This. Goes for academics too. People at the top have skills (and a work ethic) that are statistically rare. Repeating a grade isn't going to accomplish anything. |
One of my kids is gifted and has a summer birthday and we would never have redshirted her because it would have been so painful. Can you imagine teaching yourself to read at age 3, and the. Not starting K until 6, and having to sit there while your peers sound out letters? It was hard enough at 5. Starting on time and then working with the school for pullouts (for instance doing reading and math lessons with a higher grade group) has worked for us. We also supplement a ton with AoPs and a writing group after school. School is still valuable for socializing, making friends, developing classroom skills and learning to work with many different types of people. Had this particular kid not been academically advanced, we might have redshirted for social reasons. But she was so it was off the table. But the social stuff is why she will not be skipping a grade. It will get easier in middle where there is more differentiation, as she'll be able to bump up grades for certain subjects and may even take some HS classes. Elementary has been about balancing social and academic needs. They are both important. |
Weird that still nobody regrets doing it. Maybe it’s not all about sports. |
Usually for lacrosse you’ll see double redshirts. Summer and spring Kinder hold sacks then again at 8th. That’s the majority of D1 recruits. Other sports are based more on genetics and athletic ability. |
What area does all sports by grade? |
Is lacrosse just based on size? |
NP. It is always so interesting how DCUMs anti-redshirt posters find themselves living in school districts that are so statistically aberrant from national norms. Quite a unique thing, this unusual ability to land squarely in places that are standard deviations of the norm. |
So are they the most popular kid? They should be with the edge right? |
Don’t you know? You claim to know how poorly these kids are doing. Yet the practice remains. Your scare tactics fool nobody. |
I really don’t think so. There’s smaller kids who do well but the average d1 player like most sports is over 6’. Lax is just a white kid sport that rewards this kind of thing. You can’t get away with it as much in football or basketball. Recruiters want to see pure genetics, not just parenting helping make it happen all the way through by holding back. |
|
Who said they are doing poorly? it’s an advantage |
Every single parent should be taking advantage of those opportunities that give their kid an advantage. Why in the world wouldn’t you. |
Please link the actual studies that show this. Not the People magazine summary you read. Actual studies. And I’ll give away the end here: I know and can cite all of the relevant studies because I collected them and analyzed them for fun a few years ago, and I’ve kept up with it. Data analysis is something I’m trained it, and I got tired of all the wildly exaggerated statements made on DCUM about redshirting (mostly from anti-redshirters but also some redshirters). So, I tracked down the alleged sources a few years ago for fun. There is literally nothing that supports language as conclusive as what you wrote. But, maybe there is a new, broad, comprehensive study out there that I’ve missed. So, please update my citation list for me! |
Exactly. And people like OP have FOMO. That’s all this is about. The redshirted kids are doing fine. |