Schools back in-person in 2022 due to mass-vaccine

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Keeping kids out of school for 2.5 years over a virus with a 99% survival rate is batsh!t crazy and completely unfair and untenable.

Stop being so selfish. 1% mortality rate is still a lot of people abs would be higher if schools were open!

So keep kids out of school for 3 years over this? Get high risk people and adults vaccinated and get kids back in school. Enough of this sh!t. Kids matter too and 3 years of DL will do irreparable harm to millions of them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Keeping kids out of school for 2.5 years over a virus with a 99% survival rate is batsh!t crazy and completely unfair and untenable.

Stop being so selfish. 1% mortality rate is still a lot of people abs would be higher if schools were open!

So keep kids out of school for 3 years over this? Get high risk people and adults vaccinated and get kids back in school. Enough of this sh!t. Kids matter too and 3 years of DL will do irreparable harm to millions of them.

No, it won’t. Kids survive famine and war and parents in the US can’t imagine their child having to survive the smallest adversity. It’s embarrassing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:My kids have been back this entire year in private school. Time for school choice everyone. Because public schools aren't opening in the fall either.

Selfish. Me me me.

[Anonymous]

This is a huge shift. By the end of this the publics will only be for the poor and overwhelmed. People with means are out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is a huge shift. By the end of this the publics will only be for the poor and overwhelmed. People with means are out.

Oh, you mean the overcrowded schools will finally only have the number of kids they're designed for? No more trailer parks in the back lot? No more overcrowded classrooms? No more buildings falling apart because too much money is spent on too many kids? All for the same budget.

Thank you, thank you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Keeping kids out of school for 2.5 years over a virus with a 99% survival rate is batsh!t crazy and completely unfair and untenable.

Stop being so selfish. 1% mortality rate is still a lot of people abs would be higher if schools were open!

So keep kids out of school for 3 years over this? Get high risk people and adults vaccinated and get kids back in school. Enough of this sh!t. Kids matter too and 3 years of DL will do irreparable harm to millions of them.

No, it won’t. Kids survive famine and war and parents in the US can’t imagine their child having to survive the smallest adversity. It’s embarrassing.

Oh shove it. So what if we have higher expectations for our childrens’ lives than a lack of famine and war. And for many kids, this is more than just “the smallest adversity.” If you don’t understand that, then you are clueless about the world outside your bubble.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Keeping kids out of school for 2.5 years over a virus with a 99% survival rate is batsh!t crazy and completely unfair and untenable.

Stop being so selfish. 1% mortality rate is still a lot of people abs would be higher if schools were open!

So keep kids out of school for 3 years over this? Get high risk people and adults vaccinated and get kids back in school. Enough of this sh!t. Kids matter too and 3 years of DL will do irreparable harm to millions of them.

No, it won’t. Kids survive famine and war and parents in the US can’t imagine their child having to survive the smallest adversity. It’s embarrassing.

My war refugee relatives think what is going on with covid-19 education in this country is appalling. You have no idea what you are talking about. I suspect the most adversity you've ever faced is a stubbed toe.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Keeping kids out of school for 2.5 years over a virus with a 99% survival rate is batsh!t crazy and completely unfair and untenable.

Stop being so selfish. 1% mortality rate is still a lot of people abs would be higher if schools were open!

So keep kids out of school for 3 years over this? Get high risk people and adults vaccinated and get kids back in school. Enough of this sh!t. Kids matter too and 3 years of DL will do irreparable harm to millions of them.

No, it won’t. Kids survive famine and war and parents in the US can’t imagine their child having to survive the smallest adversity. It’s embarrassing.

My war refugee relatives think what is going on with covid-19 education in this country is appalling. You have no idea what you are talking about. I suspect the most adversity you've ever faced is a stubbed toe.

I’m sure it is an improvement over the education system of a country that would turn people into refugees, so give me a break. And plenty of Americans including me have experienced great adversity, well beyond a “stubbed toe.” So dial back the bitterness and stereotypes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Keeping kids out of school for 2.5 years over a virus with a 99% survival rate is batsh!t crazy and completely unfair and untenable.

Stop being so selfish. 1% mortality rate is still a lot of people abs would be higher if schools were open!

So keep kids out of school for 3 years over this? Get high risk people and adults vaccinated and get kids back in school. Enough of this sh!t. Kids matter too and 3 years of DL will do irreparable harm to millions of them.

No, it won’t. Kids survive famine and war and parents in the US can’t imagine their child having to survive the smallest adversity. It’s embarrassing.

My war refugee relatives think what is going on with covid-19 education in this country is appalling. You have no idea what you are talking about. I suspect the most adversity you've ever faced is a stubbed toe.

I’m sure it is an improvement over the education system of a country that would turn people into refugees, so give me a break. And plenty of Americans including me have experienced great adversity, well beyond a “stubbed toe.” So dial back the bitterness and stereotypes.

I wouldn't be so sure of that if I were you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Keeping kids out of school for 2.5 years over a virus with a 99% survival rate is batsh!t crazy and completely unfair and untenable.

Stop being so selfish. 1% mortality rate is still a lot of people abs would be higher if schools were open!

So keep kids out of school for 3 years over this? Get high risk people and adults vaccinated and get kids back in school. Enough of this sh!t. Kids matter too and 3 years of DL will do irreparable harm to millions of them.

No, it won’t. Kids survive famine and war and parents in the US can’t imagine their child having to survive the smallest adversity. It’s embarrassing.

x1000 Well said, PP.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does any one else think it is the Baby Boomers who are responsible for schools closing????

You can bet your butt it's the boomers' fault the schools are closed, the businesses are imploding, commercial real estate is doomed for a decade because they can all "work from home" in their smug flush retirement secure overpriced homes. Bet your butt a massive dollop of blame sits right on top of their constipated bellies. Boomers have zero skin in the game. Especially the childless boomers. The boomers in my neighborhood who had no problem closing the pool all summer because of their irrational fear. Doesn't effect them, they barely go to the pool, haha they're so content. Meanwhile, all the kids in the neighborhood are shut down all summer long. Shut the bars? No big whoop to the boomers! They sip their vodka gimlets at home anyway. Shut the theaters forever? Whatever, they have plenty of $$ for every premium channel. Shut the schools? Have at it, they aren't effected at all and besides those noisy bus stops annoy them every morning on their leisure walks anyway.

The absolute most spoiled generation in all of history. The only generation ever to not have to face its own mortality. No wars. No depression. No disasters. They grew up in America's golden age and inherited the greatest wealth ever created. Then they spent it all. Built equity in homes all the rest of us are now expected to buy from them so they can head south. The most cowardly spoiled generation ever who now is faced with a small taste of mortality, a weak flu virus that is taking out a relative handful of their numbers (250K out of 360M people? hardly a massive pandemic no matter how you slice it), a virus that is a window into their own inevitable death, and they freaked the hell out. They shut everything down. They doomed us all. Because they have no skin in the game. They are the eternally damned generation.

Never ever underestimate the intense scrutiny every self satisfied boomer will undergo at those pearly gates, pleading with Peter to please, please, please let them take their retirement money with them. They earned it!! It's a tight squeeze through the eye of that needle but you know they'll try hard to get through, and bring their insipid golf clubs with them.

Aww, it was going so well, and you were almost (well, almost) convincing with your correct English sentences and your vocabulary and grammar, but then you had to go and drop the "weak flu" propaganda lie. Just couldn't help yourself. Outed as a troll and summarily dismissed.

SO close!

Uh, flu is a coronavirus. And any coronavirus with 99.98 survival rate through the age of 60, then drops to 99.95 through 70, then drops to 94% or so from there is a WEAK FLU VIRUS. 250K or so people dying out of 360 MILLION is WEAK. If people were dying in the streets, if it caused hemorrhaging, if children were dying at all, if hospitals were ever even remotely close to full, if there was any reason whatsoever to fear this virus at all, then I'd be first one to say "shut it down". If thousands of children were dying in April the whole world wouldn't have hesitated for a second to do all this stuff we've done. But none of that is true, and you know it, or at least your left shoulder good angel keeps whispering it to you but you keep up your obstinate defiance.

Notwithstanding the political harpies on this board and throughout the DMV, the EXPERTS (oh we love you experts, smooch smooch) advised every draconian measure and the federal and all state government dutifully executed all of it. You can't name a single measure that was advised that didn't get executed. And yet, here we are, "spiking" across the world and going through the whole kabuki all over again. Except of course in Wuhan (haha the irony is sick) and Sweden (yes, Sweden Exists). Why? Maybe, just maybe, because the did the OPPOSITE of what everyone else did.

Does none of this ring any bells in your belfry?

The flu is not a coronavirus. Go back to school, you sad angry person.

Imagine what it must be like to know this person IRL.

Imagine resorting to ad hominem when your worldview collapses around you.

Read it and weep. Scream it out. Wake up. Boomer misanthropes living the good life while our kids - and the future of everybody - pays the 21st Century bar tab.

https://fee.org/articles/cambridge-study-children-s-mental-health-has-deteriorated-substantially-during-lockdown/

As a wise man recently said: "The COVID narrative hinges on 'we must sacrifice our young and their future to protect the elders'. COMPLETE INVERSION OF TRADITIONAL MORALITY where the old make sacrifices for the sake of the young."

You want to erase the people that nurtured you when you were an defenseless vulnerable shit stain?

The sooner you vacate earth the cleaner the planet will be.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Keeping kids out of school for 2.5 years over a virus with a 99% survival rate is batsh!t crazy and completely unfair and untenable.

Stop being so selfish. 1% mortality rate is still a lot of people abs would be higher if schools were open!

So keep kids out of school for 3 years over this? Get high risk people and adults vaccinated and get kids back in school. Enough of this sh!t. Kids matter too and 3 years of DL will do irreparable harm to millions of them.

No, it won’t. Kids survive famine and war and parents in the US can’t imagine their child having to survive the smallest adversity. It’s embarrassing.

x1000 Well said, PP.

So I guess you too are cool with kids enduring increased poverty, homelessness, abuse, and decreased access to regular meal and the support network a school provides while distance learning drones on for two more years? Hey, as long as it isn’t “war or famine,” they should be able to survive these “smallest adversities,” right? Pure cluelessness, idiocy, and wrongly stereotyping all American kids as rich and privileged.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Keeping kids out of school for 2.5 years over a virus with a 99% survival rate is batsh!t crazy and completely unfair and untenable.

Stop being so selfish. 1% mortality rate is still a lot of people abs would be higher if schools were open!

So keep kids out of school for 3 years over this? Get high risk people and adults vaccinated and get kids back in school. Enough of this sh!t. Kids matter too and 3 years of DL will do irreparable harm to millions of them.

No, it won’t. Kids survive famine and war and parents in the US can’t imagine their child having to survive the smallest adversity. It’s embarrassing.

You know what generally stays open during famine and war?

Schools.

It's embarrassing that Yemen has been fighting to keep schools open during civil war and famine, yet US teachers are fighting to keep schools closed for a virus whose transmission can be mitigated with a 10 cent mask and some open windows.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My kids have been back this entire year in private school. Time for school choice everyone. Because public schools aren't opening in the fall either.

Selfish. Me me me.

Why is this selfish - public schools are not providing a service people want or can use at this time. It’s BS that if you can pay your kid can go to school.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My kids have been back this entire year in private school. Time for school choice everyone. Because public schools aren't opening in the fall either.

Selfish. Me me me.

Why is this selfish - public schools are not providing a service people want or can use at this time. It’s BS that if you can pay your kid can go to school.

Agreed. I've never supported vouchers before, except while playing devil's advocate in a college course that was primarily for education majors. But I support them now, provided they come with restrictions that the voucher must constitute payment in full for tuition. This pandemic has demonstrated that there's no other way to keep public schools in check when the teachers unions wield so much political power.