Serena is a bully and a crybaby

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hate it when fans cheer unforced errors.

I agree. Classless. It happens at all venues, but the US Open seems to be one of the worst.

us open crowd is extremely ignorant.. all these fans know is Serena, Federer and john McEnroe.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

I feel very sorry for Osaka.....she's adorable and was robbed of the joy of her win.

Oh my, yes, championships should definitely be decided on the adorableness of the players.

She beat her in March, she was beating her badly yesterday too. Do you really think Serena would have lost her temper if she was leading? Do you watch any tennis? Serena has not been playing well since she came back, this was as good as it gets.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You decide

and what's your point? Nadal threatened Ramos after receiving a time violation, but no point or game penalty. Andy Murray shouted "stupid umpiring" at Ramos and also no point loss or game penalty. Shall I go on with verbal warnings to male players with no point or game penalties, because there are plenty more examples?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You decide

and what's your point? Nadal threatened Ramos after receiving a time violation, but no point or game penalty. Andy Murray shouted "stupid umpiring" at Ramos and also no point loss or game penalty. Shall I go on with verbal warnings to male players with no point or game penalties, because there are plenty more examples?

and this discrepancy hurts Serena how exactly? when was the last time she played against nadal?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

I feel very sorry for Osaka.....she's adorable and was robbed of the joy of her win.

Oh my, yes, championships should definitely be decided on the adorableness of the players.

You're either an imbecile or didn't watch the match.....likely both. Osaka outplayed Serena in every meaningful way. She's a 20 year old first time grand slam competitor. I rooted for her as the underdog and was very happy she won. You are an armchair idiot, she is a champion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You know, sometimes an issue isn’t men vs. women or black vs. white. It’s about a person’s behavior during a tough moment. That’s what this is about. Serena’s behavior during a tough situation. She didn’t handle it well. And, she doesn’t get a pass because she’s a mom, or a black woman or a super athlete.

She didn't "handle it well" because she was being treated unfairly. How would any of us react in the same situation, playing a championship game and having, first, one point, and then, an entire game handed to our opponent? If there is any point in life where a person needs to stand up for herself, this is it. If we don't stand up for ourselves during a tough moment, when will we?

Stop trying to make sense to these posters. You know most of them would never stand up for themselves. That’s why women are always the perpetual losers. They rarely fight back. They need a me too moment and require someone else to step forward first.

Women are still punished for speaking up like adults. If we do we are overly emotional. Serena was trying to be reasonable but knew what the guy did was never done. He did it to her during a final of a major and she was in shock. It just doesn't happen. Women are punished for speaking up where it is accepted from men.

Women are punished because men know they can get away with doing what they do. The reason they know they can get away with it is because other women will always blame the woman and make excuses for the man. Just follow this thread as your exhibit one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You know, sometimes an issue isn’t men vs. women or black vs. white. It’s about a person’s behavior during a tough moment. That’s what this is about. Serena’s behavior during a tough situation. She didn’t handle it well. And, she doesn’t get a pass because she’s a mom, or a black woman or a super athlete.

She didn't "handle it well" because she was being treated unfairly. How would any of us react in the same situation, playing a championship game and having, first, one point, and then, an entire game handed to our opponent? If there is any point in life where a person needs to stand up for herself, this is it. If we don't stand up for ourselves during a tough moment, when will we?

Stop trying to make sense to these posters. You know most of them would never stand up for themselves. That’s why women are always the perpetual losers. They rarely fight back. They need a me too moment and require someone else to step forward first.

Women are still punished for speaking up like adults. If we do we are overly emotional. Serena was trying to be reasonable but knew what the guy did was never done. He did it to her during a final of a major and she was in shock. It just doesn't happen. Women are punished for speaking up where it is accepted from men.

Speaking up? I believe you mean ranting like a deranged imbecile. And way to be an apologist for Serena's absurd and inexcusable behavior. The real victim here is Naomi.....don't forget that dimwit.

Women are punished because men know they can get away with doing what they do. The reason they know they can get away with it is because other women will always blame the woman and make excuses for the man. Just follow this thread as your exhibit one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

-- oh I'm a competitor, I ALWAYS turn around matches at the end and this ref stopped me -- yeah BS

Do you watch sports very much? Do you realize how common it is for an individual or team to be behind and then turn a game around and win? No game is over until it is completely over, but this match was cut short before the players could play all the points.

Just in the past couple of weeks, I saw the Nationals win a few games after being way behind. It has happened frequently enough lately that I've lost track of how many time I've seen it happen. It is not unusual for a team to come from behind in the very last inning and win the game.

Both of the opponents in this match were robbed of the chance to see how the contest would have played out in the amount of time that was originally allotted to it. People pull off come from behind wins all the time and these two players should have had the chance to play every point of their match.

If you'd watched the match you would know that there was no way Serena was coming back. I've watched her stage some amazing comebacks over the years but last night Osaka was handily outplaying her and was astonishingly calm and focused given the situation.

Sure, in theory anything could have happened but it feels neither proper nor appropriate to speculate because it diminishes Osaka's tremendous win. There will be no asterisk next to her name in the record books....she won fair and square. The ump may or may not have acted inappropriately but Serena had 100% control over how she reacted.

I watched the match in real time, and because we happened to record it for our child to watch later, watched it again.

I would never say never about a comeback. People can dig deep down inside themselves and do amazing things. That's why I wish they had been able to truly play the entire match so that we could see what might have happened.

Without the umpire's unfair calls, Serena would not have been upset as she was and we as spectators would have been able to see a great game of tennis between two fantastic competitors, without outside interference.

This I disagree. I think there will be an asterisk in the history book. It will state that she was given a point and a game and this may have been a turning point. Nevertheless, Osaka was declared the winner. For her sake, I hope she becomes a phenom like Serena and erase the asterisk. However, if she is a one hit or two hit wonder, people will always speculate if it was a true win, or if she was given help.

[Anonymous]

Djokovic killed it today.

[Anonymous]

Americans are sour losers!! ALWAYS blame on someone or something!! She lost dumb a$$.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

-- oh I'm a competitor, I ALWAYS turn around matches at the end and this ref stopped me -- yeah BS

Do you watch sports very much? Do you realize how common it is for an individual or team to be behind and then turn a game around and win? No game is over until it is completely over, but this match was cut short before the players could play all the points.

Just in the past couple of weeks, I saw the Nationals win a few games after being way behind. It has happened frequently enough lately that I've lost track of how many time I've seen it happen. It is not unusual for a team to come from behind in the very last inning and win the game.

Both of the opponents in this match were robbed of the chance to see how the contest would have played out in the amount of time that was originally allotted to it. People pull off come from behind wins all the time and these two players should have had the chance to play every point of their match.

If you'd watched the match you would know that there was no way Serena was coming back. I've watched her stage some amazing comebacks over the years but last night Osaka was handily outplaying her and was astonishingly calm and focused given the situation.

Sure, in theory anything could have happened but it feels neither proper nor appropriate to speculate because it diminishes Osaka's tremendous win. There will be no asterisk next to her name in the record books....she won fair and square. The ump may or may not have acted inappropriately but Serena had 100% control over how she reacted.

I watched the match in real time, and because we happened to record it for our child to watch later, watched it again.

I would never say never about a comeback. People can dig deep down inside themselves and do amazing things. That's why I wish they had been able to truly play the entire match so that we could see what might have happened.

Without the umpire's unfair calls, Serena would not have been upset as she was and we as spectators would have been able to see a great game of tennis between two fantastic competitors, without outside interference.

This I disagree. I think there will be an asterisk in the history book. It will state that she was given a point and a game and this may have been a turning point. Nevertheless, Osaka was declared the winner. For her sake, I hope she becomes a phenom like Serena and erase the asterisk. However, if she is a one hit or two hit wonder, people will always speculate if it was a true win, or if she was given help.

no not really.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

-- oh I'm a competitor, I ALWAYS turn around matches at the end and this ref stopped me -- yeah BS

Do you watch sports very much? Do you realize how common it is for an individual or team to be behind and then turn a game around and win? No game is over until it is completely over, but this match was cut short before the players could play all the points.

Just in the past couple of weeks, I saw the Nationals win a few games after being way behind. It has happened frequently enough lately that I've lost track of how many time I've seen it happen. It is not unusual for a team to come from behind in the very last inning and win the game.

Both of the opponents in this match were robbed of the chance to see how the contest would have played out in the amount of time that was originally allotted to it. People pull off come from behind wins all the time and these two players should have had the chance to play every point of their match.

If you'd watched the match you would know that there was no way Serena was coming back. I've watched her stage some amazing comebacks over the years but last night Osaka was handily outplaying her and was astonishingly calm and focused given the situation.

Sure, in theory anything could have happened but it feels neither proper nor appropriate to speculate because it diminishes Osaka's tremendous win. There will be no asterisk next to her name in the record books....she won fair and square. The ump may or may not have acted inappropriately but Serena had 100% control over how she reacted.

I watched the match in real time, and because we happened to record it for our child to watch later, watched it again.

I would never say never about a comeback. People can dig deep down inside themselves and do amazing things. That's why I wish they had been able to truly play the entire match so that we could see what might have happened.

Without the umpire's unfair calls, Serena would not have been upset as she was and we as spectators would have been able to see a great game of tennis between two fantastic competitors, without outside interference.

This I disagree. I think there will be an asterisk in the history book. It will state that she was given a point and a game and this may have been a turning point. Nevertheless, Osaka was declared the winner. For her sake, I hope she becomes a phenom like Serena and erase the asterisk. However, if she is a one hit or two hit wonder, people will always speculate if it was a true win, or if she was given help.

no not really.

Time will tell.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

-- oh I'm a competitor, I ALWAYS turn around matches at the end and this ref stopped me -- yeah BS

Do you watch sports very much? Do you realize how common it is for an individual or team to be behind and then turn a game around and win? No game is over until it is completely over, but this match was cut short before the players could play all the points.

Just in the past couple of weeks, I saw the Nationals win a few games after being way behind. It has happened frequently enough lately that I've lost track of how many time I've seen it happen. It is not unusual for a team to come from behind in the very last inning and win the game.

Both of the opponents in this match were robbed of the chance to see how the contest would have played out in the amount of time that was originally allotted to it. People pull off come from behind wins all the time and these two players should have had the chance to play every point of their match.

If you'd watched the match you would know that there was no way Serena was coming back. I've watched her stage some amazing comebacks over the years but last night Osaka was handily outplaying her and was astonishingly calm and focused given the situation.

Sure, in theory anything could have happened but it feels neither proper nor appropriate to speculate because it diminishes Osaka's tremendous win. There will be no asterisk next to her name in the record books....she won fair and square. The ump may or may not have acted inappropriately but Serena had 100% control over how she reacted.

I watched the match in real time, and because we happened to record it for our child to watch later, watched it again.

I would never say never about a comeback. People can dig deep down inside themselves and do amazing things. That's why I wish they had been able to truly play the entire match so that we could see what might have happened.

Without the umpire's unfair calls, Serena would not have been upset as she was and we as spectators would have been able to see a great game of tennis between two fantastic competitors, without outside interference.

This I disagree. I think there will be an asterisk in the history book. It will state that she was given a point and a game and this may have been a turning point. Nevertheless, Osaka was declared the winner. For her sake, I hope she becomes a phenom like Serena and erase the asterisk. However, if she is a one hit or two hit wonder, people will always speculate if it was a true win, or if she was given help.

no not really.

Time will tell.

Nothing to tell. You are simply wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

-- oh I'm a competitor, I ALWAYS turn around matches at the end and this ref stopped me -- yeah BS

Do you watch sports very much? Do you realize how common it is for an individual or team to be behind and then turn a game around and win? No game is over until it is completely over, but this match was cut short before the players could play all the points.

Just in the past couple of weeks, I saw the Nationals win a few games after being way behind. It has happened frequently enough lately that I've lost track of how many time I've seen it happen. It is not unusual for a team to come from behind in the very last inning and win the game.

Both of the opponents in this match were robbed of the chance to see how the contest would have played out in the amount of time that was originally allotted to it. People pull off come from behind wins all the time and these two players should have had the chance to play every point of their match.

If you'd watched the match you would know that there was no way Serena was coming back. I've watched her stage some amazing comebacks over the years but last night Osaka was handily outplaying her and was astonishingly calm and focused given the situation.

Sure, in theory anything could have happened but it feels neither proper nor appropriate to speculate because it diminishes Osaka's tremendous win. There will be no asterisk next to her name in the record books....she won fair and square. The ump may or may not have acted inappropriately but Serena had 100% control over how she reacted.

I watched the match in real time, and because we happened to record it for our child to watch later, watched it again.

I would never say never about a comeback. People can dig deep down inside themselves and do amazing things. That's why I wish they had been able to truly play the entire match so that we could see what might have happened.

Without the umpire's unfair calls, Serena would not have been upset as she was and we as spectators would have been able to see a great game of tennis between two fantastic competitors, without outside interference.

This I disagree. I think there will be an asterisk in the history book. It will state that she was given a point and a game and this may have been a turning point. Nevertheless, Osaka was declared the winner. For her sake, I hope she becomes a phenom like Serena and erase the asterisk. However, if she is a one hit or two hit wonder, people will always speculate if it was a true win, or if she was given help.

Will she’s played Serena twice, right? And won both times.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You decide

and what's your point? Nadal threatened Ramos after receiving a time violation, but no point or game penalty. Andy Murray shouted "stupid umpiring" at Ramos and also no point loss or game penalty. Shall I go on with verbal warnings to male players with no point or game penalties, because there are plenty more examples?

and this discrepancy hurts Serena how exactly? when was the last time she played against nadal?

Because if rules are enforced inconsistently, then aren’t rules, just whims and you don’t know what they are at the outset of play.