She picked Tim

[Anonymous]

I don’t care if Walz served 10 years or 50 years in the military. His record was fine as it was— why did he feel the need to embellish?

That’s the part that bothers— the resume padding and lack of full honesty.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Shocking...another lie abut Walz

Why do Republicans constantly keep making such huge fools of themselves?

Because fools keep voting for them.

[Anonymous]

Just watched the Harris/Walz interview and I love him more now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Just watched the Harris/Walz interview and I love him more now.

Right?!
And trump continues his daily step on his own d I c k so…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don’t care if Walz served 10 years or 50 years in the military. His record was fine as it was— why did he feel the need to embellish?

That’s the part that bothers— the resume padding and lack of full honesty.

You are going to lose your mind when you find out about the other side

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t care if Walz served 10 years or 50 years in the military. His record was fine as it was— why did he feel the need to embellish?

That’s the part that bothers— the resume padding and lack of full honesty.

You are going to lose your mind when you find out about the other side

The guy misspoke like 2 times in his 60 years. The other guy lied 120+ times in 60 minutes. But noooo, Walz is the liar. They can just save the outrage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Jesus. Let it go, you hyper-focused loons. These are the socially awkward weirdos who show up at parties and don't know how to talk to anyone - keep diverting the conversation so they can talk about trains or whatever.

At least there’s some charm, some passion with people with that kind of focus. This is just keyboard experts. They’re experts in asylum law, they’re experts in military ranking, they’re experts in everything.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Just watched the Harris/Walz interview and I love him more now.

They’re both such good, normal people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just watched the Harris/Walz interview and I love him more now.

They’re both such good, normal people.

They’re being so polite about each other’s music choices 😂 It reminds me of talking to my dad

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t care if Walz served 10 years or 50 years in the military. His record was fine as it was— why did he feel the need to embellish?

That’s the part that bothers— the resume padding and lack of full honesty.

You are going to lose your mind when you find out about the other side

The guy misspoke like 2 times in his 60 years. The other guy lied 120+ times in 60 minutes. But noooo, Walz is the liar. They can just save the outrage.

The concern trolling about Walz’s military service is pretty much as pathetic as all their other tactics- mispronouncing Kamala’s name, calling her stupid, saying she can’t speak.

It’s all their greatest hits but they don’t seem to work anymore.

Because they’re old. Just like Trump!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just watched the Harris/Walz interview and I love him more now.

They’re both such good, normal people.

They’re being so polite about each other’s music choices 😂 It reminds me of talking to my dad

This is adorably normal and so refreshing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t care if Walz served 10 years or 50 years in the military. His record was fine as it was— why did he feel the need to embellish?

That’s the part that bothers— the resume padding and lack of full honesty.

You are going to lose your mind when you find out about the other side

The guy misspoke like 2 times in his 60 years. The other guy lied 120+ times in 60 minutes. But noooo, Walz is the liar. They can just save the outrage.

+a million. The hypocrisy, as usual, is stunning.

[Anonymous]

Oh no a core line of attack derailed! https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/16/politics/fact-check-trump-walz-minnesota-schools-tampons/index.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t care if Walz served 10 years or 50 years in the military. His record was fine as it was— why did he feel the need to embellish?

That’s the part that bothers— the resume padding and lack of full honesty.

You are going to lose your mind when you find out about the other side

The guy misspoke like 2 times in his 60 years. The other guy lied 120+ times in 60 minutes. But noooo, Walz is the liar. They can just save the outrage.

Amen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Oh no a core line of attack derailed! https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/16/politics/fact-check-trump-walz-minnesota-schools-tampons/index.html

He looks like he’s aged 10 years in just a few short weeks.