Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 3

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As for the question about Ashley's friends on here:
They were here.

They were extremely off the hook, personally overprotective and reported the thread to the FBI!

So yeah... they were here.

Again - you have no idea. I was on here last night and said that I hoped the FBI was reading those posts because some of them were disgusting lies and rumors - like the one claiming there is "domestic abuse" in the Kavanaugh household. Who says things like that?? I'd love for the FBI to trace some of you who put lies like that out there. And I don't know any of the Kavanaughs.

Now the FBI must police every anonymous Internet forum out there? You people have seriously gone off the rails.

Well, let's see. Speaking of going off the rails, you've demanded the FBI waste their time finding out what absurd slang terms in Kavanaugh's yearbook meant, so yeah - I'd be happy if they traced any anonymous posts which deliberately spread lies about him and/or his family.

Wow, you have serious issues.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
And as many of us have stated, repeatedly - it isn't about his confirmation. I was neutral on him being confirmed at all, before these allegations came out. I honestly didn't feel strongly either way. With the accusation, I at least want to see him be treated fairly until and unless any evidence is presented that definitively ties him to this allegation. I've never thought he's "entitled" to confirmation. I don't know anyone that thinks that. What I *am* concerned about is his presumption of innocence. And every one of you claiming he's guilty with no proof should be too. It would really suck if you or a loved one were one day falsely accused of something, wouldn't it?

Where in the world have you been when there were other SC nominee hearings? It is an arduous process. Any hint of a problem and people withdraw their names so their president can get a new nominee who can make it through the process.

Problem here is that his ambition is actually greater than anything else in him.

You're omitting the elephant in the room. Remember the comments of Schumer when Kavanaugh first nominated? "I will oppose Kavanaugh with everything I've got." Those words were spoken before Kavanaugh had been accused of anything, and I'd say those feelings are representative of Ford's attorney and most DCUM posters.

So your position implies these three women are pawns of the democrats who are willing to spend 5 years in Federal prison for lying as well as destroying their private and professional lives all in the name of sinking a judicial nominee. How is that plausible?

PP here. I meant my post as my general position in theses types of case. No, I don't think the Democrats "planned" for her to come forward, and I am not trying to discredit her, although I'm not going to assume that her memory is accurate and that he's guilty of attempted rape and attempted murder. (The other two? I think the jury's out on their motivations.)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A a parent, I'd try to ensure my kids didn't interact too much with Kavanaugh; any sleepovers should be at my home, and I wouldn't let my kids drive with him
There's way too much alcohol in all these stories for me to be comfortable

And already, his life has been permanently altered. Nice.

Nothing has happened to his life. This will all be old news in a couple of weeks and he will be on the SCOTUS.

B.S. Whether he is or isn't confirmed, his life will never be the same. Thanks in large part to people like you.

I’m sorry but so what? Statistically speaking, she’s probably telling the damn truth.

I could accuse your husband or boyfriend of rape and statistically speaking, I'm probably telling the damn truth....

Will you take a polygraph? Will you name others who were present at the time? Will you ask the FBI to investigate it?

Do you mean a privately administered polygraph done by someone my attorney chooses? If the others present don't recall the event or time in question, will you take my word over theirs?

I am pretty confident that if part of the FBI investigation was to administer an additional polygraph test, Dr. Ford would submit to it. Would you? Would Kavanaugh?

Yes, I would. I'll also admit that I've never been drunk or used drugs in my life. Still not sure my memory would be intact 35 years after high school.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Diane Feinstein apparently got the Holton Arms alumni list, to email everyone asking if they have anything that might be helpful.

Is this even Kosher? -SP

Anyone? Is she looking for someone willing to lie for her?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Alana Mastrangelo
@ARmastrangelo
It turns out the woman screaming in Flake’s face yesterday is Ana Maria Archila, co-executive director of Soros-funded Center for Popular Democracy and Center for Democracy Action Fund.


Interesting....

https://populardemocracy.org/staff

I knew she must have been paid big money for that vicious performance.

It doesn't make her story false.

Hmmmm...exaggerated? embellished? for $$$$$?

[Anonymous]

Thinking the battle to stay sober this week will be tremendous challenge for Brett.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Ford's story has changed. She has changed the # of people involved since she told the therapist. She told the therapist that she was in her "late teens." She changed the statement from her polygraph from early '80s to '80's and other small changes which go back to what she told the therapist.

In a case like this, where a public takedown of a man's reputation and whole career is being put in jeopardy, it seems to me that we need to know more about the accuser. Even the part of the Safeway and Mark Judge is odd --did she read Judge's book, maybe--apparently, it may tell us when he worked there and the lawyers and Ford know this. She seemed quite insistent that they look that part up. And, when did we first hear about Judge and the Safeway? Was it before or after she hired the lawyers?

Here is a twitter site that has a thread in it that lays it all out pretty well. There are more holes in Ford's story than I had caught. It seems to me that if Kavanaugh is going to be derailed over this, that the therapist notes should be available to the FBI.

https://twitter.com/profmjcleveland?lang=en

There aren’t holes. Yes, I read this, thanks for linking.

The speculation that Ford read Judge’s book to make up the Safeway detail is just a fever dream of conservatives.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A a parent, I'd try to ensure my kids didn't interact too much with Kavanaugh; any sleepovers should be at my home, and I wouldn't let my kids drive with him
There's way too much alcohol in all these stories for me to be comfortable

And already, his life has been permanently altered. Nice.

Nothing has happened to his life. This will all be old news in a couple of weeks and he will be on the SCOTUS.

B.S. Whether he is or isn't confirmed, his life will never be the same. Thanks in large part to people like you.

I’m sorry but so what? Statistically speaking, she’s probably telling the damn truth.

I could accuse your husband or boyfriend of rape and statistically speaking, I'm probably telling the damn truth....

Will you take a polygraph? Will you name others who were present at the time? Will you ask the FBI to investigate it?

Do you mean a privately administered polygraph done by someone my attorney chooses? If the others present don't recall the event or time in question, will you take my word over theirs?

I am pretty confident that if part of the FBI investigation was to administer an additional polygraph test, Dr. Ford would submit to it. Would you? Would KavanaughI ?

Yes, I would. I'll also admit that I've never been drunk or used drugs in my life. Still not sure my memory would be intact 35 years after high school.

Great, go ahead and stand falsely accusing people of rape. I’ll wait.

That’s right, you WON’T because there are plenty of disincentives to doing so.

You’re so fixated on how SCARY it is that women COULD do this, even though they rarely do.

You should read Freud about castration anxiety. Women seem to inherently scare you.

[Anonymous]

^ and Margot Cleveland is unhinged, and I don’t type that lightly. It’s embarrassing.

[Anonymous]

^^^ start falsely accussing

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A a parent, I'd try to ensure my kids didn't interact too much with Kavanaugh; any sleepovers should be at my home, and I wouldn't let my kids drive with him
There's way too much alcohol in all these stories for me to be comfortable

And already, his life has been permanently altered. Nice.

Nothing has happened to his life. This will all be old news in a couple of weeks and he will be on the SCOTUS.

B.S. Whether he is or isn't confirmed, his life will never be the same. Thanks in large part to people like you.

I’m sorry but so what? Statistically speaking, she’s probably telling the damn truth.

I could accuse your husband or boyfriend of rape and statistically speaking, I'm probably telling the damn truth....

Will you take a polygraph? Will you name others who were present at the time? Will you ask the FBI to investigate it?

Do you mean a privately administered polygraph done by someone my attorney chooses? If the others present don't recall the event or time in question, will you take my word over theirs?

I am pretty confident that if part of the FBI investigation was to administer an additional polygraph test, Dr. Ford would submit to it. Would you? Would KavanaughI ?

Yes, I would. I'll also admit that I've never been drunk or used drugs in my life. Still not sure my memory would be intact 35 years after high school.

Great, go ahead and stand falsely accusing people of rape. I’ll wait.

That’s right, you WON’T because there are plenty of disincentives to doing so.

You’re so fixated on how SCARY it is that women COULD do this, even though they rarely do.

You should read Freud about castration anxiety. Women seem to inherently scare you.

You should participate in the trainings that educators are required to do.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ford's story has changed. She has changed the # of people involved since she told the therapist. She told the therapist that she was in her "late teens." She changed the statement from her polygraph from early '80s to '80's and other small changes which go back to what she told the therapist.

In a case like this, where a public takedown of a man's reputation and whole career is being put in jeopardy, it seems to me that we need to know more about the accuser. Even the part of the Safeway and Mark Judge is odd --did she read Judge's book, maybe--apparently, it may tell us when he worked there and the lawyers and Ford know this. She seemed quite insistent that they look that part up. And, when did we first hear about Judge and the Safeway? Was it before or after she hired the lawyers?

Here is a twitter site that has a thread in it that lays it all out pretty well. There are more holes in Ford's story than I had caught. It seems to me that if Kavanaugh is going to be derailed over this, that the therapist notes should be available to the FBI.

https://twitter.com/profmjcleveland?lang=en

There aren’t holes. Yes, I read this, thanks for linking.

The speculation that Ford read Judge’s book to make up the Safeway detail is just a fever dream of conservatives.

There are definitely holes. She goes from attack in her late teens, mid 1980s, and four boys as attackers in her therapist notes to 2 boy attackers, early 1980s then to 1982 specifically, somehow remembering she wasn't driving at the time though she can't remember how she got to and from the party. She can claim the therapist's notes are wrong all she wants, but they aren't corroborating evidence of a summer 1982 attack by 2 boys.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A a parent, I'd try to ensure my kids didn't interact too much with Kavanaugh; any sleepovers should be at my home, and I wouldn't let my kids drive with him
There's way too much alcohol in all these stories for me to be comfortable

And already, his life has been permanently altered. Nice.

Nothing has happened to his life. This will all be old news in a couple of weeks and he will be on the SCOTUS.

B.S. Whether he is or isn't confirmed, his life will never be the same. Thanks in large part to people like you.

I’m sorry but so what? Statistically speaking, she’s probably telling the damn truth.

I could accuse your husband or boyfriend of rape and statistically speaking, I'm probably telling the damn truth....

Will you take a polygraph? Will you name others who were present at the time? Will you ask the FBI to investigate it?

Do you mean a privately administered polygraph done by someone my attorney chooses? If the others present don't recall the event or time in question, will you take my word over theirs?

I am pretty confident that if part of the FBI investigation was to administer an additional polygraph test, Dr. Ford would submit to it. Would you? Would Kavanaugh?

Yes, I would. I'll also admit that I've never been drunk or used drugs in my life. Still not sure my memory would be intact 35 years after high school.

So your implication is that you would fabricate an accusation and still submit to an FBI investigation. GO FOR IT!!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A a parent, I'd try to ensure my kids didn't interact too much with Kavanaugh; any sleepovers should be at my home, and I wouldn't let my kids drive with him
There's way too much alcohol in all these stories for me to be comfortable

And already, his life has been permanently altered. Nice.

Nothing has happened to his life. This will all be old news in a couple of weeks and he will be on the SCOTUS.

B.S. Whether he is or isn't confirmed, his life will never be the same. Thanks in large part to people like you.

I’m sorry but so what? Statistically speaking, she’s probably telling the damn truth.

I could accuse your husband or boyfriend of rape and statistically speaking, I'm probably telling the damn truth....

Will you take a polygraph? Will you name others who were present at the time? Will you ask the FBI to investigate it?

Do you mean a privately administered polygraph done by someone my attorney chooses? If the others present don't recall the event or time in question, will you take my word over theirs?

No need for this false dichotomy. If one person recalls something and another doesn't, it does not mean that one must be lying. It simply means one person remembers and the other one does not.

[Anonymous]

Either way:

Winners:
Dem turnout
GOP turnout
#MeToo
Trump (stood by establishment Republican)
Conservatives (will ram someone thru, bet on it)
Dr Ford (hero)

Losers:
Senate
Mark Judge
Liberals (see above)
House GOP in midterms

On the fence:
Brett Kavanaugh