Prosecutor to Investigate Origins of FBI Trump-Russia Probe

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Listening to McCabe discuss how it is okay for Clinton campaign to fund the dossier because they paid the law firm who hired the oppo research firm who hired the Bristish spy who worked with the Russians is laughable, if it weren't so serious.

That's the same McCabe whose wife accepted almost a million dollars in funding for her own campaign from Terry McAuliffe who is tied so tightly with the Clintons. She was recruited by McAuliffe through Northam, as I recall. That never did smell right--especially, since we already knew that Clinton was going to run and, I'm confident that McAuliffe knew she was under investigation and was aware of McCabe's position at the FBI.

This.

There is a difference between paying an American company for opposition research and taking free help from the Russians.

If you cannot see that, then there simply is no hope for your understanding the truth.

Also, what happened with that research? It was given to the FBI. It was not used during the 2016 cycle even though it could have been used as such.

So, it is A-OK to take help from a foreign power as long as you pay for it. Good to know.
Research? You call what the Russians gave Steele was research? Ha ha ha ha.

They didn't pay for help from a foreign "power".

Ultimately, yes, they did. And, why did they try to hide it for a year?

What foreign "power" did they pay for help from?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Listening to McCabe discuss how it is okay for Clinton campaign to fund the dossier because they paid the law firm who hired the oppo research firm who hired the Bristish spy who worked with the Russians is laughable, if it weren't so serious.

That's the same McCabe whose wife accepted almost a million dollars in funding for her own campaign from Terry McAuliffe who is tied so tightly with the Clintons. She was recruited by McAuliffe through Northam, as I recall. That never did smell right--especially, since we already knew that Clinton was going to run and, I'm confident that McAuliffe knew she was under investigation and was aware of McCabe's position at the FBI.

This.

There is a difference between paying an American company for opposition research and taking free help from the Russians.

If you cannot see that, then there simply is no hope for your understanding the truth.

Also, what happened with that research? It was given to the FBI. It was not used during the 2016 cycle even though it could have been used as such.

So, it is A-OK to take help from a foreign power as long as you pay for it. Good to know.
Research? You call what the Russians gave Steele was research? Ha ha ha ha.

They didn't pay for help from a foreign "power".

Ultimately, yes, they did. And, why did they try to hide it for a year?

+1,000

[Anonymous]

This thread is ridiculous with people posting how innocent they are and others posting how guilty they are.

Threads, such as this, simply make the American people question institutions. Neither side wins in this. Neither.

Have some respect for he American people and let the investigation speak for itself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Listening to McCabe discuss how it is okay for Clinton campaign to fund the dossier because they paid the law firm who hired the oppo research firm who hired the Bristish spy who worked with the Russians is laughable, if it weren't so serious.

That's the same McCabe whose wife accepted almost a million dollars in funding for her own campaign from Terry McAuliffe who is tied so tightly with the Clintons. She was recruited by McAuliffe through Northam, as I recall. That never did smell right--especially, since we already knew that Clinton was going to run and, I'm confident that McAuliffe knew she was under investigation and was aware of McCabe's position at the FBI.

This.

There is a difference between paying an American company for opposition research and taking free help from the Russians.

If you cannot see that, then there simply is no hope for your understanding the truth.

Also, what happened with that research? It was given to the FBI. It was not used during the 2016 cycle even though it could have been used as such.

So, it is A-OK to take help from a foreign power as long as you pay for it. Good to know.
Research? You call what the Russians gave Steele was research? Ha ha ha ha.

They didn't pay for help from a foreign "power".

Ultimately, yes, they did. And, why did they try to hide it for a year?

What foreign "power" did they pay for help from?

Ultimately - Russia.

Meanwhile, the Daily Caller’s Chuck Ross reports that Steele identified two of his sources for Kavalec: Russia’s former spy chief Vyacheslav Trubnikov and top Kremlin adviser Vladislav Surkov.

https://news.yahoo.com/steele-dossier-verified-application-wasn-090026334.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Listening to McCabe discuss how it is okay for Clinton campaign to fund the dossier because they paid the law firm who hired the oppo research firm who hired the Bristish spy who worked with the Russians is laughable, if it weren't so serious.

That's the same McCabe whose wife accepted almost a million dollars in funding for her own campaign from Terry McAuliffe who is tied so tightly with the Clintons. She was recruited by McAuliffe through Northam, as I recall. That never did smell right--especially, since we already knew that Clinton was going to run and, I'm confident that McAuliffe knew she was under investigation and was aware of McCabe's position at the FBI.

This.

There is a difference between paying an American company for opposition research and taking free help from the Russians.

If you cannot see that, then there simply is no hope for your understanding the truth.

Also, what happened with that research? It was given to the FBI. It was not used during the 2016 cycle even though it could have been used as such.

So, it is A-OK to take help from a foreign power as long as you pay for it. Good to know.
Research? You call what the Russians gave Steele was research? Ha ha ha ha.

They didn't pay for help from a foreign "power".

Ultimately, yes, they did. And, why did they try to hide it for a year?

What foreign "power" did they pay for help from?

Ultimately - Russia.

Meanwhile, the Daily Caller’s Chuck Ross reports that Steele identified two of his sources for Kavalec: Russia’s former spy chief Vyacheslav Trubnikov and top Kremlin adviser Vladislav Surkov.

https://news.yahoo.com/steele-dossier-verified-application-wasn-090026334.html

I like how you always have to qualify it with "Ultimately".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Listening to McCabe discuss how it is okay for Clinton campaign to fund the dossier because they paid the law firm who hired the oppo research firm who hired the Bristish spy who worked with the Russians is laughable, if it weren't so serious.

That's the same McCabe whose wife accepted almost a million dollars in funding for her own campaign from Terry McAuliffe who is tied so tightly with the Clintons. She was recruited by McAuliffe through Northam, as I recall. That never did smell right--especially, since we already knew that Clinton was going to run and, I'm confident that McAuliffe knew she was under investigation and was aware of McCabe's position at the FBI.

This.

There is a difference between paying an American company for opposition research and taking free help from the Russians.

If you cannot see that, then there simply is no hope for your understanding the truth.

Also, what happened with that research? It was given to the FBI. It was not used during the 2016 cycle even though it could have been used as such.

So, it is A-OK to take help from a foreign power as long as you pay for it. Good to know.
Research? You call what the Russians gave Steele was research? Ha ha ha ha.

They didn't pay for help from a foreign "power".

Ultimately, yes, they did. And, why did they try to hide it for a year?

+1,000

+2,000
We are the liberals, and we can’t figure out how we lost.

[Anonymous]

Democrats who were in power,
were warned that their dossier was fake.
Thank you, Bruce.

[Anonymous]

Meanwhile the full Crowdstrike report to the DNC on Russia hacking their servers wasn't share with the FBI or DOJ.

[Anonymous]

The Russian government and its surrogates helped Trump and his campaign illegally and Trump and his campaign knew about it, welcomed it, and built it into their campaign strategy. Everyone knows this is true.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Russian government and its surrogates helped Trump and his campaign illegally and Trump and his campaign knew about it, welcomed it, and built it into their campaign strategy. Everyone knows this is true.

Everyone in your little world. Emphasis on "little."
Hell, Mueller doesn't even "know" this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Russian government and its surrogates helped Trump and his campaign illegally and Trump and his campaign knew about it, welcomed it, and built it into their campaign strategy. Everyone knows this is true.

Liar.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Democrats who were in power,
were warned that their dossier was fake.
Thank you, Bruce.

Funny that is is fake, given about 75% of it has been proven true. For raw intel, as this labelled, that is a remarkable hit rate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Russian government and its surrogates helped Trump and his campaign illegally and Trump and his campaign knew about it, welcomed it, and built it into their campaign strategy. Everyone knows this is true.

Liar.

^^^^

Hasn't read Mueller Report.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Russian government and its surrogates helped Trump and his campaign illegally and Trump and his campaign knew about it, welcomed it, and built it into their campaign strategy. Everyone knows this is true.

Liar.

Well everyone else knows it to be true. The first part is extensively documented in the Mueller Report.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Meanwhile the full Crowdstrike report to the DNC on Russia hacking their servers wasn't share with the FBI or DOJ.

On another note, Crowdstrike's IPO was lucrative.