Sorry, no, saying it "slower" doesn't make your point any more logical. You say "They also want a safe building." This implies Wootton is unsafe. If the building is truly unsafe, your top priority as a parent is to get your kids somewhere safe even if their friends from other schools don't get to go with them. Dufief also wasn't singled out. It is objectively the farthest from the cluster. Also, no the cluster will not stay the same under H. I thought you were supposedly well-read on these issues. First, modified versions of H have been floating for a while, including ones with the support of elected officials like Mayor of Gaithersburg. Second, even if it is currently, what's going to happen with growth increases? Cold Spring and Fallsmead will be edge properties. All H does is swap out Dufief as the edge property for current day Wootton with Cold Spring and Fallsmead as the edge properties of future day Crown. H is another boundary study down the road. If you think H keeps the cluster together long term, I have a bridge to sell you in Brooklyn. |
DUFIEF PUSHED BACK ON A-D BECAUSE THEY WANT TO STAY WTH THEIR CLUSTER. What don't you understand? It is BOTH. Stay with cluster AND safe school. Dufief was also told after the new utilization numbers came out that they could probably stay with the cluster in a modified A-D since there was now room at Frost. Nothing in writing though and can't trust MCPS so they won't end their advocacy against A-D. Since then, all of these safety issues came out. Asbestos, mold, really??? Of course they want a safe school. It's insane that the other Wootton parents don't and are willing to settle for status quo as long as they can walk to school. Sorry, but magic money is not going to fall out of the sky to renovate Wootton and open Crown as a new high school. And guess what? H isn't my first choice. I think Crown should be a holding school and E or F should be selected. Maybe Wootton should have collectively pushed those instead of an imaginary option. |
Wow you still don’t get the point. Just answer one question: you are the one saying Wootton is unsafe. What’s more of a priority? Safety or cluster being intact? |
| Oh goodness. We are 181 pages in, we will have another round of Board of Ed testimony with people hogging all spots to oppose option H. I’m so confused. I thought you all were screaming that the Wootton building was unfit and decrepit. Then the county offered you a brand new school but you don’t want that either. Everyone is always making fun of Whitman, but this is next level entitlement. |
Lol at this poster who either doesn’t get it or just doesn’t want to admit it. KeEp tHe ClUsTeR together. Did you not read anything the other poster said? Just admit Dufief rather Cold Spring and Fallsmead be the edge properties. |
Oh I get the point you are attempting to make but you are wrong. It's not an either/or. Option W thinks they can have both repairs and location plus Crown as a stand alone school. Why can't Dufief want the cluster and a safe environment? Holding school options maybe get us there, Option H maybe gets us there. A-D definitely do not. Wootton is objectively unsafe. Do you disagree with that? Do you want your kids to go to school in a building with asbestos? How about working plumbing? Why are parents okay with this as long the school stays out? |
DP. I'll go slow for you. Wootton families now only want remediation NOT renovation. There is money for remediation, especially if the plan is to use the "old" Wootton facility as a secondary holding school. It was mentioned previously that doing so hasn't been officially announced, but that may be by design - MCPS wants to move Wootton to Crown, and doesn't even want to bring up anything that would convince Wootton families to stay in the "old" facility. |
Let's be clear. It's the Wootton walkers making all the noise. God forbid their kids get on a bus. |
| What is the reason the Wootton walkers haven't advocated for E or F (or G)? Do they not want to antagonize or be seen as going against Crown/Gaithersburg? |
Ohhhh now I get it. You are also a Wootton Walker! That's why you are so mad at Dufief
|
This exactly. They don't want to piss off Crown/Gaithersburg. They are both advocating for a stand alone high school and Wootton walkers think Crown helps them for now. |
My sense is that the fiscal argument against option A-D is too strong for this to work. I think MCPS strongly wants a holding school, whether it's Crown or Wootton. |
No, you still don’t get it. If Wootton is objectively unsafe, you should support H AND support A-D. That’s the only logical pathway, unless you think it is okay to send your child to what you say is an objectively unsafe school. You can for self reasons say I support H above A-D, but you can’t logically say I support H but not A-D if you believe Wootton is objectively unsafe. The whole point of my original post is Dufief parents who didn’t support A-D and now support H due to “safety” are hypocrites. I don’t think Wootton is objectively unsafe. MCPS also doesn’t think so because if it is, why is Wootton safe for Damascus and Magruder or others that may use it as a holding school under H, but not safe for neighborhood kids in the community? Are there different safety standards for Damascus and Magruder kids? |
I agree. It will be either EFG or H. If we’re talking about fiscally, Crown as a holding school is cheaper. MCPS has done the studies. 1. MCPS own studies show Crown is closer for all the schools that need a holding school than Wootton. It would thus cost more to bus everyone to Wootton than to Crown (more accessible due to 270). Then you have to bus Wootton kids out of Wootton, which yet another extra cost to H. 2. Using Wootton as a holding school requires it to be renovated regardless since it’s not up to code. Renovation for Wootton happens under EFGH. I genuinely don’t get why H is more fiscally sensible compared to EFG. |
You think they are hypocrites because you don't understand their motivation and refuse to believe it can actually be both cluster and safety. This isn't a debate. Just because you disagree doesn't change the way people feel. Wootton needs a lot of work to become a safe holding school and I actually don't think it would be used that way under option H, at least not for a very long time. Magruder and Damascus can both build on site since they have room on their fields. Wootton doesn't have this option with its land. I don't know how it would be repurposed but you are correct that it wouldn't be safe for other kids either. |