Hunter’s plea deal

[Anonymous]

Karma is real. Bidens threatened Jill's first husband during the divorce and when he refused to bend down, he was charged with tax fraud for $8,000. Now look who is dealing with tax fraud. It comes back and hit you like a boomerang, sometimes even in next generation. Very very fascinating.

[Anonymous]

Looks like a fraud on the court by both sides. Appears that both sides had an unwritten 'understanding' in addition to the ambiguous/expansive immunity in the Diversion Agreement. Yikes.

[Anonymous]

"From the start, the judge seemed highly skeptical of the unusual deal — which offered Hunter Biden broad immunity from prosecution in perpetuity, questioning why it had been filed under a provision that gave her no legal authority to reject it. When she asked Leo Wise, a prosecutor, if there was any precedent for the kind of deal being proposed, he replied, “No, your honor.”

Wow.

Nothing amiss here.

[Anonymous]

For most ordinary practising attorneys w/o connections or 'friends' to call, this sort of thing (depending on how upset the judge is), will result in disbarment/suspension of license and possibly criminal charges as well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:For most ordinary practising attorneys w/o connections or 'friends' to call, this sort of thing (depending on how upset the judge is), will result in disbarment/suspension of license and possibly criminal charges as well.

LOL, not hardly. Stop with the hyperbole.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:"From the start, the judge seemed highly skeptical of the unusual deal — which offered Hunter Biden broad immunity from prosecution in perpetuity, questioning why it had been filed under a provision that gave her no legal authority to reject it. When she asked Leo Wise, a prosecutor, if there was any precedent for the kind of deal being proposed, he replied, “No, your honor.”

Wow.

Nothing amiss here.

Why did you quote yourself?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"From the start, the judge seemed highly skeptical of the unusual deal — which offered Hunter Biden broad immunity from prosecution in perpetuity, questioning why it had been filed under a provision that gave her no legal authority to reject it. When she asked Leo Wise, a prosecutor, if there was any precedent for the kind of deal being proposed, he replied, “No, your honor.”

Wow.

Nothing amiss here.

Why did you quote yourself?

I am neither the judge nor Leo Wise.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:For most ordinary practising attorneys w/o connections or 'friends' to call, this sort of thing (depending on how upset the judge is), will result in disbarment/suspension of license and possibly criminal charges as well.

No, it would not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:"From the start, the judge seemed highly skeptical of the unusual deal — which offered Hunter Biden broad immunity from prosecution in perpetuity, questioning why it had been filed under a provision that gave her no legal authority to reject it. When she asked Leo Wise, a prosecutor, if there was any precedent for the kind of deal being proposed, he replied, “No, your honor.”

Wow.

Nothing amiss here.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/26/us/politics/hunter-biden-plea-deal-charges.html

[Anonymous]

Meanwhile, elsewhere, the noose is tightening around Trump’s neck with new indictments coming from multiple fronts. But, apparently, the alleged crimes of Hunter Biden, a private citizen, are more newsworthy in the alternate news universe of Republicans than those of a former president of the United States.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Meanwhile, elsewhere, the noose is tightening around Trump’s neck with new indictments coming from multiple fronts. But, apparently, the alleged crimes of Hunter Biden, a private citizen, are more newsworthy in the alternate news universe of Republicans than those of a former president of the United States.

It’s so predictable. Every time the Hunter posts increase, a big trump crime headline follows in real news organizations.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Meanwhile, elsewhere, the noose is tightening around Trump’s neck with new indictments coming from multiple fronts. But, apparently, the alleged crimes of Hunter Biden, a private citizen, are more newsworthy in the alternate news universe of Republicans than those of a former president of the United States.

Certainly, Trump ain't getting no global immunity deal from DoJ in a sneaky way now is he?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Meanwhile, elsewhere, the noose is tightening around Trump’s neck with new indictments coming from multiple fronts. But, apparently, the alleged crimes of Hunter Biden, a private citizen, are more newsworthy in the alternate news universe of Republicans than those of a former president of the United States.

How does that relate to Hunter's plea deal?

[Anonymous]

Why didn't the HB's attorneys speak up during the hearing if they had a verbal agreement as to the immunity covering the FARA charge and other related potential bribery or influence peddling related charges? They had a duty to speak up and protect their client by speaking up. Failure to speak up and protect HB would be a serious violation of the Rules of the Professional Conduct for the DC, MD and VA or wherever those attorneys are licenses.

Fraud on the court may be a problem but this violation is also a problem.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meanwhile, elsewhere, the noose is tightening around Trump’s neck with new indictments coming from multiple fronts. But, apparently, the alleged crimes of Hunter Biden, a private citizen, are more newsworthy in the alternate news universe of Republicans than those of a former president of the United States.

Certainly, Trump ain't getting no global immunity deal from DoJ in a sneaky way now is he?

If he agreed to plead guilty then he would certainly get an agreement not to prosecute other related crimes. That’s how plea deals usually work.