My mom is a nurse and her hospital administrator makes 5 million. Tell me that’s not insane! I have zero issue with the amounts doctors make. Neurosurgeons deserve it. But an administrator should not make that much. |
And their incentives are to maximise revenue, not necessarily to maximise good healthcare for patients. |
Of course, but in reality people WANT their pension. |
My mom needed a new MRI and it got scheduled that week. Probably could have been next day, but it was based on my mom’s schedule. That’s crazy a wait would be for an MRI. I could understand a wait for the neurosurgeon to analyze it. |
|
This study found that up 1-1.6 million of the 6.3 million colonoscopies done each year in the US are unnecessary and cost about $3 billion. Imagine how many other procedures are also unnecessary.
https://lowninstitute.org/as-many-as-25-of-screening-colonoscopies-are-unnecessary-study-finds/ |
That article does not state that colonoscopies are unnecessary for the 45 to 75yo group though. And other countries do not use colonoscopy as screening for any group, at all. The standard is fecal test. |
Yes, my sister in Australia said that once you reach age 45, every two years you receive an at home fecal test in the mail and the results determine whether you then have a colonoscopy. It is a government funded national screening program. |
Anecdotally speaking I had to wait over a year to get a routine pap smear and am still on multiple waiting lists for primary care after moving within the US… |
+1 Americans also have to save aggressively for college from the time our children are babies. That's a non-issue in other developed countries. |
I know, right? I'd rather just wait in Canada and not have to pay a premium in insurance and copays to wait like I do now. |
Glass is half full or half empty, eh? Average age of retirement in UK is 65, same with Germany. So seems like a moot point. I lived in the UK for years and in an UMC world. You're spinning a scenario that isn't typical. What I saw was people working long hours, with long commutes, with pleasant but not extravagant lives, and constant money worries especially affording good housing and school fees for children. Most also had some kind of private insurance access. Contrary to what another poster idealized on here, administrators or national health care systems aren't focused on the best possible care but stretching out a reasonable standard of care among a bigger and bigger population (FYI health care expenditures are also soaring in UK, funding the NHS and where the money actually goes is a perennial political football topic, complaints about a bloated bureaucracy, controlling costs and unaccountability are widespread). I am sure we can all agree Denmark and similar countries are winners, but they are also small, highly homogenous, wealthy, in other words, they have it easier. |
"Just waiting" can cause a lot of anxiety at best, or painful symptoms you must live with for months until you can finally get the exams you need and surgery. |
Democrats are going to ruin our economy if they ever gain enough power. Just look at NYC, California. Businesses are leaving, wealthy people are leaving, they keep taxing their citizens further. Eventually they will run out of other peoples money. |
In their case, it will certainly be polluted. Immigrants will be a drag on their economies, will fail to assimilate, and slowly change their cultures for the worse. They will ultimately regret letting them into their countries…guaranteed. |
Nope. Just liberals living in select blue states. But of course they think it’s the same everywhere. Most of the US population (Florida, Texas and California) have access to low cost state universities. The exception is places like Massachusetts, NJ etc and the New Yorkers who wouldn’t dare send their kids to SUNY for $7k. Also consider what the universities are like that are free and how your child will be tracked from an early age in many countries. In most cases it’s very similar in cost as attending a large community college in the US. |