No they will probably be the same age or a few months older than friends. It’s not the one redshirted kid in a sea of August birthdays sent on time. |
This is a tautology. Redshirting has benefits, other parents resent those benefits, therefore redshirting is the problem because other parents resent it? By all means if something that’s been happening for decades causes problems *for kids* feel free to share. Otherwise it’s just loud sour grapes because it’s something that was equally available to all of the students and only some parents availed themselves of. |
Ok— once again, share the data on how redshirted fourth graders show such adverse emotional and social outcomes. At least 30 years of available data. |
Congrats! You get the award for the most obtuse person on DCUM. |
So…nothing. Just your hurt feelings. |
Eh, it just seems like a moronic request. |
If you say so, but a very quick google shows a pretty sizable body of data on the benefits of being older. So this assertion that there’s all sorts of problems seems…fake. |
If you redshirt a child to keep him from being the youngest, you will solve that problem for one child and create that problem for another child. So then that child's parents will redshirt, to keep him from being the youngest. Thus creating that problem for another child. So the third child's parents will redshirt him, to keep him from being the youngest. Thus creating that problem for another child. When you have February and March birthdays being redshirted, you have to ask yourself if this makes sense, and where does it end? And is there another way to solve this problem if being the youngest. |
Does your state not have laws about compulsory school attendance? That’s where it ends. It’s not the wild west where anything goes. |
Er, well, seems awfully hard to believe there would be any data pointing in either direction. How would someone even study such a thing? Do you think there's people who've been tracking redshirted kids over many years? Do you think there's academics who've made it their life's work to study the outcomes of kids who were held back in kindergarten? What? |
This. All districts have rules. Within those rules, parents make the decisions that make the most sense for their child. Not making those decisions because other parents (and again, only DCUM parents) resent them is foolish. |
Type “benefits of delaying kindergarten” into Google scholar and prepare to be amazed. |
So you support limitations on redshirting, just like OP. What are you even arguing about then? |
I support the existing laws that say something like “by 6” kids should be in school, which says nothing about redshirting. What’s the problem? Nobody but OP is advocating for change. I guess she wants it to be “by 5” or maybe 4? |
OP's whole point is that she's in a jurisdiction where the rules are not clear and don't appear to have firm limits, and she's suggesting a clearer policy where summer birthdays may be redshirted but not beyond that. Which I agree with. Redshirting February and March birthdays is absurd and will just result in December and January birthdays wanting to do it. They will have to draw the lines somewhere and I would suggest doing it in June or July depending on when school ends, or pursuing a different solution like transitional K for younger kids or mixed age classrooms in elementary. Despite what some on this board thing, I'm not anti-redshirting, I just know that some minority of parents will always try to push the limits of whatever rule is in place. There are always people who just don't think the rules apply to them. Instead of indulging those parents by making exceptions for them, districts should have stricter enforcement of cutoffs and clearly communicate them to parents. |