Duggar son allegedly molested girls including sisters

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:where does it state he molested the younger siblings? (ages 8 i guess or so and below)?

People are just guessing. Jim bob and Michelle are listed as the parents of four of the victims in the police report. The victim names are redacted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can't (and don't want) to speculate as to why any of this happened, but I just find that the people who are enjoying this scandal to be just as sick as they accuse the duggars of being.

Really? Then your barometer is off.

Really? So I'm wrong to think people are sick for ENJOYING a story about children being molested being exposed to the public?

+ 1

I agree with you. I do not understand why there is such glee? I think it is victimizing the victims again. I also find it odd that it was not the victims who made it public, so the timing is very suspect.

BTW - just so you know - I am not a Christian. I am married female, a mom and a registered democrat.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The real sick ones are the people posting their hatred for the Duggars here. You all are loving it that there is FINALLY a scandal to validate your hatred. FINALLY there is a real reason to hate the duggars. To hell with the innocent victims in this story, right? You all are sick, sick, sick.

Let me ask you something, if FRC is a "hate" group or w/e the hell you call it, can we say the same about planned parenthood? Or are you too big of hypocrites to see that?

Planned parenthood is an organization that provides healthcare, education and resources. FRC is a group that espouses hate speech and actively advocates for bigotry and discrimination. So no, not the same.

That is a matter of opinion and perception.

And fact and reality...
NP here.

[Anonymous]

Whoever's fault it is, and whoever is or is not taking glee from the Duggar downfall, their influence and their show need to be cancelled immediately!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:where does it state he molested the younger siblings? (ages 8 i guess or so and below)?

Four were his siblings. One was his babysitter, sleeping on the sofa. In the police report the addresses are listed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:where does it state he molested the younger siblings? (ages 8 i guess or so and below)?

Police report lists 4 of the victims as living in the duggar house. He had 5 female siblings at the time. The non-victim sister is described as nearing ged completion, which leads to the conclusion that it was one of the eldest. That means both the 4 and 8 year old were touched.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:where does it state he molested the younger siblings? (ages 8 i guess or so and below)?

Four were his siblings. One was his babysitter, sleeping on the sofa. In the police report the addresses are listed.

Ok so a pedophile in making.. disgusting.. ugh- I so hope this is a wake-up call.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:where does it state he molested the younger siblings? (ages 8 i guess or so and below)?

Police report lists 4 of the victims as living in the duggar house. He had 5 female siblings at the time. The non-victim sister is described as nearing ged completion, which leads to the conclusion that it was one of the eldest. That means both the 4 and 8 year old were touched.

Josh is the oldest and he was 14. No one under the age of 14 would have been nearing GED completion. 16, 17, okay. But not under 14.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Josh is the oldest and he was 14. No one under the age of 14 would have been nearing GED completion. 16, 17, okay. But not under 14.

The police report was years later. They were older then.

[Anonymous]

I think there are people who have long felt the Duggars were hypocrites and/or full of shit and this scandal proves they were onto something.

BING-fucking-GO.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Josh is the oldest and he was 14. No one under the age of 14 would have been nearing GED completion. 16, 17, okay. But not under 14.

The police report was years later. They were older then.

Yes, the report was about 3 years later.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I will get slammed for this but I don't think a 13/14 year old who is told its a sin to masturbate or have impure "nike" thoughts who acts out sexually is a child molester.

All of you crying out about brainwashing and cult need to remember Josh was subject to that as well.

I agree. A 13/14 year old boy who was just starting to have sexual feelings and is homeschooled and the only females he is exposed to are his sisters. Maybe there was never a birds and bees talk. What he did was wrong and inappropriate and the whole family needed counseling at the time but it does not mean he is a lifelong sexual predator. He was a child at the time.

First he was closer to or already 15. By his own admission today it was 12 years ago. He is 27 now. Second, I cannot fathom anyone making excuses for him. Most child molesters have horrible backgrounds. Many were abused themselves. Why is anyone making excuses for him? It also happened a second time AFTER he definitely knew it was wrong. His sisters knew it was wrong that is why they told. Horrible situation all around. Stop making excuses. The man that momested honey boo boo's sister likely had a horrible childhood is that excusable too? Catholic priests ok too? Would you let 15 year old Josh Duggar be around your 4 year old knowing "he just had a bad upbringing?"

[Anonymous]

This is what happens when you have 20 kids or whatever ridiculous number they are up to. Statistically speaking at least one of them is going to be totally screwed up. I do wonder if the lack of normal sexual development because of their religious beliefs contributed to his actions.

Regarding the rod issue. In the police report, they ask if being hit with the rod ever left bruises and the child responded "no". Maybe that's why they weren't investigated for child abuse.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm no Duggar fan, but I don't think this is as scandalous as you all are making it out to be. This was a kid acting out on a kid (kids). Josh was 12/13/14 when this happened. Of course, it is still very wrong and intolerable, but it doesn't rise to the level of an adult molesting a kid for me. Kids do unacceptable, bad things, but they are still not yet fully formed and shouldn't be damned for the rest of their lives for things they did as a kid. It does make me wonder what might have caused Josh's behavior, since child-on-child molestation is often learned behavior, but that's beside the point. Give Josh a break. Would you want your adult child to be publicly condemned and ruined for something he did as a teen?

I find this so insanely offensive, as someone who was molested by a 14 year old cousin when I was a very young child. This had lifelong consequences for me. I am sickened that your sympathy lies with the molester.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm no Duggar fan, but I don't think this is as scandalous as you all are making it out to be. This was a kid acting out on a kid (kids). Josh was 12/13/14 when this happened. Of course, it is still very wrong and intolerable, but it doesn't rise to the level of an adult molesting a kid for me. Kids do unacceptable, bad things, but they are still not yet fully formed and shouldn't be damned for the rest of their lives for things they did as a kid. It does make me wonder what might have caused Josh's behavior, since child-on-child molestation is often learned behavior, but that's beside the point. Give Josh a break. Would you want your adult child to be publicly condemned and ruined for something he did as a teen?

I find this so insanely offensive, as someone who was molested by a 14 year old cousin when I was a very young child. This had lifelong consequences for me. I am sickened that your sympathy lies with the molester.

+1

+1 also he was 15. Not far from the age he was when he started "courting" his wife.