VA Democratic House candidate performed sex acts online for tips

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I googled but couldn’t find compromising photos. She’s doing a good job shutting thing down.

Seriously, shows the lack of good judgement. But all too common with politicians.

Don't worry. Some kid or nerd probably saved all of it and it'll be up soon enough.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I googled but couldn’t find compromising photos. She’s doing a good job shutting thing down.

Seriously, shows the lack of good judgement. But all too common with politicians.

Don't worry. Some kid or nerd probably saved all of it and it'll be up soon enough.

There are hundreds still up with a quick google video search.

[Anonymous]

Sex work is real work. Sex between consenting adults should never be shamed. It's not immoral and if someone has a problem with it that's on them, not the person or people that are involved. I don't see what the problem is, other than there are conservatives that think there's some moral failing because they're ashamed of sex.

[Anonymous]

If she wins, she will have thousands of applicants for intern positions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Sex work is real work. Sex between consenting adults should never be shamed. It's not immoral and if someone has a problem with it that's on them, not the person or people that are involved. I don't see what the problem is, other than there are conservatives that think there's some moral failing because they're ashamed of sex.

https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1064489.page

[Anonymous]

I could really go for an open faced roast beef sandwich this morning.

[Anonymous]

I’m not sure how to feel about this. Can someone link to the pics, that would help me make up my mind as a voter.

[Anonymous]

Is the position she is running for in a swing district? Is it an open seat? I’m considering donating some tokens.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Sex work is real work. Sex between consenting adults should never be shamed. It's not immoral and if someone has a problem with it that's on them, not the person or people that are involved. I don't see what the problem is, other than there are conservatives that think there's some moral failing because they're ashamed of sex.

This is not about "sex between consenting adults."
It is about soliciting money to allow others to watch you have sex online. THAT is the part that is immoral. And, then to top it off with running for public office.

Had they just kept their sex acts in their bedroom and private, nobody would take issue. Once you take your sex acts public for others to "participate in" it becomes immoral, IMO.

And, "sex work is real work" is false. In most places, it is illegal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is the position she is running for in a swing district? Is it an open seat? I’m considering donating some tokens.

I think her position is cowgirl.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is the position she is running for in a swing district? Is it an open seat? I’m considering donating some tokens.

I think her position is cowgirl.

She might reverse her position at some point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is the position she is running for in a swing district? Is it an open seat? I’m considering donating some tokens.

I think her position is cowgirl.

Can you imagine the fundraisers? They’re adults only but still really exciting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is the position she is running for in a swing district? Is it an open seat? I’m considering donating some tokens.

I think her position is cowgirl.

She might reverse her position at some point.

Well played!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sex work is real work. Sex between consenting adults should never be shamed. It's not immoral and if someone has a problem with it that's on them, not the person or people that are involved. I don't see what the problem is, other than there are conservatives that think there's some moral failing because they're ashamed of sex.

This is not about "sex between consenting adults."
It is about soliciting money to allow others to watch you have sex online. THAT is the part that is immoral. And, then to top it off with running for public office.

Had they just kept their sex acts in their bedroom and private, nobody would take issue. Once you take your sex acts public for others to "participate in" it becomes immoral, IMO.

And, "sex work is real work" is false. In most places, it is illegal.

This. Also where were the kids when they were live streaming 15+ times? Down the hall? Think about this.

How much money does it make this kind of liability really worth it? IMO it was intoxicating to them, it wasn’t about the money.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sex work is real work. Sex between consenting adults should never be shamed. It's not immoral and if someone has a problem with it that's on them, not the person or people that are involved. I don't see what the problem is, other than there are conservatives that think there's some moral failing because they're ashamed of sex.

This is not about "sex between consenting adults."
It is about soliciting money to allow others to watch you have sex online. THAT is the part that is immoral. And, then to top it off with running for public office.

Had they just kept their sex acts in their bedroom and private, nobody would take issue. Once you take your sex acts public for others to "participate in" it becomes immoral, IMO.

And, "sex work is real work" is false. In most places, it is illegal.

This. Also where were the kids when they were live streaming 15+ times? Down the hall? Think about this.

How much money does it make this kind of liability really worth it? IMO it was intoxicating to them, it wasn’t about the money.

Most people’s kids are down the hall when they are having sex.