’s people just not following the rules. There were no coed bathrooms as the floor bathrooms had toilets and showers. You are a complete liar.

Wow, that's escalating. I'm just describing what my experience was. No one said you had to use/not use any particular bathrooms. Toilets and showers had stalls. And many others agree that in the 90s (and since) co-ed bathrooms are common in college dorms. Sorry I can't precisely remember whether or not a sign was on the door from 30 years back, I just remember that there were regularly mixed genders in the communal hall bathroom and it was no big deal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The 2023 Model Policies don’t limit themselves to bathrooms and lockers. K-12 students participate in school sponsored overnight trips, in which students, staff, and chaperones can share private spaces such as bedrooms, baths, and in some instances beds. Schools currently have no obligation to inform all families involved if a person (student or adult) who identifies as transgender will be sharing these accommodations with the group.

The reason why the 2023 Model Policies guide schools on accommodating transgender students by having the parents (the only one legally allowed to do so) formalizing such identity with the school, is to provide the transgender student with proper accommodations that may involve being included in the accommodations previously mentioned. This is also guiding those who are “exploring whether they are transgender, or not” to use the facilities that correspond with their biological sex until they can formalize their change of identity status, at the same time that protect the rest of the students (particularly girls) from those males who may hide under the flexibility the 2021 (old policy) provides to violate women’s privacy and even commit crimes against them.

This makes a lot of sense. It protects students of all identities while also keeping families informed.

Correct. However, there are certain people at FCPS who are a part of the FLE Committee, at the same time that are heavily involved in political and radical gender identity activism which purposely distort facts and reality, and tirelessly advocates for gender indoctrination for all students. They have rejected the 2023 Model Policies, which they maliciously refer to as the “Don’t Be Trans" School Policies. They act as if their voice and message spoke for everyone. Nevertheless, that appears to be the one voice Superintendent Reid chooses to listen.

As the new school year is about to begin, one can only hope that students inform themselves about what is really happening so that they can form their own opinions and have the wisdom to handle situations they will encounter at school. Likewise, parents have a role to play on educating our kids about these issues as we no longer can afford to outsource that role to the school.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The 2023 Model Policies don’t limit themselves to bathrooms and lockers. K-12 students participate in school sponsored overnight trips, in which students, staff, and chaperones can share private spaces such as bedrooms, baths, and in some instances beds. Schools currently have no obligation to inform all families involved if a person (student or adult) who identifies as transgender will be sharing these accommodations with the group.

The reason why the 2023 Model Policies guide schools on accommodating transgender students by having the parents (the only one legally allowed to do so) formalizing such identity with the school, is to provide the transgender student with proper accommodations that may involve being included in the accommodations previously mentioned. This is also guiding those who are “exploring whether they are transgender, or not” to use the facilities that correspond with their biological sex until they can formalize their change of identity status, at the same time that protect the rest of the students (particularly girls) from those males who may hide under the flexibility the 2021 (old policy) provides to violate women’s privacy and even commit crimes against them.

This makes a lot of sense. It protects students of all identities while also keeping families informed.

Correct. However, there are certain people at FCPS who are a part of the FLE Committee, at the same time that are heavily involved in political and radical gender identity activism which purposely distort facts and reality, and tirelessly advocates for gender indoctrination for all students. They have rejected the 2023 Model Policies, which they maliciously refer to as the “Don’t Be Trans" School Policies. They act as if their voice and message spoke for everyone. Nevertheless, that appears to be the one voice Superintendent Reid chooses to listen.

As the new school year is about to begin, one can only hope that students inform themselves about what is really happening so that they can form their own opinions and have the wisdom to handle situations they will encounter at school. Likewise, parents have a role to play on educating our kids about these issues as we no longer can afford to outsource that role to the school.

Truth!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The 2023 Model Policies don’t limit themselves to bathrooms and lockers. K-12 students participate in school sponsored overnight trips, in which students, staff, and chaperones can share private spaces such as bedrooms, baths, and in some instances beds. Schools currently have no obligation to inform all families involved if a person (student or adult) who identifies as transgender will be sharing these accommodations with the group.

The reason why the 2023 Model Policies guide schools on accommodating transgender students by having the parents (the only one legally allowed to do so) formalizing such identity with the school, is to provide the transgender student with proper accommodations that may involve being included in the accommodations previously mentioned. This is also guiding those who are “exploring whether they are transgender, or not” to use the facilities that correspond with their biological sex until they can formalize their change of identity status, at the same time that protect the rest of the students (particularly girls) from those males who may hide under the flexibility the 2021 (old policy) provides to violate women’s privacy and even commit crimes against them.

This makes a lot of sense. It protects students of all identities while also keeping families informed.

Correct. However, there are certain people at FCPS who are a part of the FLE Committee, at the same time that are heavily involved in political and radical gender identity activism which purposely distort facts and reality, and tirelessly advocates for gender indoctrination for all students. They have rejected the 2023 Model Policies, which they maliciously refer to as the “Don’t Be Trans" School Policies. They act as if their voice and message spoke for everyone. Nevertheless, that appears to be the one voice Superintendent Reid chooses to listen.

As the new school year is about to begin, one can only hope that students inform themselves about what is really happening so that they can form their own opinions and have the wisdom to handle situations they will encounter at school. Likewise, parents have a role to play on educating our kids about these issues as we no longer can afford to outsource that role to the school.

As the mother of a trans teen, I agree with the bolded. For the last two years, my HS-aged daughter (now graduated) was treated with dignity and respect by her peers and welcomed into bathrooms and other gendered spaces that matched her gender identity without question or pushback from anyone. She has told me that the noise and the anger she heard from adults outside of the school walls was not her experience with her classmates inside school. Her only agenda is to be herself and to be treated as the person she is. As her parent all I want is for her, and for all children, is for them to be safe and respected for exactly who they are. Right now the world feels very scary for my kid and I am grateful that at least in her FCPS high school she wasn't afraid to be herself. I hope that moving forward other kids like her feel that way too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The 2023 Model Policies don’t limit themselves to bathrooms and lockers. K-12 students participate in school sponsored overnight trips, in which students, staff, and chaperones can share private spaces such as bedrooms, baths, and in some instances beds. Schools currently have no obligation to inform all families involved if a person (student or adult) who identifies as transgender will be sharing these accommodations with the group.

The reason why the 2023 Model Policies guide schools on accommodating transgender students by having the parents (the only one legally allowed to do so) formalizing such identity with the school, is to provide the transgender student with proper accommodations that may involve being included in the accommodations previously mentioned. This is also guiding those who are “exploring whether they are transgender, or not” to use the facilities that correspond with their biological sex until they can formalize their change of identity status, at the same time that protect the rest of the students (particularly girls) from those males who may hide under the flexibility the 2021 (old policy) provides to violate women’s privacy and even commit crimes against them.

This makes a lot of sense. It protects students of all identities while also keeping families informed.

Correct. However, there are certain people at FCPS who are a part of the FLE Committee, at the same time that are heavily involved in political and radical gender identity activism which purposely distort facts and reality, and tirelessly advocates for gender indoctrination for all students. They have rejected the 2023 Model Policies, which they maliciously refer to as the “Don’t Be Trans" School Policies. They act as if their voice and message spoke for everyone. Nevertheless, that appears to be the one voice Superintendent Reid chooses to listen.

As the new school year is about to begin, one can only hope that students inform themselves about what is really happening so that they can form their own opinions and have the wisdom to handle situations they will encounter at school. Likewise, parents have a role to play on educating our kids about these issues as we no longer can afford to outsource that role to the school.

+1 and more if I could. I think if you examine the members of the FLE committee, you will realize that there are at least two who are extremely activist. And, probably more who will not tolerate any other opinions but theirs.

There is very little balance on the committee.

And, their response to anyone who disagrees with them is that anyone who questions gender transition is a "hater."

They do not tolerate anyone who questions their point of view.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The 2023 Model Policies don’t limit themselves to bathrooms and lockers. K-12 students participate in school sponsored overnight trips, in which students, staff, and chaperones can share private spaces such as bedrooms, baths, and in some instances beds. Schools currently have no obligation to inform all families involved if a person (student or adult) who identifies as transgender will be sharing these accommodations with the group.

The reason why the 2023 Model Policies guide schools on accommodating transgender students by having the parents (the only one legally allowed to do so) formalizing such identity with the school, is to provide the transgender student with proper accommodations that may involve being included in the accommodations previously mentioned. This is also guiding those who are “exploring whether they are transgender, or not” to use the facilities that correspond with their biological sex until they can formalize their change of identity status, at the same time that protect the rest of the students (particularly girls) from those males who may hide under the flexibility the 2021 (old policy) provides to violate women’s privacy and even commit crimes against them.

This makes a lot of sense. It protects students of all identities while also keeping families informed.

Correct. However, there are certain people at FCPS who are a part of the FLE Committee, at the same time that are heavily involved in political and radical gender identity activism which purposely distort facts and reality, and tirelessly advocates for gender indoctrination for all students. They have rejected the 2023 Model Policies, which they maliciously refer to as the “Don’t Be Trans" School Policies. They act as if their voice and message spoke for everyone. Nevertheless, that appears to be the one voice Superintendent Reid chooses to listen.

As the new school year is about to begin, one can only hope that students inform themselves about what is really happening so that they can form their own opinions and have the wisdom to handle situations they will encounter at school. Likewise, parents have a role to play on educating our kids about these issues as we no longer can afford to outsource that role to the school.

Of the 12 SB nominated members, there is at least one transgender member, at least one parent of a transgender child, and several extremely politically active Fairfax Dems who speak out on these issues. One of these is very active on Twitter--or "X" and speaks and writes in support of FCPS policy on this. According to the website, there are two vacancies--so there appear to be only 10 SB appointed members with voting rights.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The 2023 Model Policies don’t limit themselves to bathrooms and lockers. K-12 students participate in school sponsored overnight trips, in which students, staff, and chaperones can share private spaces such as bedrooms, baths, and in some instances beds. Schools currently have no obligation to inform all families involved if a person (student or adult) who identifies as transgender will be sharing these accommodations with the group.

The reason why the 2023 Model Policies guide schools on accommodating transgender students by having the parents (the only one legally allowed to do so) formalizing such identity with the school, is to provide the transgender student with proper accommodations that may involve being included in the accommodations previously mentioned. This is also guiding those who are “exploring whether they are transgender, or not” to use the facilities that correspond with their biological sex until they can formalize their change of identity status, at the same time that protect the rest of the students (particularly girls) from those males who may hide under the flexibility the 2021 (old policy) provides to violate women’s privacy and even commit crimes against them.

This makes a lot of sense. It protects students of all identities while also keeping families informed.

Correct. However, there are certain people at FCPS who are a part of the FLE Committee, at the same time that are heavily involved in political and radical gender identity activism which purposely distort facts and reality, and tirelessly advocates for gender indoctrination for all students. They have rejected the 2023 Model Policies, which they maliciously refer to as the “Don’t Be Trans" School Policies. They act as if their voice and message spoke for everyone. Nevertheless, that appears to be the one voice Superintendent Reid chooses to listen.

As the new school year is about to begin, one can only hope that students inform themselves about what is really happening so that they can form their own opinions and have the wisdom to handle situations they will encounter at school. Likewise, parents have a role to play on educating our kids about these issues as we no longer can afford to outsource that role to the school.

Of the 12 SB nominated members, there is at least one transgender member, at least one parent of a transgender child, and several extremely politically active Fairfax Dems who speak out on these issues. One of these is very active on Twitter--or "X" and speaks and writes in support of FCPS policy on this. According to the website, there are two vacancies--so there appear to be only 10 SB appointed members with voting rights.

Which school board member is transgender?

[Anonymous]

Didn't say a School Board member. A school board member nominated a transgender to the FLE committee.

So, there are three vacancies, according to the SB website, on the committee.

That makes 9 nominated committee members. There are other members but they are school reps and community reps. I'm not sure who gets a vote on this committee.

But, of the 9 SB nominated members, there is at least 1 transgender member; 1 transgender parent member; 1 who writes in support of transgender issues; and, 1 who has been the sponsor of the Gay Straight Alliance at the high school where he teacher.

This does not sound like a "representative" group to me. It sounds like they were appointed with an agenda in mind.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Didn't say a School Board member. A school board member nominated a transgender to the FLE committee.

So, there are three vacancies, according to the SB website, on the committee.

That makes 9 nominated committee members. There are other members but they are school reps and community reps. I'm not sure who gets a vote on this committee.

But, of the 9 SB nominated members, there is at least 1 transgender member; 1 transgender parent member; 1 who writes in support of transgender issues; and, 1 who has been the sponsor of the Gay Straight Alliance at the high school where he teacher.

This does not sound like a "representative" group to me. It sounds like they were appointed with an agenda in mind.

Obviously, LGBTQIA community is over represented.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The 2023 Model Policies don’t limit themselves to bathrooms and lockers. K-12 students participate in school sponsored overnight trips, in which students, staff, and chaperones can share private spaces such as bedrooms, baths, and in some instances beds. Schools currently have no obligation to inform all families involved if a person (student or adult) who identifies as transgender will be sharing these accommodations with the group.

The reason why the 2023 Model Policies guide schools on accommodating transgender students by having the parents (the only one legally allowed to do so) formalizing such identity with the school, is to provide the transgender student with proper accommodations that may involve being included in the accommodations previously mentioned. This is also guiding those who are “exploring whether they are transgender, or not” to use the facilities that correspond with their biological sex until they can formalize their change of identity status, at the same time that protect the rest of the students (particularly girls) from those males who may hide under the flexibility the 2021 (old policy) provides to violate women’s privacy and even commit crimes against them.

This makes a lot of sense. It protects students of all identities while also keeping families informed.

Correct. However, there are certain people at FCPS who are a part of the FLE Committee, at the same time that are heavily involved in political and radical gender identity activism which purposely distort facts and reality, and tirelessly advocates for gender indoctrination for all students. They have rejected the 2023 Model Policies, which they maliciously refer to as the “Don’t Be Trans" School Policies. They act as if their voice and message spoke for everyone. Nevertheless, that appears to be the one voice Superintendent Reid chooses to listen.

As the new school year is about to begin, one can only hope that students inform themselves about what is really happening so that they can form their own opinions and have the wisdom to handle situations they will encounter at school. Likewise, parents have a role to play on educating our kids about these issues as we no longer can afford to outsource that role to the school.

Of the 12 SB nominated members, there is at least one transgender member, at least one parent of a transgender child, and several extremely politically active Fairfax Dems who speak out on these issues. One of these is very active on Twitter--or "X" and speaks and writes in support of FCPS policy on this. According to the website, there are two vacancies--so there appear to be only 10 SB appointed members with voting rights.

Which school board member is transgender?

PP is referring to the members of the Family Life Education advisory committee nominated by SB members.

Tholen's pick to FLE is an outspoken transgender activist. I'd imagine she's trying to compensate for being such an elitist, racist snob when it comes to school boundaries.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So what do you say to the parents who are supportive of their transgender children using the bathroom/locker room that aligns to their desired gender and also whose transgender children want to play on sports teams with the gender that they identify with?

I hope that all of the people who are making this all about parents' rights will also affirm the rights of the parents who support their transgender youth.

And, what do you say to those who do not believe it is right to share private spaces with those whose private parts are different? What do you say to the young women who have to compete against biological men?

Honestly, I say get over it. Or your kid can go change in a stall/private space. We would all be better off if we stopped sexualizing school-aged children’s bodies. Kids aren’t ogling each other in school locker rooms. Tell your daughter to mind her own business and keep her eyes off other people’s private parts.

Try to under stand this:

Scenario A: A boy feels uncomfortable using school bathroom and locker room with biological boys. --> Understandable. This must be a boy self-identified as a girl. It is unreasonable that a girl shares the same bathroom and locker room with boys. This self-identified girl can use girl's bathroom and locker room instead of boys'.

Scenario B: A girl feels uncomfortable using school bathroom and locker room with biological boys. --> Anti-transgender, bigot, hatred. It is unreasonable that a girl fells uncomfortable sharing the same bathroom and locker room with boys unless this girl is a transgender girl.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So what do you say to the parents who are supportive of their transgender children using the bathroom/locker room that aligns to their desired gender and also whose transgender children want to play on sports teams with the gender that they identify with?

I hope that all of the people who are making this all about parents' rights will also affirm the rights of the parents who support their transgender youth.

And, what do you say to those who do not believe it is right to share private spaces with those whose private parts are different? What do you say to the young women who have to compete against biological men?

Honestly, I say get over it. Or your kid can go change in a stall/private space. We would all be better off if we stopped sexualizing school-aged children’s bodies. Kids aren’t ogling each other in school locker rooms. Tell your daughter to mind her own business and keep her eyes off other people’s private parts.

Try to under stand this:

Scenario A: A boy feels uncomfortable using school bathroom and locker room with biological boys. --> Understandable. This must be a boy self-identified as a girl. It is unreasonable that a girl shares the same bathroom and locker room with boys. This self-identified girl can use girl's bathroom and locker room instead of boys'.

Scenario B: A girl feels uncomfortable using school bathroom and locker room with biological boys. --> Anti-transgender, bigot, hatred. It is unreasonable that a girl fells uncomfortable sharing the same bathroom and locker room with boys unless this girl is a transgender girl.

I’m not getting your point at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So what do you say to the parents who are supportive of their transgender children using the bathroom/locker room that aligns to their desired gender and also whose transgender children want to play on sports teams with the gender that they identify with?

I hope that all of the people who are making this all about parents' rights will also affirm the rights of the parents who support their transgender youth.

And, what do you say to those who do not believe it is right to share private spaces with those whose private parts are different? What do you say to the young women who have to compete against biological men?

Honestly, I say get over it. Or your kid can go change in a stall/private space. We would all be better off if we stopped sexualizing school-aged children’s bodies. Kids aren’t ogling each other in school locker rooms. Tell your daughter to mind her own business and keep her eyes off other people’s private parts.

Try to under stand this:

Scenario A: A boy feels uncomfortable using school bathroom and locker room with biological boys. --> Understandable. This must be a boy self-identified as a girl. It is unreasonable that a girl shares the same bathroom and locker room with boys. This self-identified girl can use girl's bathroom and locker room instead of boys'.

Scenario B: A girl feels uncomfortable using school bathroom and locker room with biological boys. --> Anti-transgender, bigot, hatred. It is unreasonable that a girl fells uncomfortable sharing the same bathroom and locker room with boys unless this girl is a transgender girl.

I’m not getting your point at all.

I think it is pretty clear: PP is saying that those supporting trans kids want them to use the bathroom they "identify" with rather than the bathroom of their biological sex because they are uncomfortable using the biological choice.

On the other hand, biological girls who are uncomfortable sharing the bathroom with biological boys are considered "bigors."

Why do the trans girls get more consideration than biological girls?

Pretty straightforward.