Warren now the most likely nominee according to some betting markets

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She has to lie about her crowds


She stated 15,000 at a rally recently and evidence shows only about 1590 showed up. Meanwhile in a blue state of NM Trump numbers are 45k tickets, 94% in state purchases, 78% of registrants matched voter files, 20% voted in one or less of the last four elections, 52% female 48% female (sorry not sorry liberals, only two genders so....) 40% LATINO and 31% registered Democrats.

These numbers are staggering and it shows Trump's support gaining. After fake Russia stories, Kavanaugh BS, fake dossiers and now things like McCabe possibly being charged it's only going to get better for him.

It sure is! Especially among white looking Hispanics and everyone who can't wait for next season when we find out what's in the China deal!!

[Anonymous]

New Florida polling shows Warren and Trump in a tie

https://business.fau.edu/departments/economics/business-economics-polling/bepi-polls/

Biden v Trump, Trump is ahead by +1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In all seriousness, how would she address offshore tax havens and all those writeoffs that the megarich use? Example Epstein.

Like a Harvard Professor: despite whatever noise she makes, she’ll support $$$ in the end.

Why would she? She never has before and her campaign relies on small dollar contributions, not contributions from corporations. Why would she be beholden to them if they gave her nothing?

Her actual history is *much more* mixed than her propaganda.

True words

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In all seriousness, how would she address offshore tax havens and all those writeoffs that the megarich use? Example Epstein.

Like a Harvard Professor: despite whatever noise she makes, she’ll support $$$ in the end.

Why would she? She never has before and her campaign relies on small dollar contributions, not contributions from corporations. Why would she be beholden to them if they gave her nothing?

Her actual history is *much more* mixed than her propaganda.

True words

"And when it's not, just make stuff up!"

- GOP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:New Florida polling shows Warren and Trump in a tie

https://business.fau.edu/departments/economics/business-economics-polling/bepi-polls/

Biden v Trump, Trump is ahead by +1

Well this is bad for Trump. Can he win without FL?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:New Florida polling shows Warren and Trump in a tie

https://business.fau.edu/departments/economics/business-economics-polling/bepi-polls/

Biden v Trump, Trump is ahead by +1

Well this is bad for Trump. Can he win without FL?

His people don't seem to think so

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/05/09/trump-2020-campaign-florida-1313622

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She has to lie about her crowds


She stated 15,000 at a rally recently and evidence shows only about 1590 showed up. Meanwhile in a blue state of NM Trump numbers are 45k tickets, 94% in state purchases, 78% of registrants matched voter files, 20% voted in one or less of the last four elections, 52% female 48% female (sorry not sorry liberals, only two genders so....) 40% LATINO and 31% registered Democrats.

These numbers are staggering and it shows Trump's support gaining. After fake Russia stories, Kavanaugh BS, fake dossiers and now things like McCabe possibly being charged it's only going to get better for him.

1. I understand from Sean Spicer that it’s not lying about crowd size if you really think the crowd was big.
2. According to you there’s just one sex, female and female.
3. Those numbers aren’t really staggering, even in a blue state.
4. Where do you see his support gaining?

I want to see you gnashing your teeth when Warren wins in 2020.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She has to lie about her crowds


She stated 15,000 at a rally recently and evidence shows only about 1590 showed up. Meanwhile in a blue state of NM Trump numbers are 45k tickets, 94% in state purchases, 78% of registrants matched voter files, 20% voted in one or less of the last four elections, 52% female 48% female (sorry not sorry liberals, only two genders so....) 40% LATINO and 31% registered Democrats.

These numbers are staggering and it shows Trump's support gaining. After fake Russia stories, Kavanaugh BS, fake dossiers and now things like McCabe possibly being charged it's only going to get better for him.

1. I understand from Sean Spicer that it’s not lying about crowd size if you really think the crowd was big.
2. According to you there’s just one sex, female and female.
3. Those numbers aren’t really staggering, even in a blue state.
4. Where do you see his support gaining?

I want to see you gnashing your teeth when Warren wins in 2020.

Close your eyes and envision them gnashing their teeth. Do you feel better? See how that works? And no molars were harmed in this visualization. Namaste.

[Anonymous]

Amazing. Predict it now has her buy price at 44 vs Biden's 26. A difference of 18

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Amazing. Predict it now has her buy price at 44 vs Biden's 26. A difference of 18

I tried looking up what a buy price is - I assume this means the betting markets find her very much more likely as the nom.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In all seriousness, how would she address offshore tax havens and all those writeoffs that the megarich use? Example Epstein.

She won't.

She will just use them as the excuse to raise taxes, substantially, on the middle and middle upper class. That's where the easy-to-tax salary money is.

of course

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In all seriousness, how would she address offshore tax havens and all those writeoffs that the megarich use? Example Epstein.

She won't.

She will just use them as the excuse to raise taxes, substantially, on the middle and middle upper class. That's where the easy-to-tax salary money is.

of course

She won’t. Unless you make over $50 mill a year; that’s not really the upper middle class though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In all seriousness, how would she address offshore tax havens and all those writeoffs that the megarich use? Example Epstein.

She won't.

She will just use them as the excuse to raise taxes, substantially, on the middle and middle upper class. That's where the easy-to-tax salary money is.

of course

She won’t. Unless you make over $50 mill a year; that’s not really the upper middle class though.

LOL. Sure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In all seriousness, how would she address offshore tax havens and all those writeoffs that the megarich use? Example Epstein.

She won't.

She will just use them as the excuse to raise taxes, substantially, on the middle and middle upper class. That's where the easy-to-tax salary money is.

of course

She won’t. Unless you make over $50 mill a year; that’s not really the upper middle class though.

LOL. Sure.

+1 she supports Bernies healthcare plan taxes are going to go up for everyone on here

If you are making under 50k I don't see a reason not to support Warner if you are making over 50k aka almost everyone on here I don't see a reason to support her. It's going to be just like Obamacare the 50k point is the tipping point between free and having to pay.

[Anonymous]

If Warren rescinds the Trump tax “cut,” I will get my taxes cut because Trump increased taxes on me, an upper-middle class person. I don’t actually mind my taxes going up as long as I am paying for something real other than tax cuts for billionaires.