What is your honest opinion on undocumented immigrants?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The funny part? The same women's rights people are open to Muslims coming in by the millions..a culture with a horrendous women's rights record

Which . . . they would be under different laws here. Perhaps people will view this as an opportunity to change things.

But...they don't...they want Sharia law...

Same ignorant rant. Name one country where muslims are less than 50% of the population where Sharia is enforced. If it is a muslim majority country then if they want Sharia then thats their business. But then for an uneducated, ignorant mind I guess a demagogue who incites hate is all the matters. Reason, numbers, facts and history be damned.

Seriously? That's their business? Ha. Whose business? The men that are able to vote to enforce it, along with enforcing that women can't drive, show skin, and so on and so forth. America should protect its ideals and to do that we may need to keep out ideas that go against our beliefs of equal rights for all, etc... There should not be a litmus test for religion unless that religion directly harms our way of life. Wake up. London and Brussles have been changed for the worse.

You dont have reading comprehension or analytical skills AT ALL. Read again with a cool head and parse each word.

Really good comeback. I don't expect anymore because you can't argue the facts.

The PP is telling you that sharia rules ONLY HAPPENS in MUSLIM MAJORITY countries and it is NOT USA's business to change that. If you can show Sharia law being enforced anywhere in the USA Please show credible links. Seriously what are the facts you have shown?

The concern is that if they ha e enough numbers to pass these laws they may be able to do so. In Texas, a community tried to pass Sharia law and the mayor passed a law outlawing it. The fact that they wanted to is what was of concern. Backwards in time...

You are worried about a population that is less than 1% could grow to have enough numbers to pass Sharia law. I AM WORRIED ABOUT WHITE SUPREMACISTS who are significantly larger than 10% of the population could grow in numbers and PASS SLAVERY INTO LAW and kill minorities and jews.

As you can see, if you can think, I am using your own logic. Dont you think I could be right, if you could be right?

Ask the Swedes and the Germans how easy it is...

Ask the millions of blacks, minorities, jews how easy it is for White Supremacy to raise again.

And yet? It's only radical Islam that seems to be wreaking havoc around the world, not White Supremacy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The funny part? The same women's rights people are open to Muslims coming in by the millions..a culture with a horrendous women's rights record

Please back up what you are saying with some credible source that women's rights activists want Muslims by millions. Us has taken less than 10000 REFUGEES since the crisis in Syria started. Show me any article where any American women rights group wanted millions of Muslims. One article. Otherwise you are just a low life liar.

Why do Liberals always focus on Syria? I never said Syria. I said Muslims. This has been going on for quite a while:

http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/01/06/a-new-estimate-of-the-u-s-muslim-population/

When you can show me women's rights groups are not also liberals, we can talk

You think people here are as stupid as you are. Your link shows the muslim population growth in the USA. You do know muslims have been coming to the USA for over 50 years. But you claimed that muslims are coming to the US in millions NOW supported by women's rights groups.

So again, classic liar behavior. Try to switch the topic when you are exposed.

How's that working out for Germany? Sweden? What I SAID was I was surprised that women's groups support Muslims coming here by the millions given the way Muslim countries treat women. YOU are the one who changed it to NOW and Syria.

Wrong again. SOME, not all, women's groups support SOME "refugees" coming from all over the world be it African or Muslim or Christians from Middle east. No one SAYS EXCLUSIVELY TO GET MUSLIMS alone. Besides the point these are REFUGEES which are a different class than Normal Immigrants, even the refugees are NOT IN MILLIONS. Get your facts straight. But I know you are not capable coz you afterall posted the growth of overall muslim population(which includes a good number of black americans) in the USA as proof of Muslim immigrant GROWTH. Apparently RC and Analytical procesing is not your strong suite. So think and analyze before you post, if you can.

Different poster you are arguing with above. Obviously there are several people with similar points of view. I am liberal and have a little girl and I want to ensure that our society is heading in the right direction and not going backwards. By doing the "liberal" thing which may seem kind in letting in refugees and others that want to harm us, we are hurting others like lgbt, women's rights, etc... Friends that grew up in these societies and fled them and are not religious are petrified of the influx of immigrants. They escaped the culture to come here and now you go to Tyson's mall and so many women are head to toe in burkas and were sitting at separate tables from their husbands. It was very strange and it was obvious it was not their choice to sit there. They didn't look very happy. Very sad and hard to believe they really want to wear a hot burka in Summer weather.

Do you also know many VERY RELIGIOUS JEWS USED TO WEAR a very similar religious clothing when they came as refugees in the 1930s,40s and 50s. Infact some jews still wear these to synagogues. The first generation always does. Dont be afraid of symbolism.

WHAT REALLY MATTERS is to NOT LET people with FELONY or People on NO FLY list or People on Terror watch list TO GET GUNS. But the GOP, under NRAs order, supports the rights of criminals and terrorists THAN the rights of regular citizens. But the so called security experts here ONLY POINT AT terrorists/RACISTS after they commit crime BUT wont support them from getting guns in the first place.

Again, what other rights will you take away because of a man-made list prone to errors. Ted Kennedy was on that no-fly list by accident. You know that, right? Now of course that was easy to fix. What if it's your husband? Father? Mother? Child? How much do you want to spend proving you don't belong there?

We live in a world of Artificial Intelligence and Google knows EVERYTHING You and I type. You think smart people using even smarter technologies cant solve the problem you raised. Technology can sort out all the problems.

But You Support the rights of CRIMINALS and Terrorists to own a gun rather than the right of Common citizens to live a peaceful life.

We have that technology now, and guess what? The list is still wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Only if they're rich and/or a "10" because America isn't for sad loser babies. We need to Make America Great Again with rich, good looking babies, not poor, ugly babies. And no Mexicans. We don't want any rapist anchor babies. That would be terrible. The worst.

TRUMP!

No not really. Just don't want to bring people here that make our society go BACKWARDS and put the rights of women and gays back a few decades. It's funny liberals that protect gay rights and women's rights want to bring people here that want to dismantle these rights. It's true. My frond married a Muslim man here in the states and while he was "Westernized" prior to marriage - once married and a mom, he wouldn't let her drive and made her be driven around by a driver. He made her wear the headscarf. He also had women on the aid and came and went as he pleased without telling her. Treated her like crap.

This happens among all people among all races. Go to Appalachia or White Trailer trash areas and you will find the same crap happen. Or check what happens in White Supremacist Households and see how women are treated.

Maybe but it is NOT the law. You understand that right?

You are the one who missed the point. No matter the law, THE LAW DOESN'T HAVE EYES TO LOOK INTO EVERY HOUSEHOLD and stop every crime in every household. The law takes hold if something is reported. If any woman reports domestic abuse then the law supports her. So in the USA ALL domestic abuse is treated the same way if the Women reports it. Now there are many white/black/asian/muslim woman who may not report it, thats a different issue.

I do not know what Sharia Law does in case of Domestic abuse. Maybe it supports the women (doesn't mean if the law supports the political class executes it) or maybe it doesn't. I am not any religious expert.

You are arguing and have no idea what the hell you are supporting? Jesus, liberals are dumb!

Read again. I said in America the law supports the woman, no matter if they are abused by White or black or muslim man. I dont CARE WHAT SHARIA says, coz in this country Sharia is not the law. If a muslim man abuse his wife in the name of Sharia, that is no different than a white man abusing in the name of MALE POWER. Neither Sharia nor Male Power is the law of the land.

And guess what happened in NJ? A Jordanian woman was refused a restraining order because the judge ruled her husband didn't know beating her was wrong, due to their culture. It took A YEAR for that to be undone. A YEAR for that woman to finally receive her restraining order. In good ole America. Imagine that!

What the PP was saying, is that Muslims have already TRIED to get Sharia law passed. At this moment in time, they were shot down. If we continue to allow unchecked Muslim immigration, how long before we are dealing with the same issues German and Sweden are?

It is shot down right. Just like every law passed by White Supremacists. Do you know the White SUPREMACISTS HAVE MANY TIMES PASSED the law to deport NON-WHITES in their GRAND yearly gatherings. IS THE LAW THEY PASSED VALID? Same is the case with Any Sharia Law passed.

If you are afraid of a population that is 1%, then you should be afraid of the White Supremacist population(easily atleast 10%) that wants to "Make America White Again". Why are you not afraid of White Supremacist group as an existential threat to ALL OF AMERICA? There is really something going on here. Something inconceivable. Something I cant talk about.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The funny part? The same women's rights people are open to Muslims coming in by the millions..a culture with a horrendous women's rights record

Please back up what you are saying with some credible source that women's rights activists want Muslims by millions. Us has taken less than 10000 REFUGEES since the crisis in Syria started. Show me any article where any American women rights group wanted millions of Muslims. One article. Otherwise you are just a low life liar.

Why do Liberals always focus on Syria? I never said Syria. I said Muslims. This has been going on for quite a while:

http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/01/06/a-new-estimate-of-the-u-s-muslim-population/

When you can show me women's rights groups are not also liberals, we can talk

You think people here are as stupid as you are. Your link shows the muslim population growth in the USA. You do know muslims have been coming to the USA for over 50 years. But you claimed that muslims are coming to the US in millions NOW supported by women's rights groups.

So again, classic liar behavior. Try to switch the topic when you are exposed.

How's that working out for Germany? Sweden? What I SAID was I was surprised that women's groups support Muslims coming here by the millions given the way Muslim countries treat women. YOU are the one who changed it to NOW and Syria.

Wrong again. SOME, not all, women's groups support SOME "refugees" coming from all over the world be it African or Muslim or Christians from Middle east. No one SAYS EXCLUSIVELY TO GET MUSLIMS alone. Besides the point these are REFUGEES which are a different class than Normal Immigrants, even the refugees are NOT IN MILLIONS. Get your facts straight. But I know you are not capable coz you afterall posted the growth of overall muslim population(which includes a good number of black americans) in the USA as proof of Muslim immigrant GROWTH. Apparently RC and Analytical procesing is not your strong suite. So think and analyze before you post, if you can.

Different poster you are arguing with above. Obviously there are several people with similar points of view. I am liberal and have a little girl and I want to ensure that our society is heading in the right direction and not going backwards. By doing the "liberal" thing which may seem kind in letting in refugees and others that want to harm us, we are hurting others like lgbt, women's rights, etc... Friends that grew up in these societies and fled them and are not religious are petrified of the influx of immigrants. They escaped the culture to come here and now you go to Tyson's mall and so many women are head to toe in burkas and were sitting at separate tables from their husbands. It was very strange and it was obvious it was not their choice to sit there. They didn't look very happy. Very sad and hard to believe they really want to wear a hot burka in Summer weather.

Do you also know many VERY RELIGIOUS JEWS USED TO WEAR a very similar religious clothing when they came as refugees in the 1930s,40s and 50s. Infact some jews still wear these to synagogues. The first generation always does. Dont be afraid of symbolism.

WHAT REALLY MATTERS is to NOT LET people with FELONY or People on NO FLY list or People on Terror watch list TO GET GUNS. But the GOP, under NRAs order, supports the rights of criminals and terrorists THAN the rights of regular citizens. But the so called security experts here ONLY POINT AT terrorists/RACISTS after they commit crime BUT wont support them from getting guns in the first place.

Again, what other rights will you take away because of a man-made list prone to errors. Ted Kennedy was on that no-fly list by accident. You know that, right? Now of course that was easy to fix. What if it's your husband? Father? Mother? Child? How much do you want to spend proving you don't belong there?

We live in a world of Artificial Intelligence and Google knows EVERYTHING You and I type. You think smart people using even smarter technologies cant solve the problem you raised. Technology can sort out all the problems.

But You Support the rights of CRIMINALS and Terrorists to own a gun rather than the right of Common citizens to live a peaceful life.

We have that technology now, and guess what? The list is still wrong.

I am sorry I didn't know I am talking to the CIA director, President of USA, Secretary of Homeland ALL COMBINED into one. You know it all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The funny part? The same women's rights people are open to Muslims coming in by the millions..a culture with a horrendous women's rights record

Which . . . they would be under different laws here. Perhaps people will view this as an opportunity to change things.

But...they don't...they want Sharia law...

Same ignorant rant. Name one country where muslims are less than 50% of the population where Sharia is enforced. If it is a muslim majority country then if they want Sharia then thats their business. But then for an uneducated, ignorant mind I guess a demagogue who incites hate is all the matters. Reason, numbers, facts and history be damned.

Seriously? That's their business? Ha. Whose business? The men that are able to vote to enforce it, along with enforcing that women can't drive, show skin, and so on and so forth. America should protect its ideals and to do that we may need to keep out ideas that go against our beliefs of equal rights for all, etc... There should not be a litmus test for religion unless that religion directly harms our way of life. Wake up. London and Brussles have been changed for the worse.

You dont have reading comprehension or analytical skills AT ALL. Read again with a cool head and parse each word.

Really good comeback. I don't expect anymore because you can't argue the facts.

The PP is telling you that sharia rules ONLY HAPPENS in MUSLIM MAJORITY countries and it is NOT USA's business to change that. If you can show Sharia law being enforced anywhere in the USA Please show credible links. Seriously what are the facts you have shown?

The concern is that if they ha e enough numbers to pass these laws they may be able to do so. In Texas, a community tried to pass Sharia law and the mayor passed a law outlawing it. The fact that they wanted to is what was of concern. Backwards in time...

You are worried about a population that is less than 1% could grow to have enough numbers to pass Sharia law. I AM WORRIED ABOUT WHITE SUPREMACISTS who are significantly larger than 10% of the population could grow in numbers and PASS SLAVERY INTO LAW and kill minorities and jews.

As you can see, if you can think, I am using your own logic. Dont you think I could be right, if you could be right?

Ask the Swedes and the Germans how easy it is...

Ask the millions of blacks, minorities, jews how easy it is for White Supremacy to raise again.

And yet? It's only radical Islam that seems to be wreaking havoc around the world, not White Supremacy.

White Supremacy wrecks the lives of Minorities and KILLED MILLIONS OF MINORITIES. If the white supremacist groups are allowed to have their way this country will have slavery again.

I am not supporting any extremist group be it radical muslim groups or radical RACIST groups. In my book anyone who causes terror to a peaceful public is a TERRORIST.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Only if they're rich and/or a "10" because America isn't for sad loser babies. We need to Make America Great Again with rich, good looking babies, not poor, ugly babies. And no Mexicans. We don't want any rapist anchor babies. That would be terrible. The worst.

TRUMP!

No not really. Just don't want to bring people here that make our society go BACKWARDS and put the rights of women and gays back a few decades. It's funny liberals that protect gay rights and women's rights want to bring people here that want to dismantle these rights. It's true. My frond married a Muslim man here in the states and while he was "Westernized" prior to marriage - once married and a mom, he wouldn't let her drive and made her be driven around by a driver. He made her wear the headscarf. He also had women on the aid and came and went as he pleased without telling her. Treated her like crap.

This happens among all people among all races. Go to Appalachia or White Trailer trash areas and you will find the same crap happen. Or check what happens in White Supremacist Households and see how women are treated.

Maybe but it is NOT the law. You understand that right?

You are the one who missed the point. No matter the law, THE LAW DOESN'T HAVE EYES TO LOOK INTO EVERY HOUSEHOLD and stop every crime in every household. The law takes hold if something is reported. If any woman reports domestic abuse then the law supports her. So in the USA ALL domestic abuse is treated the same way if the Women reports it. Now there are many white/black/asian/muslim woman who may not report it, thats a different issue.

I do not know what Sharia Law does in case of Domestic abuse. Maybe it supports the women (doesn't mean if the law supports the political class executes it) or maybe it doesn't. I am not any religious expert.

Yes, it is very clear that you are not a religious expert if you are the same poster that has been defending Sharia law etc..

[Anonymous]

First generation work hard but do break the laws, like driving without a license, not paying taxes, etc. They do run up health bills at the local hospitals which they can't pay for and I don't know how they pay for the public school, which has enough of a ESL population that the school has deceased the number of children in it's honor's group. The pie of money just isn't big enough for both. Now the local elementary is a Title One school, which for the life of me I can't figure out why the teacher I spoke to thought that was great?
When my family arrived late 180s0 and early 1900s they had to work or they'd die. Now the current population can rely on social benefits which I pay for. Look at Europe and an entire population recently arrived getting food, housing, and a monthly check.
Would I come here illegally if I were from a country overrun by drug gangs and civil war?
Yes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Only if they're rich and/or a "10" because America isn't for sad loser babies. We need to Make America Great Again with rich, good looking babies, not poor, ugly babies. And no Mexicans. We don't want any rapist anchor babies. That would be terrible. The worst.

TRUMP!

No not really. Just don't want to bring people here that make our society go BACKWARDS and put the rights of women and gays back a few decades. It's funny liberals that protect gay rights and women's rights want to bring people here that want to dismantle these rights. It's true. My frond married a Muslim man here in the states and while he was "Westernized" prior to marriage - once married and a mom, he wouldn't let her drive and made her be driven around by a driver. He made her wear the headscarf. He also had women on the aid and came and went as he pleased without telling her. Treated her like crap.

This happens among all people among all races. Go to Appalachia or White Trailer trash areas and you will find the same crap happen. Or check what happens in White Supremacist Households and see how women are treated.

Maybe but it is NOT the law. You understand that right?

You are the one who missed the point. No matter the law, THE LAW DOESN'T HAVE EYES TO LOOK INTO EVERY HOUSEHOLD and stop every crime in every household. The law takes hold if something is reported. If any woman reports domestic abuse then the law supports her. So in the USA ALL domestic abuse is treated the same way if the Women reports it. Now there are many white/black/asian/muslim woman who may not report it, thats a different issue.

I do not know what Sharia Law does in case of Domestic abuse. Maybe it supports the women (doesn't mean if the law supports the political class executes it) or maybe it doesn't. I am not any religious expert.

Yes, it is very clear that you are not a religious expert if you are the same poster that has been defending Sharia law etc..

Here is where your RC ability comes into question. I am neither defending Sharia law nor am I defending White Supremacist law or ANY LAW THAT IS NOT the law of the land.

All I am saying is DO NOT POINT finger at ALL MUSLIM AMERICANS in this country for something a small minority of muslims do. Just as I will say Do not blame ALL Whites for what a minority White supremacist group does. So while you point the dangers of Sharia, point the dangers of White Supremacy also coz to this day MILLIONS more have been affected by White Supremacy than by Sharia law. That is an undeniable fact.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:First generation work hard but do break the laws, like driving without a license, not paying taxes, etc. They do run up health bills at the local hospitals which they can't pay for and I don't know how they pay for the public school, which has enough of a ESL population that the school has deceased the number of children in it's honor's group. The pie of money just isn't big enough for both. Now the local elementary is a Title One school, which for the life of me I can't figure out why the teacher I spoke to thought that was great?
When my family arrived late 180s0 and early 1900s they had to work or they'd die. Now the current population can rely on social benefits which I pay for. Look at Europe and an entire population recently arrived getting food, housing, and a monthly check.
Would I come here illegally if I were from a country overrun by drug gangs and civil war?
Yes.

So what is the solution, Find some other politician who will deport all 11 million of them coz TRUMP has developed a large heart and actually blames Obama for being heartless coz he has deported thousands of illegal immigrants with criminal records.

http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-06-25/trump-says-immigration-plan-wouldn-t-feature-mass-deportations

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Only if they're rich and/or a "10" because America isn't for sad loser babies. We need to Make America Great Again with rich, good looking babies, not poor, ugly babies. And no Mexicans. We don't want any rapist anchor babies. That would be terrible. The worst.

TRUMP!

No not really. Just don't want to bring people here that make our society go BACKWARDS and put the rights of women and gays back a few decades. It's funny liberals that protect gay rights and women's rights want to bring people here that want to dismantle these rights. It's true. My frond married a Muslim man here in the states and while he was "Westernized" prior to marriage - once married and a mom, he wouldn't let her drive and made her be driven around by a driver. He made her wear the headscarf. He also had women on the aid and came and went as he pleased without telling her. Treated her like crap.

This happens among all people among all races. Go to Appalachia or White Trailer trash areas and you will find the same crap happen. Or check what happens in White Supremacist Households and see how women are treated.

Maybe but it is NOT the law. You understand that right?

You are the one who missed the point. No matter the law, THE LAW DOESN'T HAVE EYES TO LOOK INTO EVERY HOUSEHOLD and stop every crime in every household. The law takes hold if something is reported. If any woman reports domestic abuse then the law supports her. So in the USA ALL domestic abuse is treated the same way if the Women reports it. Now there are many white/black/asian/muslim woman who may not report it, thats a different issue.

I do not know what Sharia Law does in case of Domestic abuse. Maybe it supports the women (doesn't mean if the law supports the political class executes it) or maybe it doesn't. I am not any religious expert.

Yes, it is very clear that you are not a religious expert if you are the same poster that has been defending Sharia law etc..

Here is where your RC ability comes into question. I am neither defending Sharia law nor am I defending White Supremacist law or ANY LAW THAT IS NOT the law of the land.

All I am saying is DO NOT POINT finger at ALL MUSLIM AMERICANS in this country for something a small minority of muslims do. Just as I will say Do not blame ALL Whites for what a minority White supremacist group does. So while you point the dangers of Sharia, point the dangers of White Supremacy also coz to this day MILLIONS more have been affected by White Supremacy than by Sharia law. That is an undeniable fact.

Noone is talking about Muslim Americans already here. They are talking about the new wave of refugees and immigrants that seem to be causing the most havoc in Europe.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The funny part? The same women's rights people are open to Muslims coming in by the millions..a culture with a horrendous women's rights record

Which . . . they would be under different laws here. Perhaps people will view this as an opportunity to change things.

But...they don't...they want Sharia law...

Same ignorant rant. Name one country where muslims are less than 50% of the population where Sharia is enforced. If it is a muslim majority country then if they want Sharia then thats their business. But then for an uneducated, ignorant mind I guess a demagogue who incites hate is all the matters. Reason, numbers, facts and history be damned.

Seriously? That's their business? Ha. Whose business? The men that are able to vote to enforce it, along with enforcing that women can't drive, show skin, and so on and so forth. America should protect its ideals and to do that we may need to keep out ideas that go against our beliefs of equal rights for all, etc... There should not be a litmus test for religion unless that religion directly harms our way of life. Wake up. London and Brussles have been changed for the worse.

You dont have reading comprehension or analytical skills AT ALL. Read again with a cool head and parse each word.

Really good comeback. I don't expect anymore because you can't argue the facts.

The PP is telling you that sharia rules ONLY HAPPENS in MUSLIM MAJORITY countries and it is NOT USA's business to change that. If you can show Sharia law being enforced anywhere in the USA Please show credible links. Seriously what are the facts you have shown?

The concern is that if they ha e enough numbers to pass these laws they may be able to do so. In Texas, a community tried to pass Sharia law and the mayor passed a law outlawing it. The fact that they wanted to is what was of concern. Backwards in time...

You are worried about a population that is less than 1% could grow to have enough numbers to pass Sharia law. I AM WORRIED ABOUT WHITE SUPREMACISTS who are significantly larger than 10% of the population could grow in numbers and PASS SLAVERY INTO LAW and kill minorities and jews.

As you can see, if you can think, I am using your own logic. Dont you think I could be right, if you could be right?

Ok, but lets talk mass killings in the WORLD, including here. How many in the last say 2 years, or lets say since and including Boston, were done by "white supremecists?" I think they were all islamic terrorists. So, that worries me now. It is 2016. Not 1966.

[Anonymous]

System is broken and the fall of America - similar to Rome

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The funny part? The same women's rights people are open to Muslims coming in by the millions..a culture with a horrendous women's rights record

Which . . . they would be under different laws here. Perhaps people will view this as an opportunity to change things.

But...they don't...they want Sharia law...

Same ignorant rant. Name one country where muslims are less than 50% of the population where Sharia is enforced. If it is a muslim majority country then if they want Sharia then thats their business. But then for an uneducated, ignorant mind I guess a demagogue who incites hate is all the matters. Reason, numbers, facts and history be damned.

Seriously? That's their business? Ha. Whose business? The men that are able to vote to enforce it, along with enforcing that women can't drive, show skin, and so on and so forth. America should protect its ideals and to do that we may need to keep out ideas that go against our beliefs of equal rights for all, etc... There should not be a litmus test for religion unless that religion directly harms our way of life. Wake up. London and Brussles have been changed for the worse.

You dont have reading comprehension or analytical skills AT ALL. Read again with a cool head and parse each word.

Really good comeback. I don't expect anymore because you can't argue the facts.

The PP is telling you that sharia rules ONLY HAPPENS in MUSLIM MAJORITY countries and it is NOT USA's business to change that. If you can show Sharia law being enforced anywhere in the USA Please show credible links. Seriously what are the facts you have shown?

The concern is that if they ha e enough numbers to pass these laws they may be able to do so. In Texas, a community tried to pass Sharia law and the mayor passed a law outlawing it. The fact that they wanted to is what was of concern. Backwards in time...

You are worried about a population that is less than 1% could grow to have enough numbers to pass Sharia law. I AM WORRIED ABOUT WHITE SUPREMACISTS who are significantly larger than 10% of the population could grow in numbers and PASS SLAVERY INTO LAW and kill minorities and jews.

As you can see, if you can think, I am using your own logic. Dont you think I could be right, if you could be right?

Ok, but lets talk mass killings in the WORLD, including here. How many in the last say 2 years, or lets say since and including Boston, were done by "white supremecists?" I think they were all islamic terrorists. So, that worries me now. It is 2016. Not 1966.

Educate yourself.
http://time.com/3934980/right-wing-extremists-white-terrorism-islamist-jihadi-dangerous/
http://www.mintpressnews.com/white-americans-are-the-biggest-terror-threat-in-the-united-states/211608/

Dylann Roof happened in 2015 and many more before that. SO IT IS AS MUCH AN ISSUE today as was in 1966. Depending on your race you dont register it. IF you are white you may register a non-white terror as opposed to a minority who may register a white racist terror.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The funny part? The same women's rights people are open to Muslims coming in by the millions..a culture with a horrendous women's rights record

Which . . . they would be under different laws here. Perhaps people will view this as an opportunity to change things.

But...they don't...they want Sharia law...

Same ignorant rant. Name one country where muslims are less than 50% of the population where Sharia is enforced. If it is a muslim majority country then if they want Sharia then thats their business. But then for an uneducated, ignorant mind I guess a demagogue who incites hate is all the matters. Reason, numbers, facts and history be damned.

Seriously? That's their business? Ha. Whose business? The men that are able to vote to enforce it, along with enforcing that women can't drive, show skin, and so on and so forth. America should protect its ideals and to do that we may need to keep out ideas that go against our beliefs of equal rights for all, etc... There should not be a litmus test for religion unless that religion directly harms our way of life. Wake up. London and Brussles have been changed for the worse.

You dont have reading comprehension or analytical skills AT ALL. Read again with a cool head and parse each word.

Really good comeback. I don't expect anymore because you can't argue the facts.

The PP is telling you that sharia rules ONLY HAPPENS in MUSLIM MAJORITY countries and it is NOT USA's business to change that. If you can show Sharia law being enforced anywhere in the USA Please show credible links. Seriously what are the facts you have shown?

The concern is that if they ha e enough numbers to pass these laws they may be able to do so. In Texas, a community tried to pass Sharia law and the mayor passed a law outlawing it. The fact that they wanted to is what was of concern. Backwards in time...

You are worried about a population that is less than 1% could grow to have enough numbers to pass Sharia law. I AM WORRIED ABOUT WHITE SUPREMACISTS who are significantly larger than 10% of the population could grow in numbers and PASS SLAVERY INTO LAW and kill minorities and jews.

As you can see, if you can think, I am using your own logic. Dont you think I could be right, if you could be right?

Ok, but lets talk mass killings in the WORLD, including here. How many in the last say 2 years, or lets say since and including Boston, were done by "white supremecists?" I think they were all islamic terrorists. So, that worries me now. It is 2016. Not 1966.

Educate yourself.
http://time.com/3934980/right-wing-extremists-white-terrorism-islamist-jihadi-dangerous/
http://www.mintpressnews.com/white-americans-are-the-biggest-terror-threat-in-the-united-states/211608/

Dylann Roof happened in 2015 and many more before that. SO IT IS AS MUCH AN ISSUE today as was in 1966. Depending on your race you dont register it. IF you are white you may register a non-white terror as opposed to a minority who may register a white racist terror.

I am arab actually, but thanks. nice try.

[Anonymous]

My honest opinion..if we deport all the undocumented people in dc will have to pay Americans to cut their grass, do their housework, work on their house. I try my best to hire Americans, legal immigrants, etc... It costs more to do work on houses in much cheaper parts of the country ( in my experience) because they are not flooded with illegals driving wages down.

I don't think the issue has much to do with terror, more to do with jobs and wages.