Atheism’s sexual misconduct problem

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yeah, unlike an actual organization, we’ll never know how many teachers took Dawkin’s advocacy of pedophlia to heart.

That doesn’t make it any less pernicious. In fact, it’s more pernicious. The Catholic bishops are now publishing numbers (and I completely condemn the pedo priests).

But atheist leaders like Dawkins, Silverman and Harris have no accountability at all.

Thus all the denials about Dawkins not being a pope. Sure, he sells millions of books, but nobody actually pays attention to him or his support for pedophilia.

There’s no accountability in atheism. You guys are furiously trying to distance yourself from Dawkins.

Tell us: do you support canceling Dawkins, Harris and Silverman?

Sure. Go ahead.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yeah, unlike an actual organization, we’ll never know how many teachers took Dawkin’s advocacy of pedophlia to heart.

That doesn’t make it any less pernicious. In fact, it’s more pernicious. The Catholic bishops are now publishing numbers (and I completely condemn the pedo priests).

But atheist leaders like Dawkins, Silverman and Harris have no accountability at all.

Again: not leaders. Just guys. Who appear to be d!cks.

A leader is somebody people can follow. He doesn’t need an organization. If he sells millions of books, he’s a leader. You atheists are so dishonest.

So should they be cancelled?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yeah, unlike an actual organization, we’ll never know how many teachers took Dawkin’s advocacy of pedophlia to heart.

That doesn’t make it any less pernicious. In fact, it’s more pernicious. The Catholic bishops are now publishing numbers (and I completely condemn the pedo priests).

But atheist leaders like Dawkins, Silverman and Harris have no accountability at all.

Again: not leaders. Just guys. Who appear to be d!cks.

A leader is somebody people can follow. He doesn’t need an organization. If he sells millions of books, he’s a leader. You atheists are so dishonest.

So should they be cancelled?

I’ve only heard of Dawkins because of DCUM atheist haters. No clue who the other guys are.

Maybe the atheist haters buy all of their books.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yeah, unlike an actual organization, we’ll never know how many teachers took Dawkin’s advocacy of pedophlia to heart.

That doesn’t make it any less pernicious. In fact, it’s more pernicious. The Catholic bishops are now publishing numbers (and I completely condemn the pedo priests).

But atheist leaders like Dawkins, Silverman and Harris have no accountability at all.

Again: not leaders. Just guys. Who appear to be d!cks.

A leader is somebody people can follow. He doesn’t need an organization. If he sells millions of books, he’s a leader. You atheists are so dishonest.

So should they be cancelled?

Oh, FFS. As I've been saying, SURE GO AHEAD AND CANCEL THEM.

Actually, you know what? You got us: there IS a secret Atheist structure, including a Secret Book of Atheist Rules and Procedures, and, in accordance with Section II, Subsection D paragraph (a)(1), I officially Cancelled Dawkins, Silverman and Harris by sticking my head out the window just now and yelling "Oi! Dawkins! Silverman! Harris! You're cancelled!"

So, good news, OP: they've been Officially Atheistically Cancelled! We did it!!!1!

Now what?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yeah, unlike an actual organization, we’ll never know how many teachers took Dawkin’s advocacy of pedophlia to heart.

That doesn’t make it any less pernicious. In fact, it’s more pernicious. The Catholic bishops are now publishing numbers (and I completely condemn the pedo priests).

But atheist leaders like Dawkins, Silverman and Harris have no accountability at all.

Thus all the denials about Dawkins not being a pope. Sure, he sells millions of books, but nobody actually pays attention to him or his support for pedophilia.

There’s no accountability in atheism. You guys are furiously trying to distance yourself from Dawkins.

Tell us: do you support canceling Dawkins, Harris and Silverman?

Accountability for what exactly?

Are you accountable for some random perv who lives in the same town as you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yeah, unlike an actual organization, we’ll never know how many teachers took Dawkin’s advocacy of pedophlia to heart.

That doesn’t make it any less pernicious. In fact, it’s more pernicious. The Catholic bishops are now publishing numbers (and I completely condemn the pedo priests).

But atheist leaders like Dawkins, Silverman and Harris have no accountability at all.

Thus all the denials about Dawkins not being a pope. Sure, he sells millions of books, but nobody actually pays attention to him or his support for pedophilia.

There’s no accountability in atheism. You guys are furiously trying to distance yourself from Dawkins.

Tell us: do you support canceling Dawkins, Harris and Silverman?

Accountability for what exactly?

Are you accountable for some random perv who lives in the same town as you?

Apparently they want the non-existent atheist church to excommunicate them?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Maybe it’s time to recap the majority atheist response on this thread.

1. Dawkins may have sold millions of books and delivered hundreds of lectures, but he lectures to people directly instead of through an organization so his support for pedophilia isn’t my problem.

2. Harris and Silverman: crickets

3. NAMBLA—the only case any of you feel comfortable talking about

4. I wanna talk about the Catholic Church instead of atheist abusers! Talking about atheist abusers makes widdle me uncomfortable! Waaaaahhhh!

Atheists have ZERO to do with any of that.

You seem to struggle with facts and reality.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yeah, unlike an actual organization, we’ll never know how many teachers took Dawkin’s advocacy of pedophlia to heart.

That doesn’t make it any less pernicious. In fact, it’s more pernicious. The Catholic bishops are now publishing numbers (and I completely condemn the pedo priests).

But atheist leaders like Dawkins, Silverman and Harris have no accountability at all.

Thus all the denials about Dawkins not being a pope. Sure, he sells millions of books, but nobody actually pays attention to him or his support for pedophilia.

There’s no accountability in atheism. You guys are furiously trying to distance yourself from Dawkins.

Tell us: do you support canceling Dawkins, Harris and Silverman?

Accountability for what exactly?

Are you accountable for some random perv who lives in the same town as you?

Apparently they want the non-existent atheist church to excommunicate them?

Ok. I’m the atheist pope and I excommunicated them. Done.

Next?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Men (people?) who want to tell other people how to think and behave also are often sexually coercive.

In other news, water is wet.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yeah, unlike an actual organization, we’ll never know how many teachers took Dawkin’s advocacy of pedophlia to heart.

That doesn’t make it any less pernicious. In fact, it’s more pernicious. The Catholic bishops are now publishing numbers (and I completely condemn the pedo priests).

But atheist leaders like Dawkins, Silverman and Harris have no accountability at all.

Thus all the denials about Dawkins not being a pope. Sure, he sells millions of books, but nobody actually pays attention to him or his support for pedophilia.

There’s no accountability in atheism. You guys are furiously trying to distance yourself from Dawkins.

Tell us: do you support canceling Dawkins, Harris and Silverman?

Accountability for what exactly?

Are you accountable for some random perv who lives in the same town as you?

Apparently they want the non-existent atheist church to excommunicate them?

Ok. I’m the atheist pope and I excommunicated them. Done.

Next?

No fair - it's my week to be pope!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting. There were no actual purchasers for Dawkins’ best-selling books. People turn off their TVs when he comes on. Nobody attends his many, many lectures.

You people are despicable, trying to downplay his role in atheism in order to wave your hands at his support for pedophila.

I have no idea who Dawkins is.

--atheist who doesn't spend any time thinking about atheism or religion at all. Living my best spiritual-free life.

I only heard about him on DCUM when some atheist hater posted about him.

Seems like the atheist hater is OBSESSED with Hawkins. Wonder why that is…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yeah, unlike an actual organization, we’ll never know how many teachers took Dawkin’s advocacy of pedophlia to heart.

That doesn’t make it any less pernicious. In fact, it’s more pernicious. The Catholic bishops are now publishing numbers (and I completely condemn the pedo priests).

But atheist leaders like Dawkins, Silverman and Harris have no accountability at all.

Thus all the denials about Dawkins not being a pope. Sure, he sells millions of books, but nobody actually pays attention to him or his support for pedophilia.

There’s no accountability in atheism. You guys are furiously trying to distance yourself from Dawkins.

Tell us: do you support canceling Dawkins, Harris and Silverman?

Accountability for what exactly?

Are you accountable for some random perv who lives in the same town as you?

Apparently they want the non-existent atheist church to excommunicate them?

Ok. I’m the atheist pope and I excommunicated them. Done.

Next?

No fair - it's my week to be pope!

My bad. Feel to excommunicate him as well. He was on double secret probation anyway so he can be excommunicated multiple times.

[Anonymous]

Wow, you guys want to talk about anything besides the problem of atheist sexual misconduct. Outta here….

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yeah, unlike an actual organization, we’ll never know how many teachers took Dawkin’s advocacy of pedophlia to heart.

That doesn’t make it any less pernicious. In fact, it’s more pernicious. The Catholic bishops are now publishing numbers (and I completely condemn the pedo priests).

But atheist leaders like Dawkins, Silverman and Harris have no accountability at all.

Thus all the denials about Dawkins not being a pope. Sure, he sells millions of books, but nobody actually pays attention to him or his support for pedophilia.

There’s no accountability in atheism. You guys are furiously trying to distance yourself from Dawkins.

Tell us: do you support canceling Dawkins, Harris and Silverman?

Accountability for what exactly?

Are you accountable for some random perv who lives in the same town as you?

Apparently they want the non-existent atheist church to excommunicate them?

Ok. I’m the atheist pope and I excommunicated them. Done.

Next?

No fair - it's my week to be pope!

My bad. Feel to excommunicate him as well. He was on double secret probation anyway so he can be excommunicated multiple times.

When it's your stint, please make sure to cancel the other ones (that I personally have never heard of) as well. Because otherwise the next response is that we've only canceled Dawkins, and the atheists don't care about the other ones!

[Anonymous]

To recap again for the slow folks:

Individuals should be held accountable for their actions - such as abusing others.

Organizations should be held accountable for their actions - such as covering up abuses.

Atheism isn’t an organization.


Oh. And OP has an unnatural obsession with Hawkins and atheists.