Whistleblower accuses Biden of criminal conduct

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Why has Biden repeatedly lied about his family not receiving money from China?

Why did Biden lie about not knowing anything about his son's business dealings?

Interesting fact: While he was running for US President, Trump paid more in taxes to the CCP than he did to the US treasury. While he was running for US President, Trump had millions in transactions on a Chinese bank account that he owned, which he failed to disclose, hid from the American people, and fought to prevent subpoenas to find out about it. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/dec/30/trump-tax-returns-released-us-house-committee


Interesting fact: While Trump was US President, his daughter Ivanka got fast-tracked approval in China for 41 trademarks. https://www.forbes.com/sites/tommybeer/2020/09/22/ivankas-trademark-requests-were-fast-tracked-in-china-after-trump-was-elected/?sh=163ccef41d60

DP. S/he is asking about BIDEN.

DON'T CARE.

How can anyone talk about Biden's alleged foreign business dealings without ALSO acknowledging Trump's foreign business dealings? Because to only talk about one while completely ignoring the other is DISHONEST.

The whole point of this is to neutralize all of Trump's corrupt dealings. The republicans know they are saddled with a candidate that is on the take from many foreign governments. They have no counter argument. So their tactic is to make up fake stories about how Biden is also on the take. Then they can claim that everyone is corrupt and don't have to try to defend Trump. It's transparent and obvious, except to the morons who actually believe the lies. And a few of them have found this thread.

+1
They are sooo gullible.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Why has Biden repeatedly lied about his family not receiving money from China?

Why did Biden lie about not knowing anything about his son's business dealings?

Why don't you care about the $2 billion Jared got from the Saudis?
Why don't you care about the $640 million Javanka made WHILE Trump was in office?

Nice attempt at deflection. Take it to another thread.
Answer my questions:
Why has Biden repeatedly lied about his family not receiving money from China?

Why did Biden lie about not knowing anything about his son's business dealings?

Maybe he isn't aware of his familiy's business dealings since he wasn't a part of them, doesn't benefit from them and was in semi-retirement before running for President.

His tax forms tell the story, unless you are going to allege he is a tax fraudster, like Trump.

Sure. And, maybe we do have operational control of our border.

You do realize there are multiple photos of him with Hunter's "business" partners and multiple emails confirming that these business partners met with Joe?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Why has Biden repeatedly lied about his family not receiving money from China?

Why did Biden lie about not knowing anything about his son's business dealings?

Why don't you care about the $2 billion Jared got from the Saudis?
Why don't you care about the $640 million Javanka made WHILE Trump was in office?

Nice attempt at deflection. Take it to another thread.
Answer my questions:
Why has Biden repeatedly lied about his family not receiving money from China?

Why did Biden lie about not knowing anything about his son's business dealings?

Maybe he isn't aware of his familiy's business dealings since he wasn't a part of them, doesn't benefit from them and was in semi-retirement before running for President.

His tax forms tell the story, unless you are going to allege he is a tax fraudster, like Trump.

Willful ignorance is universal, as we see here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Why has Biden repeatedly lied about his family not receiving money from China?

Why did Biden lie about not knowing anything about his son's business dealings?

Interesting fact: While he was running for US President, Trump paid more in taxes to the CCP than he did to the US treasury. While he was running for US President, Trump had millions in transactions on a Chinese bank account that he owned, which he failed to disclose, hid from the American people, and fought to prevent subpoenas to find out about it. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/dec/30/trump-tax-returns-released-us-house-committee

Interesting fact: While Trump was US President, his daughter Ivanka got fast-tracked approval in China for 41 trademarks. https://www.forbes.com/sites/tommybeer/2020/09/22/ivankas-trademark-requests-were-fast-tracked-in-china-after-trump-was-elected/?sh=163ccef41d60

DP. S/he is asking about BIDEN.

What's funny is you complain that Biden doesn't have to follow the rules that everybody else does, yet when someone brings up an example of someone else also not follwing the rules everybody else does, you shut it down. It's almost like you don't really care about following the rules, you just want to get Biden.

+1000

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Why has Biden repeatedly lied about his family not receiving money from China?

Why did Biden lie about not knowing anything about his son's business dealings?

Why don't you care about the $2 billion Jared got from the Saudis?
Why don't you care about the $640 million Javanka made WHILE Trump was in office?

Nice attempt at deflection. Take it to another thread.
Answer my questions:
Why has Biden repeatedly lied about his family not receiving money from China?

Why did Biden lie about not knowing anything about his son's business dealings?

Maybe he isn't aware of his familiy's business dealings since he wasn't a part of them, doesn't benefit from them and was in semi-retirement before running for President.

His tax forms tell the story, unless you are going to allege he is a tax fraudster, like Trump.

Sure. And, maybe we do have operational control of our border.

You do realize there are multiple photos of him with Hunter's "business" partners and multiple emails confirming that these business partners met with Joe?

BuT tRuUuUuMp…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Why has Biden repeatedly lied about his family not receiving money from China?

Why did Biden lie about not knowing anything about his son's business dealings?

Interesting fact: While he was running for US President, Trump paid more in taxes to the CCP than he did to the US treasury. While he was running for US President, Trump had millions in transactions on a Chinese bank account that he owned, which he failed to disclose, hid from the American people, and fought to prevent subpoenas to find out about it. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/dec/30/trump-tax-returns-released-us-house-committee


Interesting fact: While Trump was US President, his daughter Ivanka got fast-tracked approval in China for 41 trademarks. https://www.forbes.com/sites/tommybeer/2020/09/22/ivankas-trademark-requests-were-fast-tracked-in-china-after-trump-was-elected/?sh=163ccef41d60

DP. S/he is asking about BIDEN.

DON'T CARE.

How can anyone talk about Biden's alleged foreign business dealings without ALSO acknowledging Trump's foreign business dealings? Because to only talk about one while completely ignoring the other is DISHONEST.

You’re the dishonest one. You’re not “ALSO” acknowledging anything, you’re derailing the thread.

Nonsense, it's not at all dishonest.
What's fair is talking about both. What's fair is talking about neither.
What's NOT fair is talking about one and refusing to talk about the other.
You're accusing me of shutting the thread down when in fact it's you who wants to shut down discussion of both and only have a dishonest, unfair thread about only one.
And even there, it's dishonest of you to accuse me of shutting down the thread when I've done no such thing. It's truly bizarre, that your MAGA ideas about free speech are basically "I have free speech to say whatever I want but you don't have free speech to criticize or question me for it." And that you falsely characterize anyone questioning or confronting you of "censoring" you or "shutting you down." No, dear - you were not censored or shut down. You got to say your piece, and then, like it or not, but others get to say their piece as well.

[Anonymous]

Even Fox News...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Even Fox News...

Fox doesn't want another defamation suit.

[Anonymous]

an email from a friend who knows a lot about grand juries:


None of the network news
Programs reported anything about this last night. While the information revealed yesterday was significant, it is stunning the network news totally ignored it. But, I recall in 1972, after the Watergate break-in that the event was pretty much ignored. Nobody knew then what was coming. What is overlooked by the media is that we were told the House Committee investigation was not ending, it was just beginning. The fact so much has been developed in just a few months tells me that more is coming. 170 SARs from just 4 of 12 banks is more than unusual; it is evidence justifying a full grand jury investigation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:an email from a friend who knows a lot about grand juries:


None of the network news
Programs reported anything about this last night. While the information revealed yesterday was significant, it is stunning the network news totally ignored it. But, I recall in 1972, after the Watergate break-in that the event was pretty much ignored. Nobody knew then what was coming. What is overlooked by the media is that we were told the House Committee investigation was not ending, it was just beginning. The fact so much has been developed in just a few months tells me that more is coming. 170 SARs from just 4 of 12 banks is more than unusual; it is evidence justifying a full grand jury investigation.

The House doesn’t convene grand juries, though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:an email from a friend who knows a lot about grand juries:


None of the network news
Programs reported anything about this last night. While the information revealed yesterday was significant, it is stunning the network news totally ignored it. But, I recall in 1972, after the Watergate break-in that the event was pretty much ignored. Nobody knew then what was coming. What is overlooked by the media is that we were told the House Committee investigation was not ending, it was just beginning. The fact so much has been developed in just a few months tells me that more is coming. 170 SARs from just 4 of 12 banks is more than unusual; it is evidence justifying a full grand jury investigation.

The House doesn’t convene grand juries, though.

True. And, will it happen with this DOJ? That is the problem. But, the House can make their findings public. Of course, media is not reporting this story. And, that is another serious problem.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:an email from a friend who knows a lot about grand juries:


None of the network news
Programs reported anything about this last night. While the information revealed yesterday was significant, it is stunning the network news totally ignored it. But, I recall in 1972, after the Watergate break-in that the event was pretty much ignored. Nobody knew then what was coming. What is overlooked by the media is that we were told the House Committee investigation was not ending, it was just beginning. The fact so much has been developed in just a few months tells me that more is coming. 170 SARs from just 4 of 12 banks is more than unusual; it is evidence justifying a full grand jury investigation.

Your “friend” is an idiot. As someone who has worked in bank compliance, I can tell you banks file SARs at the drop of a hat because there are big penalties for not filing them and no penalty for filing bad ones. If you have a business, transfer or receive money from overseas, or any substantial assets, your bank has filed SARs on you. Here’s a good primer if you actually interested in facts:
https://bpi.com/the-truth-about-suspicious-activity-reports/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:an email from a friend who knows a lot about grand juries:


None of the network news
Programs reported anything about this last night. While the information revealed yesterday was significant, it is stunning the network news totally ignored it. But, I recall in 1972, after the Watergate break-in that the event was pretty much ignored. Nobody knew then what was coming. What is overlooked by the media is that we were told the House Committee investigation was not ending, it was just beginning. The fact so much has been developed in just a few months tells me that more is coming. 170 SARs from just 4 of 12 banks is more than unusual; it is evidence justifying a full grand jury investigation.

Your “friend” is an idiot. As someone who has worked in bank compliance, I can tell you banks file SARs at the drop of a hat because there are big penalties for not filing them and no penalty for filing bad ones. If you have a business, transfer or receive money from overseas, or any substantial assets, your bank has filed SARs on you. Here’s a good primer if you actually interested in facts:
https://bpi.com/the-truth-about-suspicious-activity-reports/

Have you ever prosecuted white collar crime?
Please explain why the Bidens were receiving all those millions of dollars?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Even Fox News...

Fox doesn't want another defamation suit.

Well yes because defamation involves lying. So I guess they are reluctant to lie.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:an email from a friend who knows a lot about grand juries:


None of the network news
Programs reported anything about this last night. While the information revealed yesterday was significant, it is stunning the network news totally ignored it. But, I recall in 1972, after the Watergate break-in that the event was pretty much ignored. Nobody knew then what was coming. What is overlooked by the media is that we were told the House Committee investigation was not ending, it was just beginning. The fact so much has been developed in just a few months tells me that more is coming. 170 SARs from just 4 of 12 banks is more than unusual; it is evidence justifying a full grand jury investigation.

Your “friend” is an idiot. As someone who has worked in bank compliance, I can tell you banks file SARs at the drop of a hat because there are big penalties for not filing them and no penalty for filing bad ones. If you have a business, transfer or receive money from overseas, or any substantial assets, your bank has filed SARs on you. Here’s a good primer if you actually interested in facts:
https://bpi.com/the-truth-about-suspicious-activity-reports/

Have you ever prosecuted white collar crime?
Please explain why the Bidens were receiving all those millions of dollars?

No I haven’t. I don’t know the details of their finances. How would I know that? But I can say the SARs evidence the Rs keep citing is meaningless. And the fact that they keep citing it shows they are morons.