NYT article on men struggling with their place in society

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What a surprise. Another man bashing thread on DCUM. Nurse Ratched army loves to brigade around here.

White women are the worst. They love to double dip - they get their white privilege AND get to try to leverage all the gender oppression Olympics in their favor. They’re often the most cringeworthy.

70%+ of c suite jobs are men.

Not sure which Olympics your watching.

And >90% of work related fatalities are men.

Women don't want equality. They just want more representation in the easiest, cushiest fields that pay the most, which are by in large easy going paper pushing white collar jobs in a safe, insulated office environment where you have endless useless meetings and click computer screens all day to make PowerPoint presentations.

You never hear women crying about more and equal representation to be garbage collectors. Or Fishermen. Or lumberjacks. Or plumbers. Women never want to do the hardest, dirtiest, and most dangerous jobs. It's not really about equality. We will be equal once women make up 50% of work place deaths. Let's worry about that before their representation in the C suite, which is only an extremely small fraction of jobs.

Become a nurse if you want to, nobody told you to be a lumber jack.

It's only 5000 death a year, btw. If you put child birth death and killed by H/boyfriend in the mix it's about the same.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What a surprise. Another man bashing thread on DCUM. Nurse Ratched army loves to brigade around here.

White women are the worst. They love to double dip - they get their white privilege AND get to try to leverage all the gender oppression Olympics in their favor. They’re often the most cringeworthy.

70%+ of c suite jobs are men.

Not sure which Olympics your watching.

Women should start their own companies then rather than cry about it. Many studies have shown that men are more willing to take bigger risks than women. Women cannot be risk adverse, then cry later on when they're not on charge because they didn't want to take the risk starting businesses. Women always want everyone else to do the heavy lifting for them, then come in and take over control. Ha, that's not the way the world works. Put up or shut up. Why don't you put your home and all do your life's savings on the line to start a business if you want to be CEO so much?

I’m a woman, and I mostly agree with this. I remember reading a post on here years ago when someone mentioned women/minorities/etc. “just wanting a seat at the table” and a woman said something along the lines of “build your own table”.

That being said, whenever men start talking about how women don’t want “real equality” I would like to remind them (and women) about something called opportunity cost. Particularly when it comes to reproduction. Our wombs are worth a hell of a lot more than your sperm, so women should be mindful of that and not allow some man to gaslight her into thinking he doesn’t owe her (for lack of a better term) for carrying, birthing, and raising his child. This is the area in which you find men wanting women to do the heavy lifting for them but then whine about “equality” when they have to pay child support or alimony…

It's always "my body, my choice" and reproductive autonomy for women until it comes time to deal with the consequences, and then it's "his child" for which she is owed a debt. This is exactly what PP is talking about. You want to be in control and take charge of decisions (i.e. be the CEO), but when it comes time to deal with the aftermath it's "his child" or "society's child", not even "our child". I don't even disagree with you about the value of a womb/sperm, but this type of language and thought pattern abdicating responsibility for choices made is all too common for women these days, despite their expressed desire for increasingly more autonomy.

Nothing in my post suggested abdicating responsibility. Your post is an example of the gaslighting I was talking about, though. (The quotes around “his child” … it’s not “his child”, it’s his child.)

Don’t knock up a woman who is intelligent and perceptive enough to understand her worth. That’s a choice you can make.

In another post you will be telling us about how a woman's worth should not be reduced to her womb lol.

Sorry, but people are seeing through your gaslighting now.

Understanding that my womb is exponentially more valuable than your sperm doesn’t mean that I am under the impression that it is my only value. Keep trying.

Your womb is designed specifically to respond to the sperm of a man. The functioning of your womb literally relies on male sperm. Men can do everything they do with or without your womb.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What a surprise. Another man bashing thread on DCUM. Nurse Ratched army loves to brigade around here.

White women are the worst. They love to double dip - they get their white privilege AND get to try to leverage all the gender oppression Olympics in their favor. They’re often the most cringeworthy.

70%+ of c suite jobs are men.

Not sure which Olympics your watching.

Women should start their own companies then rather than cry about it. Many studies have shown that men are more willing to take bigger risks than women. Women cannot be risk adverse, then cry later on when they're not on charge because they didn't want to take the risk starting businesses. Women always want everyone else to do the heavy lifting for them, then come in and take over control. Ha, that's not the way the world works. Put up or shut up. Why don't you put your home and all do your life's savings on the line to start a business if you want to be CEO so much?

They are. In 2021, 49% of new companies were started by women.

Which is sad. Women are less entrepreneurial than men. So that means that there were fewer new companies started in 2021.

Actually 2021 had a record high of new companies started.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What a surprise. Another man bashing thread on DCUM. Nurse Ratched army loves to brigade around here.

White women are the worst. They love to double dip - they get their white privilege AND get to try to leverage all the gender oppression Olympics in their favor. They’re often the most cringeworthy.

70%+ of c suite jobs are men.

Not sure which Olympics your watching.

Women should start their own companies then rather than cry about it. Many studies have shown that men are more willing to take bigger risks than women. Women cannot be risk adverse, then cry later on when they're not on charge because they didn't want to take the risk starting businesses. Women always want everyone else to do the heavy lifting for them, then come in and take over control. Ha, that's not the way the world works. Put up or shut up. Why don't you put your home and all do your life's savings on the line to start a business if you want to be CEO so much?

I’m a woman, and I mostly agree with this. I remember reading a post on here years ago when someone mentioned women/minorities/etc. “just wanting a seat at the table” and a woman said something along the lines of “build your own table”.

That being said, whenever men start talking about how women don’t want “real equality” I would like to remind them (and women) about something called opportunity cost. Particularly when it comes to reproduction. Our wombs are worth a hell of a lot more than your sperm, so women should be mindful of that and not allow some man to gaslight her into thinking he doesn’t owe her (for lack of a better term) for carrying, birthing, and raising his child. This is the area in which you find men wanting women to do the heavy lifting for them but then whine about “equality” when they have to pay child support or alimony…

It's always "my body, my choice" and reproductive autonomy for women until it comes time to deal with the consequences, and then it's "his child" for which she is owed a debt. This is exactly what PP is talking about. You want to be in control and take charge of decisions (i.e. be the CEO), but when it comes time to deal with the aftermath it's "his child" or "society's child", not even "our child". I don't even disagree with you about the value of a womb/sperm, but this type of language and thought pattern abdicating responsibility for choices made is all too common for women these days, despite their expressed desire for increasingly more autonomy.

Nothing in my post suggested abdicating responsibility. Your post is an example of the gaslighting I was talking about, though. (The quotes around “his child” … it’s not “his child”, it’s his child.)

Don’t knock up a woman who is intelligent and perceptive enough to understand her worth. That’s a choice you can make.

In another post you will be telling us about how a woman's worth should not be reduced to her womb lol.

Sorry, but people are seeing through your gaslighting now.

Understanding that my womb is exponentially more valuable than your sperm doesn’t mean that I am under the impression that it is my only value. Keep trying.

Your womb is designed specifically to respond to the sperm of a man. The functioning of your womb literally relies on male sperm. Men can do everything they do with or without your womb.

They can be a father without her womb?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What a surprise. Another man bashing thread on DCUM. Nurse Ratched army loves to brigade around here.

White women are the worst. They love to double dip - they get their white privilege AND get to try to leverage all the gender oppression Olympics in their favor. They’re often the most cringeworthy.

70%+ of c suite jobs are men.

Not sure which Olympics your watching.

And >90% of work related fatalities are men.

Women don't want equality. They just want more representation in the easiest, cushiest fields that pay the most, which are by in large easy going paper pushing white collar jobs in a safe, insulated office environment where you have endless useless meetings and click computer screens all day to make PowerPoint presentations.

You never hear women crying about more and equal representation to be garbage collectors. Or Fishermen. Or lumberjacks. Or plumbers. Women never want to do the hardest, dirtiest, and most dangerous jobs. It's not really about equality. We will be equal once women make up 50% of work place deaths. Let's worry about that before their representation in the C suite, which is only an extremely small fraction of jobs.

And yet fields like nursing, home health aides, teachers, and childcare are all dominated by women. Jobs where you have to be on your feet all day, where you are regularly exposed to bodily fluids and illness. Is being a nurse in a hospital "cushier" than being a garbage man? Is being a kindergarten teacher "easier" than being a plumber?

Also I know women who have wanted to pursue jobs that would enable them to work outside, work with their hands, etc. -- working on construction sites or as a plumber or electrician, or working in forestry or fishing. But these industries are extremely hard for women to break into because of sexist ideas about what women are capable of. If you are a woman in one of these fields, you pretty much have to accept that you will experience forms of harassment or hostile work environment, and many women ultimately decide they don't want to deal with that. The men who go into these fields don't have to think about that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What a surprise. Another man bashing thread on DCUM. Nurse Ratched army loves to brigade around here.

White women are the worst. They love to double dip - they get their white privilege AND get to try to leverage all the gender oppression Olympics in their favor. They’re often the most cringeworthy.

70%+ of c suite jobs are men.

Not sure which Olympics your watching.

Women should start their own companies then rather than cry about it. Many studies have shown that men are more willing to take bigger risks than women. Women cannot be risk adverse, then cry later on when they're not on charge because they didn't want to take the risk starting businesses. Women always want everyone else to do the heavy lifting for them, then come in and take over control. Ha, that's not the way the world works. Put up or shut up. Why don't you put your home and all do your life's savings on the line to start a business if you want to be CEO so much?

I’m a woman, and I mostly agree with this. I remember reading a post on here years ago when someone mentioned women/minorities/etc. “just wanting a seat at the table” and a woman said something along the lines of “build your own table”.

That being said, whenever men start talking about how women don’t want “real equality” I would like to remind them (and women) about something called opportunity cost. Particularly when it comes to reproduction. Our wombs are worth a hell of a lot more than your sperm, so women should be mindful of that and not allow some man to gaslight her into thinking he doesn’t owe her (for lack of a better term) for carrying, birthing, and raising his child. This is the area in which you find men wanting women to do the heavy lifting for them but then whine about “equality” when they have to pay child support or alimony…

It's always "my body, my choice" and reproductive autonomy for women until it comes time to deal with the consequences, and then it's "his child" for which she is owed a debt. This is exactly what PP is talking about. You want to be in control and take charge of decisions (i.e. be the CEO), but when it comes time to deal with the aftermath it's "his child" or "society's child", not even "our child". I don't even disagree with you about the value of a womb/sperm, but this type of language and thought pattern abdicating responsibility for choices made is all too common for women these days, despite their expressed desire for increasingly more autonomy.

Nothing in my post suggested abdicating responsibility. Your post is an example of the gaslighting I was talking about, though. (The quotes around “his child” … it’s not “his child”, it’s his child.)

Don’t knock up a woman who is intelligent and perceptive enough to understand her worth. That’s a choice you can make.

In another post you will be telling us about how a woman's worth should not be reduced to her womb lol.

Sorry, but people are seeing through your gaslighting now.

Understanding that my womb is exponentially more valuable than your sperm doesn’t mean that I am under the impression that it is my only value. Keep trying.

Your womb is designed specifically to respond to the sperm of a man. The functioning of your womb literally relies on male sperm. Men can do everything they do with or without your womb.

They can be a father without her womb?

There are not really any major biological functions of a man’s body that require a woman. A woman cannot become pregnant without a man. What a stupid argument to begin with but if the pp really insists on measuring “value” like a farm animal then the (ridiculous) argument fails to support her own bias.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What a surprise. Another man bashing thread on DCUM. Nurse Ratched army loves to brigade around here.

White women are the worst. They love to double dip - they get their white privilege AND get to try to leverage all the gender oppression Olympics in their favor. They’re often the most cringeworthy.

70%+ of c suite jobs are men.

Not sure which Olympics your watching.

Women should start their own companies then rather than cry about it. Many studies have shown that men are more willing to take bigger risks than women. Women cannot be risk adverse, then cry later on when they're not on charge because they didn't want to take the risk starting businesses. Women always want everyone else to do the heavy lifting for them, then come in and take over control. Ha, that's not the way the world works. Put up or shut up. Why don't you put your home and all do your life's savings on the line to start a business if you want to be CEO so much?

I’m a woman, and I mostly agree with this. I remember reading a post on here years ago when someone mentioned women/minorities/etc. “just wanting a seat at the table” and a woman said something along the lines of “build your own table”.

That being said, whenever men start talking about how women don’t want “real equality” I would like to remind them (and women) about something called opportunity cost. Particularly when it comes to reproduction. Our wombs are worth a hell of a lot more than your sperm, so women should be mindful of that and not allow some man to gaslight her into thinking he doesn’t owe her (for lack of a better term) for carrying, birthing, and raising his child. This is the area in which you find men wanting women to do the heavy lifting for them but then whine about “equality” when they have to pay child support or alimony…

It's always "my body, my choice" and reproductive autonomy for women until it comes time to deal with the consequences, and then it's "his child" for which she is owed a debt. This is exactly what PP is talking about. You want to be in control and take charge of decisions (i.e. be the CEO), but when it comes time to deal with the aftermath it's "his child" or "society's child", not even "our child". I don't even disagree with you about the value of a womb/sperm, but this type of language and thought pattern abdicating responsibility for choices made is all too common for women these days, despite their expressed desire for increasingly more autonomy.

Nothing in my post suggested abdicating responsibility. Your post is an example of the gaslighting I was talking about, though. (The quotes around “his child” … it’s not “his child”, it’s his child.)

Don’t knock up a woman who is intelligent and perceptive enough to understand her worth. That’s a choice you can make.

In another post you will be telling us about how a woman's worth should not be reduced to her womb lol.

Sorry, but people are seeing through your gaslighting now.

Understanding that my womb is exponentially more valuable than your sperm doesn’t mean that I am under the impression that it is my only value. Keep trying.

It is the only reason why you are presumed to have more intrinsic value than your average man, and thus derive all of the benefits of benevolent sexism that protects and caters to your cosseted behind, your attitude notwithstanding. It is the reason men have the burden of performance whereas women are more tolerated when they behave like entitled, ungrateful children.

It’s not a presumption; it’s a biological fact. Sorry you don’t like it, but throwing a tantrum (which I suspect you had ChatGPT write for you) doesn’t change it.

You know someone has no good response when they pull out the tired "ChatGPT" line. SMH.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What a surprise. Another man bashing thread on DCUM. Nurse Ratched army loves to brigade around here.

White women are the worst. They love to double dip - they get their white privilege AND get to try to leverage all the gender oppression Olympics in their favor. They’re often the most cringeworthy.

70%+ of c suite jobs are men.

Not sure which Olympics your watching.

And >90% of work related fatalities are men.

Women don't want equality. They just want more representation in the easiest, cushiest fields that pay the most, which are by in large easy going paper pushing white collar jobs in a safe, insulated office environment where you have endless useless meetings and click computer screens all day to make PowerPoint presentations.

You never hear women crying about more and equal representation to be garbage collectors. Or Fishermen. Or lumberjacks. Or plumbers. Women never want to do the hardest, dirtiest, and most dangerous jobs. It's not really about equality. We will be equal once women make up 50% of work place deaths. Let's worry about that before their representation in the C suite, which is only an extremely small fraction of jobs.

And yet fields like nursing, home health aides, teachers, and childcare are all dominated by women. Jobs where you have to be on your feet all day, where you are regularly exposed to bodily fluids and illness. Is being a nurse in a hospital "cushier" than being a garbage man? Is being a kindergarten teacher "easier" than being a plumber?

Also I know women who have wanted to pursue jobs that would enable them to work outside, work with their hands, etc. -- working on construction sites or as a plumber or electrician, or working in forestry or fishing. But these industries are extremely hard for women to break into because of sexist ideas about what women are capable of. If you are a woman in one of these fields, you pretty much have to accept that you will experience forms of harassment or hostile work environment, and many women ultimately decide they don't want to deal with that. The men who go into these fields don't have to think about that.

Complete nonsense that men who pursue teaching or nursing or other traditionally female-centric careers don’t face hostile work environments or harassment. Even a simple search of DCUM will result in more than a few posts explaining why men who want to be preschool teachers for example are inherently suspicious.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who encourages this gender divide? Men are our literal partners and almost half the population.

Who benefits from this divisiveness?

The currently powerful

I disagree. I think it’s 3 forces: (1) hurt people lashing out in anger rather with more consideration for themselves than the future, (2) scared people wanting to make sure to get a piece of the pie, (3) righteous people who believe that there’s some sort of way of making the world fair if only you make sure every hurt can be somehow avenged and (4) politicians.

However you cut it, the kind, brave and generous are not stoking this fight.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2025/01/16/opinion/men-trump-voters-focus-group.html?unlocked_article_code=1.pk4.M2Hr.Thy5lM84dXHH&smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare

I just read this and I am not sure there is an eye roll emoji that can accurately reflect how ridiculous this article is. A focus group of 12 men who voted for Trump. I admit I am a 40-something woman, with sisters and daughters so I probably have less opportunity to see this, but I struggle to believe that men are feeling like they don’t have a place in society. They OWN society. What is the deal with this whining? Even the comments about how they feel like chivalry is gone because women give them a dirty look if they hold a door. It is BASIC courtesy. And since when are men worried about getting a dirty look?

Can anyone explain this to me?

They used to own society. Now women own something like 2% and they are seething about it. It's no surprise coming from trumpers though lol. White men are the biggest victims of the 21st century

+100
The thread on gay men proves this. If you're used to being handed everything in life (straight men) and suddenly you have to work for things, you get mad. If you haven't had everything handed to you in life, you're benefiting now that societal values have shifted.

To be fair, pretty much everything I've read over the last few years paints white men as the root of all evil. Blatant racism against white people is 100% tolerated almost everywhere. I'm an Asian woman so I don't feel that bad, but I truly think that the intense vitriol against white men for even existing gave Trump the election.

I'm a Asian woman married to a white man, and he agrees that historically, white rulers did do a lot of damage and were kind of evil.

They also historically did a lot of evil things to minorities in the US, too.

They held all the power, so they get all the blame.

Whereas women and ethnic minorities in Asia have historically been . . . systematically oppressed and violently controlled or eliminated. In fact, this is still happening.

Since 2016, the government of the People's Republic of China (PRC) has subjected Uyghurs and members of other predominantly Muslim ethnic minority groups in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (XUAR) to genocide, state-imposed forced labor, and crimes against humanity: https://www.dol.gov/agencies/ilab

Why do you hope to gain from not acknowledging (or caring about?) oppression of vulnerable people? Your statement above erases them and all those who have suffered before them for millenia.

As a white man I refuse to take all the blame here either! My fellow men of all colors have plenty of blood on their hands, now and throughout history.

Therein lies the confusion. Nobody is asking you to take “the blame.” People are asking you to recognize your privilege and use it for good. When you’re defensive, you don’t do that. This is how I’ve explained it to my white boys. I also recognize the privilege I have over non-white women and try to own it and use it for good.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What bothers me is that this was actually a real opportunity to discuss what men struggle with. We could discuss how boys in schools need more movement, that there needs to be a better pipeline to jobs like teaching, nursing, the arts, etc. There needs to be a discussion that eventually we need a larger population of dads staying home with their children in addition of moms. We need to discuss how to be what was historically considered "masculine" without being a mouth breather heathen. There were so many things they could have talked about.

But they talked about where you get your news, and do you have women friends, and where do your women friends get their news.

There was a tiny bit at the end where they bemoan women not being interested in them because they are not tall and rich, which is odd, isn't Republican philosophy "work harder if your not getting ahead" (a head - pun intended).

One guy talked about his generation does not know how to make friend... that is the content that would have been of value.

DP. We are getting to the end of gentle parenting. Maybe we are ready to get to the end of eradicating masculinity, too. As a culture, we have tried to dismantle masculinity and femininity. And as a result, a lot of people are confused and unhappy.

We don't need to cater to children more, we need to expect and require more from them. We don't need to cater to men or women, we need to expect more from them.

ACTUALLY our standards for children are higher than they are for adults. We dont cater to children. We cater to adults who cant handle parenting children or being told no or being told there is something they need to fix- there is a distinct difference. Children model what they see adults do. If adults are always on devices, they expect to be on devices. If adults trash talk other people and say unkind words and denigrate entire swaths of society....well, you get a$$hole kids just like their parents. We also dont have a child-friendly society even though all the data points to the first 5 years as the most important developmentally.

You have obviously never dealt with a #boymom.

It is never helpful to rely on sweeping generalizations and harmful stereotypes when talking about societal issues.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who encourages this gender divide? Men are our literal partners and almost half the population.

Who benefits from this divisiveness?

The currently powerful

I disagree. I think it’s 3 forces: (1) hurt people lashing out in anger rather with more consideration for themselves than the future, (2) scared people wanting to make sure to get a piece of the pie, (3) righteous people who believe that there’s some sort of way of making the world fair if only you make sure every hurt can be somehow avenged and (4) politicians.

However you cut it, the kind, brave and generous are not stoking this fight.

DP. The comment you are replying to did not say anything about “kind, brave and generous” they said “currently powerful”. The kindest, bravest and most generous people that I know are broke and powerless.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The other thread on this has been eye-opening.

I'm beginning to see how Trump won. He's a voice for the marginalized and straight white dudes now see themselves that way due to overzealous DEI practices.

I find some DEI practices a bit too restrictive. We had a female employee give notice and to maintain a "good ratio" on our team, my supervisor said the new hire had to be a woman. So boobs > qualifications, cool.

Logically fallacious. The woman you ended up hiring was probably more qualified than the man because she ended up at the same place without the advantage of being a straight man.

Now THAT ^ is logically fallacious.

[Anonymous]

Men are weak. The End.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What a surprise. Another man bashing thread on DCUM. Nurse Ratched army loves to brigade around here.

White women are the worst. They love to double dip - they get their white privilege AND get to try to leverage all the gender oppression Olympics in their favor. They’re often the most cringeworthy.

70%+ of c suite jobs are men.

Not sure which Olympics your watching.

Women should start their own companies then rather than cry about it. Many studies have shown that men are more willing to take bigger risks than women. Women cannot be risk adverse, then cry later on when they're not on charge because they didn't want to take the risk starting businesses. Women always want everyone else to do the heavy lifting for them, then come in and take over control. Ha, that's not the way the world works. Put up or shut up. Why don't you put your home and all do your life's savings on the line to start a business if you want to be CEO so much?

Hmmm, let’s see…Women don’t have the same access to capital that mean do.

Woke types like you always have another baseless excuse to pull out of their a** when whining about their lack of success

You’re telling on yourself with your rant about “wokeness,” so I know you’re allergic to facts. There is tons of data going back years about this, but how about most recently from Yale (I understand I’m likely wasting my time since illiteracy is a virtue for Trump bootlickers):

https://insights.som.yale.edu/insights/why-its-harder-for-women-founders-to-get-venture-capital-funding