Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 3

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You people with the lawyer obsession are ridiculous. Even if all the lawyers are rabid partisans paid for by the DNC, doesn’t mean Ford is lying. I really think you expected her to crack under questioning and admit Soris was paying her to lie. You weren’t expecting this all to be.....possibly true.

Whats a better approach: be flanked by liberal lawyers or whatever, or deliver largely unvetted testimony seen by only one other. Re watch the hearings and tell me.

Guy came off as unhinged. Clinton accusations. Asserting since he wasnt caught in 1998 when Livingston was outed by Hustler somehow proves his innocence. His responses to Klobuchar and Leahy. His lying to Whitehouse and Mitchell. Et al

Clarence Thomas, who he clearly wanted to channel, was so much more composed.

Nope. You are not going unchecked in your ridiculous comparison.
Clarence Thomas was not accused of the things Kavanaugh was. Judge Kavanaugh has been accused, among other things, of sexual assault, attempted rape, attempted murder (Yes - read Ford’s testimony) and gang rape. He was furious, and he should have been. When an innocent person is accused of such heinous acts, that person is going to become angry and righteously indignant. Especially when the media and other outside organizations are working hard to advance the fallacies.
And, your claims of lies, are in fact, lies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DP. Your anger toward successful people is apparent.

My parents, both of whom grew up poor yet had successful careers, gifted me money for the downpayment on my house. It is completely legal and is not ripping off the taxpayers. (After all, they paid taxes on that money when they earned it.) It was their money to do with what they want. Why no hostility toward people using government support programs as ripping off the taxpayer?

That’s lovely that your parents were able to help.

Do we have any proof that Kavanaugh’s parents helped, or is this just the latest excuse du jour for his unforgivable disappearing debt?

It is so common in this area that few doubt that it is not true.

Rape and attempted rape is so common that few doubt he’s innocent. We’re still going to investigate. And someone should investigate his money troubles. The baseball ticket excuse doesn’t wash. And if he was goven a down payment for his house, there should be proof of that, too.

First of all..... just because it is common, does not mean he is guilty. This argument is so bogus it’s ridiculous. Seems as if all the #MeToo women are holding Kavanaugh responsible for what happened to them. They are blaming him - with absolutely NO PROOF.
And, the “money troubles,” as you call them, aren’t money troubles at all. Don’t you wonder why the Democrats on the committee are not harping on this issue? I don’t wonder at all. You know why? It was addressed in closed session, where it should have been. So, just let it go.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The real investigation during this week is being done by the media. If I were them I'd be looking into sexual contact with men as well as women. There is something fishy about his overt public displays of masculinity (both during the alleged incidents, and during the hearings). Actual rapists tend to operate in secret, and former classmates have already stated that he seemed to be performing more for his buddies than the women. He also got married at the age of 39, to a religious woman 10 years his junior.

Oh, FFS. You are off the charts crazy. Get help.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You people with the lawyer obsession are ridiculous. Even if all the lawyers are rabid partisans paid for by the DNC, doesn’t mean Ford is lying. I really think you expected her to crack under questioning and admit Soris was paying her to lie. You weren’t expecting this all to be.....possibly true.

Whats a better approach: be flanked by liberal lawyers or whatever, or deliver largely unvetted testimony seen by only one other. Re watch the hearings and tell me.

Guy came off as unhinged. Clinton accusations. Asserting since he wasnt caught in 1998 when Livingston was outed by Hustler somehow proves his innocence. His responses to Klobuchar and Leahy. His lying to Whitehouse and Mitchell. Et al

Clarence Thomas, who he clearly wanted to channel, was so much more composed.

Nope. You are not going unchecked in your ridiculous comparison.
Clarence Thomas was not accused of the things Kavanaugh was. Judge Kavanaugh has been accused, among other things, of sexual assault, attempted rape, attempted murder (Yes - read Ford’s testimony) and gang rape. He was furious, and he should have been. When an innocent person is accused of such heinous acts, that person is going to become angry and righteously indignant. Especially when the media and other outside organizations are working hard to advance the fallacies.
And, your claims of lies, are in fact, lies.

Yes Kavanaugh’s lies are lies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone notice how Kavanaugh lives in a renovated house in Chevy Chase in a neighborhood that people with his HHI can’t afford? But it’s a neighborhood where other Supreme Court justices, Yalies, journalists and other power players live. He knows what he wants and is clawing to get it. That’s not really what Supreme Court justices do - there’s not supposed to be a career path to the highest court.

FYI - we have a similar HHI and we can’t afford our $650,000 house , never mind a 1.3 million dollar house. And we have no law school debts even.

Same. We have a similar income, a $650k house, no other debt and do alright, but could certainly not afford a country club (or two) and two private school tuitions.

I've read many, many times on this forum that there are a lot of people in DC who have help from wealthy parents for home purchases. Are the Kavanaughs somehow an exception?

Well - was that parental ‘help’ reported as income and taxes paid on it? Because that’s the law.

You know one of those six FBI investigations of Kavanaugh could answer your question. Perhaps submit a FOIA to see if Kavanaugh is a tax cheat as well as an alcoholic, serial rapist, boofer, wife and child abuser, misogynist, sexist, and renate alumnius.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The witnesses being interviewed by the FBI were agreed upon by the White House and Senate Republicans. Senate Republicans, with no input from the Democrats, drafted the witness list.

The four witnesses were Mr. Judge; Leland Keyser, a high school friend of Dr. Blasey’s whom she said attended the party but was not told of the assault; P.J. Smyth, another party guest; and Ms. Ramirez, the Yale accuser. The White House has asked that the F.B.I. share its findings after investigators complete those interviews, and at that point, Mr. Trump and his advisers would decide whether to have the accusations investigated further, the people said.

So it will be up to the WH if anyone else, beyond those 4 people, is interviewed. This is NOT an "investigation," it is a sham. And if Jeff Flake thinks this will satisfy Americans, and that this won't rip our country apart, he would be wrong.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/29/us/politics/kavanaugh-fbi-inquiry.html

Trump has clarified. The FBI has free rein.

In case you haven't noticed, Trump isn't the most honest guy in the world. Right now, this is all the FBI is doing and they've received no different instructions.

https://twitter.com/KenDilanianNBC/status/1046429663608942598

New: A senior U.S. official and another source familiar with the matter tell NBC News that the FBI has received no new instructions from the White House about how to proceed with its weeklong investigation of sexual misconduct allegations against Judge Kavanaugh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The witnesses being interviewed by the FBI were agreed upon by the White House and Senate Republicans. Senate Republicans, with no input from the Democrats, drafted the witness list.

The four witnesses were Mr. Judge; Leland Keyser, a high school friend of Dr. Blasey’s whom she said attended the party but was not told of the assault; P.J. Smyth, another party guest; and Ms. Ramirez, the Yale accuser. The White House has asked that the F.B.I. share its findings after investigators complete those interviews, and at that point, Mr. Trump and his advisers would decide whether to have the accusations investigated further, the people said.

So it will be up to the WH if anyone else, beyond those 4 people, is interviewed. This is NOT an "investigation," it is a sham. And if Jeff Flake thinks this will satisfy Americans, and that this won't rip our country apart, he would be wrong.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/29/us/politics/kavanaugh-fbi-inquiry.html

Trump has clarified. The FBI has free rein.

In case you haven't noticed, Trump isn't the most honest guy in the world. Right now, this is all the FBI is doing and they've received no different instructions.

https://twitter.com/KenDilanianNBC/status/1046429663608942598

New: A senior U.S. official and another source familiar with the matter tell NBC News that the FBI has received no new instructions from the White House about how to proceed with its weeklong investigation of sexual misconduct allegations against Judge Kavanaugh.

A “senior official” also told NBC last week that Rosenstein was on his way to the WH to be fired. So, there’s that.
Truth is..... nobody knows who the FBI is investigating because the FBI doesn’t disclose this information. They will do their job. They will go where the story takes them.
And, I hope when they investigate and find that Ramirez’s claim and Swetnik’s claim is FOS, they will prosecute.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The real investigation during this week is being done by the media. If I were them I'd be looking into sexual contact with men as well as women. There is something fishy about his overt public displays of masculinity (both during the alleged incidents, and during the hearings). Actual rapists tend to operate in secret, and former classmates have already stated that he seemed to be performing more for his buddies than the women. He also got married at the age of 39, to a religious woman 10 years his junior.

Ding, ding, ding.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The real investigation during this week is being done by the media. If I were them I'd be looking into sexual contact with men as well as women. There is something fishy about his overt public displays of masculinity (both during the alleged incidents, and during the hearings). Actual rapists tend to operate in secret, and former classmates have already stated that he seemed to be performing more for his buddies than the women. He also got married at the age of 39, to a religious woman 10 years his junior.

Are you projecting your own homoerotic fantasies, PP? You seem to know a lot about life on the down low?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The real investigation during this week is being done by the media. If I were them I'd be looking into sexual contact with men as well as women. There is something fishy about his overt public displays of masculinity (both during the alleged incidents, and during the hearings). Actual rapists tend to operate in secret, and former classmates have already stated that he seemed to be performing more for his buddies than the women. He also got married at the age of 39, to a religious woman 10 years his junior.

Ding, ding, ding.

We’ve got two wacky people here. You all are troubled, seriously.

[Anonymous]

Uh huh. Because no married Republican public figure has *ever* been a married closeted gay person. Totally insane!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:A “senior official” also told NBC last week that Rosenstein was on his way to the WH to be fired. So, there’s that.
Truth is..... nobody knows who the FBI is investigating because the FBI doesn’t disclose this information. They will do their job. They will go where the story takes them.
And, I hope when they investigate and find that Ramirez’s claim and Swetnik’s claim is FOS, they will prosecute.

I hope that too. But I fear they will find that those claims are not FOS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The real investigation during this week is being done by the media. If I were them I'd be looking into sexual contact with men as well as women. There is something fishy about his overt public displays of masculinity (both during the alleged incidents, and during the hearings). Actual rapists tend to operate in secret, and former classmates have already stated that he seemed to be performing more for his buddies than the women. He also got married at the age of 39, to a religious woman 10 years his junior.

Ding, ding, ding.

We’ve got two wacky people here. You all are troubled, seriously.

This would explain the boofing

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A “senior official” also told NBC last week that Rosenstein was on his way to the WH to be fired. So, there’s that.
Truth is..... nobody knows who the FBI is investigating because the FBI doesn’t disclose this information. They will do their job. They will go where the story takes them.
And, I hope when they investigate and find that Ramirez’s claim and Swetnik’s claim is FOS, they will prosecute.

I hope that too. But I fear they will find that those claims are not FOS.

I have NO DOUBT they are both FOS. Give it time.
They have already referred one false allegation claim to law enforcement for prosecution.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The real investigation during this week is being done by the media. If I were them I'd be looking into sexual contact with men as well as women. There is something fishy about his overt public displays of masculinity (both during the alleged incidents, and during the hearings). Actual rapists tend to operate in secret, and former classmates have already stated that he seemed to be performing more for his buddies than the women. He also got married at the age of 39, to a religious woman 10 years his junior.

Ding, ding, ding.

You could be onto something.