new kavanaugh sexual assault allegations

[Anonymous]

OMG - college buddies get together. Who knew!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:OMG - college buddies get together. Who knew!!

Seriously. So nefarious, I just can’t even!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I got on my computer. Per the Times, he contacted senators and the FBI

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/14/sunday-review/brett-kavanaugh-deborah-ramirez-yale.html

At least seven people, including Ms. Ramirez’s mother, heard about the Yale incident long before Mr. Kavanaugh was a federal judge. Two of those people were classmates who learned of it just days after the party occurred, suggesting that it was discussed among students at the time.

We also uncovered a previously unreported story about Mr. Kavanaugh in his freshman year that echoes Ms. Ramirez’s allegation. A classmate, Max Stier, saw Mr. Kavanaugh with his pants down at a different drunken dorm party, where friends pushed his penis into the hand of a female student. Mr. Stier, who runs a nonprofit organization in Washington, notified senators and the F.B.I. about this account, but the F.B.I. did not investigate and Mr. Stier has declined to discuss it publicly. (We corroborated the story with two officials who have communicated with Mr. Stier.)

Mr. Kavanaugh did not speak to us because we could not agree on terms for an interview. But he has denied Dr. Ford’s and Ms. Ramirez’s allegations, and declined to answer our questions about Mr. Stier’s account.

***

Ms. Ramirez, who was never asked to testify, also found the hearings distressing. Her efforts to backstop her recollections with friends would later be cited as evidence that her memory was unreliable or that she was trying to construct a story rather than confirm one.

Ms. Ramirez’s legal team gave the F.B.I. a list of at least 25 individuals who may have had corroborating evidence. But the bureau — in its supplemental background investigation — interviewed none of them, though we learned many of these potential witnesses tried in vain to reach the F.B.I. on their own.

Two F.B.I. agents interviewed Ms. Ramirez, telling her that they found her “credible.” But the Republican-controlled Senate had imposed strict limits on the investigation. “‘We have to wait to get authorization to do anything else,’” Bill Pittard, one of Ms. Ramirez’s lawyers, recalled the agents saying. “It was almost a little apologetic.”

You should read the whole piece

Yale was sooooooooo traumatic, from welcome week forward...

...yet she and mum helped her little sister get admitted too?

Interesting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OMG - college buddies get together. Who knew!!

Seriously. So nefarious, I just can’t even!

Can you imagine he likes beer! That is obviously disqualifying behavior. And, the Nats tickets boogaloo. LOL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Gee. And, Max Stier defended Clnton. And, his wife was nominated to the US District Court in 2016 by Obama and her nomination expired. No bias here. None at all.

You already said this a few pages ago. Bretty was just another Repo attack dog, not some lily white prince doing the lord’s work.

I was the one who mentioned Pan’s fruitless nomination a few pages back, and I am not the poster you quoted. Image be two posters questioning Stier’s motivation.

That said, it’s kinda cute that you call him ”Bretty.” Did you date him in the 8th grade?

[Anonymous]

This is a real person with a family. With young daughters. I think it's just gross how people talk about him on DCUM.

[Anonymous]

Damn.

The NYT has updated the piece tonight to say that the earlier version omitted something from the book. That "something" was that the female student who was the alleged victim declined to be interviewed and friends say she does not recall the incident.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Damn.

The NYT has updated the piece tonight to say that the earlier version omitted something from the book. That "something" was that the female student who was the alleged victim declined to be interviewed and friends say she does not recall the incident.

Unbelievable!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Damn.

The NYT has updated the piece tonight to say that the earlier version omitted something from the book. That "something" was that the female student who was the alleged victim declined to be interviewed and friends say she does not recall the incident.

Unbelievable!!

Wow. This makes the NYT look awful.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is a real person with a family. With young daughters. I think it's just gross how people talk about him on DCUM.

And I think a man with his checkered past and drinking problem should have thought of his family before accepting the nomination.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:OMG - college buddies get together. Who knew!!

Who get angry after losing at dice and tell them all to keep everything from their spouses? Gosh, he really is one of the leches from a 1980s frat movie.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OMG - college buddies get together. Who knew!!

Who get angry after losing at dice and tell them all to keep everything from their spouses? Gosh, he really is one of the leches from a 1980s frat movie.

Normal college buddies. You are trying to demonize something that happens all day everyday. If this is the sort of things that really put you in a tizzy you have a boring and uneventful life.

Maybe you can tie all this to Russia to really wrap this all up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Damn.

The NYT has updated the piece tonight to say that the earlier version omitted something from the book. That "something" was that the female student who was the alleged victim declined to be interviewed and friends say she does not recall the incident.

In other words, she doesn’t want her life to be ruined by relentless harpies like you people. I can’t blame her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Damn.

The NYT has updated the piece tonight to say that the earlier version omitted something from the book. That "something" was that the female student who was the alleged victim declined to be interviewed and friends say she does not recall the incident.

In other words, she doesn’t want her life to be ruined by relentless harpies like you people. I can’t blame her.

Really. Show us an example of a ruined life? All the liars thus far have lived their lives just fine. Making up things and coming forward hasn’t hurt anybody except the accused.

That’s ok. The ruined lives along the way are all fine. Means justifies the end to the liberal mind. A mind that manages to lie itself in some weird loop. Liberalism is a mental disease devoid of logic and facts. This board shows that in spades.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Damn.

The NYT has updated the piece tonight to say that the earlier version omitted something from the book. That "something" was that the female student who was the alleged victim declined to be interviewed and friends say she does not recall the incident.

In other words, she doesn’t want her life to be ruined by relentless harpies like you people. I can’t blame her.

Really. Show us an example of a ruined life? All the liars thus far have lived their lives just fine. Making up things and coming forward hasn’t hurt anybody except the accused.

That’s ok. The ruined lives along the way are all fine. Means justifies the end to the liberal mind. A mind that manages to lie itself in some weird loop. Liberalism is a mental disease devoid of logic and facts. This board shows that in spades.

Christine Blasey Ford, Kavenaugh’s first accuser (attempted rape, if you recall). Her life will never be the same because of crazies like you. Meanwhile, her attempted rapist sits on the Supreme Court. I would’t say that his life is in ruins. But you know that - and you enjoy that she will punished forever for being a victim of entitled male aggression, misogynism, and sheer stupidity from right wingers who refuse to even consider that the deeply flawed people that they admire could be sexual predators, conmen, and traitors. If you people weren’t so loathsome, I’d almost feel sorry for you.