How has Karl Frisch raised $371,559 for his campaign, when . . .

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Karl is not the victim here. It’s the kids whose interests are subordinated to Karl’s friends.

“Friends”

More anti-gay language

There is literally a group called "Friends of Karl Frisch" that has filed campaign finance reports with the Virginia Department of Elections.

Every candidate has a "Friends" group. Funny how we only hear about "friends" for Frisch.

And how strange that more than half his donations for a Virginia candidacy- no, a local county-level position on a board which is not supposed to be partisan in the first place - come from outside the Commonwealth.

Over half of Karl’s donations come from California.

Still no explanation from Karl on that.

It’s a lot of seed money from LBGTQ donors in NY/CA who want to launch the political careers of LBGTQ politicians like Frisch. The hope is that he’ll get elected to a low-level position like the School Board and then get elected to higher office. In his case, he ran into a roadblock when he tried to leave the School Board in the middle of his term and run for HOD. Holly Siebold steamrolled him. He’s not an impressive or even likable guy and any credible Democrat will continue to beat him. That’s why he’s suddenly running so hard to retain his School Board seat. It’s not really what he wants to be doing, but his opponent is a poorly funded, quirky Republican, so it’s a race he can win in Fairfax.

It’s not like Republicans don’t try to do the same thing by putting money into some School Board races. It’s just that they don’t have as much money and they tend to spend it in areas where they think they’ll be more competitive. They’ve given a fair amount to Saundra Davis to try and break up the complete Democratic lock on the FCPS School Board, but she still has less than 1/3 of the campaign funds that Frisch has at his disposal.

Hi. I am the OP.

Thank you for at least providing one explanation here, after so many pages of Karl’s deflections and obfuscations.

So you believe the BS “explanation” from a random anonymous nobody on the internet, because it tells you what you want to hear.

Got it.

DP. If you have a different explanation, let's hear it! Otherwise, perhaps you should STFU?

You’re not the board monitor. Take a seat, Becky.

Thanks for proving the point that you have no other explanation - you just don't want to hear the truth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:frisch won.

So did Youngkin, yet he is criticized 24/7 on this site. Deal with it.

Youngkin miserably lost Fairfax County. Democrats won every school board seat and won easily won every precinct.

Hmm, you must not have heard? Youngkin won the election, period. So again, Frisch may have won but that doesn't give him immunity from criticism. And again - deal with it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:frisch won.

He is still such a worthless pos.

And yet a winner.

Yes, a winning POS.
DP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:frisch won.

So did Youngkin, yet he is criticized 24/7 on this site. Deal with it.

Youngkin miserably lost Fairfax County. Democrats won every school board seat and won easily won every precinct.

Hmm, you must not have heard? Youngkin won the election, period. So again, Frisch may have won but that doesn't give him immunity from criticism. And again - deal with it.

Maybe criticize him on something that matters instead of criticizing him for winning

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:frisch won.

He is still such a worthless pos.

And yet a winner.

Yes, a winning POS.
DP

Cry more.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:frisch won.

So did Youngkin, yet he is criticized 24/7 on this site. Deal with it.

Youngkin miserably lost Fairfax County. Democrats won every school board seat and won easily won every precinct.

Hmm, you must not have heard? Youngkin won the election, period. So again, Frisch may have won but that doesn't give him immunity from criticism. And again - deal with it.

Maybe criticize him on something that matters instead of criticizing him for winning

Sure, take your own advice when it comes to whining about Youngkin.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:frisch won.

So did Youngkin, yet he is criticized 24/7 on this site. Deal with it.

Youngkin miserably lost Fairfax County. Democrats won every school board seat and won easily won every precinct.

Hmm, you must not have heard? Youngkin won the election, period. So again, Frisch may have won but that doesn't give him immunity from criticism. And again - deal with it.

Maybe criticize him on something that matters instead of criticizing him for winning

Frisch certainly won the California opinion-polls, and all that dirty money paid off for him.

Kind of a disgusting way to “win,” don’t you agree?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:frisch won.

So did Youngkin, yet he is criticized 24/7 on this site. Deal with it.

Youngkin miserably lost Fairfax County. Democrats won every school board seat and won easily won every precinct.

Hmm, you must not have heard? Youngkin won the election, period. So again, Frisch may have won but that doesn't give him immunity from criticism. And again - deal with it.

Maybe criticize him on something that matters instead of criticizing him for winning

Frisch certainly won the California opinion-polls, and all that dirty money paid off for him.

Kind of a disgusting way to “win,” don’t you agree?

+1
And he has certainly been criticized on things that “matter,” as the idiot PP put it - and will continue to be.

[Anonymous]

His average contribution was $44 as a PP pointed out. Sabio’s was almost $200. But talk more about “dark money” please. It just goes to show you have no idea what you’re talking about.

Voters reelected Frisch because he talked about the issues instead of right wing conspiracy theories.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:His average contribution was $44 as a PP pointed out. Sabio’s was almost $200. But talk more about “dark money” please. It just goes to show you have no idea what you’re talking about.

Voters reelected Frisch because he talked about the issues instead of right wing conspiracy theories.

Karl talks a lot. What he then does usually turns out to be either useless or affirmatively counterproductive.

People just vote a party-line ticket. It's not because they really think as highly of Karl as he thinks of himself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:His average contribution was $44 as a PP pointed out. Sabio’s was almost $200. But talk more about “dark money” please. It just goes to show you have no idea what you’re talking about.

Voters reelected Frisch because he talked about the issues instead of right wing conspiracy theories.

Karl talks a lot. What he then does usually turns out to be either useless or affirmatively counterproductive.

People just vote a party-line ticket. It's not because they really think as highly of Karl as he thinks of himself.

He won by more than he did last time at a time when most school board member margins went down.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:His average contribution was $44 as a PP pointed out. Sabio’s was almost $200. But talk more about “dark money” please. It just goes to show you have no idea what you’re talking about.

Voters reelected Frisch because he talked about the issues instead of right wing conspiracy theories.

Karl talks a lot. What he then does usually turns out to be either useless or affirmatively counterproductive.

People just vote a party-line ticket. It's not because they really think as highly of Karl as he thinks of himself.

He won by more than he did last time at a time when most school board member margins went down.

Voters in low-information contests vote a party-line ticket or based on name recognition. It’s why the Democrats win by a big margin for soil and water commissioners as well.

Most who’ve paid any attention to Frisch know he’s a self-promoting schmuck who wastes taxpayer money.

[Anonymous]

I went to vote on Election Day and Tony sabio’s volunteers were handing out a piece of paper attacking Karl. The paper didn’t say anything about why we should vote for tony. Probably a good example of why he lost.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I went to vote on Election Day and Tony sabio’s volunteers were handing out a piece of paper attacking Karl. The paper didn’t say anything about why we should vote for tony. Probably a good example of why he lost.

Frisch derangement syndrome

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I went to vote on Election Day and Tony sabio’s volunteers were handing out a piece of paper attacking Karl. The paper didn’t say anything about why we should vote for tony. Probably a good example of why he lost.

Frisch derangement syndrome

Is this Karl comparing himself to Trump here? They are both narcissists.