Yes. This is what is meant by "going viral." Certainly more people had more time to get test results back, thanks to snow days, and more people understood how to properly report, and so on. But it's also true that, with a highly-transmissable virus, actual rates of infection can easily increase by 50%, 100%, even 200% in a single day. It's called exponential growth. I hope this helps. |
Red doesn’t automatically trigger virtual, just a review by the health department to determine whether it’s appropriate. So virtual wouldn’t start the next day, for sure. |
|
To those who are rigidly opposed to temporarily switching to virtual, what's your solution to not enough staff? I think that's the biggest hurdle.
|
Actually, we’re good. Thanks for your concern though. |
|
There is a FB group called PAGES Coalition that has been urging parents and teachers to submit fake positive results to MCPS to force MCPS to "re-evaluate their contribution to this public health crisis and to re-evaluate their choice for Interim Superintendent." Now we don't know what is real and what is fake.
https://twitter.com/OpenMCPS/status/1479057225586982917 |
Make it easier for parents to sub. Put out a call to the community for help. Like we used to during the war and the last epidemic, when we were really a nation of people who cared. |
Our HS is supposedly over 7% now. Yet all of DC’s teachers were there yesterday. |
I was told here that it was a preposterous concern that this would happen. I can probably go dig up 20 posts from the last two days alone. At least this is the first step toward MCPS abandoning the color-coded system. |
Any comments from the "you're crazy, nobody would do this" crowd? |
Really? Maybe some will be able to sub, but I think it would be hard to fill this, especially in MS and HS. I can see this happening for ES, although Idk how many parents would want to go to school during a surge. Also, in WW2, most women were not working, we are in a different situation. I don't know how this solution would be better for MS and HS than doing a temporary virtual. |
That still no one has done it? You're not even talking about a real sick out, you're talking about some people writing "infected by McKnight's choices" as a weird protest that was promptly deleted even by the pro-closing group. So yeah, you still seem crazy. |
DP, and it was probably PAGES members making those comments
|
It's not preposterous. But they'll balance with all the parents refusing to test their kids.
|
|
Oof…my sons school is 1 case away from going red. He’s home now with Covid (tested positive Monday). He’s vaxxed and has zero symptoms except a stuffy head for a day. I didn’t report it because he caught over the break, so I don’t see the reason. I don’t care one way or the other about in-person vs virtual, but I wouldn’t mind going virtual so we can temporarily relocate to south Florida and enjoy some warmer weather.
I think I’ll go ahead and report his case the more I think about it. I just got a new Tesla, so a road trip sounds really fun. Ok, I just talked myself into wanting virtual. Lol |
Actually, women were where we found the excess workers needed, but that might be your point. Staffing concerns are the only reason I would accept for going virtual, and should be used as a last resort. We are at an ES so it’s easier to take only certain classes virtual if a teacher is out - I know especially HS scheduling is tougher so I don’t pretend to have an answer for that. Virtual in response to an actual problem makes sense, much as I hate it and will not have my kids do it. But virtual in a misguided attempt to prevent a problem is infuriating. |