Are DCUM Political Topics Changing Your Vote?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I agree with Jeff, "biological man" is really just a dog whistle. I'll see comments online (not here because Jeff thankfully won't allow it to progress to that point) where people will describe transgender girls as "biological men in girl's sports" or "biological men in the girl's bathroom". As though a 14 or 15 year old transgender girl is the same as a 50 year old cisgender man. Calling trans women biological men instead of trans women then complaining about your language being policed makes it pretty clear how you actually feel. Jeff made a really good point, if they're interchangeable to you, then why don't you use the term trans women instead of biological man? I guess the real question is why do you even put on a show and lie about it? The people posting on this board are smart enough to see what you're doing. It's pretty transparent.

Do trans women have a biological advantage in sports? Maybe. I have no idea. I'm not into sports and I've never conducted or reviewed research on trans women in sports. What I do know is that there were no transgender women in the Olympics so the transphobic people had to create a trans woman out of a cis woman to have something to be upset about. Ever since RvW was overturned, the discourse over trans people (and especially trans women) has really blown up. If Lia Thomas had been allowed in the Olympics the Imane Khelif discourse never would have happened because it was manufactured to create more outrage against trans people.

The sports thing just seems to be an easy entry point with a final goal of debating if any transgender person should be allowed to transition regardless of age. I think it's pretty unlikely that all gender transition is ever going to be banned. Places like Maryland and DC would never enforce a federal mandate like that (in the same way that they don't enforce many federal anti-marijuana laws).

- the only trans woman that posts on DCUM

Can you please give us a descriptor to use that is not “trans woman” that permits us to reference retained male biological characteristics in a straightforward way? Not a long explanation, not a paragraph. Or are any and all terms that reference male biology “hateful”?

Also, more generally, why do you believe you can control and should be able to control what women say and think, particularly on matters related to their safety and achievement? This (extremely male) desire to fully control women’s speech, thoughts, experiences, and spaces is one of the most disturbing aspects of trans ideology. You really aren’t any different than the far-right theocrats who want to strip the right to vote from women, or who want them killed for showing hair in public, or who want to force them to bear children. Your post just reinforces for me that trans ideology is at heart a men’s rights movement.

Is that what you think you're doing when you call trans women biological men? Are you saying that you only call trans women biological men when specifically speaking about sports? I think you can just say what advantage you think a trans woman specifically has. You seem to be also implying that it's obvious that all trans women have some innate advantage over cis women in all circumstances.

I do not believe I can control what anyone thinks. It's extremely common for transphobic people to call trans women male though like you did. Oh look at your male behavior. Or look at your aggressive male behavior when trans women act at all in a way transphobic people disagree with. When trans women try to conform to whatever standards are set, those same people will claim that trans women are making a mockery of woman hood or whatever. As I said, sports is just one step towards trying to ban transition for all transgender people. There's one single trans woman on DCUM and you can't help but use personal attacks and claim I'm acting male because I put out that I'm trans which makes me vulnerable to your personal attacks while you sit in a tower of invulnerability and anonymity.

Women who do not use anonymity to decry the male pattern violence associated with the trans rights movement are subject to horrific violence, death threats, rape threats, etc. It is male privilege that you can speak openly about what you want, without fearing violence, rape, and death threats. If that is upsetting to you, then look around at the people celebrating violence against women. The girls who spoke up about Lia Thomas’s locker room behavior are regularly threatened and trans rights activists are absolutely fine with it and remain silent at best.

“Male pattern violence”?

There’s that boogeyman.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I do agree that the far left has gone too far in labeling everything hate speech.

But I have also never been close minded nor anti-trans or racist. I went to a LGBTQ friendly site to find politically correct definitions so that going forward there is no issue of being maliciously accused of being anti-trans when discussing topics on DCUM.

Here is what I found:

Assigned Female At Birth (AFAB) or Female-Assigned-at-Birth (FAAB): An individual assigned female at birth.

Assigned Male At Birth (AMAB) or Male-Assigned-at-Birth (MAAB): An individual assigned male at birth.

Assigned Sex or Sex Assigned At Birth: The sex (typically M or F) that is assigned to a person based on external genitalia at birth.

Apparently, the term "biological sex at birth" while still technically totally accurate as it is simply a scientific term, has been deemed by the left to be derogatory and as they are authoritarian...it is no longer politically correct to use that term. Fine with me...but as someone who grew up loving biology classes and having a minor in biology, please be patient as I still may on occasion refer to "biological sex at birth" for all people regardless of gender. Old habits are hard to break. That doesn’t mean I am anti-trans or mean it as anything other than simply what it is..a defined term.

So referring to a transwoman as someone who was "assigned male at birth" or "whose sex was assigned male at birth" can therefore not at all be considered hurtful or derogatory as it is simply stating a politically and LGBTQ acceptable defined term. Much less classified as hate speech.

“Assigned male at birth” requires accepting that “male” is something that can be “assigned” by some amorphous being in the first place. The descriptor requires acceptance of a thought framework. It is a good example of how trans activists have iron control over speech in this area.

Oh, I totally agree...hence why I added that they are authoritarian....but I am going to let the term "assigned" go because it's basically just more "politically correct/PC" and my interpretation is that a transwoman is someone who was "assigned male at birth" or "whose sex was assigned male at birth" based on having XX or XY chromosomes and external genitalia at birth.

I still argue that using the term "biological sex at birth" is not in any way anti-trans...but as it's perceived as such it's not very PC.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I agree with Jeff, "biological man" is really just a dog whistle. I'll see comments online (not here because Jeff thankfully won't allow it to progress to that point) where people will describe transgender girls as "biological men in girl's sports" or "biological men in the girl's bathroom". As though a 14 or 15 year old transgender girl is the same as a 50 year old cisgender man. Calling trans women biological men instead of trans women then complaining about your language being policed makes it pretty clear how you actually feel. Jeff made a really good point, if they're interchangeable to you, then why don't you use the term trans women instead of biological man? I guess the real question is why do you even put on a show and lie about it? The people posting on this board are smart enough to see what you're doing. It's pretty transparent.

Do trans women have a biological advantage in sports? Maybe. I have no idea. I'm not into sports and I've never conducted or reviewed research on trans women in sports. What I do know is that there were no transgender women in the Olympics so the transphobic people had to create a trans woman out of a cis woman to have something to be upset about. Ever since RvW was overturned, the discourse over trans people (and especially trans women) has really blown up. If Lia Thomas had been allowed in the Olympics the Imane Khelif discourse never would have happened because it was manufactured to create more outrage against trans people.

The sports thing just seems to be an easy entry point with a final goal of debating if any transgender person should be allowed to transition regardless of age. I think it's pretty unlikely that all gender transition is ever going to be banned. Places like Maryland and DC would never enforce a federal mandate like that (in the same way that they don't enforce many federal anti-marijuana laws).

- the only trans woman that posts on DCUM

Can you please give us a descriptor to use that is not “trans woman” that permits us to reference retained male biological characteristics in a straightforward way? Not a long explanation, not a paragraph. Or are any and all terms that reference male biology “hateful”?

Also, more generally, why do you believe you can control and should be able to control what women say and think, particularly on matters related to their safety and achievement? This (extremely male) desire to fully control women’s speech, thoughts, experiences, and spaces is one of the most disturbing aspects of trans ideology. You really aren’t any different than the far-right theocrats who want to strip the right to vote from women, or who want them killed for showing hair in public, or who want to force them to bear children. Your post just reinforces for me that trans ideology is at heart a men’s rights movement.

Is that what you think you're doing when you call trans women biological men? Are you saying that you only call trans women biological men when specifically speaking about sports? I think you can just say what advantage you think a trans woman specifically has. You seem to be also implying that it's obvious that all trans women have some innate advantage over cis women in all circumstances.

I do not believe I can control what anyone thinks. It's extremely common for transphobic people to call trans women male though like you did. Oh look at your male behavior. Or look at your aggressive male behavior when trans women act at all in a way transphobic people disagree with. When trans women try to conform to whatever standards are set, those same people will claim that trans women are making a mockery of woman hood or whatever. As I said, sports is just one step towards trying to ban transition for all transgender people. There's one single trans woman on DCUM and you can't help but use personal attacks and claim I'm acting male because I put out that I'm trans which makes me vulnerable to your personal attacks while you sit in a tower of invulnerability and anonymity.

Women who do not use anonymity to decry the male pattern violence associated with the trans rights movement are subject to horrific violence, death threats, rape threats, etc. It is male privilege that you can speak openly about what you want, without fearing violence, rape, and death threats. If that is upsetting to you, then look around at the people celebrating violence against women. The girls who spoke up about Lia Thomas’s locker room behavior are regularly threatened and trans rights activists are absolutely fine with it and remain silent at best.

Are you under the impression that trans women are not subject to horrific violence, death threats, rape threats, etc.?

No, of course not. But those threats and violence don’t come from women nearly all of the time, whereas women get threats from transwomen and men. The threats and violence against transwomen come from men. And transwomen are more able to defend themselves physically on average, and find a court system that is more sympathetic.

Just look at how violence against women by men (all men) is accepted in this country. It’s not called terrorism, it’s seen as routine, in many cases seen as deserved — a crime of “passion” being somehow less serious. A man who kills his girlfriend doesn’t get hate crime status attached; a man who kills his trans girlfriend will often be facing additional hate crime charges.

Transwomen have privilege with respect to their physical safety and how serious threats against them are taken that regular women simply don’t have. It is a sign of male hegemony how accepted male violence against women is, and how now that it is also directed against trans women, it’s somehow more serious. That is definitionally male privilege.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I agree with Jeff, "biological man" is really just a dog whistle. I'll see comments online (not here because Jeff thankfully won't allow it to progress to that point) where people will describe transgender girls as "biological men in girl's sports" or "biological men in the girl's bathroom". As though a 14 or 15 year old transgender girl is the same as a 50 year old cisgender man. Calling trans women biological men instead of trans women then complaining about your language being policed makes it pretty clear how you actually feel. Jeff made a really good point, if they're interchangeable to you, then why don't you use the term trans women instead of biological man? I guess the real question is why do you even put on a show and lie about it? The people posting on this board are smart enough to see what you're doing. It's pretty transparent.

Do trans women have a biological advantage in sports? Maybe. I have no idea. I'm not into sports and I've never conducted or reviewed research on trans women in sports. What I do know is that there were no transgender women in the Olympics so the transphobic people had to create a trans woman out of a cis woman to have something to be upset about. Ever since RvW was overturned, the discourse over trans people (and especially trans women) has really blown up. If Lia Thomas had been allowed in the Olympics the Imane Khelif discourse never would have happened because it was manufactured to create more outrage against trans people.

The sports thing just seems to be an easy entry point with a final goal of debating if any transgender person should be allowed to transition regardless of age. I think it's pretty unlikely that all gender transition is ever going to be banned. Places like Maryland and DC would never enforce a federal mandate like that (in the same way that they don't enforce many federal anti-marijuana laws).

- the only trans woman that posts on DCUM

Can you please give us a descriptor to use that is not “trans woman” that permits us to reference retained male biological characteristics in a straightforward way? Not a long explanation, not a paragraph. Or are any and all terms that reference male biology “hateful”?

Also, more generally, why do you believe you can control and should be able to control what women say and think, particularly on matters related to their safety and achievement? This (extremely male) desire to fully control women’s speech, thoughts, experiences, and spaces is one of the most disturbing aspects of trans ideology. You really aren’t any different than the far-right theocrats who want to strip the right to vote from women, or who want them killed for showing hair in public, or who want to force them to bear children. Your post just reinforces for me that trans ideology is at heart a men’s rights movement.

Is that what you think you're doing when you call trans women biological men? Are you saying that you only call trans women biological men when specifically speaking about sports? I think you can just say what advantage you think a trans woman specifically has. You seem to be also implying that it's obvious that all trans women have some innate advantage over cis women in all circumstances.

I do not believe I can control what anyone thinks. It's extremely common for transphobic people to call trans women male though like you did. Oh look at your male behavior. Or look at your aggressive male behavior when trans women act at all in a way transphobic people disagree with. When trans women try to conform to whatever standards are set, those same people will claim that trans women are making a mockery of woman hood or whatever. As I said, sports is just one step towards trying to ban transition for all transgender people. There's one single trans woman on DCUM and you can't help but use personal attacks and claim I'm acting male because I put out that I'm trans which makes me vulnerable to your personal attacks while you sit in a tower of invulnerability and anonymity.

Women who do not use anonymity to decry the male pattern violence associated with the trans rights movement are subject to horrific violence, death threats, rape threats, etc. It is male privilege that you can speak openly about what you want, without fearing violence, rape, and death threats. If that is upsetting to you, then look around at the people celebrating violence against women. The girls who spoke up about Lia Thomas’s locker room behavior are regularly threatened and trans rights activists are absolutely fine with it and remain silent at best.

Are you under the impression that trans women are not subject to horrific violence, death threats, rape threats, etc.?

No, of course not. But those threats and violence don’t come from women nearly all of the time, whereas women get threats from transwomen and men. The threats and violence against transwomen come from men. And transwomen are more able to defend themselves physically on average, and find a court system that is more sympathetic.

Just look at how violence against women by men (all men) is accepted in this country. It’s not called terrorism, it’s seen as routine, in many cases seen as deserved — a crime of “passion” being somehow less serious. A man who kills his girlfriend doesn’t get hate crime status attached; a man who kills his trans girlfriend will often be facing additional hate crime charges.

Transwomen have privilege with respect to their physical safety and how serious threats against them are taken that regular women simply don’t have. It is a sign of male hegemony how accepted male violence against women is, and how now that it is also directed against trans women, it’s somehow more serious. That is definitionally male privilege.

All violence is bad. None of it acceptable or accepted. Predators should face serious consequences for their crimes.

You are gaslighting. Transgender women get far less respect and are at a much higher risk of victimization.

Equating all male violence with transgender women is pure bigotry. The right manufacturing a boogeyman to try to win elections.

https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/press/ncvs-trans-press-release/
Transgender women and men had higher rates of violent victimization (86.1 and 107.5 per 1,000 people, respectively) than cisgender women and men (23.7 and 19.8 per 1,000 people, respectively).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I agree with Jeff, "biological man" is really just a dog whistle. I'll see comments online (not here because Jeff thankfully won't allow it to progress to that point) where people will describe transgender girls as "biological men in girl's sports" or "biological men in the girl's bathroom". As though a 14 or 15 year old transgender girl is the same as a 50 year old cisgender man. Calling trans women biological men instead of trans women then complaining about your language being policed makes it pretty clear how you actually feel. Jeff made a really good point, if they're interchangeable to you, then why don't you use the term trans women instead of biological man? I guess the real question is why do you even put on a show and lie about it? The people posting on this board are smart enough to see what you're doing. It's pretty transparent.

Do trans women have a biological advantage in sports? Maybe. I have no idea. I'm not into sports and I've never conducted or reviewed research on trans women in sports. What I do know is that there were no transgender women in the Olympics so the transphobic people had to create a trans woman out of a cis woman to have something to be upset about. Ever since RvW was overturned, the discourse over trans people (and especially trans women) has really blown up. If Lia Thomas had been allowed in the Olympics the Imane Khelif discourse never would have happened because it was manufactured to create more outrage against trans people.

The sports thing just seems to be an easy entry point with a final goal of debating if any transgender person should be allowed to transition regardless of age. I think it's pretty unlikely that all gender transition is ever going to be banned. Places like Maryland and DC would never enforce a federal mandate like that (in the same way that they don't enforce many federal anti-marijuana laws).

- the only trans woman that posts on DCUM

Can you please give us a descriptor to use that is not “trans woman” that permits us to reference retained male biological characteristics in a straightforward way? Not a long explanation, not a paragraph. Or are any and all terms that reference male biology “hateful”?

Also, more generally, why do you believe you can control and should be able to control what women say and think, particularly on matters related to their safety and achievement? This (extremely male) desire to fully control women’s speech, thoughts, experiences, and spaces is one of the most disturbing aspects of trans ideology. You really aren’t any different than the far-right theocrats who want to strip the right to vote from women, or who want them killed for showing hair in public, or who want to force them to bear children. Your post just reinforces for me that trans ideology is at heart a men’s rights movement.

Is that what you think you're doing when you call trans women biological men? Are you saying that you only call trans women biological men when specifically speaking about sports? I think you can just say what advantage you think a trans woman specifically has. You seem to be also implying that it's obvious that all trans women have some innate advantage over cis women in all circumstances.

I do not believe I can control what anyone thinks. It's extremely common for transphobic people to call trans women male though like you did. Oh look at your male behavior. Or look at your aggressive male behavior when trans women act at all in a way transphobic people disagree with. When trans women try to conform to whatever standards are set, those same people will claim that trans women are making a mockery of woman hood or whatever. As I said, sports is just one step towards trying to ban transition for all transgender people. There's one single trans woman on DCUM and you can't help but use personal attacks and claim I'm acting male because I put out that I'm trans which makes me vulnerable to your personal attacks while you sit in a tower of invulnerability and anonymity.

Women who do not use anonymity to decry the male pattern violence associated with the trans rights movement are subject to horrific violence, death threats, rape threats, etc. It is male privilege that you can speak openly about what you want, without fearing violence, rape, and death threats. If that is upsetting to you, then look around at the people celebrating violence against women. The girls who spoke up about Lia Thomas’s locker room behavior are regularly threatened and trans rights activists are absolutely fine with it and remain silent at best.

Are you under the impression that trans women are not subject to horrific violence, death threats, rape threats, etc.?

No, of course not. But those threats and violence don’t come from women nearly all of the time, whereas women get threats from transwomen and men. The threats and violence against transwomen come from men. And transwomen are more able to defend themselves physically on average, and find a court system that is more sympathetic.

Just look at how violence against women by men (all men) is accepted in this country. It’s not called terrorism, it’s seen as routine, in many cases seen as deserved — a crime of “passion” being somehow less serious. A man who kills his girlfriend doesn’t get hate crime status attached; a man who kills his trans girlfriend will often be facing additional hate crime charges.

Transwomen have privilege with respect to their physical safety and how serious threats against them are taken that regular women simply don’t have. It is a sign of male hegemony how accepted male violence against women is, and how now that it is also directed against trans women, it’s somehow more serious. That is definitionally male privilege.

Wow...you bring up a great point I hadn't thought about. For all the gender equality that the far left keep pushing....if all genders should have equal rights, then crimes against all genders should be labeled "hate crimes" because right now transgenders are being treated as superior to cis-genders by affording them the additional hate crime tag. And that is wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I agree with Jeff, "biological man" is really just a dog whistle. I'll see comments online (not here because Jeff thankfully won't allow it to progress to that point) where people will describe transgender girls as "biological men in girl's sports" or "biological men in the girl's bathroom". As though a 14 or 15 year old transgender girl is the same as a 50 year old cisgender man. Calling trans women biological men instead of trans women then complaining about your language being policed makes it pretty clear how you actually feel. Jeff made a really good point, if they're interchangeable to you, then why don't you use the term trans women instead of biological man? I guess the real question is why do you even put on a show and lie about it? The people posting on this board are smart enough to see what you're doing. It's pretty transparent.

Do trans women have a biological advantage in sports? Maybe. I have no idea. I'm not into sports and I've never conducted or reviewed research on trans women in sports. What I do know is that there were no transgender women in the Olympics so the transphobic people had to create a trans woman out of a cis woman to have something to be upset about. Ever since RvW was overturned, the discourse over trans people (and especially trans women) has really blown up. If Lia Thomas had been allowed in the Olympics the Imane Khelif discourse never would have happened because it was manufactured to create more outrage against trans people.

The sports thing just seems to be an easy entry point with a final goal of debating if any transgender person should be allowed to transition regardless of age. I think it's pretty unlikely that all gender transition is ever going to be banned. Places like Maryland and DC would never enforce a federal mandate like that (in the same way that they don't enforce many federal anti-marijuana laws).

- the only trans woman that posts on DCUM

Can you please give us a descriptor to use that is not “trans woman” that permits us to reference retained male biological characteristics in a straightforward way? Not a long explanation, not a paragraph. Or are any and all terms that reference male biology “hateful”?

Also, more generally, why do you believe you can control and should be able to control what women say and think, particularly on matters related to their safety and achievement? This (extremely male) desire to fully control women’s speech, thoughts, experiences, and spaces is one of the most disturbing aspects of trans ideology. You really aren’t any different than the far-right theocrats who want to strip the right to vote from women, or who want them killed for showing hair in public, or who want to force them to bear children. Your post just reinforces for me that trans ideology is at heart a men’s rights movement.

Is that what you think you're doing when you call trans women biological men? Are you saying that you only call trans women biological men when specifically speaking about sports? I think you can just say what advantage you think a trans woman specifically has. You seem to be also implying that it's obvious that all trans women have some innate advantage over cis women in all circumstances.

I do not believe I can control what anyone thinks. It's extremely common for transphobic people to call trans women male though like you did. Oh look at your male behavior. Or look at your aggressive male behavior when trans women act at all in a way transphobic people disagree with. When trans women try to conform to whatever standards are set, those same people will claim that trans women are making a mockery of woman hood or whatever. As I said, sports is just one step towards trying to ban transition for all transgender people. There's one single trans woman on DCUM and you can't help but use personal attacks and claim I'm acting male because I put out that I'm trans which makes me vulnerable to your personal attacks while you sit in a tower of invulnerability and anonymity.

Women who do not use anonymity to decry the male pattern violence associated with the trans rights movement are subject to horrific violence, death threats, rape threats, etc. It is male privilege that you can speak openly about what you want, without fearing violence, rape, and death threats. If that is upsetting to you, then look around at the people celebrating violence against women. The girls who spoke up about Lia Thomas’s locker room behavior are regularly threatened and trans rights activists are absolutely fine with it and remain silent at best.

Are you under the impression that trans women are not subject to horrific violence, death threats, rape threats, etc.?

No, of course not. But those threats and violence don’t come from women nearly all of the time, whereas women get threats from transwomen and men. The threats and violence against transwomen come from men. And transwomen are more able to defend themselves physically on average, and find a court system that is more sympathetic.

Just look at how violence against women by men (all men) is accepted in this country. It’s not called terrorism, it’s seen as routine, in many cases seen as deserved — a crime of “passion” being somehow less serious. A man who kills his girlfriend doesn’t get hate crime status attached; a man who kills his trans girlfriend will often be facing additional hate crime charges.

Transwomen have privilege with respect to their physical safety and how serious threats against them are taken that regular women simply don’t have. It is a sign of male hegemony how accepted male violence against women is, and how now that it is also directed against trans women, it’s somehow more serious. That is definitionally male privilege.

Wow...you bring up a great point I hadn't thought about. For all the gender equality that the far left keep pushing....if all genders should have equal rights, then crimes against all genders should be labeled "hate crimes" because right now transgenders are being treated as superior to cis-genders by affording them the additional hate crime tag. And that is wrong.

Most crimes against trans people are not prosecuted as hate crimes even if the crime is specifically because that person hates trans people. All crimes committed by incels should be prosecuted as hate crimes because they are committing those crimes because they hate women.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I agree with Jeff, "biological man" is really just a dog whistle. I'll see comments online (not here because Jeff thankfully won't allow it to progress to that point) where people will describe transgender girls as "biological men in girl's sports" or "biological men in the girl's bathroom". As though a 14 or 15 year old transgender girl is the same as a 50 year old cisgender man. Calling trans women biological men instead of trans women then complaining about your language being policed makes it pretty clear how you actually feel. Jeff made a really good point, if they're interchangeable to you, then why don't you use the term trans women instead of biological man? I guess the real question is why do you even put on a show and lie about it? The people posting on this board are smart enough to see what you're doing. It's pretty transparent.

Do trans women have a biological advantage in sports? Maybe. I have no idea. I'm not into sports and I've never conducted or reviewed research on trans women in sports. What I do know is that there were no transgender women in the Olympics so the transphobic people had to create a trans woman out of a cis woman to have something to be upset about. Ever since RvW was overturned, the discourse over trans people (and especially trans women) has really blown up. If Lia Thomas had been allowed in the Olympics the Imane Khelif discourse never would have happened because it was manufactured to create more outrage against trans people.

The sports thing just seems to be an easy entry point with a final goal of debating if any transgender person should be allowed to transition regardless of age. I think it's pretty unlikely that all gender transition is ever going to be banned. Places like Maryland and DC would never enforce a federal mandate like that (in the same way that they don't enforce many federal anti-marijuana laws).

- the only trans woman that posts on DCUM

Can you please give us a descriptor to use that is not “trans woman” that permits us to reference retained male biological characteristics in a straightforward way? Not a long explanation, not a paragraph. Or are any and all terms that reference male biology “hateful”?

Also, more generally, why do you believe you can control and should be able to control what women say and think, particularly on matters related to their safety and achievement? This (extremely male) desire to fully control women’s speech, thoughts, experiences, and spaces is one of the most disturbing aspects of trans ideology. You really aren’t any different than the far-right theocrats who want to strip the right to vote from women, or who want them killed for showing hair in public, or who want to force them to bear children. Your post just reinforces for me that trans ideology is at heart a men’s rights movement.

Is that what you think you're doing when you call trans women biological men? Are you saying that you only call trans women biological men when specifically speaking about sports? I think you can just say what advantage you think a trans woman specifically has. You seem to be also implying that it's obvious that all trans women have some innate advantage over cis women in all circumstances.

I do not believe I can control what anyone thinks. It's extremely common for transphobic people to call trans women male though like you did. Oh look at your male behavior. Or look at your aggressive male behavior when trans women act at all in a way transphobic people disagree with. When trans women try to conform to whatever standards are set, those same people will claim that trans women are making a mockery of woman hood or whatever. As I said, sports is just one step towards trying to ban transition for all transgender people. There's one single trans woman on DCUM and you can't help but use personal attacks and claim I'm acting male because I put out that I'm trans which makes me vulnerable to your personal attacks while you sit in a tower of invulnerability and anonymity.

Women who do not use anonymity to decry the male pattern violence associated with the trans rights movement are subject to horrific violence, death threats, rape threats, etc. It is male privilege that you can speak openly about what you want, without fearing violence, rape, and death threats. If that is upsetting to you, then look around at the people celebrating violence against women. The girls who spoke up about Lia Thomas’s locker room behavior are regularly threatened and trans rights activists are absolutely fine with it and remain silent at best.

Are you under the impression that trans women are not subject to horrific violence, death threats, rape threats, etc.?

No, of course not. But those threats and violence don’t come from women nearly all of the time, whereas women get threats from transwomen and men. The threats and violence against transwomen come from men. And transwomen are more able to defend themselves physically on average, and find a court system that is more sympathetic.

Just look at how violence against women by men (all men) is accepted in this country. It’s not called terrorism, it’s seen as routine, in many cases seen as deserved — a crime of “passion” being somehow less serious. A man who kills his girlfriend doesn’t get hate crime status attached; a man who kills his trans girlfriend will often be facing additional hate crime charges.

Transwomen have privilege with respect to their physical safety and how serious threats against them are taken that regular women simply don’t have. It is a sign of male hegemony how accepted male violence against women is, and how now that it is also directed against trans women, it’s somehow more serious. That is definitionally male privilege.

All violence is bad. None of it acceptable or accepted. Predators should face serious consequences for their crimes.

You are gaslighting. Transgender women get far less respect and are at a much higher risk of victimization.

Equating all male violence with transgender women is pure bigotry. The right manufacturing a boogeyman to try to win elections.

https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/press/ncvs-trans-press-release/
Transgender women and men had higher rates of violent victimization (86.1 and 107.5 per 1,000 people, respectively) than cisgender women and men (23.7 and 19.8 per 1,000 people, respectively).

If you remove sex workers from this equation, these numbers change dramatically. The gaslighting is on your end.

The fact is that there is an epidemic of male violence against women in our society that is simply accepted. It’s not seen as a hate crime although it is overwhelmingly men perpetrating violence against women. It’s not seen as even particularly serious. Trans women benefit from systemic protections that are not extended to cis women.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I agree with Jeff, "biological man" is really just a dog whistle. I'll see comments online (not here because Jeff thankfully won't allow it to progress to that point) where people will describe transgender girls as "biological men in girl's sports" or "biological men in the girl's bathroom". As though a 14 or 15 year old transgender girl is the same as a 50 year old cisgender man. Calling trans women biological men instead of trans women then complaining about your language being policed makes it pretty clear how you actually feel. Jeff made a really good point, if they're interchangeable to you, then why don't you use the term trans women instead of biological man? I guess the real question is why do you even put on a show and lie about it? The people posting on this board are smart enough to see what you're doing. It's pretty transparent.

Do trans women have a biological advantage in sports? Maybe. I have no idea. I'm not into sports and I've never conducted or reviewed research on trans women in sports. What I do know is that there were no transgender women in the Olympics so the transphobic people had to create a trans woman out of a cis woman to have something to be upset about. Ever since RvW was overturned, the discourse over trans people (and especially trans women) has really blown up. If Lia Thomas had been allowed in the Olympics the Imane Khelif discourse never would have happened because it was manufactured to create more outrage against trans people.

The sports thing just seems to be an easy entry point with a final goal of debating if any transgender person should be allowed to transition regardless of age. I think it's pretty unlikely that all gender transition is ever going to be banned. Places like Maryland and DC would never enforce a federal mandate like that (in the same way that they don't enforce many federal anti-marijuana laws).

- the only trans woman that posts on DCUM

Can you please give us a descriptor to use that is not “trans woman” that permits us to reference retained male biological characteristics in a straightforward way? Not a long explanation, not a paragraph. Or are any and all terms that reference male biology “hateful”?

Also, more generally, why do you believe you can control and should be able to control what women say and think, particularly on matters related to their safety and achievement? This (extremely male) desire to fully control women’s speech, thoughts, experiences, and spaces is one of the most disturbing aspects of trans ideology. You really aren’t any different than the far-right theocrats who want to strip the right to vote from women, or who want them killed for showing hair in public, or who want to force them to bear children. Your post just reinforces for me that trans ideology is at heart a men’s rights movement.

Is that what you think you're doing when you call trans women biological men? Are you saying that you only call trans women biological men when specifically speaking about sports? I think you can just say what advantage you think a trans woman specifically has. You seem to be also implying that it's obvious that all trans women have some innate advantage over cis women in all circumstances.

I do not believe I can control what anyone thinks. It's extremely common for transphobic people to call trans women male though like you did. Oh look at your male behavior. Or look at your aggressive male behavior when trans women act at all in a way transphobic people disagree with. When trans women try to conform to whatever standards are set, those same people will claim that trans women are making a mockery of woman hood or whatever. As I said, sports is just one step towards trying to ban transition for all transgender people. There's one single trans woman on DCUM and you can't help but use personal attacks and claim I'm acting male because I put out that I'm trans which makes me vulnerable to your personal attacks while you sit in a tower of invulnerability and anonymity.

Women who do not use anonymity to decry the male pattern violence associated with the trans rights movement are subject to horrific violence, death threats, rape threats, etc. It is male privilege that you can speak openly about what you want, without fearing violence, rape, and death threats. If that is upsetting to you, then look around at the people celebrating violence against women. The girls who spoke up about Lia Thomas’s locker room behavior are regularly threatened and trans rights activists are absolutely fine with it and remain silent at best.

Are you under the impression that trans women are not subject to horrific violence, death threats, rape threats, etc.?

No, of course not. But those threats and violence don’t come from women nearly all of the time, whereas women get threats from transwomen and men. The threats and violence against transwomen come from men. And transwomen are more able to defend themselves physically on average, and find a court system that is more sympathetic.

Just look at how violence against women by men (all men) is accepted in this country. It’s not called terrorism, it’s seen as routine, in many cases seen as deserved — a crime of “passion” being somehow less serious. A man who kills his girlfriend doesn’t get hate crime status attached; a man who kills his trans girlfriend will often be facing additional hate crime charges.

Transwomen have privilege with respect to their physical safety and how serious threats against them are taken that regular women simply don’t have. It is a sign of male hegemony how accepted male violence against women is, and how now that it is also directed against trans women, it’s somehow more serious. That is definitionally male privilege.

All violence is bad. None of it acceptable or accepted. Predators should face serious consequences for their crimes.

You are gaslighting. Transgender women get far less respect and are at a much higher risk of victimization.

Equating all male violence with transgender women is pure bigotry. The right manufacturing a boogeyman to try to win elections.

https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/press/ncvs-trans-press-release/
Transgender women and men had higher rates of violent victimization (86.1 and 107.5 per 1,000 people, respectively) than cisgender women and men (23.7 and 19.8 per 1,000 people, respectively).

If you remove sex workers from this equation, these numbers change dramatically. The gaslighting is on your end.

The fact is that there is an epidemic of male violence against women in our society that is simply accepted. It’s not seen as a hate crime although it is overwhelmingly men perpetrating violence against women. It’s not seen as even particularly serious. Trans women benefit from systemic protections that are not extended to cis women.

Well said.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I come on here to laugh at the sheeple that are suddenly pro-Kamaka despite never casting a vote for her in their life.

+1 Y’all cain’t take away mah freedom.

Look at the UK where you can be jailed for a social media post.

Look at the US where you can buy an AR-15 online. MAGA.

Which prevents a UK policy

Exactly.


AR15’s (among other things) in the hands of citizens keep certain members of our polical class from directing their police to put people in jail for pointing their finger at them and shouting “who the F’ is allah?”


That’s exactly correct. That is the expressed purpose of the Second Amendment. Not hunting ducks. Not for shooting deer. Not for fishing. For keeping at bay by fear of death the thousands of petty tyrants out there who would abuse such power before the Sun set for the day.

AMEN!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I agree with Jeff, "biological man" is really just a dog whistle. I'll see comments online (not here because Jeff thankfully won't allow it to progress to that point) where people will describe transgender girls as "biological men in girl's sports" or "biological men in the girl's bathroom". As though a 14 or 15 year old transgender girl is the same as a 50 year old cisgender man. Calling trans women biological men instead of trans women then complaining about your language being policed makes it pretty clear how you actually feel. Jeff made a really good point, if they're interchangeable to you, then why don't you use the term trans women instead of biological man? I guess the real question is why do you even put on a show and lie about it? The people posting on this board are smart enough to see what you're doing. It's pretty transparent.

Do trans women have a biological advantage in sports? Maybe. I have no idea. I'm not into sports and I've never conducted or reviewed research on trans women in sports. What I do know is that there were no transgender women in the Olympics so the transphobic people had to create a trans woman out of a cis woman to have something to be upset about. Ever since RvW was overturned, the discourse over trans people (and especially trans women) has really blown up. If Lia Thomas had been allowed in the Olympics the Imane Khelif discourse never would have happened because it was manufactured to create more outrage against trans people.

The sports thing just seems to be an easy entry point with a final goal of debating if any transgender person should be allowed to transition regardless of age. I think it's pretty unlikely that all gender transition is ever going to be banned. Places like Maryland and DC would never enforce a federal mandate like that (in the same way that they don't enforce many federal anti-marijuana laws).

- the only trans woman that posts on DCUM

Can you please give us a descriptor to use that is not “trans woman” that permits us to reference retained male biological characteristics in a straightforward way? Not a long explanation, not a paragraph. Or are any and all terms that reference male biology “hateful”?

Also, more generally, why do you believe you can control and should be able to control what women say and think, particularly on matters related to their safety and achievement? This (extremely male) desire to fully control women’s speech, thoughts, experiences, and spaces is one of the most disturbing aspects of trans ideology. You really aren’t any different than the far-right theocrats who want to strip the right to vote from women, or who want them killed for showing hair in public, or who want to force them to bear children. Your post just reinforces for me that trans ideology is at heart a men’s rights movement.

Is that what you think you're doing when you call trans women biological men? Are you saying that you only call trans women biological men when specifically speaking about sports? I think you can just say what advantage you think a trans woman specifically has. You seem to be also implying that it's obvious that all trans women have some innate advantage over cis women in all circumstances.

I do not believe I can control what anyone thinks. It's extremely common for transphobic people to call trans women male though like you did. Oh look at your male behavior. Or look at your aggressive male behavior when trans women act at all in a way transphobic people disagree with. When trans women try to conform to whatever standards are set, those same people will claim that trans women are making a mockery of woman hood or whatever. As I said, sports is just one step towards trying to ban transition for all transgender people. There's one single trans woman on DCUM and you can't help but use personal attacks and claim I'm acting male because I put out that I'm trans which makes me vulnerable to your personal attacks while you sit in a tower of invulnerability and anonymity.

Women who do not use anonymity to decry the male pattern violence associated with the trans rights movement are subject to horrific violence, death threats, rape threats, etc. It is male privilege that you can speak openly about what you want, without fearing violence, rape, and death threats. If that is upsetting to you, then look around at the people celebrating violence against women. The girls who spoke up about Lia Thomas’s locker room behavior are regularly threatened and trans rights activists are absolutely fine with it and remain silent at best.

Are you under the impression that trans women are not subject to horrific violence, death threats, rape threats, etc.?

No, of course not. But those threats and violence don’t come from women nearly all of the time, whereas women get threats from transwomen and men. The threats and violence against transwomen come from men. And transwomen are more able to defend themselves physically on average, and find a court system that is more sympathetic.

Just look at how violence against women by men (all men) is accepted in this country. It’s not called terrorism, it’s seen as routine, in many cases seen as deserved — a crime of “passion” being somehow less serious. A man who kills his girlfriend doesn’t get hate crime status attached; a man who kills his trans girlfriend will often be facing additional hate crime charges.

Transwomen have privilege with respect to their physical safety and how serious threats against them are taken that regular women simply don’t have. It is a sign of male hegemony how accepted male violence against women is, and how now that it is also directed against trans women, it’s somehow more serious. That is definitionally male privilege.

All violence is bad. None of it acceptable or accepted. Predators should face serious consequences for their crimes.

You are gaslighting. Transgender women get far less respect and are at a much higher risk of victimization.

Equating all male violence with transgender women is pure bigotry. The right manufacturing a boogeyman to try to win elections.

https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/press/ncvs-trans-press-release/
Transgender women and men had higher rates of violent victimization (86.1 and 107.5 per 1,000 people, respectively) than cisgender women and men (23.7 and 19.8 per 1,000 people, respectively).

If you remove sex workers from this equation, these numbers change dramatically. The gaslighting is on your end.

The fact is that there is an epidemic of male violence against women in our society that is simply accepted. It’s not seen as a hate crime although it is overwhelmingly men perpetrating violence against women. It’s not seen as even particularly serious. Trans women benefit from systemic protections that are not extended to cis women.

Presenting facts that break apart your narrative isn’t gaslighting.

The only crimes that are prosecuted as hate crimes are those with anti-LGBTQ motives. Not every single crime against a transgender person is a hate crime.

Violence against women is not accepted.

As already noted, cisgender women have much less risk of violence.

Your narrative is completely baseless. You’re spinning lies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I come on here to laugh at the sheeple that are suddenly pro-Kamaka despite never casting a vote for her in their life.

+1 Y’all cain’t take away mah freedom.

Look at the UK where you can be jailed for a social media post.

Look at the US where you can buy an AR-15 online. MAGA.

Which prevents a UK policy

Exactly.


AR15’s (among other things) in the hands of citizens keep certain members of our polical class from directing their police to put people in jail for pointing their finger at them and shouting “who the F’ is allah?”


That’s exactly correct. That is the expressed purpose of the Second Amendment. Not hunting ducks. Not for shooting deer. Not for fishing. For keeping at bay by fear of death the thousands of petty tyrants out there who would abuse such power before the Sun set for the day.

Too bad all the "muh AR is fer tyrants!" folks are too stupid to see that the actual tyrant, the true threat to Democracy, is the "dictator on day one," "January 6th coup attempting" sociopath they all worship.

If Dems truly believed trump or any other republican would literally bring tyranny to the US, they’d be arming themselves. Because it would be irresponsible not to, for the sake of the country.


But that’s not happening, is it? No. Instead, Dems are working feverishly to take guns away at every opportunity.

That’s not an indicator of being worried about tyranny. That’s an indicator of plans to impose tyranny.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I come on here to laugh at the sheeple that are suddenly pro-Kamaka despite never casting a vote for her in their life.

+1 Y’all cain’t take away mah freedom.

Look at the UK where you can be jailed for a social media post.

Look at the US where you can buy an AR-15 online. MAGA.

Which prevents a UK policy

Exactly.


AR15’s (among other things) in the hands of citizens keep certain members of our polical class from directing their police to put people in jail for pointing their finger at them and shouting “who the F’ is allah?”


That’s exactly correct. That is the expressed purpose of the Second Amendment. Not hunting ducks. Not for shooting deer. Not for fishing. For keeping at bay by fear of death the thousands of petty tyrants out there who would abuse such power before the Sun set for the day.

Too bad all the "muh AR is fer tyrants!" folks are too stupid to see that the actual tyrant, the true threat to Democracy, is the "dictator on day one," "January 6th coup attempting" sociopath they all worship.

If Dems truly believed trump or any other republican would literally bring tyranny to the US, they’d be arming themselves. Because it would be irresponsible not to, for the sake of the country.


But that’s not happening, is it? No. Instead, Dems are working feverishly to take guns away at every opportunity.

That’s not an indicator of being worried about tyranny. That’s an indicator of plans to impose tyranny.

If anyone thinks that a bunch of people armed with AKs are a good match against the US military....

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I come on here to laugh at the sheeple that are suddenly pro-Kamaka despite never casting a vote for her in their life.

+1 Y’all cain’t take away mah freedom.

Look at the UK where you can be jailed for a social media post.

Look at the US where you can buy an AR-15 online. MAGA.

Which prevents a UK policy

Exactly.


AR15’s (among other things) in the hands of citizens keep certain members of our polical class from directing their police to put people in jail for pointing their finger at them and shouting “who the F’ is allah?”


That’s exactly correct. That is the expressed purpose of the Second Amendment. Not hunting ducks. Not for shooting deer. Not for fishing. For keeping at bay by fear of death the thousands of petty tyrants out there who would abuse such power before the Sun set for the day.

Too bad all the "muh AR is fer tyrants!" folks are too stupid to see that the actual tyrant, the true threat to Democracy, is the "dictator on day one," "January 6th coup attempting" sociopath they all worship.

If Dems truly believed trump or any other republican would literally bring tyranny to the US, they’d be arming themselves. Because it would be irresponsible not to, for the sake of the country.


But that’s not happening, is it? No. Instead, Dems are working feverishly to take guns away at every opportunity.

That’s not an indicator of being worried about tyranny. That’s an indicator of plans to impose tyranny.

Based on your response, I assume that you don't actually know many liberals. I know many liberals who in fact are arming themselves because they are afraid of MAGA violence and don't want to be caught bringing a peace sign to a gun fight. Moreover, a huge number of liberals, including the current nominee for Vice President, are gun owners and have no interest in taking guns away. What most Democrats want are things like universal background checks, bans on especially dangerous weapons such as AR-15s, perhaps required training, and other things to make our society safer. Beyond that, you can keep your guns.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I agree with Jeff, "biological man" is really just a dog whistle. I'll see comments online (not here because Jeff thankfully won't allow it to progress to that point) where people will describe transgender girls as "biological men in girl's sports" or "biological men in the girl's bathroom". As though a 14 or 15 year old transgender girl is the same as a 50 year old cisgender man. Calling trans women biological men instead of trans women then complaining about your language being policed makes it pretty clear how you actually feel. Jeff made a really good point, if they're interchangeable to you, then why don't you use the term trans women instead of biological man? I guess the real question is why do you even put on a show and lie about it? The people posting on this board are smart enough to see what you're doing. It's pretty transparent.

Do trans women have a biological advantage in sports? Maybe. I have no idea. I'm not into sports and I've never conducted or reviewed research on trans women in sports. What I do know is that there were no transgender women in the Olympics so the transphobic people had to create a trans woman out of a cis woman to have something to be upset about. Ever since RvW was overturned, the discourse over trans people (and especially trans women) has really blown up. If Lia Thomas had been allowed in the Olympics the Imane Khelif discourse never would have happened because it was manufactured to create more outrage against trans people.

The sports thing just seems to be an easy entry point with a final goal of debating if any transgender person should be allowed to transition regardless of age. I think it's pretty unlikely that all gender transition is ever going to be banned. Places like Maryland and DC would never enforce a federal mandate like that (in the same way that they don't enforce many federal anti-marijuana laws).

- the only trans woman that posts on DCUM

Great. Now biological male (a scientific term - and a factual one) is a “dog whistle.” This is where we are folks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I agree with Jeff, "biological man" is really just a dog whistle. I'll see comments online (not here because Jeff thankfully won't allow it to progress to that point) where people will describe transgender girls as "biological men in girl's sports" or "biological men in the girl's bathroom". As though a 14 or 15 year old transgender girl is the same as a 50 year old cisgender man. Calling trans women biological men instead of trans women then complaining about your language being policed makes it pretty clear how you actually feel. Jeff made a really good point, if they're interchangeable to you, then why don't you use the term trans women instead of biological man? I guess the real question is why do you even put on a show and lie about it? The people posting on this board are smart enough to see what you're doing. It's pretty transparent.

Do trans women have a biological advantage in sports? Maybe. I have no idea. I'm not into sports and I've never conducted or reviewed research on trans women in sports. What I do know is that there were no transgender women in the Olympics so the transphobic people had to create a trans woman out of a cis woman to have something to be upset about. Ever since RvW was overturned, the discourse over trans people (and especially trans women) has really blown up. If Lia Thomas had been allowed in the Olympics the Imane Khelif discourse never would have happened because it was manufactured to create more outrage against trans people.

The sports thing just seems to be an easy entry point with a final goal of debating if any transgender person should be allowed to transition regardless of age. I think it's pretty unlikely that all gender transition is ever going to be banned. Places like Maryland and DC would never enforce a federal mandate like that (in the same way that they don't enforce many federal anti-marijuana laws).

- the only trans woman that posts on DCUM

Can you please give us a descriptor to use that is not “trans woman” that permits us to reference retained male biological characteristics in a straightforward way? Not a long explanation, not a paragraph. Or are any and all terms that reference male biology “hateful”?

Also, more generally, why do you believe you can control and should be able to control what women say and think, particularly on matters related to their safety and achievement? This (extremely male) desire to fully control women’s speech, thoughts, experiences, and spaces is one of the most disturbing aspects of trans ideology. You really aren’t any different than the far-right theocrats who want to strip the right to vote from women, or who want them killed for showing hair in public, or who want to force them to bear children. Your post just reinforces for me that trans ideology is at heart a men’s rights movement.

Is that what you think you're doing when you call trans women biological men? Are you saying that you only call trans women biological men when specifically speaking about sports? I think you can just say what advantage you think a trans woman specifically has. You seem to be also implying that it's obvious that all trans women have some innate advantage over cis women in all circumstances.

I do not believe I can control what anyone thinks. It's extremely common for transphobic people to call trans women male though like you did. Oh look at your male behavior. Or look at your aggressive male behavior when trans women act at all in a way transphobic people disagree with. When trans women try to conform to whatever standards are set, those same people will claim that trans women are making a mockery of woman hood or whatever. As I said, sports is just one step towards trying to ban transition for all transgender people. There's one single trans woman on DCUM and you can't help but use personal attacks and claim I'm acting male because I put out that I'm trans which makes me vulnerable to your personal attacks while you sit in a tower of invulnerability and anonymity.

Women who do not use anonymity to decry the male pattern violence associated with the trans rights movement are subject to horrific violence, death threats, rape threats, etc. It is male privilege that you can speak openly about what you want, without fearing violence, rape, and death threats. If that is upsetting to you, then look around at the people celebrating violence against women. The girls who spoke up about Lia Thomas’s locker room behavior are regularly threatened and trans rights activists are absolutely fine with it and remain silent at best.

Thank you! But they'll pretend it's not happening.
Or how about those threatening women with rape for staying they should have separate bathrooms.