Where’s Melania?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do we even have proof that she's still alive? Has anyone seen her in the last 19 days, even from a distance?

I find it hard to believe that her surgery was planned - ie: plastic surgery. They would've announced it ahead of time and come up with a better cover story.

Yes, reporters on twitter have said that they’ve seen her at the White House.

Links please.

DP here. Google is your friend.

CNBC reporter Eamon Javers tweeted “Not that this will deter the conspiracy theorists, but I saw the First Lady walking with her aides in the West Wing yesterday afternoon.”

https://www.insideedition.com/melania-trump-spotted-public-first-time-20-days-43747

Sorry to dash all your conspiracy theories, folks.

Here’s his tweet. https://mobile.twitter.com/EamonJavers/status/1001789353197260800
The responses might be helpful for you. For one thing, a sighting doesn’t disprove any of the conspiracy theories. For another, this admin lies like a rug. Why are they lying? They’re clearly not even giving a good story. For another, forgive me, but this lying admin has actually lied so often that I wouldn’t put it past them to hire a double for this. That’s not a conspiracy, that’s a citizen noting that when you’re repeatedly lied to, you no longer trust.

And again: Trump raped and strangled his first wife. He punched his son in front of his friends. He stalked Hillary around the debate stage. And I won’t go into some of the other rumors, but this is a man with an anger problem.

Ugh. Your tin foil hat must be suffocating you because it seems you're babbling nonsense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If she doesn't make an appearance soon people need to get louder.

Really? Why? And how could you possibly get louder?

I think it's funny that your heads are exploding because you're just.so.damned.nosy and no one's bothering to share details with you. Because it's none of your business. I love it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What if Michelle Obama did the same thing? What would your response have been then, conservatives?

I can honestly say I wouldn't have been concerned about where she had been and why she hadn't made an appearance. I would understand that anyone who had recently had a medical procedure would need time to convalesce. You people are truly obsessive and it's beyond weird.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If she doesn't make an appearance soon people need to get louder.

Oh, yeah, that will work.

Here’s a little newsflash...... She will make a public appearance when she is ready and it is appropriate for her to do so.

Yesterday would have been appropriate.

For whom? You?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If she doesn't make an appearance soon people need to get louder.

Really? Why? And how could you possibly get louder?

I think it's funny that your heads are exploding because you're just.so.damned.nosy and no one's bothering to share details with you. Because it's none of your business. I love it.

Wrong. Melania is living off of taxpayer dollars. It absolutely is our business. Withholding details is criminal, but not out of line with her chain migrating past.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If she doesn't make an appearance soon people need to get louder.

Oh, yeah, that will work.

Here’s a little newsflash...... She will make a public appearance when she is ready and it is appropriate for her to do so.

Yesterday would have been appropriate.

For whom? You?

Yes. And everyone else who finances her lifestyle, which would be all Americans.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If she doesn't make an appearance soon people need to get louder.

Really? Why? And how could you possibly get louder?

I think it's funny that your heads are exploding because you're just.so.damned.nosy and no one's bothering to share details with you. Because it's none of your business. I love it.

Wrong. Melania is living off of taxpayer dollars. It absolutely is our business. Withholding details is criminal, but not out of line with her chain migrating past.

Oh, I get it now! You're the same sicko obsessive PP who hates Kate Middleton and the fact that she's currently spending the majority of her time raising her kids. Because she's a SAHM living off of British taxpayers!! The nerve!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If she doesn't make an appearance soon people need to get louder.

Really? Why? And how could you possibly get louder?

I think it's funny that your heads are exploding because you're just.so.damned.nosy and no one's bothering to share details with you. Because it's none of your business. I love it.

Wrong. Melania is living off of taxpayer dollars. It absolutely is our business. Withholding details is criminal, but not out of line with her chain migrating past.

"Withholding details is criminal"??? Do you even hear yourself?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If she doesn't make an appearance soon people need to get louder.

Really? Why? And how could you possibly get louder?

I think it's funny that your heads are exploding because you're just.so.damned.nosy and no one's bothering to share details with you. Because it's none of your business. I love it.

Wrong. Melania is living off of taxpayer dollars. It absolutely is our business. Withholding details is criminal, but not out of line with her chain migrating past.

Oh, I get it now! You're the same sicko obsessive PP who hates Kate Middleton and the fact that she's currently spending the majority of her time raising her kids. Because she's a SAHM living off of British taxpayers!! The nerve!

The irony is rich. Weren't you the one shrieking about Michelle Obama's every move?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If she doesn't make an appearance soon people need to get louder.

Really? Why? And how could you possibly get louder?

I think it's funny that your heads are exploding because you're just.so.damned.nosy and no one's bothering to share details with you. Because it's none of your business. I love it.

Wrong. Melania is living off of taxpayer dollars. It absolutely is our business. Withholding details is criminal, but not out of line with her chain migrating past.

Oh, I get it now! You're the same sicko obsessive PP who hates Kate Middleton and the fact that she's currently spending the majority of her time raising her kids. Because she's a SAHM living off of British taxpayers!! The nerve!

The irony is rich. Weren't you the one shrieking about Michelle Obama's every move?

Nope. I didn't pay too much attention to Michelle Obama. And I can't for the life of me understand why you're obsessing over Melania Trump. Isn't there *anything else* in your life to occupy that space?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If she doesn't make an appearance soon people need to get louder.

Really? Why? And how could you possibly get louder?

I think it's funny that your heads are exploding because you're just.so.damned.nosy and no one's bothering to share details with you. Because it's none of your business. I love it.

Wrong. Melania is living off of taxpayer dollars. It absolutely is our business. Withholding details is criminal, but not out of line with her chain migrating past.

Oh, I get it now! You're the same sicko obsessive PP who hates Kate Middleton and the fact that she's currently spending the majority of her time raising her kids. Because she's a SAHM living off of British taxpayers!! The nerve!

The irony is rich. Weren't you the one shrieking about Michelle Obama's every move?

Nope. I didn't pay too much attention to Michelle Obama. And I can't for the life of me understand why you're obsessing over Melania Trump. Isn't there *anything else* in your life to occupy that space?

Sure you didn't.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If she doesn't make an appearance soon people need to get louder.

Really? Why? And how could you possibly get louder?

I think it's funny that your heads are exploding because you're just.so.damned.nosy and no one's bothering to share details with you. Because it's none of your business. I love it.

Wrong. Melania is living off of taxpayer dollars. It absolutely is our business. Withholding details is criminal, but not out of line with her chain migrating past.

"Withholding details is criminal"??? Do you even hear yourself?

Yes, loud and clear. Judicial Watch sued Michelle Obama for her travel records in 2010. The precedent has been set, and Melania should be held to the same standard.

https://www.politico.com/blogs/politico44/2012/03/group-sues-for-michelle-obama-vacation-records-116545

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If she doesn't make an appearance soon people need to get louder.

Oh, yeah, that will work.

Here’s a little newsflash...... She will make a public appearance when she is ready and it is appropriate for her to do so.

LOL, there is nothing remotely appropriate about her even being in the WH in the first place. The whole circus is a joke and now we have added Kardashians to the sordid, disreputable, trashy mess.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If she doesn't make an appearance soon people need to get louder.

Really? Why? And how could you possibly get louder?

I think it's funny that your heads are exploding because you're just.so.damned.nosy and no one's bothering to share details with you. Because it's none of your business. I love it.

Wrong. Melania is living off of taxpayer dollars. It absolutely is our business. Withholding details is criminal, but not out of line with her chain migrating past.

Oh, I get it now! You're the same sicko obsessive PP who hates Kate Middleton and the fact that she's currently spending the majority of her time raising her kids. Because she's a SAHM living off of British taxpayers!! The nerve!

And yet here you are.
The irony is rich. Weren't you the one shrieking about Michelle Obama's every move?

Nope. I didn't pay too much attention to Michelle Obama. And I can't for the life of me understand why you're obsessing over Melania Trump. Isn't there *anything else* in your life to occupy that space?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here’s his tweet. https://mobile.twitter.com/EamonJavers/status/1001789353197260800
The responses might be helpful for you. For one thing, a sighting doesn’t disprove any of the conspiracy theories. For another, this admin lies like a rug. Why are they lying? They’re clearly not even giving a good story. For another, forgive me, but this lying admin has actually lied so often that I wouldn’t put it past them to hire a double for this. That’s not a conspiracy, that’s a citizen noting that when you’re repeatedly lied to, you no longer trust.

And again: Trump raped and strangled his first wife. He punched his son in front of his friends. He stalked Hillary around the debate stage. And I won’t go into some of the other rumors, but this is a man with an anger problem.

Ugh. Your tin foil hat must be suffocating you because it seems you're babbling nonsense.

I guess if you aren’t a great reader and if you don’t follow a lot of news. You would have to admit that Trump and his admin tell a lot of lies, that’s a fact. The story they have concocted - that she had a kidney procedure that’s typically outpatient - is inconsistent with her being unable to do her job for nearly a month, or even to be seen by more than one person outside the White House.

I suppose you think I’ve stepped into tinfoil with my second paragraph? But no, Ivana wrote in her autobiography that Donald attacked her. She recanted later, but legitimate publishers don’t typically put those kinds of accusations into print without proof. Here’s the first google result for my claim that Donald punched Jr while he was in college. https://www.complex.com/life/2016/11/donald-trump-jr-college-classmate-claims-trump-knocked-son-ground-in-front-friends-once Here’s the first google result for my claim that Donald stalked Hillary around the debate stage https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/2016-presidential-debates/presidential-debate-trump-accused-stalking-clinton-stage-n663516

My point is: First Lady is a weird job. It’s archaic. But it is what it is. You come to the White House you gd do your job. If she had plastic surgery and is embarrassed and waiting for it to settle, okay, fine. It’s a little stupid not to wait until they’re out of the White House, but just concoct a better lie from the outset. Because this kind of stupid thing they’ve done? It’s just stupid.