The Mueller Report

[Anonymous]

Dear moron ( I’m praying there is only one of you):
A president talking about timing of negotiations ( flexibility)
Is not in any way equivalent to:
Undermining our entire f#cking democracy for personal gain ie building hotels and lining your pockets.
So. STFU already.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The bottom line........

This entire investigation was based on something that didn't happen.

We need to know why it was begun.

As a candidate, Trump repeatedly denied any connections to Russia even as his business was pursuing a potential real estate deal in Moscow. Trump also voiced skepticism that Russia had hacked Democratic party emails “at the same time as he and other Campaign advisors privately sought information … about any future planned WikiLeaks releases.”

The Russian government interfered in the 2016 presidential election “in a sweeping and systematic fashion”. “The investigation established that the Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome.” Investigators found multiple ties between the Trump campaign and the Russians.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Uggghhhhagain. It wasn’t because of the dossier. !!!!!!!!!!!

It was a direct result of his firing Comey. Blah. If I have to repeat that, I’m going to mass tweet fox news until they receive the communication.

Prepare to receive my annual political Facebook post,friends.

Me again. If you cite the dossier in this discussion again, I will paste the following.

Fact: dossier released to public January 10, 2017
Fact: Trump fires James Comey May 9, 2017
Fact: Rod Rosenstein appoints special counsel May 17, 2017

In here again. I’m going to take this further, because I’m done letting trump supporters draw illegitimate conclusions, and correcting them, and then *i don’t circle back and point out why their misinformation was so calculated by whomever gave you wrong info*
1. In all loving kindness I want to know why you thought the dossier’s release was related to the appointment of mueller.
2. Who told you that? Whoever it was wants to confuse you.
3. Why do they want to confuse you? It’s hard to admit, but please take a deep breath and realize that certain people on tv, radio, and typing up headlines do not have your best interest in mind. They want you to be confused and hurt
4. I don’t know what conclusions we can all agree on, but for the love, please read documents straight from the source. Then decide how to think about it.

Please stop giving devoted trust to Fox News, Rush Limbaugh, Alex Jones. If you are having difficulty finding other sources, I suggest finding reasonable people you know that can weigh both sides and listening to what they have to say. Or visit moderate, no-comment-section news sources such as PBS Newshour, CBS news, and Reuters.

Who said ANYTHING about the dossier to trigger your rant?
Why can't you possibly believe that the genesis of this investigation was tainted and needs to be looked into?

DP, because it s a common authoriaian ruse to do exactly what Trump is trying to do here and people like you and the other 30% of the country like you are buying it uncritically.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now Trump is tweeting that the “Crazy Mueller Report” was “fabricated by 18 Angry Democrats” and is “total bullshit.”

A couple days ago the report was “total exoneration” and Mueller acted honorably.


I’m so confused! Which is it? Exoneration or bullshit????

Your take on his tweet is incorrect.
Full tweet:

Statements are made about me by certain people in the Crazy Mueller Report, in itself written by 18 Angry Democrat Trump Haters, which are fabricated & totally untrue. Watch out for people that take so-called “notes,” when the notes never existed until needed. Because I never....
...agreed to testify, it was not necessary for me to respond to statements made in the “Report” about me, some of which are total bullshit & only given to make the other person look good (or me to look bad). This was an Illegally Started Hoax that never should have happened, a...

Wow. Unhinged rant, even b Trump standards. Rage tweeting from the shitter.

If he claims it’s fabricated or untrue, he should do something about it. Why don’t we pull out all the video, notes, and other evidence. You know, what constitutes 2,388 footnotes!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now Trump is tweeting that the “Crazy Mueller Report” was “fabricated by 18 Angry Democrats” and is “total bullshit.”

A couple days ago the report was “total exoneration” and Mueller acted honorably.


I’m so confused! Which is it? Exoneration or bullshit????

Your take on his tweet is incorrect.
Full tweet:

Statements are made about me by certain people in the Crazy Mueller Report, in itself written by 18 Angry Democrat Trump Haters, which are fabricated & totally untrue. Watch out for people that take so-called “notes,” when the notes never existed until needed. Because I never....
...agreed to testify, it was not necessary for me to respond to statements made in the “Report” about me, some of which are total bullshit & only given to make the other person look good (or me to look bad). This was an Illegally Started Hoax that never should have happened, a...

Wow. Unhinged rant, even b Trump standards. Rage tweeting from the shitter.

And it’s been almost an hour in mid-tweet. Somebody better send somebody for a wellness check. Let’s hope he didn’t stroke out on the golden throne at a Mar a Lago.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Dear moron ( I’m praying there is only one of you):
A president talking about timing of negotiations ( flexibility)
Is not in any way equivalent to:
Undermining our entire f#cking democracy for personal gain ie building hotels and lining your pockets.
So. STFU already.

+1000

The job of a prosecutor (Mueller) is to call balls and strikes. In this case he is calling no pitch as it relates to obstruction.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Uggghhhhagain. It wasn’t because of the dossier. !!!!!!!!!!!

It was a direct result of his firing Comey. Blah. If I have to repeat that, I’m going to mass tweet fox news until they receive the communication.

Prepare to receive my annual political Facebook post,friends.

Me again. If you cite the dossier in this discussion again, I will paste the following.

Fact: dossier released to public January 10, 2017
Fact: Trump fires James Comey May 9, 2017
Fact: Rod Rosenstein appoints special counsel May 17, 2017

Fact: special counsel was appointed BECAUSE Trump fired Comey.

Yes, we agree on that. I mean that’s not up for debate. Just some people here are like “we need to find out WHY this investigation began.”
That’s clear.
It’s a red herring these people are throwing out there to distract. And I’m not standing for it.

[Anonymous]

Gym Jordan, Rudy Giuliani, and Sarah Sanders are out there in full damage control mode this morning and are embarasssing themselves on any outlet that allows them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Uggghhhhagain. It wasn’t because of the dossier. !!!!!!!!!!!

It was a direct result of his firing Comey. Blah. If I have to repeat that, I’m going to mass tweet fox news until they receive the communication.

Prepare to receive my annual political Facebook post,friends.

Me again. If you cite the dossier in this discussion again, I will paste the following.

Fact: dossier released to public January 10, 2017
Fact: Trump fires James Comey May 9, 2017
Fact: Rod Rosenstein appoints special counsel May 17, 2017

In here again. I’m going to take this further, because I’m done letting trump supporters draw illegitimate conclusions, and correcting them, and then *i don’t circle back and point out why their misinformation was so calculated by whomever gave you wrong info*
1. In all loving kindness I want to know why you thought the dossier’s release was related to the appointment of mueller.
2. Who told you that? Whoever it was wants to confuse you.
3. Why do they want to confuse you? It’s hard to admit, but please take a deep breath and realize that certain people on tv, radio, and typing up headlines do not have your best interest in mind. They want you to be confused and hurt
4. I don’t know what conclusions we can all agree on, but for the love, please read documents straight from the source. Then decide how to think about it.

Please stop giving devoted trust to Fox News, Rush Limbaugh, Alex Jones. If you are having difficulty finding other sources, I suggest finding reasonable people you know that can weigh both sides and listening to what they have to say. Or visit moderate, no-comment-section news sources such as PBS Newshour, CBS news, and Reuters.

Who said ANYTHING about the dossier to trigger your rant?
Why can't you possibly believe that the genesis of this investigation was tainted and needs to be looked into?

DP, because it s a common authoriaian ruse to do exactly what Trump is trying to do here and people like you and the other 30% of the country like you are buying it uncritically.

Best comment of the thread.

[Anonymous]

A big question for trump supporters.
True or untrue:
This would be an acceptable playbook for a D president.

So, any d candidate could put together a timeline, start from day 1 of Trump’s actions as indicated in the report, and follow it to the present day... would that be just fine with you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:A big question for trump supporters.
True or untrue:
This would be an acceptable playbook for a D president.

So, any d candidate could put together a timeline, start from day 1 of Trump’s actions as indicated in the report, and follow it to the present day... would that be just fine with you?

Pp here.
And if you truly answer Yes, sure, I’ll go with that. If that’s your opinion, I’ll respect it.

My answer is, no, it’s not OK. And now is your moment to speak up. You can’t speak up in 4 years after a D has done the same.

[Anonymous]

I’m the person on this board who has said, over and over, that I think Russia literally switched the votes in key places. Now that we know that the Trump campaign shared internal polling data on Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisco with Russia, my theory looks ever more correct.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m the person on this board who has said, over and over, that I think Russia literally switched the votes in key places. Now that we know that the Trump campaign shared internal polling data on Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisco with Russia, my theory looks ever more correct.

I have stated this as well. As early as Dec 2016, when the whole Jill Stein "recount effort" was happening, someone on twitter posted precinct data from Pennsylvania. I cannot find the post now, but my recollection is that there were many precincts that had exact percentages (ie Trump 75% Clinton 25%) - if that happens once, it is a unicorn....but it happened in like 10-15 precincts....a virtual impossibility.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Dear moron ( I’m praying there is only one of you):
A president talking about timing of negotiations ( flexibility)
Is not in any way equivalent to:
Undermining our entire f#cking democracy for personal gain ie building hotels and lining your pockets.
So. STFU already.

So Clinton, Obama, Biden, and the rest- all public servants have become multi-millionaires through pay for play schemes isn't a problem for you?

I'd say Trump's money at least is made legitimately overall versus how these lifetime politicians end up filthy rich through corruption.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dear moron ( I’m praying there is only one of you):
A president talking about timing of negotiations ( flexibility)
Is not in any way equivalent to:
Undermining our entire f#cking democracy for personal gain ie building hotels and lining your pockets.
So. STFU already.

So Clinton, Obama, Biden, and the rest- all public servants have become multi-millionaires through pay for play schemes isn't a problem for you?

I'd say Trump's money at least is made legitimately overall versus how these lifetime politicians end up filthy rich through corruption.